Core Viewpoint - The recently released "Antitrust Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms (Draft for Comments)" introduces eight new types of monopoly risks, providing practical compliance guidance for platform enterprises [1][2] Group 1: Purpose and Context - The purpose of the guidelines is to guide platform enterprises in enhancing risk identification, risk management, and compliance assurance to effectively prevent antitrust compliance risks and promote the innovative and healthy development of the platform economy [1] - The platform economy in China has developed rapidly, characterized by significant scale effects and network effects, leading to a "winner-takes-all" scenario where leading platform enterprises can easily engage in cross-industry competition and rapid expansion [1] Group 2: Key Risks and Compliance Guidance - The guidelines adopt a problem-oriented approach, combining specific rules with eight risk examples to provide practical compliance guidance for platform enterprises [2] - The guidelines highlight that platform enterprises with market dominance should avoid implementing "choose one from two" practices through punitive or incentivizing measures, based on enforcement experiences [2] - The guidelines warn that requiring merchants on platforms to sell goods at prices lower than those on competing platforms may constitute abuse of market dominance or monopolistic agreements [2] - The guidelines emphasize the importance of transparency in algorithms, identifying "algorithm collusion" as a risk, and encourage platform enterprises to conduct algorithm screening to prevent monopolistic behaviors from the source [2] Group 3: Regulatory Approach - The regulatory approach aims to balance regulation and development, accelerating the introduction of the guidelines, strengthening antitrust enforcement in the platform economy, and fostering a positive competitive ecosystem while protecting the legitimate rights and interests of relevant parties [2]

来源：新华视点 作者：刘开雄 吴慧珺 制造低资金流水假象、虚构运输业务链条、购买轨迹信息伪装……一些平台企业花样百出，不仅自己偷 逃税、虚开发票，还拓展"业务"成为下游企业偷逃税的"帮凶"。 互联网不是法外之地。12月17日，浙江、陕西、辽宁等地税务部门公布了近年查处的3起平台企业涉税 违法案件。涉案的上下游开票、受票企业也受到税务部门相应处罚。这是税务部门首次对互联网平台企 业涉税违法案件进行曝光。 在浙江，温州市税务局第二稽查局对一家平台企业——浙江嫲嫲团网络科技有限公司立案检查时发现， 该公司在与供应商进行货款结算时都会加收服务费，又通过会计手段将这些服务费伪装成"负债"，将其 藏匿在报表的"其他应付款"科目中，少缴税费款297.29万元。此外，嫲嫲团公司还通过个人账户向推广 人员支付劳动报酬，却未代扣代缴个人所得税，造成国家税款流失达472.75万元。 ——货运平台"无中生有"业务造假。 在陕西，网络货运平台运是滴科技发展有限责任公司虚构运输业务、伪造资金流水，甚至花钱购买运输 信息、货车导航定位等伪造运营的"真实性"，进而对外虚开增值税专用发票，非法收取"开票费"。经税 务部门查实，该企业接受上游企 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese National Market Regulation Administration is accelerating the introduction of the "Antitrust Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms," indicating that requiring merchants to offer the "lowest price on the entire network" may constitute abuse of market dominance or monopolistic agreements [1][2] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The National Market Regulation Administration plans to expedite the release of the "Antitrust Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms" to help platform operators identify, assess, and prevent antitrust compliance risks [1] - The guidelines aim to clarify behavioral boundaries for platform operators and enhance their compliance awareness and capabilities in the context of significant antitrust risks in the platform economy [2] Group 2: Market Characteristics - The platform economy exhibits distinct competitive characteristics compared to traditional economies, including significant scale effects and network effects, which facilitate cross-industry competition and rapid expansion [1] - Platform enterprises possess inherent advantages over merchants and consumers, allowing them to set rules, manage data, utilize algorithms, and allocate traffic [1] Group 3: Compliance Guidelines - The guidelines advise platform enterprises with market dominance to avoid implementing "either-or" practices through punitive or incentivizing measures [2] - The requirement for merchants to offer the "lowest price on the entire network" is highlighted as a potential abuse of market dominance or a monopolistic agreement [2] - The guidelines also address risks associated with "algorithm collusion" and encourage platforms to conduct algorithm screening to establish a system for identifying and preventing algorithmic monopolies [2]

Core Points - The National Market Regulation Administration has taken significant actions against monopolistic practices, including 35 cases of monopoly agreements and 25 cases of abuse of market dominance, resulting in a total fine of 2.93 billion yuan [1] - The administration has also concluded 950 cases related to business concentration in the livelihood sector, supporting companies in improving operational efficiency through mergers and acquisitions [1] Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement in Key Sectors - In the pharmaceutical sector, 12 major cases were handled over three years, with fines totaling 1.219 billion yuan, 362 million yuan, and 223 million yuan for specific companies, leading to price reductions of over 40% for involved drugs, with some reductions reaching 95% [1] - In public utilities, 16 cases of monopolistic behavior in water, electricity, gas, and heating sectors were addressed, resulting in fines of 183 million yuan, effectively curbing practices like bundled sales and ensuring consumer choice [1] Group 2: Platform Economy Regulation - The administration is enhancing regular supervision of the platform economy, focusing on competitive behaviors and issues like "lowest price" guarantees and "choose one of two" practices, aiming to protect the interests of small merchants and consumers [2] - A draft guideline for antitrust compliance in internet platforms has been released for public feedback, aiming to provide practical guidance for platform enterprises and address monopolistic behaviors [2][3] Group 3: Future Regulatory Focus - Future regulatory efforts will emphasize breaking local protectionism and administrative monopolies, which are crucial for optimizing the business environment and protecting consumer interests [3] - The administration plans to increase enforcement against the abuse of administrative power, promote fair competition review systems, and enhance policy coordination to ensure a unified national market [3][4] Group 4: Comprehensive Regulatory Approach - The administration adheres to a dual approach of regulation and service, employing a comprehensive regulatory toolset to promote self-discipline among enterprises and ensure a healthy market environment [4] - A core regulatory mechanism focusing on risk warning, compliance guidance, and precise regulation will be further refined to foster a competitive and orderly market environment [4]

Group 1 - The article highlights the joint meeting held by Beijing's housing and urban-rural development committee, along with other departments, to address the issue of misinformation and market disruption in the real estate sector [2] - It was reported that various self-media accounts have been spreading negative narratives about Beijing's real estate market, creating panic and disseminating false information, which severely disrupts market order [2] - As of December 12, over 17,000 pieces of illegal and harmful information were cleared from platforms like 58.com, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and others, along with the removal of more than 2,300 accounts and live streams that contributed to market volatility [2] Group 2 - The authorities plan to continue strengthening collaboration and maintain a "zero tolerance" approach towards any online disruptions in the real estate market, aiming to create a clearer online environment [3] - Internet platforms that fail to rectify issues and continue to infringe on public interests will face strict legal consequences [3]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has introduced new antitrust compliance guidelines for internet platforms, highlighting eight new types of monopoly risks and providing practical compliance guidance for platform enterprises [1] Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement - The SAMR held a press conference on December 17 to discuss antitrust enforcement in the consumer sector [1] - Liu Jian, Deputy Director of the Antitrust Enforcement Division, emphasized that some platform companies require merchants to sell products at prices not higher than those on competing platforms [1] Group 2: Compliance Guidelines - The recently released "Antitrust Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms (Draft for Comments)" outlines potential abuses of market dominance, including the requirement for merchants to maintain "the lowest price on the entire network" [1] - Such practices may constitute an abuse of market dominance or monopolistic agreements [1]

Group 1 - The Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has taken action to strengthen online ecological governance and curb chaos in the real estate sector by conducting joint interviews with various internet platforms [1] - Some self-media accounts have been found to disseminate negative information about the Beijing real estate market, creating panic and spreading false information, which disrupts market order [1] - As of December 12, under the supervision of relevant departments, platforms such as 58.com, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and others have collectively cleaned up over 17,000 pieces of illegal and harmful information [1] Group 2 - The next steps involve continued collaboration among departments to maintain a "zero tolerance" approach towards online chaos that disrupts the real estate market [2] - Internet platforms that fail to rectify issues and continue to infringe on public interests will face strict legal consequences [2] - The aim is to create a clearer online space by promoting positive voices and mainstream values [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights three tax evasion cases involving platform enterprises, marking the first time tax authorities have publicly exposed such cases in the internet platform sector [1][2][3] - Zhejiang Mamatang Network Technology Co., Ltd. manipulated accounting entries to misrepresent income and evade personal income tax, engaging in "double tax evasion" [1][2] - The company Yunshi Di Technology Development Co., Ltd. fabricated transportation business chains and issued false invoices, while Liaoning Hezhong Yixin Technology Co., Ltd. assisted in creating fictitious service fees to evade tax obligations [2][3] Group 2 - One of the cases has been referred to law enforcement for further investigation, while two others are undergoing judicial proceedings, with penalties imposed on involved enterprises [3] - Experts emphasize that compliance in platform enterprises is crucial for the overall value orientation of the industry, warning that non-compliance could lead to a detrimental impact on the sector's development [3] - The National Tax Administration stresses that compliance is essential for the sustainable growth of platform enterprises, which hold significant data and responsibilities [3]

Macro Dynamics - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and other departments have released the "Benchmark Levels and Baseline Levels for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Coal (2025 Edition)", aiming to align with the strictest domestic and international pollutant emission standards for coal [2][3] - The document emphasizes the need for dynamic adjustments to benchmark and baseline levels based on industry development and standard revisions, enhancing the guiding role of benchmark levels and the constraining role of baseline levels [2] Industry Initiatives - Six departments, including the NDRC and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, are promoting the clean and efficient utilization of coal in new and existing projects, encouraging upgrades to meet benchmark levels [3] - Existing projects that fall below baseline levels are urged to undergo orderly upgrades, with a general deadline of no more than three years for compliance [3] Financial Data - From January to November, the national general public budget revenue reached 200,516 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 0.8%, with tax revenue at 164,814 billion yuan, up 1.8% [4] Company Dynamics - Zhong Fu Li has resigned from key positions in Hangzhou Wahaha Food Co., marking her complete exit from core management roles within the Wahaha Group [10] - The company, established in 1992, is a significant player in the pre-packaged food sector and holds 387 trademarks valued over 90 billion yuan [10] Market Data - On December 17, A-shares saw a collective rise, with the Shanghai Composite Index up 1.19% and the ChiNext Index up 3.39%, indicating a strong market performance [8] - In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng Index increased by 0.92%, with notable gains in the metals and semiconductor sectors [9] Technology Developments - Moer Thread has announced the open-sourcing of its 3DGS base library LiteGS, which can achieve up to 10.8 times training acceleration while reducing parameter volume by over 50% [11] Business Contracts - Shanghai Airport has signed contracts for the transfer of duty-free shop operating rights at both Pudong and Hongqiao International Airports, expected to positively impact revenue from 2026 to 2033 [12]

互联网不是法外之地。12月17日，浙江、陕西、辽宁等地税务部门公布了近年查处的3起平台企业涉税 违法案件。涉案的上下游开票、受票企业也受到税务部门相应处罚。这是税务部门首次对互联网平台企 业涉税违法案件进行曝光。 新华社"新华视点"记者刘开雄、吴慧珺 平台企业是数字经济的生态核心，依法纳税合规经营是其健康发展的应有之义。然而，近年来平台企业 涉税违法案件频发，严重扰乱了公平竞争的市场秩序。 制造低资金流水假象、虚构运输业务链条、购买轨迹信息伪装……一些平台企业花样百出，不仅自己偷 逃税、虚开发票，还拓展"业务"成为下游企业偷逃税的"帮凶"。 ——网购平台"移花接木"双重偷税。 在浙江，温州市税务局第二稽查局对一家平台企业——浙江嫲嫲团网络科技有限公司立案检查时发现， 该公司在与供应商进行货款结算时都会加收服务费，又通过会计手段将这些服务费伪装成"负债"，将其 藏匿在报表的"其他应付款"科目中，少缴税费款297.29万元。此外，嫲嫲团公司还通过个人账户向推广 人员支付劳动报酬，却未代扣代缴个人所得税，造成国家税款流失达472.75万元。 ——货运平台"无中生有"业务造假。 在陕西，网络货运平台运是滴科技发展有限 ...