深圳商报·读创客户端记者 陈燕青 数据显示，年内参与到A股定增的21家公募机构中，10家公募机构定增获配金额超1亿元，其中诺德基 金参与到31只A股定增，合计获配金额达43.56亿元，目前浮盈金额达6.89亿元，浮盈比例达15.83%。财 通基金参与到28只A股定增，合计获配金额达32.64亿元，目前浮盈金额达6.10亿元，浮盈比例达 18.70%。此外，大成基金、华夏基金、朱雀基金、鹏华基金、招商基金、国泰基金、博时基金和易方 达基金参与定增获配金额均不低于1亿元。 公募定增整体浮盈近20%，浮盈公募机构占比超八成。从浮盈比例来看，21家参与定增的公募机构中， 18家公募机构实现浮盈，占比达85.71%，其中4家公募机构浮盈比例在10%以内，5家浮盈比例在 10%-19.99%，3家浮盈比例在20%-29.99%，6家浮盈比例不低于30%。 数据显示，年内公募机构参与定增的31只A股中，23只个股公募机构定增获配金额超1亿元，昊华科技 （600378）最受公募机构定增青睐，共有财通基金、大成基金和诺德基金3家公募机构参与到该股定 增，合计获配金额达16.28亿元，按当前收盘价统计，该股盈亏平衡。另外，国联民 ...

Group 1 - The public REITs market in China has experienced a surge in temporary suspensions due to significant price increases, with nearly 30 products suspended this year due to exceeding threshold gains, particularly in consumer infrastructure REITs which have averaged around 40% gains [1][3] - The low interest rate environment has led to increased institutional demand for REITs, driving up valuations, but the rising premium rates have resulted in a notable decline in cash distribution rates, indicating emerging market risks [1][6] - Consumer infrastructure REITs have become the fastest-growing segment within the public REITs market, supported by favorable policies aimed at boosting consumption, with the average gain for listed REITs reaching 15.17% this year [4][5] Group 2 - Specific REITs such as E Fund Huawai Market REIT and Hongtu Innovation Shenzhen Anju REIT have announced temporary suspensions due to significant price deviations from their benchmark prices, with E Fund's price increasing by 71.39% and Hongtu's by 52.78% [2][3] - The performance of consumer infrastructure REITs has been particularly strong, with several products achieving gains exceeding 40%, including Huazhong Baiyun Consumer REIT and Jiashi Wumei Consumer REIT [4][5] - Analysts suggest that while consumer REITs are considered relatively safe investments due to their anti-cyclical nature, investors should be cautious of high premium rates and declining cash distribution rates, which have dropped from 6.22% to 4.21% for Jiashi Wumei Consumer REIT [6][7]

申万宏源 「研选」说 普通定投 客户自主设置的定期定额基金申购业务。 普通定投首先需要注意的就是定投的频率如日 r /円/メイト/コメイ) 六八/小/ 实际出发量力而行。 智能定投 客户自主设置的定期但不定额基金申购业务。 智能定投通过制定规则,帮助投资者确定合理 的定投金额，实现避坑: 场内智能定投: 成本价定投 「足投」 怎么投? 投点啥? 与一次性投资相比,基金定投具有手续简 单、省时省力、能够分散平摊投资风险的特 点，因此吸引了大量的投资者。 但其实，"定投"也需要注意选择合适的定 投方式和定投产品。 挑选合适的局設方式 「普通定投」与「智能定投」 ...

截至2025年5月21日 09:39，公司债ETF(511030)多空胶着，最新报价105.72元。拉长时间看，截至2025年5月20日，公司债ETF近半年累计上涨1.11%。 流动性方面，公司债ETF盘中换手0.01%，成交82.46万元。拉长时间看，截至5月20日，公司债ETF近1周日均成交19.14亿元。 规模方面，公司债ETF最新规模达142.70亿元，创近1年新高。 份额方面，公司债ETF最新份额达1.35亿份，创近1月新高。 消息面上，5 月20 日，国有大行下调了人民币存款利率，其中活期利率下调5 个基点至0.05%；定期整存整取三个月期、半年期、一年期、二年期均下调15 个基点，分别为0.65%、0.85%、0.95%、1.05%一年期定存首次下破1%；三年期和五年期均下调25 个基点，分别至1.25%和1.3%。 定期零存整取、整存零取、存本取息三种期限均下调15 个基点。7 天期通知存款利率下调15 个基点至0.3%。与此同时，5 月贷款市场报价利率（LPR）报价 出炉：5 年期以上LPR 为3.5%，1 年期LPR 为3.0%，均较上月下调10BP。至此，本轮政策利率、存款利率、LPR ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 公告送出日期：2025年05月21日 1 公告基本信息 （1）江信汇福定期开放债券型证券投资基金以下简称"本基金"。 （2）本次仅开放申购、赎回、转换业务，不开放定期定额投资业务。 2 日常申购、赎回、转换业务的办理时间 （1）根据基金合同的约定，本基金以3个月为一个封闭期，自每个封闭期结束之后第一个工作日（含该 日）起进入开放期，开放期为5-10个工作日，其间可以办理申购、赎回、转换业务。本基金的第一个开 放期起始日为基金合同生效日起3个月的对日（含该日），本基金其他开放期起始日均为前一开放期起 始日后3个月的对日（含该日），遇节假日顺延。 （2）本次开放期自2025年05月26日至2025年05月30日，本基金在此期间接受投资者申购、赎回、基金 转换申请，申购、赎回、基金转换的具体办理时间为上海证券交易所、深圳证券交易所正常交易日的交 易时间，敬请投资者留意。本基金自2025年05月31日起进入下一个封闭运作周期，届时不再另行公告。 3 日常申购业务 3.1 申购金额限制 （1）投资者通过直销中心的首次最低申购金额为人民币1000元，每笔追加最低申购金额为 ...

Group 1 - The BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust (NYSE: BCAT) has approximately $1.6 billion in assets under management and employs a modest leverage of around 5% [1] - The trust's discount to net asset value has narrowed to 3.31% following significant activist pressure [1] - Bram de Haas, with 15 years of investing experience and over 5 years managing a Euro hedge fund, utilizes risk management skills to identify lucrative investments based on special situations [1]

Group 1 - The S fund market in Shanghai is gaining attention as an important tool for revitalizing existing assets and optimizing resource allocation, with a total transaction amount exceeding 250 billion yuan as of May 18 [1][2] - The Shanghai Equity Custody Trading Center has released valuation guidelines for fund shares to address challenges such as valuation difficulties, information asymmetry, and complex transaction structures in the S fund industry [1] - The "Eskimo" 2.0 version of the private fund mobile service platform and the Bank of Communications' equity management system were launched to enhance transaction information efficiency for various users [2] Group 2 - The Shanghai S fund market has seen continuous high-quality development and expansion, with the S fund alliance comprising over a hundred leading market institutions, including national-level mother funds and well-known domestic and international funds [2] - As of May 18, the platform has completed 121 fund share transactions and 44 share pledge transactions, with financing amounts of approximately 99.34 billion yuan [2] - The S fund trading market in Shanghai is expected to achieve a significant increase in transaction amounts in 2024, surpassing 100 billion yuan, contributing positively to the circulation of financial and industrial capital [2]

Core Viewpoint - The "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" marks a systematic reform phase in the public fund industry, focusing on investor interests and returning to the essence of "entrusted management" [1] Fee Reform - The plan promotes a floating management fee mechanism for actively managed equity funds, linking fees to performance against benchmarks, addressing the issue of "funds making money while investors do not" [2][3] - The floating fee model aims to enhance the accountability of fund companies, compelling them to improve investment capabilities and focus on long-term value creation [2] Interest Binding - The core of the public fund reform is "interest binding," which strengthens the alignment of interests among fund companies, fund managers, and investors, marking a shift towards prioritizing "investor returns" [4][5] - The plan defines fund performance metrics and emphasizes long-term performance in fund manager evaluations, with at least 80% weight on product performance metrics [6] Future Outlook - The shift in evaluation focus from management scale to investor returns is expected to create a virtuous cycle of "increased returns—capital inflow—market stability," fostering a healthier and more vibrant capital market ecosystem [7]

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is experiencing a wave of adjustments regarding performance benchmarks, with nearly 80 funds changing their benchmarks since the beginning of the year to better reflect risk-return characteristics and improve comparability with performance benchmarks [1][3][4]. Group 1: Adjustments in Performance Benchmarks - As of May 20, 2023, around 80 public funds have changed their performance benchmarks, significantly higher than in previous years [3]. - Fund companies are adjusting benchmarks to scientifically and reasonably evaluate fund performance [4]. - The adjustments mainly fall into three categories: 1. Significant changes in the weight of indices within the benchmark [6]. 2. Updating the main weights in thematic fund benchmarks [6]. 3. Complete overhaul of the performance benchmark [6]. Group 2: Regulatory Environment - The regulatory framework is evolving, with plans to establish a "benchmark library" to standardize the setting of performance benchmarks [9][12]. - The "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" emphasizes the constraint role of performance benchmarks, indicating that more funds will actively adjust their benchmarks [7][10]. - Regulatory measures will include strict oversight of the establishment, modification, disclosure, and ongoing evaluation of performance benchmarks [11]. Group 3: Challenges and Future Directions - Fund companies face challenges in selecting appropriate benchmarks that accurately reflect their investment strategies and styles [14][15]. - There are concerns that standardizing performance benchmarks may limit innovation in fund products [13]. - Future adjustments will require fund companies to manage benchmarks more effectively and establish regular evaluation mechanisms to ensure alignment with actual investment strategies [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the low performance benchmark achievement rate among fund managers, with only 65.99% of the 2005 fund managers meeting their benchmarks over the past three years [2][3] - The "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" was released on May 7, aiming to shift the focus of the industry from "scale" to "returns" and to establish a performance benchmark regulatory guideline [2] - Many public funds have yet to implement corresponding assessment systems in response to the new regulatory framework, primarily due to waiting for detailed guidelines and observing the actions of leading companies [5][6] Group 2 - Among the 2005 fund managers, 1323 achieved performance benchmarks, while 682 did not, indicating a significant disparity, especially within mixed fund managers where only 52.13% met the standards [3] - Active equity fund managers have a benchmark achievement rate of 52.19%, with a notable number of managers failing to meet benchmarks due to reliance on popular products launched in 2019-2020 [4] - The performance of stock fund managers shows a 61.54% achievement rate, with over 70% of those not meeting benchmarks concentrated in specific sectors like new energy and semiconductors [4] Group 3 - The industry response to the new assessment guidelines is cautious, with many firms preferring to wait for clearer regulations before making significant changes to their internal assessment systems [5][6] - Some large fund companies have submitted over 180 potential performance benchmark indices to provide a more diverse range of performance standards for their products, although this could complicate operations [6] - Current assessment practices vary, with some firms extending the assessment period to three years and focusing on excess returns relative to benchmarks to maintain investment direction and style consistency [7][8]