波音公司（BA.US）涨幅迅速扩大至3.28%，刷新日高至192.57美元，涨幅随后收窄至不足2.8%。 英国宇航系统（BAE，BA/.LN）维持超过0.5%的涨幅，持稳于北京时间22:44刷新的日高1742.50（便士）附 近。 竞争对手空中客车法国巴黎股价（AIR.FP）涨超2.3%，22:47刷新日高至158.42欧元，目前涨幅略微收窄。 达索系统（DSY.FP）目前持平于33.18欧元刷新日低，日内呈现出冲高回落走势，16:38曾涨至33.88欧元。 美国总统特朗普宣称，英国同意采购价值100亿美元的波音（飞机）。 | Boeing Co | 概览 | 对比 | 财务信息 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | NYSE: BA : | | | | | | | 市场概况 > Boeing Co | | | | | | | 191.65 บริ | | | | | + 关注 | | +6.09 (3.28%) ↑ 今天 | | | | | | | 5月8日 GMT-4 上午11:07 • 免责声明 | | | | | | | 1天 | 5天 1 个月 ...

Core Points - Boeing has proposed to deliver the delayed new version of "Air Force One" by 2027 [1] - The U.S. Air Force selected the Boeing 747-8 as the new presidential aircraft in 2015 to replace the modified Boeing 747-200 used since 1990 [1] - The contract for the new aircraft was originally set for delivery in 2024, but has faced delays due to labor shortages, design, manufacturing, and supply chain issues [1] - President Trump has criticized Boeing multiple times since February for not completing the presidential aircraft project approved during his first term [1]

Core Viewpoint - China Aviation Industry Fund (中航产融) is selling assets to recover funds as it is in the process of delisting from the stock market due to significant operational uncertainties and expected financial losses [1][2][7]. Group 1: Asset Sale Details - The company plans to transfer 160 million shares of AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry Group (中航西飞) and 22.68 million shares of AVIC Aircraft (中航机载) to its controlling shareholder, AVIC (中国航空工业集团), for a total price of approximately 4.067 billion yuan [1][4]. - The share transfer represents 5.76% of AVIC Xi'an's total shares and 0.47% of AVIC Aircraft's total shares [4]. - The transfer price is based on the average weighted price of the shares over the previous 30 trading days, with AVIC Xi'an priced at 23.81 yuan per share and AVIC Aircraft at 11.19 yuan per share [4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Future Plans - As of September 2024, the company's total assets amounted to 442.393 billion yuan, with a debt-to-asset ratio of 85.13% [3][6]. - The company anticipates a net loss of approximately 48 million yuan for 2024, marking its first loss since 2006, with a projected net loss of 189 million yuan after excluding non-recurring items [2][5]. - The company is actively pursuing a voluntary delisting from the A-share market, with the Shanghai Stock Exchange having accepted its application for termination of listing [2][7][8]. Group 3: Legal Issues - The company is facing a lawsuit from China Life Insurance (中国人寿) regarding a share buyback dispute, with the total claim amounting to approximately 2.71 billion yuan [9][10].

巴基斯坦军方称：击中一架印度阵风战机。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has delayed the airworthiness certification of China's C919 aircraft, stating it will take an additional 3 to 6 years for the certification process to complete, which has raised concerns about the motivations behind this delay and its implications for the aviation market [1][5][10]. Group 1: EASA's Certification Delay - EASA has used the term "technical familiarity" to justify the delay in the airworthiness certification of the C919, indicating that it is unlikely to receive certification this year [1]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has responded to the situation, suggesting a confrontational stance against EASA's prolonged certification process, which has lasted six years [5]. - The delay is perceived as a strategic move by EASA to protect the interests of European aerospace giants Airbus and Boeing, preventing competition from the C919 [7][10]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Opportunities - The ongoing delays in certification have created a unique opportunity for the C919, as domestic orders have surged past 1,000 units, significantly overshadowing Airbus's orders in China [16]. - The C919 has gained traction in international markets, with significant orders from countries like Saudi Arabia, which has placed an order for 10 aircraft, showcasing a shift in market dynamics [12][16]. - The C919's safety record is highlighted as superior to that of Boeing's troubled aircraft, which may influence consumer preferences and order flows in the aviation market [17][20]. Group 3: Strategic Implications for the Aviation Industry - The situation illustrates a broader trend where Western technology restrictions may inadvertently accelerate the development of China's aviation industry, leading to the emergence of alternative solutions and partnerships [16][17]. - The potential for the C919 to capture market share in the Middle East and Southeast Asia could disrupt the existing duopoly of Boeing and Airbus, leading to a reevaluation of their market strategies [21][23]. - The ongoing delays and strategic maneuvers by EASA may result in a significant shift in the global aviation landscape, with the possibility of new alliances forming outside of the traditional Western framework [21][23].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of providing direct and constructive feedback in the workplace for employee development, as articulated by Patrice Louvet, CEO of Ralph Lauren [1][2]. Group 1: Feedback Strategies - Louvet advocates for a straightforward approach when addressing significant issues with employees, suggesting that sometimes a blunt approach is necessary to awaken individuals to their shortcomings [2]. - For non-critical issues, Louvet recommends starting with positive reinforcement before offering suggestions for improvement, focusing on creating development opportunities [2]. - A recent survey indicates that approximately 75% of employees desire more recognition of their value at work, particularly among the Z generation, who benefit from clear identification of their skill gaps [2]. Group 2: Challenges in Feedback Delivery - Many managers struggle to balance positive and negative feedback, with only 14% of executives from Fortune 500 companies acknowledging their ability to accurately identify high and low performers [3]. - Some leaders adopt unique methods for delivering feedback, such as Binance's former CEO, Changpeng Zhao, who prefers public feedback to benefit others and avoid redundancy [4]. - Boeing's CEO, David Calhoun, is known for his directness, urging employees to focus on tasks rather than gossip [5].

今年7月份，关税政策更是要全面生效，这可是个关键节点。专家预测，这会让美国经济雪上加霜，甚至可能引发经济衰退。 这就像本来就病入膏肓，现在 又来了一记重锤，直接送你去见阎王！ 美国经济最近不太景气，这可不是什么小感冒，感觉像是得了场慢性病，而且病根儿还跟特朗普的关税政策脱不了干系。 这就像玩一把大的，结果不仅没 赢，还把自己的家底都赔进去了，现在正躺在病床上唉声叹气呢！ 特朗普政府当时可是信心满满，觉得美国经济强壮，单挑全世界贸易秩序都没问题。结果呢？现实狠狠地给了他们一巴掌！ 他们觉得用关税大棒敲打别 人，就能让别人乖乖就范，结果却招来了其他国家的一致反击。这就好比，你一个人单枪匹马去挑战一个武林高手，结果被人家一套组合拳打得鼻青脸肿， 还没讨到好。 这可不是什么"美国优先"，而是"美国孤立"啊！ >特朗普的关税战就像是一招"七伤拳"，打伤别人，也伤了自己。 波音订单减少，大豆出口一蹶不振，美国经济受到了巨大的冲击。华尔街的交易员都私下 议论纷纷，说这不仅仅是经济衰退，而是帝国的"慢性死亡"。 这可不是危言耸听！ 总的来说，美国经济现在面临的困境是多方面的，关税政策只是其中一个重要因素。 7月份将是一个关键 ...

色彩缤纷的后备箱摊位依次排开，琳琅满目的商品与热情洋溢的吆喝声交织在一起；惠民服务摊位 前，理发、义诊等便民项目有序开展；文化体验区内，非遗手作展示引得产业工人驻足围观……近日， 第三届"前进号"公益集市在杭州吉利汽车有限公司热闹开市。 这场融合消费活力、民生服务与文化体验的春日盛会，吸引超千名产业工人参与。自2022年启动以 来，"前进号"已举办入企公益内购活动10余场，覆盖产业工人超1万名，成为杭州前进智造园服务4万余 名产业工人的"暖心名片"。 作为钱塘区高端装备产业核心区，前进智造园聚焦"让工人幸福成长"的目标，构建起产业工人"全 链条"培育体系。园区联合前进街道打造"技能小镇"品牌，推出技能提升、学历进阶、竞赛认证等八项 举措：开设机械加工、电子装配等专项课程，近150名工人通过培训掌握先进技术；举办省市区三级技 能比武，将赛事与职业资格认定挂钩，激发员工提升热情；更创新推出工匠创富计划，帮助技术人才实 现技能变现。 产教融合的深度实践成为人才培育亮点。园区推动校企共建"六位一体"培育中心，华瑞航空与浙江 机电学院联合开办航空复材制造班，首批57名学员全部进入C929大飞机生产线；汽车零部件龙头企业 ...

据红星新闻报道，近来美方不断有消息称中美之间正在谈判，甚至将会达成协议，还有美方相关表态称中美关税战将很 快降温。在近日举行的外交部发布会和商务部发布会上，两部门对此相继进行了回应，并表明中方立场。外交部发言人 表示"中美之间正在谈判，甚至将会达成协议"都是假消息。中美双方并没有就关税问题进行磋商或谈判，更谈不上达成 协议。商务部新闻发言人表示，目前中美之间未进行任何经贸谈判。任何关于中美经贸谈判进展的说法都是捕风捉影， 没有事实依据。 谁能想，在中国给出基本的谈判条件和对他们的发言辟过谣后，美国财政部长贝森特近日在与亚洲开发银行行长会晤 时，竟然要求该行停止对中国贷款，显然是准备打压中国在国际金融机构中的活动空间。紧接着，美国总统特朗普也对 中国发出了威胁，他称除非中国在关税谈判中作出实质性的让步，才有可能对华降低关税。从会对华关税大幅下降到除 非中国在关税谈判中作出实质性的让步，才有可能对华降低关税。 拜登、奥巴马、克林顿（资料图） 全美超过了500万人举行大规模游行，他们反对关税战，反对政府裁员等等，不要特朗普这样的"国王"。此外，美国三大 前总统拜登、奥巴马、克林顿在公开场合，也对特朗普进行了猛烈的批 ...

本文叙述皆有官方信源，为了读者有更好的体验放在了文章后缀，感谢您的支持！ 中美贸易战愈演愈烈，中国也愈战愈勇，不过美国却似乎有点招架不住了。 始作俑者特朗普抛出橄榄枝想同中国谈判，结果竟然几度翻脸、出尔反尔，甚至还想借着谈判从中挖取好处，不愧是利益至上的商人啊。 中国也不是软柿子，怎么可能会任美国戏耍呢！ 这不，就马不停蹄地叫停了所有美国的油气，直击特朗普背后的金主，这下特朗普可谓是背腹受敌了。 当他生气地质问中国损失时，中国的回答只有四个字，且简洁明了。 到底是哪四个字，威力如此之大，让特朗普听了能当场爆炸？ 作为美国总统，特朗普其实心里很清楚，和中国打关税贸易战对美国而言并不会有多么大的好处，从美国国内的现状和特朗普主动抛出橄榄枝就能感受到。 特朗普口口声声说的压倒性胜利，无非是想掩盖自己的错误决策，先发制人通过强调胜利来给民众洗脑。 与此同时，自己则向中国释放想要谈判的信号，不过特朗普一向说的比唱的好听，想和中国谈判结果却反将一军，眼看着谈判可能就要成了，然后又猝不及 防地提出自己的条件，扬言要是中美之间的贸易逆差不扭转，那谈判也就不用进行了。 特朗普以为别人愿意和自己谈判就是怕自己，所以才如此厚脸皮地 ...