Group 1 - The core initiative of "Rural Coordinator" in Jiande City aims to enhance grassroots governance by addressing local issues and improving public services, such as optimizing bus stop locations for better accessibility [1][2] - The implementation of 17 new bus stops in Dazhou Village demonstrates the effectiveness of community engagement and feedback in local governance [1] - The "Rural Coordinator" mechanism has successfully resolved 13 long-standing disputes in the city, showcasing its role as both a mediator and a designer of governance solutions [2] Group 2 - Community participation is encouraged through initiatives like "Praise Action" and "Star Grid Member" selection, leading to a 95% involvement rate in village environmental improvement efforts [3] - The "I Come to Help" service in Xin'anjiang Street has addressed over 500 grassroots livelihood issues through neighborly assistance [3] - The initiative "Everyone is a Cleaner" in Getang Village has resulted in a significant transformation of the village environment and saved over 20,000 yuan in cleaning costs since March [3]

Core Points - The article highlights the implementation of village-level deliberative democracy in Shaanxi Province, emphasizing community engagement in local governance [1][2][3] - It discusses the establishment of a systematic framework for village-level discussions, including topic selection, responsibility delineation, decision-making procedures, and outcome implementation [2][3] - The article showcases various innovative practices and platforms for community engagement, such as "cloud discussions" and "small stool meetings," which facilitate effective communication between residents and local authorities [4][5][8] Group 1: Institutional Framework - Shaanxi Province has issued guidelines to standardize village-level deliberative democracy, making it a foundational aspect of grassroots governance [2][3] - The province has developed a comprehensive mechanism for topic selection, participant responsibility, decision-making processes, and outcome follow-up [2][3] - A "1+5+X" mechanism has been established to ensure broad participation in discussions, involving village party organizations and various community representatives [3] Group 2: Community Engagement Practices - Various forms of community engagement have been implemented, including online platforms and in-person meetings, to gather public opinions and address local issues [3][4] - The "small stool meeting" concept has been popularized, allowing community leaders to gather feedback and resolve conflicts effectively [4][5] - Innovative brands of deliberation have emerged across different regions, such as "Luyuanliangyi" and "Hometown Discussion Day," enhancing community participation in governance [4][5] Group 3: Training and Capacity Building - Training programs for village party organization leaders have been initiated to ensure effective facilitation of deliberative processes [7] - The province has selected demonstration counties to promote comprehensive implementation of deliberative democracy, aiming for widespread adoption [7] - The integration of technology and local governance practices is being emphasized to enhance the effectiveness of community engagement [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The successful mediation case highlights the effective integration of social governance and conflict resolution in Han City, showcasing the city's commitment to improving community services and legal support [3][4]. Group 1: Mediation Process - Zhang Qingchao expressed satisfaction with the mediation process, noting the professionalism and attentiveness of the mediator [1]. - The mediation involved a detailed examination of the case facts and an understanding of both parties' needs, leading to a consensus [2]. Group 2: Social Governance Integration - The case exemplifies Han City's approach to integrating "execution linkage + social governance," promoting multi-faceted conflict resolution and enhancing social governance efficiency [3]. - The city has established mechanisms for early detection and intervention in conflicts, ensuring timely resolution [3][4]. Group 3: Center Operations and Achievements - The Han City Comprehensive Governance Center has adopted a "one-stop" model for conflict resolution, integrating various services such as legal consultation and dispute mediation [3]. - In 2024, the center handled over 600 public requests, with a mediation success rate exceeding 95% [3]. - The city has implemented a structured framework for the governance centers, achieving a conflict resolution rate of over 97% for 181 cases this year [4]. Group 4: Future Plans - The Han City Comprehensive Governance Center plans to innovate work models to ensure a closed-loop management system for addressing public concerns [5].