"不是夺权。如果马斯克说，明天开始特斯拉关闭，所有车子烧掉，特斯拉股东会议一样会让他停 止。"靖奇投资一位股东对《华夏时报》记者如是表示。然而，范思奇则对本报记者表示，"他们的谎话 前后不一致而且自相矛盾"。 近日，一纸《十年努力，一朝背刺》的控诉，撕开了量化私募行业光鲜外表下残酷的"权力游戏"。 6月22日，上海靖奇投资管理有限公司（下称"靖奇投资"）创始人范思奇在网络上发布一封长信，控诉 自己在一场"提前9分钟通知的股东会"上被自己创立的公司扫地出门。 范思奇称，股东会单方面罢免了他所有职务，随后封锁了他的系统权限、员工联络通道，甚至切断了他 访问自己编写的核心代码的权限。 "这不是一次体面的交接，而是一场彻底的背刺。"范思奇在信中写道。股东会结束后，靖奇投资官方公 众号发文称"祝范思奇早日恢复健康"，被范视为暗示自己有精神问题。 权力争夺"罗生门" 这场风波始于6月11日。当天，范思奇向投资者发出一封信，宣布将于本月卸任靖奇投资基金经理职 务，其管理的基金产品也将进入清盘流程。 在信中，他解释称，近年市场环境变化带来巨大身心压力，管理公司事务、协调合作关系等消耗了绝大 部分时间，影响生活质量并使他失去行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between the founders of Jingqi Investment, particularly the expulsion of Fan Siqi, highlights governance issues within private equity firms in China, emphasizing the need for improved ownership structures and incentive mechanisms to ensure sustainable development [2][8][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Fan Siqi, the founder and fund manager of Jingqi Investment, claims he was expelled from the company during a shareholder meeting that he was notified about only 9 minutes in advance [2][6]. - In a letter to investors, Fan announced his resignation and the initiation of the liquidation process for the funds he managed, which was later clarified by Jingqi Investment as affecting only a small portion of their total assets under management [4][9]. - The dispute escalated after Fan's article circulated online, accusing the other founder, Tang Jing, of orchestrating his removal without proper discussion [5][6]. Group 2: Company Background - Jingqi Investment was established on March 9, 2015, and registered as a private securities investment fund manager on August 6, 2015, with a management scale between 1 billion and 2 billion [9]. - The ownership structure includes Fan Siqi holding 36.36% of the shares, while Tang Jing and Mao Noping hold 27.27% each, and Shanghai Jing'erqi Enterprise Management Partnership holds 9.09% [9]. Group 3: Governance Issues - The incident has drawn attention to the governance problems prevalent in private equity firms, with experts suggesting that the lack of a reasonable ownership structure and internal checks can lead to power struggles and instability [8][10]. - Recommendations for improving governance include optimizing ownership distribution, establishing internal checks and balances, designing fair incentive mechanisms, and enhancing transparency through better information disclosure [10].

Core Viewpoint - The private equity industry is facing increasing scrutiny from regulatory authorities due to rampant violations and misconduct, necessitating improvements in regulation and self-discipline to ensure healthy development [1][6][8] Group 1: Regulatory Issues - Regulatory bodies have frequently highlighted violations in the private equity sector, revealing various irregularities such as engaging in unrelated businesses and facilitating illegal fundraising [1][4] - The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau reported that some private equity managers have deviated from their core responsibilities, engaging in activities like acting as brokers for fake gold exchanges and bond issuances [2][4] - There has been a significant increase in penalties, with over 240 fines issued by the regulatory system and more than 200 disciplinary actions from the Asset Management Association of China in 2023 [6][7] Group 2: Misconduct Examples - Some private equity firms have been found to charge excessive fees for consulting services related to unrelated business activities, such as promoting real estate investment plans [2][3] - Instances of illegal fundraising have been reported, where firms used their fund management qualifications to facilitate unauthorized public fundraising, leading to potential criminal activities [4][5] - Certain firms have engaged in "shell selling" practices, transferring operational control without proper registration, which has been exploited for illegal fundraising [5] Group 3: Underlying Causes - The private equity industry is characterized by its inherent complexity and opacity, making comprehensive regulation challenging [7][8] - The competitive nature of the industry drives some firms to adopt unethical practices, including market manipulation and insider trading, to achieve higher returns [7] - The lack of in-depth regulatory oversight due to resource constraints has resulted in a significant information asymmetry, hindering the detection of hidden violations [7] Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - It is essential to enhance legal frameworks to clarify compliance requirements and increase penalties for violations, thereby deterring potential misconduct [8] - Regulatory authorities should leverage modern technology, such as big data and AI, to establish a comprehensive monitoring system for real-time oversight of private equity activities [8] - Strengthening industry self-regulation through the establishment of strict guidelines and compliance training is crucial for improving the overall integrity of the sector [8]

Core Viewpoint - The announcement of cash dividends by Shanghai's quantitative private equity firms, KuanDe and YanFu, has sparked industry speculation regarding their motives, with some suggesting financial difficulties or a desire to extract management fees [1][3][4]. Group 1: Dividend Announcement - KuanDe and YanFu have announced dividends for certain products, allowing investors to choose between cash dividends or reinvestment [1][3]. - The firms clarified that the dividend distribution is a routine operation based on fund contract agreements and current investment performance [1][3]. Group 2: Market Reactions and Speculations - The public announcement of dividends is rare in the private equity sector, leading to various interpretations about the intentions behind these actions [3][4]. - Some industry experts suggest that the timing of the dividends may indicate a strategy to control fund size and maintain competitive investment strategies [4][6]. Group 3: Performance Metrics - Quantitative long-only strategies have shown strong performance, with billion-dollar private equity firms reporting average returns of 8.91% in Q1, and 19 firms achieving over 20% returns in the past year [5]. - KuanDe and YanFu reported average returns of 11.75% and 7.7% respectively over the first five months of the year [5]. Group 4: Investor Perspectives - High-net-worth investors face significant entry barriers, with minimum investment thresholds set at 1 million yuan, which influences their perception of the value of dividends [2][6]. - The choice between cash dividends and reinvestment is seen as a way to enhance investor experience and provide flexibility [3][4].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the establishment of Taibao Zhiyuan (Shanghai) Private Fund Management Co., Ltd. as a registered securities private fund manager, marking a significant move by a major insurance company into long-term stock investment [1][3]. - The private fund is controlled by China Pacific Insurance, with its shareholders being Pacific Asset Management Company [2]. - The management team includes Xiang Tao, who has extensive experience in finance and investment, and He Jiacheng, who has a background in risk management [4]. Group 2 - The initial target scale for the private fund is set at 20 billion yuan, aimed at responding to national calls for expanding private securities investment fund reforms [5]. - Several major insurance companies have initiated private securities funds, including China Life and Xinhua Insurance, which have launched a fund with a scale of 50 billion yuan [6]. - Other insurance firms, such as Sunshine Life and Taikang Life, have also announced significant investments in private securities funds, with planned contributions of 20 billion yuan and 12 billion yuan respectively [7][8].

产品全渠道"封盘"？百亿量化私募宽德投资回应 金十数据6月23日讯，就市场传出"封盘"和产品分红的消息，6月22日晚间，宽德投资在官微发布了《关 于宽德投资产品运作安排的说明》。近期，公司的部分渠道募集节奏调整，市场对公司基金产品运作情 况有所关注，同时也有投资人针对产品分红等安排提出询问。针对产品"封盘"的说法，宽德投资表示， 目前公司层面并无统一"封盘"计划，当前部分合作渠道针对产品募集节奏所做的阶段性调整，旨在更好 地匹配策略承载能力，力争持续为投资者带来良好体验。针对分红的情况，宽德投资表示，近期部分产 品实施的分红安排，系基于基金合同约定及投资运作情况开展的常规化操作机制，意在优化投资体验， 增强客户的自主选择空间，相关操作不涉及策略方向或市场判断的调整。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The investment strategy of the company has evolved from a singular focus on growth stocks to a diversified approach that adapts to market changes, emphasizing the importance of both sustainable growth and risk management in investment decisions [1][5][9]. Group 1: Investment Strategy Evolution - The company has recognized the limitations of a single investment strategy, especially in the current challenging market for growth stocks, prompting a shift towards diversification [1][4]. - The investment philosophy now incorporates a combination of growth, value, and dividend stocks, with a focus on macroeconomic trends and style timing to enhance portfolio resilience [5][9]. - The company aims to balance investment opportunities with safety, particularly in sectors benefiting from AI advancements and those with reasonable valuations [1][9]. Group 2: Market Outlook and Focus Areas - The company believes that the most uncertain phase of the market has passed, with expectations for better investment opportunities in the fourth quarter, particularly in growth stocks [9]. - Key sectors of interest include the internet sector benefiting from AI development, domestic consumption-related industries, technology with a focus on self-sufficiency, and sectors supported by growth policies like engineering machinery [9][10]. - The semiconductor industry is highlighted for its significant growth potential, driven by increasing domestic production and technological advancements [10].

Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes the importance of long-term adaptability and global investment strategies in the face of significant market changes, leveraging technology and expanding into international markets [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Strategy - The company has restructured its investment system using artificial intelligence technology, named "AI Cybertron," and has expanded its investment scope to include markets in South Korea, India, and Singapore [1]. - The investment portfolio currently includes high-quality companies from A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, U.S. stocks, and other international markets, reflecting a global investment approach [2]. - The core research team consists of seven members, with five being overseas returnees, enhancing the team's global research capabilities [2]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The company is particularly optimistic about the technology sector, especially artificial intelligence, and plans to build a global investment portfolio centered around AI [4]. - Investment in the technology sector is categorized into scientific technology and business innovation, with a focus on areas such as AI computing, autonomous driving, and quantum computing [4]. - In business innovation, the company is looking at investment opportunities in SaaS, fintech, and platform economy sectors driven by AI technology [5]. Group 3: Investment Philosophy - The company adheres to value investing principles but recognizes the need for flexibility in adjusting positions based on market sentiment and using derivative tools to enhance portfolio stability [3]. - The selection criteria for investment targets include strong competitiveness, high growth potential, and significant value creation [3]. - The company aims to create absolute returns for investors by exploring derivative tools to improve position adjustment flexibility and enhance portfolio resilience [3].

Core Viewpoint - Kuande Investment clarifies that there is currently no unified "closure" plan for its products, and the recent dividend distributions are part of regular operations [2][3] Group 1: Product Operations - Kuande Investment has stated that recent reports of a "closure" are unfounded, and any adjustments in fundraising are aimed at better matching strategy capacity [2] - The company emphasizes that it will cautiously advance the reopening of products while controlling the scale of similar strategies [2] - Investors are encouraged to rationally assess their allocation plans in light of these adjustments [2] Group 2: Dividend Distribution - The recent dividend distributions are based on fund contract agreements and are intended to enhance the investment experience and provide clients with more choices [3] - These operations do not indicate any changes in strategy direction or market judgment [3] Group 3: Company Background - Kuande Investment operates two private securities investment fund management entities, both established in the second half of 2014, with assets exceeding 100 billion [3] - The Shanghai Kuande entity has 494 registered private products, with 79 registered this year, while the Zhuhai Kuande entity has 122 registered products, with 5 registered this year [3] Group 4: Industry Context - Several well-known private equity firms have announced "closures" of some of their products recently, indicating a trend in the industry [4] - For instance, Ruijun Asset has decided to suspend new client subscriptions for its products starting June 8, 2025, prioritizing performance and moderate scale control [5] - Another firm, Huanfu Investment, has also announced a temporary halt on new client subscriptions for certain index-enhanced products effective July 1 [5]

Core Viewpoint - The private equity industry is undergoing a significant regulatory crackdown, with multiple firms facing penalties for various violations, indicating a trend of increased scrutiny and potential market exit for non-compliant entities [1][3][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning letter to Jiaming Asset Management for non-compliance with fund contract investment scopes and providing non-actual investment agreements to custodians [4]. - Hainan Securities Regulatory Bureau ordered Jiayue Private Securities Fund Management to rectify issues related to inter-fund investments and fundraising from non-qualified investors [4]. - Other firms, including Beijing Yanstone Investment and Shanghai Leitu Asset Management, also received warning letters from their respective regulatory bodies [5]. Group 2: Industry Trends - The private equity industry is experiencing a rapid exit of problematic firms, with 580 firms having been deregistered this year alone, continuing a trend from previous years [6][7]. - Cumulatively, since 2021, a total of 8,063 private equity firms have been deregistered, reflecting ongoing challenges within the industry [8]. - As of April 2025, there are 19,891 active private equity fund managers managing a total of 20.22 trillion yuan in assets, with a significant portion in private securities and equity investment funds [8].