Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Wang Zai Xiao Qiao's concert highlights ongoing issues in the music industry regarding copyright protection and the legality of cover songs [2][3][25]. Group 1: Concert Details and Controversy - Wang Zai Xiao Qiao's concert was scheduled for August 9 in Shanghai, with nearly 23 million followers online [1]. - The concert faced backlash due to high ticket prices, lack of original content, and a significant portion of the setlist being cover songs, leading to a postponement and over 3 million lost followers [2][5]. - The concert was set to feature 30 songs, including 7 original songs and 15 covers [9]. Group 2: Copyright Issues - The event underscores the challenges of copyright protection in the music industry, with legal experts analyzing the legitimacy of cover songs and the associated costs of rights management [3][14]. - Wang Zai Xiao Qiao's rise to fame was largely due to her covers of popular songs, raising questions about the ownership of rights for these performances [4][25]. - Legal definitions of original, original performer, and cover artist are complex, with the necessity of obtaining authorization from copyright holders for covers [17][23]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives on Cover Songs - Cover artists must secure authorization from copyright holders to avoid infringement, and unauthorized performances for profit are considered illegal [27][30]. - The concept of "fair use" may apply in certain contexts, but high-profile artists like Wang Zai Xiao Qiao are less likely to qualify under this exception due to their commercial success [30][31]. - The legal landscape for copyright enforcement is complicated, with many artists facing challenges in proving infringement due to difficulties in evidence collection [31][39]. Group 4: Financial Implications of Copyright Management - The cost of obtaining rights for cover songs can be substantial, with estimates for Wang Zai Xiao Qiao's concert ranging from 800,000 to 1,000,000 yuan [42][44]. - The fees for popular songs can exceed 50,000 yuan per song, with additional costs for management and legal services [44][45]. - The lack of a standardized system for copyright management complicates the process for artists, particularly those with less financial backing [46][47]. Group 5: Recommendations for Copyright Protection - Artists are advised to take proactive measures to protect their rights, including obtaining time-stamped evidence of their work and formal agreements for rights transfer [52][53]. - The establishment of clearer and more accessible copyright registration systems is necessary to facilitate better management and protection of music rights [47][48].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the masked concert of internet celebrity "Wang Zai Xiao Qiao" has escalated into a public dispute between two major Chinese singers, leading to significant backlash and a drop in her follower count [1][10]. Group 1: Event Background - The incident began with Wang Zai Xiao Qiao announcing a "masked" concert in Shanghai on July 18, 2023, to celebrate her five-year anniversary, which raised questions about the authenticity of her performance [2][8]. - The concert ticket prices ranged from 268 yuan to 968 yuan, comparable to established artists, despite the performance being primarily composed of covers rather than original songs [9][14]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Consequences - Following the announcement, Wang Zai Xiao Qiao faced severe criticism, resulting in a loss of 4.24 million followers across social media platforms, with her accounts being restricted [1][10]. - The controversy intensified as her previous controversial statements were revisited, particularly her claim regarding the original singer of the song "Nian Lun," which further fueled the public debate [10][11]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident reflects a broader trend in the industry where internet celebrities are increasingly attempting to monetize their popularity through live performances, despite lacking the necessary vocal skills for such events [17]. - The market for internet celebrity concerts may undergo a "bubble-popping" phase, where only those with genuine talent and dedication to their craft will succeed, pushing the industry towards a more professional and sustainable model [17][18].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing copyright dispute surrounding the song "Year Ring" highlights the complexities and challenges in the music industry's copyright system, particularly in the context of multiple versions and interpretations of songs [1][19][20] Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The controversy began when online singer "Wang Zai Xiao Qiao" claimed that the original singer of "Year Ring" is only Zhang Bichen, leading to a "dual original singer" dispute between the song's creator Wang Sulong and performer Zhang Bichen [3][5] - The year 2015 marked a pivotal moment in China's online music copyright landscape, with the National Copyright Administration issuing a notice to halt unauthorized music distribution, thus ending the "wild west" era of online music [3][4] Group 2: Industry Response - Major music streaming platforms, such as QQ Music and NetEase Cloud, exhibited unusual behavior by altering the "original singer" labels for the song, which raised public skepticism about the criteria for determining "original" status [4][19] - The platforms' actions reflect a lack of a clear and transparent standard for defining "original" in the context of multiple versions of songs, indicating a need for improved governance in the industry [4][20] Group 3: Implications for Copyright System - The "dual original singer" situation underscores the necessity for a more refined and transparent copyright determination system that accommodates the evolving nature of music production and consumption [19][20] - The current copyright framework struggles to adapt to the complexities of multiple interpretations and versions of songs, necessitating a shift towards a more nuanced approach that balances emotional value and commercial interests [20]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the masked concert of internet celebrity singer Wang Zai Xiao Qiao highlights the changing dynamics of the concert market, revealing a lack of sincerity and authenticity in the current entertainment landscape [3][4][10]. Group 1: Market Reaction and Fan Trust - Wang Zai Xiao Qiao's concert ticket pricing strategy has faced strong criticism, particularly the high price of 968 yuan for inner tickets, raising questions about the value offered to fans [4][5]. - Following the announcement of the concert, Wang Zai Xiao Qiao's follower count on Douyin dropped from 23.448 million to 18.352 million, a loss of over 5.09 million fans, indicating a direct market response to the controversy [4][10]. - The lack of original content in her performance, with only 7 out of 30 songs being original works, has led to public ridicule, suggesting that fans feel shortchanged [4][14]. Group 2: Comparison with Other Performers - In contrast, comedian Yue Yunpeng's concert sold out quickly despite a higher ticket price of 1580 yuan, demonstrating that sincerity and audience engagement can lead to success even without traditional singing credentials [6][13]. - Yue Yunpeng's performance was characterized by genuine interaction and humor, which resonated with the audience, showcasing that the value of a concert extends beyond just musical talent [7][13]. - The stark difference in audience reception between Wang Zai Xiao Qiao and Yue Yunpeng illustrates the market's intolerance for perceived insincerity and the importance of authentic engagement [7][10]. Group 3: Evolving Concert Market Dynamics - The concert market is shifting towards a more rational and mature phase, where audience expectations for value and authenticity are increasing [15][16]. - The essence of concerts is evolving into a complex exchange of artistic expression and commercial value, where audience trust and engagement are paramount [16][17]. - Future concert success will depend on performers' ability to understand and respect the rules of value exchange, regardless of their public persona [17].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the original singer of the song "Year Ring" has sparked significant public interest, highlighting the complexities of copyright and performance rights in the music industry [3][5][12]. Group 1: Event Overview - Influencer @Wangzai Xiao Qiao announced a masked concert with ticket prices ranging from 268 to 968 yuan, which led to public scrutiny due to her lack of original songs and high ticket prices [3]. - The situation escalated when past comments by @Wangzai Xiao Qiao regarding the song "Year Ring" resurfaced, leading to a heated debate about the song's original artist [5][6]. Group 2: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts clarified that "original singer" is not a legal term; instead, it refers to the performer who first publicly released a recording, which in this case is Zhang Bichen [7][9]. - The dispute centers on Zhang Bichen claiming to be the sole original singer based on the timing of her release, while Wang Sulong asserts that "Year Ring" has dual original singers due to his authorship rights [11][12]. Group 3: Copyright Implications - The rights of the original singer are limited to performance rights and do not include the broader copyright ownership held by the songwriter [9][12]. - The concept of "dual original singers" is theoretically possible if the contracts allow for multiple versions, but this requires clear contractual agreements [14][16]. Group 4: Industry Insights - The incident reflects a broader issue in the music industry regarding the recognition of original artists versus copyright holders, emphasizing the need for clarity in contracts and communication among involved parties [19][22]. - The discussion also highlights the emotional and commercial implications of such disputes, as artists navigate their identities and rights within the industry [22].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding NetEase Cloud Music's handling of the original artist label for songs by Zhang Bicheng and Wang Sulong, highlighting issues of copyright and platform responsibility [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - NetEase Cloud Music initially removed the original artist label for three songs by Zhang Bicheng, including "Year Ring," while maintaining the label for Wang Sulong's version [2][3]. - The platform later restored the original artist labels after user complaints and clarified that the removal was due to a system display issue [3][4]. - Legal experts noted that the original artist label lacks a clear definition in Chinese copyright law, and the rights depend on the contractual agreements between the artists and the platform [4][7]. Group 2: Artist Statements and Reactions - Zhang Bicheng's studio stated that she is the only original artist for "Year Ring," which was first released in June 2015, while Wang Sulong's version followed shortly after [4][6]. - Wang Sulong's team announced the decision to retract the song's authorization due to the ongoing dispute over the original artist designation [4][6]. Group 3: Financial Context - NetEase Cloud Music is facing increasing financial pressure, with a reported revenue decline of 8.4% year-on-year in Q1 2025, totaling 1.858 billion yuan, and a gross profit decrease of 11% [14]. - In contrast, Tencent Music reported a revenue increase of 8.7% year-on-year, highlighting the competitive challenges faced by NetEase Cloud Music [14].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the original singer label for Zhang Bicheng's songs on NetEase Cloud Music highlights issues of copyright and platform management in the music industry [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - NetEase Cloud Music initially removed the original singer label for three songs by Zhang Bicheng, including the popular track "Year Wheel," while maintaining the label for the version by Wang Sulong [2][3]. - The platform later restored the original singer labels after clarifying that the removal was due to a system display issue [3]. - Legal experts indicated that if the copyright holder retracts the performance authorization, the performer cannot continue to perform the song unless specified in the contract [3][5]. Group 2: Background and Reactions - The dispute originated from comments made by online singer "Wang Zai Xiao Qiao," who stated that "Year Wheel" was created by Wang Sulong but originally sung by Zhang Bicheng [4]. - Zhang Bicheng's studio asserted that she was the only original singer of "Year Wheel," which was first released in June 2015, while Wang Sulong's version followed shortly after [4]. - Wang Sulong's team announced the retraction of authorization for "Year Wheel" due to the ongoing controversy, while Zhang Bicheng's studio stated they would no longer perform the song out of respect [4]. Group 3: Financial Context - NetEase Cloud Music is facing increasing financial pressure, with a reported revenue of 1.858 billion yuan in Q1 2025, down 8.4% from 2.029 billion yuan in the same period last year [10]. - The company's gross profit also decreased by 11%, contrasting with Tencent Music's growth in revenue and profit during the same quarter [10]. - The series of operational missteps raises concerns about NetEase Cloud Music's ability to deliver satisfactory financial results by the end of the year [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent copyright dispute surrounding the song "Nian Lun," highlighting the complexities of music rights and the implications for the Chinese music industry, particularly in the context of original artists and their recognition [1][4][10]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - "Nian Lun" is a song from the popular drama "Hua Qian Gu," which set viewership records in 2015, with an average rating of 2.69% [3]. - The song has been embroiled in a copyright controversy after a singer known as "Wang Zai Xiao Qiao" claimed that Zhang Bi Chen was the original singer, leading to a public dispute between fans [4][6]. - Zhang Bi Chen's studio announced that she would no longer perform "Nian Lun," while the song's original author, Wang Su Long, retracted the song's performance rights, making it effectively a "forbidden song" [1][6]. Group 2: Legal and Industry Implications - The dispute reveals issues within the music industry regarding the lack of clarity in copyright laws, particularly the absence of a legal definition for "original singer" [8][9]. - Wang Su Long holds complete copyright over "Nian Lun," which includes rights for reproduction, distribution, and performance, allowing him to authorize any performances of the song [8]. - The article emphasizes that the music industry needs clearer contractual agreements regarding authorization scope, duration, and exclusivity to prevent such disputes in the future [9]. Group 3: Broader Industry Issues - The controversy reflects a broader issue in the Chinese music industry, where the identities of songwriters are often overshadowed by the fame of performing artists [9][10]. - The rise of internet celebrities and their impact on music consumption has led to a situation where original creators are frequently overlooked, as seen with "Wang Zai Xiao Qiao," who gained significant popularity through cover songs without proper attribution [10][11]. - The article also notes that music platforms often mislabel original artists, contributing to confusion and disputes over song ownership [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The essence of the copyright dispute revolves around the inadequacy of licensing terms in the music industry, highlighted by the controversy surrounding the song "Nian Lun" and its original singer claims [1][9]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - "Nian Lun" gained popularity as a theme song for the 2015 drama "Hua Qian Gu," which set a record for viewership in Chinese weekly dramas with an average rating of 2.69% [3]. - The song has been embroiled in a copyright dispute ten years after its release, triggered by a popular singer's claim regarding the original performer, leading to a public outcry and fan conflicts [5][6]. Group 2: Statements from Involved Parties - Zhang Bichen's studio claimed she holds the permanent singing rights to "Nian Lun," but announced she would no longer perform the song out of respect [1]. - The team of the song's author, Wang Sulong, announced the withdrawal of the song's usage authorization, effectively making it unavailable for public performance [1][6]. Group 3: Legal and Industry Insights - The lack of a legal definition for "original singer" in Chinese copyright law has contributed to the confusion, as the law recognizes only authors and performers [7][9]. - The dispute has highlighted the need for clearer contractual agreements regarding the scope, duration, and exclusivity of music rights [9]. Group 4: Industry Reactions and Implications - Industry experts noted that the controversy reflects broader issues within the Chinese pop music scene, including the lack of proper attribution for songwriters in the age of social media [10]. - The incident has led to significant changes in how music platforms label original performers, as seen with the removal of "original singer" tags from various songs following the dispute [10].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the original singer dispute of the song "Year Ring," with claims from both Wang Zai Xiao Qiao and QQ Music regarding the original attribution of the song [2][3] - Wang Su Long's team declared on July 25 that "Year Ring" has "dual original singers" and announced the retraction of the song's authorization [3][4] - Zhang Bi Chen's studio asserted that she is the "only original singer" based on the first public release and distribution records, while acknowledging "Dream Fantasy Zhuang Xian" as a "dual original" song [3][4] Group 2 - The definition of "original singer" is debated, with the term not explicitly defined in the Civil Code or Copyright Law, leading to confusion among the public [5][9] - The industry recognizes "original singer" based on market perception and customary practices, with the first public release being a key factor [10][18] - The concept of "dual original" is not traditionally recognized in the industry, especially during the era of physical recordings [10][18] Group 3 - Wang Su Long's retraction of authorization is legally valid, allowing him to control the use of "Year Ring" without transferring copyright [21][24] - Zhang Bi Chen's claim of "permanent singing rights" may refer to non-commercial performances or specific contractual agreements, but the legitimacy of such rights remains unclear [22][25] - The ongoing dispute highlights the need for clear contractual agreements in the music industry to prevent future conflicts [25][26]