Core Insights - Multiple public funds have issued warnings regarding the premium risk associated with US stock QDII products, as retail investors and speculators increasingly favor these investments, leading to significant premiums between secondary market prices and net asset values [1][2][3] Group 1: Premium Risks - On November 17, major fund companies including E Fund, GF Fund, and others alerted investors about the premium risks in their US stock-themed QDII products, emphasizing that high premiums could lead to substantial losses [1][2] - E Fund's Nasdaq 100 ETF (QDII) reported a closing price of 1.767 yuan on November 14, reflecting a premium of 7.47% over its net asset value [2] - Other QDII funds, such as the S&P Consumer Select QDII and the S&P 500 Index QDII, have also issued similar warnings regarding premium risks and the potential for temporary trading halts [3] Group 2: Investment Trends - The narrative surrounding new technologies like AI, chips, and innovative pharmaceuticals has made US stock QDIIs particularly attractive, drawing significant capital compared to Hong Kong stock QDIIs [4] - Despite conservative returns, US stock QDIIs have shown strong capital inflow, with E Fund's Nasdaq 100 QDII growing from 1.4 billion yuan at the beginning of the year to 3.7 billion yuan by the end of September [4] - Fund managers have been reducing their positions in Hong Kong stocks while increasing their allocations to US stocks, with some funds completely exiting Hong Kong positions to focus on US markets [7] Group 3: Performance and Strategy - Fund managers have reported significant performance improvements after reallocating to US stocks, with some QDII funds achieving over 85% returns year-to-date [7] - The focus on US technology stocks is driven by expectations of continued growth in sectors like AI and high-performance computing, which are seen as critical for future investment opportunities [8][9] - The Nasdaq 100 index, representing leading tech companies, is expected to outperform other indices and serve as a key tool for investors looking to capitalize on US tech sector growth [9]

此外，包括景顺长城标普消费精选QDII、国泰标普500指数QDII、广发纳斯达克100、招商纳斯达克100、大成纳斯达克100等QDII基金亦发布类似公告。其中，标普 消费精选QDII基金强调，若在2025年11月17日，该QDII基金的二级市场交易价格溢价幅度未能有效回落，基金公司有权采取向深圳证券交易所申请盘中临时停牌、 延长停牌时间等措施以向市场警示风险。 11月17日，多家公募集体发布公告，提示美股QDII产品存在溢价风险。 在美股市场单边逞强背景下，散户和游资纷纷拥抱美股主题QDII，并使此类QDII的二级市场价格与基金净值之间出现大幅溢价。17日，易方达基金、广发基金、景 顺长城基金、大成基金、华夏基金等公司同时发布公告，提示投资者关注二级市场交易价格溢价风险，如果高溢价买入，可能面临较大损失，基金公司也可能通过 申请盘中临时停牌、延长停牌时间等方式，向市场警示风险。 值得一提的是，不仅散户在拥抱美股资产，基金经理也同样如此，近期多个公募QDII基金降低港股市场仓位，同时加大对美股巨头的重仓力度，部分QDII基金甚至 完全清仓港股，并将卖出的港股仓位全部增加到美股市场，短时间内获得丰厚的回报和基金 ...

清明假期期间，随着我方的反制措施发布，市场的声音迅速两极分化，极左和极右——要么是美方赢麻了、中要跪，要么是美方蠢坏了、中必赢。 但理性来看（当然也许我说理性，很多人也觉得不够理性），不管是对等关税，还是强硬反制， 从资产价格的角度看，无疑是双输的局面 。 就好像一对重量级拳手，在擂台对垒，原先都戴着拳套，有裁判居间维持秩序，看似拳拳到肉，但实际因为有拳套的缓冲，以及可以搂抱暂停，所以顶多 是皮开肉绽，不至于伤筋动骨，最后不管是点胜还是KO，双方都可以拿着千万美刀的出场费，潇洒地离开。 而这轮贸易战掀桌子后， 就好像两位拳手把拳套给脱了 ，裁判也没有了， 直接硬碰硬，这就导致，不管最后是谁笑到最后，双方一定都会给对方，造成 更大的伤害。 本文确保都是干货，建议收藏。 节前A股收盘后，全球金融市场又发生了 足以载入史册的危机模式 ——标普500，周四、周五两日，累计下跌10.8%，而上一次两日跌幅超过10%，还是 在2020年3月，美股因疫情熔断的期间；再上一次，是2008年的金融危机；而大多数人印象比较深刻的，去年7-8月，美股因日元加息导致的大跌过程中， 标普500连续两日最大跌幅都没有超过5%。 所以，说 ...