2月13日，最高人民法院发布第48批指导性案例（268–272号），这是最高法首次发布道路交通安全刑事专题指导性案例。 其中，指导性案例271号《王某群危险驾驶案》明确：车载辅助驾驶系统不能代替驾驶人成为驾驶主体。驾驶人激活辅助驾驶功能后，仍是实际执行驾驶任 务的人，负有确保行车安全的责任。即使行为人利用私自安装的配件逃避系统监测、不在主驾驶位操控车辆，仍应作为驾驶主体承担相应法律责任。 根据《每日经济新闻》记者观察，本次发布前，关于"开启辅助驾驶后发生事故，驾驶人是否担刑责"在法律界虽有讨论，但并无由最高人民法院审判委员会 讨论通过的全国性裁判规则。人民法院案例库虽于2025年11月收录该案裁判文书，但此时该案例属于"参考案例"，仅作为生效判决入库归档，不具有强制参 照效力；而本次将其遴选为"指导性案例"，意味着该案的裁判要点自此具备强制参照效力。 图片来源：最高人民法院官网 辅助驾驶系统不能代替驾驶人成为驾驶主体 案情显示，2025年9月13日，被告人王某群饮酒后驾驶汽车返回小区，后又驶离并激活辅助驾驶功能，设置目的地，使用私自加装的"智驾神器"模拟手握方 向盘，逃避系统脱手监测，其本人则移至副驾驶位睡觉 ...

2月13日，最高人民法院发布第48批指导性案例（指导性案例268-272号），包括1件以危险方法危害公共安全案、1件交通肇事案、3件危险驾驶案。 这是最高人民法院首次发布道路交通安全刑事专题指导性案例。尤其需要注意的是，本批指导性案例涉及当下社会最为关注的辅助驾驶事故中的责任认定问 题，明确激活辅助驾驶功能情形下驾驶人的刑事责任认定规则。 指导性案例： 驾驶员酒后开L2级智驾坐副驾驶位仍是责任主体 酒后坐副驾驶打开智驾功能是否合法？指导性案例271号给出答案。 基于此前一年，被告人王某群就曾因饮酒后驾驶机动车被暂扣机动车驾驶证六个月，并处罚款人民币一千五百元。最终，法院判决被告人王某群犯危险驾驶 罪，判处拘役一个月十五日，并处罚金人民币四千元。宣判后，没有上诉、抗诉，判决已发生法律效力。 最高人民法院指出，在辅助驾驶技术应用日益广泛的背景下，有的驾驶人在激活辅助驾驶系统后不再专注驾驶，而是玩手机、睡觉等，有的驾驶人甚至购 买、使用"智驾神器"等非法配件，逃避系统安全监测，长时间"脱手"驾驶，严重威胁道路交通安全。 指导性案例271号《王某群危险驾驶案》明确，车载辅助驾驶系统不能代替驾驶人成为驾驶主体，驾驶人激 ...

Core Viewpoint - The approval of L3-level conditional autonomous driving vehicles in China marks a significant milestone in the transition from L2-level assistance to true automation, fundamentally altering the responsibility chain in driving and opening new market opportunities for the automotive industry [4][10][19]. Group 1: Market Response and Impact - Following the announcement of L3-level vehicle approvals, the stock market reacted positively, with several companies in the intelligent driving sector experiencing significant stock price increases, indicating strong investor interest [6][19]. - The approval of L3 vehicles is expected to lead to a competitive landscape where companies that can leverage L3 technology will gain a strategic advantage in the automotive market [10][19]. Group 2: Technical Specifications and Regulations - The first two approved L3 vehicles, the Changan Deep Blue SL03 and the BAIC Arcfox Alpha S6, will operate in designated areas with maximum speeds of 50 km/h and 80 km/h respectively, highlighting the initial application of L3 technology in specific scenarios [8][10]. - The L3 technology represents a shift in responsibility from the driver to the system under certain conditions, which is a fundamental change from L2 systems where the driver retains full responsibility [7][10]. Group 3: Future Projections and Industry Trends - Industry experts predict that by 2026, the penetration rate of L3 and above autonomous vehicles could reach 10%, with L2-level vehicles expected to achieve a 70% market penetration [10][27]. - The development of L3 technology is anticipated to create a new market worth trillions, as the industry shifts from selling vehicles to selling mileage, particularly in specific applications like airport shuttles and logistics [26][27]. Group 4: Challenges and Considerations - Despite the advancements, the rollout of L3 vehicles will face challenges, including the need for high-precision infrastructure and regulatory frameworks to ensure safety and operational efficiency [31][32]. - The approval process for L3 vehicles has been gradual, involving extensive testing and regulatory compliance, which underscores the importance of a robust safety and operational framework for the future of autonomous driving [19][28].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the need for clear communication and regulation regarding the distinction between assisted driving and autonomous driving in the context of smart connected electric vehicles [1][3][5] - Recent regulatory efforts have focused on enhancing the recall and supervision of smart connected electric vehicle products, particularly concerning the safety and usage instructions for combined driving assistance systems [1][4] - The rapid development of smart driving technology has led to consumer confusion, as marketing often blurs the lines between assisted and autonomous driving capabilities [1][2][3] Group 2 - There is a significant gap in consumer education regarding smart driving technologies, with many users unable to discern the true capabilities and limitations of these systems [3][5] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has proposed the establishment of mandatory national standards for the safety requirements of combined driving assistance systems, reflecting a push for more conservative marketing practices in the industry [5][4] - Safety remains the primary concern for consumers, necessitating a cautious approach to marketing that avoids exaggeration and misinformation about smart driving technologies [6][1]

Core Insights - The intelligent IoT industry in Zhejiang is experiencing significant development, highlighted by various innovative applications such as smart logistics vehicles, unmanned boats, and drone delivery services [1][2] - The "Ten Chains, Hundred Events, Thousand Enterprises" initiative aims to enhance collaboration and innovation within the intelligent IoT industry, focusing on core technology breakthroughs and ecological optimization [1] - The region of Tonglu is positioning itself as a hub for autonomous driving and logistics, leveraging its existing strengths in the express delivery sector and implementing supportive policies to attract investment [1][2] Group 1: Industry Developments - The intelligent IoT industry cluster in Zhejiang is projected to achieve a revenue of 1.35 trillion yuan in 2024, marking a year-on-year growth of 9.9% [2] - The region has established a comprehensive industrial ecosystem, including a significant production base for Hikvision and a provincial high-tech zone with favorable land prices and diverse policy incentives [2] Group 2: Strategic Initiatives - The event in Tonglu emphasized the importance of "demand-driven supply," with state-owned enterprises presenting specific needs for intelligent production and inspection technologies [1] - Future plans include the implementation of nine major actions to create ten landmark achievements, aiming to build a modern industrial system unique to Zhejiang and accelerate the development of a global advanced manufacturing base [2]