Workflow
科技创新
icon
Search documents
经济日报金观平:强化资本市场枢纽功能服务科创
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-06-20 21:56
在2025陆家嘴论坛上,中国证监会主席吴清表示,充分发挥多层次资本市场枢纽功能,推动科技创新和 产业创新融合发展。这释放出一个鲜明信号:进一步深化资本市场改革,以更好支持科技创新和新质生 产力发展为核心,突出发挥资本市场枢纽功能,助力科技创新和产业创新深度融合。 资本市场通过对关键要素和资产的合理定价,能够激发企业家精神和人才创新创造活力,进而带动人 才、技术、数据等生产要素有机融合与协同集聚,更好服务传统产业升级、新兴产业壮大和未来产业培 育。从国内外实践经验看,无论是大而强的科技巨头,还是小而美的科创新秀,都离不开资本市场的有 力支持。创新始于科技、兴于产业、成于资本的特点越来越明显。 当前,全球科技创新进入密集活跃期。我国在深入实施创新驱动发展战略、加快构建现代化产业体系的 引领下,科技创新正在从点状突破向系统集成加快推进,技术突破向市场应用加快转化,恰似一株株幼 苗向森林生长。而资本市场能否成为适配的灌溉水源,直接关系创新生态的繁茂程度。 客观来看,目前资本供给与科创需求间仍存在周期错配、服务断层等堵点。科技创新需要长期资本"助 跑",但当前适应创新规律的资本形成机制还不完善,金融供给存在资金短期化、 ...
提升政策效能强化科技投入保障
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-06-19 22:12
聚焦产业转型升级,进一步强化企业创新主体地位,大力支持科技成果落地转化。科技成果转化连接创 新链与产业链,是科技创新的"最后一公里"。为此,要关注科技创新和产业对接的"转化关口",加大建 平台、出政策、投资金力度。这就需要进一步推动研发、产业奖补等政策,2024年财政等部门首批支持 1039家"小巨人"企业,就全面提升了中小企业数字化水平。再如,完善首台(套)重大技术装备、新材 料首批次应用保险补偿等政策,推动产品在规模化应用中不断迭代升级。鼓励各级财政聚焦重大战略、 重点领域和薄弱环节,通过政府引导、投贷联动等方式投早、投小、投硬科技。 科技创新能够催生新产业、新模式、新动能,是发展新质生产力的核心要素。当前,实现高水平科技自 立自强、发展新质生产力,对科技创新和产业创新深度融合提出更为迫切的需求,因此要更好发挥财政 作用,持续提升政策效能,不断激发各类主体创新活力。 创新财政支持方式、强化跨部门政策协调配合,深化财政科技体制改革,确保政策同向发力、效能增 进。不断创新财政支出方式,统筹用好财政贴息、资本金注入、引导基金、政策性融资担保、风险补偿 等工具,发挥"四两拨千斤"的撬动作用。加强财政、货币、产业、 ...
释放资本市场改革红利全方位赋能“双新”融合
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of capital markets in supporting the integration of technology, industry, and finance, particularly through innovative financial tools and policies aimed at enhancing the financing efficiency of "hard technology" enterprises [1][2] - In 2024, over 90% of new listings on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, Growth Enterprise Market, and Beijing Stock Exchange will belong to strategic emerging industries or high-tech enterprises, with A-share listed companies' R&D investment reaching 1.88 trillion yuan, accounting for more than half of the total social R&D expenditure [1][2] - The increasing "tech" attribute of A-shares is highlighted, with listed companies becoming the main force in technological innovation, driven by deep structural changes in the capital market [1][2] Group 2 - A series of policies supporting high-quality development of venture capital and the capital market's service to technology enterprises have been introduced since 2024, including the "1+6" policy measures for deepening the reform of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [2][3] - The Sci-Tech Innovation Board allows unprofitable technology innovation companies to list under the fifth standard, with 20 innovative biopharmaceutical companies having successfully listed since its inception [2][3] - Mergers and acquisitions are increasingly recognized as important tools for promoting deep integration of technological and industrial innovation, with a significant number of listed companies actively pursuing M&A to drive transformation and industry consolidation [3][4] Group 3 - The recent reforms in the merger and acquisition market aim to support listed companies in aligning with technological innovation and industrial upgrades, guiding resources towards new productive forces [3][4] - The revised "Major Asset Restructuring Management Measures" is expected to invigorate the M&A market, supporting corporate transformation and accelerating the development of new productive forces [3][4] - A multi-dimensional financing system, including private equity funds and technology bonds, is emerging to facilitate the integration of technology, capital, and industry elements [4][5] Group 4 - Approximately 90% of companies listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board received private equity investment prior to their listing, with efforts to broaden funding sources and optimize exit channels for private equity funds [4][5] - The issuance of over 200 technology bonds, with a total issuance scale exceeding 400 billion yuan, reflects the capital market's commitment to serving innovation [4][5] - The new policies and standards for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board and Growth Enterprise Market are designed to open financing channels for unprofitable innovative enterprises, while the M&A reforms aim to accelerate vertical and horizontal integration within industries [5]
全链条监管护航科创企业行稳致远
● 本报记者 昝秀丽 优化私募股权创投基金退出"反向挂钩"制度等举措得到有效落实,与科创企业特质相匹配的监管体系持 续完善,上市公司走访常态化推进…… "科创板八条"发布一年来,有关部门落实"加强科创板上市公司全链条监管""积极营造良好市场生态"相 关要求,不断提高制度适配性,积极打造有利于加快发展新质生产力的市场生态。 在新起点上,改革持续深化。《关于在科创板设置科创成长层 增强制度包容性适应性的意见》等政策 发布实施,将更加有力促进科技、资本、产业良性循环,更好发挥科创板改革试验田作用,为科创企业 提供全链条金融服务。 构建与科创企业特质相匹配的监管体系,是加强全链条监管的重要基础。今年4月,证监会发布《上市 公司信息披露暂缓与豁免管理规定》,兼顾保护科创企业核心商业秘密与市场知情权,进一步为科创板 上市公司依法依规豁免披露国家秘密、商业秘密等敏感信息提供政策依据。 中国社科院金融研究所研究员张跃文分析,上述规定通过分类豁免叠加动态监管的制度设计,避免 了"一刀切披露"对科创企业的伤害,是资本市场适配新质生产力发展的关键制度创新。 呵护科创企业发展,营造良好发展环境,"科创板八条"中明确提及的引导创始团队 ...
香港重返全球竞争力三甲!税率及法规具吸引力:外商争相落户
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-19 17:04
Core Insights - Hong Kong has risen to third place in the global competitiveness ranking, marking its return to the top three since 2019, with a total score of 99.2, an increase of 7.7 points, the highest growth among the top ten economies [1][4] Group 1: Competitiveness Factors - Hong Kong's "government efficiency" and "business efficiency" have both ranked second globally, while "economic performance" and "infrastructure" have risen to sixth and seventh respectively [4] - In sub-factors, Hong Kong ranks first in "tax policy" and "business regulations," and second in "international investment," "education," and "finance," with "international trade" and "management practices" ranking third [4] Group 2: Economic Outlook - The Hong Kong government projects economic growth between 2% and 3% for the year, reflecting positive evaluations from business leaders regarding the region's competitiveness [7] - The number of registered companies in Hong Kong has reached a new peak, indicating a favorable business environment despite challenges faced by certain sectors like retail and dining [7] Group 3: Financial Market Performance - The "Stock Connect" programs have shown significant growth, with average daily northbound trading volume increasing by 33% year-on-year, and southbound trading volume rising by 191% [10] - This growth highlights international investors' confidence in utilizing Hong Kong as a bridge to invest in mainland markets [10] Group 4: Challenges and Future Directions - Despite the positive ranking, challenges remain, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) facing operational pressures and the need for transformation [11][12] - The government aims to enhance governance and accountability among senior officials to improve overall governance levels [4][11]
北京年技术合同成交额突破9000亿元大关,居全国首位
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-06-19 14:13
Core Viewpoint - Beijing's International Science and Technology Innovation Center has become a significant force in the global innovation network, with technological innovation reforms being a key variable for high-level openness [1] Group 1: Achievements in Innovation - The number of invention patents per ten thousand people reached 262.9, a year-on-year increase of 20.4%, marking the highest growth rate in the past five years [1] - The annual technical contract transaction volume exceeded 900 billion yuan, reaching 915.3 billion yuan, maintaining the top position in the country [1] - The number of unicorn companies in Beijing stands at 115, ranking first in the nation [1] - The total revenue of enterprises in the Zhongguancun National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone reached 8.74 trillion yuan, ranking first among 178 national high-tech zones [1] Group 2: International Recognition and Rankings - Beijing ranks among the top global technology innovation clusters according to the World Intellectual Property Organization [1] - In the International Science and Technology Innovation Center Index, Beijing is ranked third globally [1] - The city has 431 individuals recognized as highly cited scientists, maintaining the top position in the global innovation city rankings for two consecutive years [1] - Beijing has consistently topped the "Nature Index - Research Cities" global rankings for several years [1] Group 3: Policy Innovations and Reforms - Zhongguancun has implemented 24 major reform measures, with 21 pilot policies fully promoted in the demonstration zone [2] - The "reporting and approval" policy for high-tech enterprises has been introduced, reducing the approval process by over 80%, benefiting more than 500 companies [2] - A "pay after use" model for scientific and technological achievements has been launched, encouraging innovation among small and medium-sized enterprises [2] - The number of foreign-funded R&D centers has increased, with 221 centers recognized [2] Group 4: Future Plans and International Cooperation - The city plans to deepen the implementation of the internationalization action plan for technological innovation, enhancing global scientific cooperation [2] - Six major actions will be promoted to expand international cooperation networks, improve platforms, and enhance the open innovation ecosystem [2] - The Zhongguancun Forum will be improved to consolidate international cooperation results and expand the international "circle of friends" [3]
上交所明确科创成长层标准,配套机制护航未盈利科技企业
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-06-19 02:38
【环球网财经综合报道】6月18日,随着中国证监会印发《关于在科创板设置科创成长层增强制度包容性适应性的意见》,上海证券交 易所迅速响应,同步制订的两项配套业务规则——《科创板上市公司自律监管指引第5号——科创成长层》及《发行上市审核规则适用 指引第7号——预先审阅》公开征求意见,是为技术突破性强、商业前景广阔但暂未盈利的科技型企业提供更精准的制度支持。 《科创板上市公司自律监管指引第5号——科创成长层》拟从三方面建立配套机制:一是明确实施标准及程序,规定纳入和调出标准, 并就调出标准进行"新老划断";二是强化风险揭示,科创成长层公司股票简称后增加标识"U",投资者投资新注册企业需签署专项风险 揭示书;三是提升信息披露质量,要求相关公司在定期报告和临时报告中披露未盈利情况及相关风险,并压实中介机构持续督导责任。 新制订的《发行上市审核规则适用指引第7号——预先审阅》为那些因过早披露业务技术信息、上市计划可能对其生产经营造成重大不 利影响的发行人提供了缓冲机制。发行人可申请预先审阅,上交所将参照正式审核程序把关,但此程序非必经环节,也不构成对发行条 件的预先确认。 值得关注的是,上交所还在研究制订关于"资深专业机 ...
资本市场与科技产业再次完美对接
Zheng Quan Ri Bao· 2025-06-18 16:18
■谢若琳 另一方面,科创成长层彰显资本市场支持科技创新的政策导向。2024年以来,监管部门聚焦服务实体经 济特别是支持科技创新,先后发布实施"科技十六条""科创板八条""并购六条",以及《关于资本市场做 好金融"五篇大文章"的实施意见》等政策文件,不断完善支持科技创新的制度体系和市场生态,形成资 本市场支持科技型企业发展的良好氛围。 科创成长层为增量制度改革提供更可控的"试验空间",覆盖科技企业"初创—成长—成熟"全生命周期的 资本市场服务体系日趋完善,市场内在稳定性和吸引力进一步增强。 当然,改革之路从无坦途。科创成长层的成功落地,仍需直面几重挑战,如企业分层标准的科学界定, 需兼顾成长性与科技成色的真实度量;不同层级间的转板机制设计,须确保灵活与稳定间的平衡;投资 者保护工作更需同步强化,谨防风险在层级间无序传导。这要求监管智慧与市场实践在动态磨合中不断 校准。 "试验田"精神正是破解挑战的密钥。以科创成长层为新的支点,撬动一场更具系统性的生态革新,从包 容性制度到适应性服务,从融资端优化到投资端保护。让资本市场的土壤养分更足、阳光更充沛,中国 科创企业"成长的烦恼"便能转化为"蜕变的动力"。我们有理由相 ...
首批成员单位85家!郑州中原科技城科创联盟正式成立
news flash· 2025-06-18 11:25
Group 1 - The Zhengzhou Zhongyuan Science and Technology City Innovation Alliance has been officially established, marking a significant step in fostering innovation [1] - The alliance has successfully attracted 85 initial member units, including universities, research institutes, state-owned enterprises, key private enterprises, and financial institutions, achieving comprehensive coverage of the innovation chain [1]
除了股票简称后加标识“U”,上交所解释何为科创成长层
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-18 11:17
Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued guidelines for establishing a "Growth Layer" within the Sci-Tech Innovation Board to enhance the inclusivity and adaptability of the system, with supporting rules from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) [1][2][3] Group 1: Establishment of the Growth Layer - The Growth Layer aims to serve technology companies that have significant breakthroughs, broad commercial prospects, and substantial ongoing R&D investments, particularly those that are currently unprofitable [3] - A total of 54 unprofitable companies have successfully listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board over the past six years, generating a combined revenue of 1,744.79 billion yuan in 2024, with 26 of these companies exceeding 1 billion yuan in revenue [3] Group 2: Regulatory Framework - The SSE's self-regulatory guidelines for the Growth Layer will establish mechanisms in three areas: implementation standards and procedures, risk disclosure, and enhancement of information disclosure quality [4] - Companies in the Growth Layer will have their stocks or depositary receipts marked with a special identifier "U," and investors will need to sign a risk disclosure document when investing in newly registered companies [4] Group 3: Pre-Review Mechanism for IPOs - The SSE is introducing a pre-review mechanism for IPO applications to help companies manage sensitive information and reduce exposure during the listing process [5][7] - The pre-review process will not replace the formal application process and will not confirm compliance with listing conditions, but will provide feedback to issuers before they formally apply [8]