Group 1 - The local government bond market in China has entered a new expansion cycle since 2025, with the total number of local government bonds reaching 12,535 and a balance of approximately 51 trillion yuan, reflecting an 8% increase compared to the end of 2024 [1] - In 2025, a total of 832 local government bonds were issued, amounting to 4.46 trillion yuan, with a significant year-on-year increase and an advanced issuance pace [1] - The current low-interest-rate environment, driven by policy expansion and monetary easing, has enhanced the investment value of local bonds, with increasing turnover rates and improving liquidity [1] Group 2 - As of June 6, 2025, the yield spread between short-term local bonds and government bonds has widened by nearly 10 basis points, with 2Y and 3Y local bonds showing spreads exceeding 15 basis points, placing them in the top 60% since 2022 [2] - The funding rate remains around 1.4%, with short-term local bonds offering positive yield spreads, making them an attractive choice under the current monetary easing expectations [2] Group 3 - There are currently four local bond ETFs in the market, including two managed by Penghua Fund, which cater to different investor needs with varying durations [3] - The Penghua 5-Year Local Bond ETF focuses on medium to long-term local bonds, offering higher yield potential with lower credit risk, while the Penghua 0-4 Year Local Bond ETF targets short-term local bonds, providing low volatility and stable returns [3] Group 4 - Both Penghua local bond ETFs support T+0 trading and can be used for pledged financing, with a low annual comprehensive fee rate of only 0.2% [4] - The trading activity of these ETFs has been robust, with average weekly trading volumes of 1.5 billion yuan and 2.1 billion yuan, and daily turnover rates of 35% and 117% respectively [4] - The investment team at Penghua Fund has extensive experience, with an average of over 8 years in the industry, and is well-equipped to manage various market conditions [4]

2025年6月19日共267只ETF基金获资金净流入，337只ETF基金净流出。净流入金额超1亿元的有42只，短融ETF(511360.SH)、信用债ETF基金(511200.SH)、 公司债ETF(511030.SH)、恒生科技指数ETF(513180.SH)、政金债券ETF(511520.SH)资金显著流入，分别净流入12.48亿元、10.82亿元、7.93亿元、7.45亿元、 7.20亿元（净申购份额*单位净值）。 | 排名 | 基金管理人 | 证券简称 | 证券代码 | 净流出金额（万元 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | l | 华泰柏瑞基金 | 沪深300ETF | 510300 | 4635. | | 2 | 易方达基金 | 沪深300ETF易方达 | 510310 | 32706 | | 3 | 华夏基金 | A500ETF基金 | 512050 | 3193. | | प | 南方基金 | 中证500ETF | 510500 | 23761 | | 5 | 富国基金 | 中证A500ETF富国 | 563220 | 21638 | | 6 | 嘉实基金 | ...

华西证券指出，资金趋稳的背后，是央行在两个层面的呵护：一是通过释放积极的中长期资金信号，稳 定资金利率中枢。6月起，央行月内的三段式呵护从隐性转为显性，消除信息差，更为有效地引导资金 预期。二是及时平抑资金的非理性波动，如在6月12日，由于临近税期，流动性惯例防御性收敛，次日 央行便将OMO单日投放规模提升至2025亿元，净投放675亿元，也反映出央行呵护资金的态度较为坚 定。从当前的状况来看，央行的态度已然转暖，我们可能正处于曲线由平走陡的拐点上。 5年地债ETF(159972)主要投资中长期地方债，适合进行久期管理和波段配置，提供相对较高的收益潜 力，并且信用风险较低。 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 截至2025年6月16日 14:20，5年地债ETF(159972)上涨2bp，最新价报116.05元。 流动性方面，5年地债ETF盘中换手49.96%，成交20.46亿元，市场交投活跃。拉长时间看，截至6月13 日，5年地债ETF近1周日均成交16.61亿元。规模方面，5年地债ETF最新规模达40.99亿元。 随着季末月进程过半，市场对月内资金稳定性的担忧初步缓解， ...

2025年6月4日，共295只ETF基金获主力资金（单笔成交额100万元以上）净买入，181只ETF基金遭主力资金净卖出。主力资金净买入金额超1千万元的ETF 基金有123只，信用债ETF博时(159396), 信用债ETF(511190), 5年地债ETF(159972), 国债ETF(511010), 公司债ETF易方达(511110)受到主力资金青睐，分别获净 买入20.03亿元, 19.27亿元, 15.66亿元, 13.42亿元, 6.49亿元。 | 排名 | 基金管理人 | 证券简称 | 证券代码 | 净买入金额(万元 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | l | 博时基金 | 信用债ETF博时 | 159396 | 200266.44 | | 2 | 海富通事令 | 信用债ETF | 511190 | 192657.20 | | 3 | 鹏华基金 | 5年地债ETF | 159972 | 156582.78 | | ব | 国泰基金 | 国债ETF | 511010 | 134216.13 | | 5 | 易方达基金 | 公司债ETF易方达 | 511110 | ...

Group 1 - The 5-year local government bond ETF (159972) has seen a recent increase of 7 basis points, with an average daily trading volume of 1.369 billion yuan and a turnover rate of 29.84% over the past week [1] - The fund's performance shows a net value growth rate of 4.23% over the past year, 12.36% over the past three years, and 24.23% since its inception [1] - This ETF is the first of its kind in the market, closely tracking the China Securities 5-year local government bond index, consisting of non-directionally issued local government bonds with remaining maturities between 4 and 5.25 years [1] Group 2 - Recent key information includes a significant easing of US-China tariff rates and stronger-than-expected export data for April, although PPI year-on-year and new credit data showed weakness, leading to a defensive phase in the bond market with rising yields [1] - Guotai Junan Securities suggests that the easing signals from US-China negotiations have led the market to adjust its previously pessimistic pricing for the second quarter, with long-term rates declining first [1] - The current overnight funding rates have returned close to policy rates, indicating a lack of downward momentum without triggering factors, and the market is awaiting catalysts for the transmission chain from funding rates to short-term and then long-term rates [2]

"双降"落地后，债市走出短端强势的行情。据Wind数据，截至2025年5月15日，全市场唯一的短久期地 债ETF——鹏华0-4地债ETF(159816.SZ)近半年、近一年分别上涨1.13%、2.93%；鹏华5年地债 ETF(159972.SZ)近半年、近一年分别累计上涨1.89%、4.51%。流动性方面，5月15日，鹏华0-4地债ETF 交投活跃，成交额达到23.53亿元，换手率为127%。 据Wind数据，鹏华两只地债ETF今年以来交投活跃，场内流动性较佳。截至2025年5月9日，鹏华0-4地 债ETF本周日均成交量为19亿元，本周日均换手率为104%。鹏华5年地债ETF本周日均成交量为13亿 元，本周日均换手率为27%。 值得一提的是，上述两只地债ETF久期不同，在产品定位方面也有所不同，致力于为投资者提供多样化 的选择。鹏华5年地债ETF久期更长，更偏投资属性，相对适合作为波段交易的工具。鹏华0-4地债ETF 是短久期地债品种配置工具，定位是货币增强，主打追求稳健。 业绩方面，鹏华5年地债ETF(159972.SZ)长期业绩稳定，据基金定期报告，2020-2024年完整的自然年度 持续保持净值正增长， ...

Core Viewpoint - The 5-year local government bond ETF (159972) has shown a slight increase and is experiencing active trading, with significant developments in the US-China trade negotiations impacting market sentiment [2][3]. Group 1: ETF Performance - As of May 12, 2025, the 5-year local government bond ETF (159972) rose by 0.05%, with the latest price at 116 yuan [1]. - Over the past six months, the ETF has accumulated a total increase of 2.09% [2]. - The ETF's latest scale reached 4.598 billion yuan, marking a new high in nearly a year [2]. Group 2: Market Activity - The ETF experienced a turnover rate of 18.8% during trading, with a transaction volume of 864 million yuan, indicating active market participation [2]. - The average daily transaction volume over the past month was 1.425 billion yuan [2]. Group 3: Economic Context - Recent US-China trade talks in Geneva have reportedly made "substantial progress" regarding tariff negotiations, which may influence market dynamics [2]. - The recent monetary policy adjustments, including interest rate cuts, have not met market expectations, leading to a steepening of the bond market curve [2]. - The bond market remains optimistic due to the anticipated decline in funding rates and the upcoming deposit rate cuts, while the progress in US-China trade talks introduces uncertainty [2]. Group 4: Investment Strategy - The 5-year local government bond ETF primarily invests in medium to long-term local government bonds, making it suitable for duration management and tactical allocation, offering relatively high yield potential with low credit risk [2].

截至2025年4月30日 13:52，5年地债ETF(159972)上涨2bp， 冲击4连涨。最新价报115.83元。拉长时间 看，截至2025年4月29日，5年地债ETF近半年累计上涨2.36%。 流动性方面，5年地债ETF盘中换手25.62%，成交11.75亿元，市场交投活跃。拉长时间看，截至4月29 日，5年地债ETF近1月日均成交13.85亿元。 规模方面，5年地债ETF最新规模达45.88亿元，创近1年新高。 消息面上，4月30日，国家统计局公布数据显示，4月份，制造业采购经理指数（PMI）为49.0%，比上 月下降1.5个百分点。 国家统计局服务业调查中心高级统计师赵庆河指出，受外部环境急剧变化等因素影响，4月份制造业采 购经理指数有所回落，但高技术制造业等相关行业继续保持扩张，以内销为主的制造业企业生产经营总 体稳定。总体看，综合PMI产出指数自2023年1月以来始终位于临界点以上，我国经济总体产出持续扩 张，长期向好的基本面没有改变。 华西证券认为4月30日的制造业PMI数据以及央行公告买断式回购的规模，或成为市场重新波动的催化 剂。从高频数据来看，企业或从"抢出口"开始步入"抢转口"的阶段， ...

全市场唯一的短久期地债ETF——鹏华0-4地债ETF(159816.SZ)近日交投持续活跃。据Wind数据，2025 年4月23日，该基金的成交量为19.2亿元，换手率达104%，为全市场债券ETF第一；4月24日，其成交量 上升至20.61亿元，换手率达112.09%，居全市场债券ETF第四；4月25日，成交量为18.44亿元，换手率 为100.25%，再次位居全市场债券ETF第一。 分析当前投资环境，鹏华基金现金投资部表示，关税冲击下，一方面市场避险需求增加，利好债市，另 一方面，市场对央行降准降息的预期增加, 4月多家银行下调了存款利率，存款利率的调降和大行后续核 心一级资本的补充都有利于缓解银行净息差压力，为后续降息的落地做好准备。目前30Y地方债-30Y国 债利差24BP，处于2022年以来95%分位数，防御价值凸显，曲线形态上，短端3Y依旧偏凸，后续观察 资金利率是否能进一步下行，若下行顺畅则能带动短端利率下行。 在债券ETF领域，鹏华固收"债券指数专家"团队通过产品差异化的创新路径，填补了地方债ETF的市场 空白并建立起领先优势，2019年推出全市场首只5年期地方债ETF——鹏华5年地债ETF( ...

Report Overview - The report is a weekly tracking of bond ETFs from April 21 to April 25, 2025, focusing on share trends, net value trends, and capital inflows of various bond ETFs [1][30] 1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the report 2. Report's Core View - This week, the overall contraction trend of bond ETF shares has stabilized, and the shares of major bond ETFs have also become stable. Among the net values of major bond - type ETFs, the convertible bond ETF has shown a significant increase. The convertible bond ETF has the highest cumulative net inflow this week, while the urban investment bond ETF has the highest net inflow this month [4][8][11] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Various Bond ETF Share Trends - As of the close on April 25, 2025, the shares of treasury bond - type, policy - financial bond - type, local bond - type, credit bond - type, and convertible bond - type were 299.13 million shares, 475.51 million shares, 82.24 million shares, 1980.69 million shares, and 3547.85 million shares respectively, with a total of 6385.41 million shares for bond - type ETFs. Compared with the close on April 18, 2025, they changed by - 1.32 million shares, - 3.29 million shares, 0.01 million shares, 4.63 million shares, - 8.80 million shares respectively, and the total change for bond - type ETFs was - 8.77 million shares. Compared with the end of last month, they changed by - 19.30 million shares, 41.05 million shares, 8.45 million shares, 185.24 million shares, - 105.10 million shares respectively, and the total change for bond - type ETFs was 110.34 million shares [4][5] 3.2 Main Bond ETF Share Trends - As of the close on April 25, 2025, the shares of 30 - year treasury bond ETF, policy - financial bond ETF, 5 - year local bond ETF, urban investment bond ETF, and convertible bond ETF were 132.98 million shares, 386.06 million shares, 39.62 million shares, 1563.68 million shares, and 2989.29 million shares respectively. Compared with the close on April 18, 2025, they changed by - 0.19 million shares, - 1.72 million shares, no change, no change, 7.20 million shares respectively [4][8] 3.3 Main Bond ETF Net Value Trends - As of the close on April 25, 2025, the net values of 30 - year treasury bond ETF, policy - financial bond ETF, 5 - year local bond ETF, urban investment bond ETF, and convertible bond ETF were 1.2933, 1.1514, 1.2457, 1.4240, and 1.1825 respectively. Compared with the close on April 18, 2025, they changed by - 0.15%, - 0.09%, 0.04%, - 0.06%, 0.89% respectively; compared with the end of last month, they changed by 2.86%, 1.04%, 0.73%, 0.18%, - 1.22% respectively [4][11] 3.4 Partial Bond ETF Net Inflow Situations - Weekly: The top three bond ETFs with cumulative net inflows this week were convertible bond ETF, short - term financing ETF, and state - development bond ETF, with net inflow amounts of 8.51 million yuan, 5.17 million yuan, and 0.43 million yuan respectively. - Monthly: The top three bond ETFs with cumulative net inflows this month were urban investment bond ETF, short - term financing ETF, and Shanghai Stock Exchange convertible bond ETF, with net inflow amounts of 143.40 million yuan, 78.15 million yuan, and 58.22 million yuan respectively. - In the past 10 trading days: The top three bond ETFs with cumulative net inflows were convertible bond ETF (78.64 million yuan), urban investment bond ETF (74.90 million yuan), and short - term financing ETF (31.66 million yuan). - In the past 20 trading days: The top three bond ETFs with cumulative net inflows were urban investment bond ETF (143.40 million yuan), short - term financing ETF (79.72 million yuan), and Shanghai Stock Exchange convertible bond ETF (54.05 million yuan) [4][14] 3.5 Partial Bond ETF Portfolio Duration and Portfolio Convexity - Based on the heavy - position bonds and their proportions disclosed in the latest quarterly reports of bond ETFs, the report sorted out bond ETFs where the proportion of heavy - position bonds in the fund's net value exceeded 50% in total, and calculated the portfolio duration and portfolio convexity of bond ETFs through weighted calculation according to the proportion of each heavy - position bond in the fund's net value [17]