Core Viewpoint - Trina Storage has successfully delivered its first energy storage projects in Japan, marking a significant milestone in the deployment of grid-level energy storage systems in the Japanese market [1][2]. Group 1: Project Details - The projects consist of two energy storage stations located in Gunma Prefecture, which have completed system debugging and delivery [1]. - Trina Storage acted as the system integrator, providing a comprehensive solution from battery cells to AC side integration, including design, construction, integration, and long-term maintenance services for 20 years [1][2]. Group 2: Technology and Certification - The projects utilize Trina Storage's self-developed energy storage system platform, Elementa Jingang 2, featuring proprietary 314Ah battery cells, known for high integration, safety, and energy efficiency [2]. - The system has successfully passed rigorous certification tests by the Japan Electrical Safety & Environment Technology Laboratories (JET), becoming the first overseas company to achieve this certification in Japan [2]. Group 3: Market Impact and Future Plans - Trina Storage has accelerated its global market expansion, with a projected over 100% growth in energy storage installations in 2024, surpassing a cumulative shipment of 10GWh [2]. - The company aims to achieve an energy storage system shipment volume of 8-10GWh by 2025, reinforcing its competitive advantage and brand influence in the global energy storage market [2][3].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the power equipment and new energy industry [1] Core Viewpoints - The report highlights significant policy developments aimed at promoting green electricity and enhancing the quality of products in the renewable energy sector [2] - It notes a historical high in domestic monthly installations, with a substantial increase in exports following a surge in domestic demand [4] - The report emphasizes the ongoing price decline across the supply chain, leading to production cuts among mid and downstream manufacturers [3] Summary by Sections Industry Chain - Prices are under pressure due to weak terminal demand, with silicon material prices dropping significantly; as of June 18, N-type recycled and granular silicon prices were 34,400 and 33,500 CNY/ton respectively, down 8.3% and 2.9% from late May [15] - The production of silicon materials is expected to increase by 4% in June, reaching approximately 106,000 tons, while silicon wafer production is projected to decrease by 3% to around 57 GW [3][30] - Battery cell prices are experiencing differentiation, with stable prices for 210R orders, while 183N and 210N prices continue to decline [17] - Component prices remain stable, with a projected production decrease of 9% to 53 GW in June [3][30] Demand - Domestic installations reached a record high in May with an addition of 92.92 GW, a year-on-year increase of 388% [4][35] - Exports of battery components in May totaled 28.87 GW, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 7% [4][41] Procurement Data Tracking - The procurement data for June shows a significant year-on-year increase in bidding volumes, with N-type standard prices rising by 0.03 CNY/W [5][65] - The total bidding, opening, and awarding volumes for large state-owned enterprises in June were 48.6 GW, 90.7 GW, and 54.4 GW respectively [5][65] Important Industry Events - The report discusses the implications of the "Great American Clean Energy Act," which has seen changes that may benefit storage projects significantly [76][77] - The SNEC 2025 photovoltaic exhibition highlighted a shift in focus from technical disputes to efficiency improvements and application potential [2][76]

Core Viewpoint - The industry faces weak demand but limited downside risk for stock prices, with potential for a 30%-50% recovery in beta if industry expectations improve [1][27]. Group 1: Industry Demand and Supply Dynamics - The SNEC exhibition showcased leading companies launching high-power modules around 680W, with efficiency reaching approximately 24.8%, indicating a significant technological advancement [3][7]. - Companies with strong financial backing and technological leadership are gaining market share, while second and third-tier companies are accelerating their exit from the market due to low operational capacity and inability to upgrade [3][10]. - The copper paste industry is strengthening, driven by rising silver prices and efforts from leading companies to enhance efficiency and reduce costs, with plans for multiple low-metalization solutions to be mass-produced by 2025 [3][12]. Group 2: Financial Health and Debt Pressure - The financial risk for photovoltaic companies is significant, with cash flow from operations being less than accounts receivable and debt renewal challenges looming [4][20]. - As of Q1 2025, second-tier companies had a total of 30 billion yuan in cash and equivalents against 60 billion yuan in short-term loans and long-term liabilities due within a year, indicating potential debt repayment pressure [4][20]. - Banks are cautious about withdrawing loans, especially for companies that can cover interest payments, suggesting a relatively stable lending environment despite the financial pressures [4][21]. Group 3: Demand Outlook - Short-term production is expected to decline by about 10%, with mid-term stability anticipated, while long-term demand is projected to benefit from the 14th Five-Year Plan and ongoing energy transition efforts [4][25]. - The overall photovoltaic industry is expected to see a gradual recovery in demand as market conditions stabilize, particularly in the second half of the year [4][26]. Group 4: Investment Opportunities - The industry is currently at a low point in terms of attention and investment, but there are positive signals such as leading companies actively launching high-power products and pushing for supply-side reforms [6][27]. - The potential for significant recovery in beta and alpha opportunities exists, particularly for companies involved in new technologies and those with flexible supply-side policies [1][27].

Core Viewpoint - The enthusiasm for perovskite technology among companies stems from the realization that investments in crystalline silicon are often unprofitable, while the photovoltaic market presents significant opportunities, making perovskite the "only choice" [1][4]. Industry Trends - In the past three years, major photovoltaic companies and energy firms have entered the perovskite sector, with expectations for mass production to begin in 2025 [7]. - Companies like GCL-Poly and several startups are building gigawatt-level production lines, indicating a strong commitment to perovskite technology [3][8][9]. - Leading crystalline silicon manufacturers, including LONGi Green Energy and Trina Solar, have also invested in perovskite-silicon tandem cell research, with some already establishing hundred-megawatt production lines [10]. Market Space - Many domestic perovskite companies are targeting applications in areas like streetlights and carports, aiming to penetrate markets that crystalline silicon cannot easily cover [14]. - GCL-Poly has opted to replace crystalline silicon components directly in photovoltaic power plants, indicating a strategic focus on larger-scale applications [15]. - The efficiency of perovskite-silicon tandem cells is projected to reach up to 43%, significantly higher than current crystalline silicon efficiencies, which have not surpassed 26% [18][10]. Technological Complexity - Perovskite technology is considered more complex than crystalline silicon, which may delay the onset of competitive "involution" seen in the crystalline silicon market [5][24]. - The production of perovskite involves significant material innovations, requiring flexible manufacturing capabilities to adapt to new formulations [25][26]. - The transition from single-junction to tandem cells is crucial, as tandem cells can achieve higher efficiencies, but they also present additional technical challenges [28][29]. Future Outlook - The perovskite sector is expected to evolve significantly over the next decade, with the potential for substantial growth and innovation, unlike the stagnation seen in the crystalline silicon market [31].

公司前次主体长期信用等级为 AA，"天 23 转债"的信用等级为 AA，评级展 望为稳定，评级机构为联合资信，评级日期为 2024 年 6 月 20 日。评级机构联合 资信在对公司经营状况及相关行业进行综合分析与评估的基础上，于 2025 年 6 月 跟踪评级报告》（联合20254383 号），评级结果如下：联合资信维持公司的主体 长期信用等级为 AA，维持"天 23 转债"的信用等级为 AA，评级展望为稳定。 本次跟踪评级报告已于同日在上海证券交易所网站（www.sse.com.cn）披露。 特此公告。 天合光能股份有限公司董事会 关于"天 23 转债"跟踪信用评级结果的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 根据《上市公司证券发行注册管理办法》《上海证券交易所科创板股票上市规 则》等有关规定，天合光能股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）委托信用评级机构 联合资信评估股份有限公司（以下简称"联合资信"）对公司主体及公司向不特定 对象发行的可转换公司债券（以下简称"天 23 转债"）进行了跟踪信用 ...

Core Viewpoint - Trina Solar Co., Ltd. maintains a stable credit rating of AA, with its convertible bond "Tian 23" also rated AA, reflecting the company's strong position in the photovoltaic industry despite facing challenges from price declines and increased competition [1][3][4]. Company Overview - Trina Solar's main business segments include photovoltaic products, photovoltaic systems, and smart energy solutions, with a focus on the photovoltaic equipment manufacturing industry [9]. - As of the end of 2024, the company had total assets of 1239.35 billion RMB and equity of 322.42 billion RMB, with a reported revenue of 802.82 billion RMB and a net loss of 36.60 billion RMB [9][10]. Financial Performance - The company experienced a significant decline in profitability, with total profits for 2024 showing a loss of 36.60 billion RMB, compared to a profit of 65.28 billion RMB in 2023 [7][9]. - As of March 2025, the company reported total debt of 554.80 billion RMB, with an asset-liability ratio of 74.97%, indicating a rising debt burden [6][7]. Industry Analysis - The photovoltaic manufacturing industry is currently facing a supply-demand imbalance, leading to a sharp decline in product prices and increased competition, which has adversely affected the company's financial performance [3][4][19]. - Despite the challenges, Trina Solar's photovoltaic module shipments ranked fourth globally, showcasing its competitive strength in the market [3][4]. Research and Development - The company has a strong R&D capability, with a reported investment of 5.558 billion RMB in 2024 and a total of 2857 patents, including 1117 invention patents [5][14]. - Trina Solar's N-type bifacial i-TOPCon (210) battery achieved a maximum conversion efficiency of 26.58%, demonstrating its technological advancements [5][14]. Market Position and Risks - The company has a diversified revenue stream, with significant contributions from overseas markets, including Europe and the United States, which accounted for 19.98% and 12.29% of revenue, respectively [6][14]. - However, the company faces risks related to overseas operations, including political and trade policy changes that could impact its business [6][20].

Group 1 - The audit report concludes that Jiangsu Trina Energy Storage Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Trina Storage") financial statements fairly reflect its financial position as of December 31, 2024, in accordance with accounting standards [1][2][3] - The management of Trina Storage is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that provide a true and fair view, and for maintaining necessary internal controls to prevent material misstatements due to fraud or error [2][3] - The auditors conducted their work in accordance with Chinese auditing standards, ensuring independence and adherence to professional ethics [1][3] Group 2 - Trina Storage has a registered capital of RMB 100 million and was established on November 4, 2015, with its main activities including manufacturing, research, design, and technical services related to energy storage systems [5][6] - As of December 31, 2024, Trina Storage has 16 subsidiaries globally, with various registered capital amounts [5] - The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, with management assessing the company's ability to continue operations for the next 12 months [5][6] Group 3 - The audit opinion is based on sufficient and appropriate audit evidence obtained during the audit process, which included assessing the risks of material misstatement due to fraud or error [3][4] - The auditors evaluated the appropriateness of accounting policies selected by management and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and disclosures [3][4] - The report emphasizes that while reasonable assurance is provided, it does not guarantee that all material misstatements will be detected [3][4]

天合光能股份有限公司 向不特定对象发行可转换公司债券 2025 年跟踪评级报告 特此公告 联合资信评估股份有限公司 评级总监： | | | www.lhratings.com 1 联合〔2025〕4383 号 联合资信评估股份有限公司通过对天合光能股份有限公司主体 及其相关债券的信用状况进行跟踪分析和评估，确定维持天合光能 股份有限公司主体长期信用等级为 AA，维持"天 23 转债"信用等 级为 AA，评级展望为稳定。 二〇二五年六月二十三日 声 明 一、本报告是联合资信基于评级方法和评级程序得出的截至发表之日的 独立意见陈述，未受任何机构或个人影响。评级结论及相关分析为联合资信 基于相关信息和资料对评级对象所发表的前瞻性观点，而非对评级对象的事 实陈述或鉴证意见。联合资信有充分理由保证所出具的评级报告遵循了真 实、客观、公正的原则。鉴于信用评级工作特性及受客观条件影响，本报告 在资料信息获取、评级方法与模型、未来事项预测评估等方面存在局限性。 二、本报告系联合资信接受天合光能股份有限公司（以下简称"该公 司"）委托所出具，除因本次评级事项联合资信与该公司构成评级委托关系 外，联合资信、评级人员与该公司不存在 ...

天合光能股份有限公司 天合光能股份有限公司 2025 年第三次临时股东会会议材料 天合光能股份有限公司 天合光能股份有限公司 2025 年第三次临时股东会会议材料 天合光能股份有限公司 为了维护全体股东的合法权益，确保股东会的正常秩序和议事效率，保证会议的顺利 进行，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》《中华人民共和国证券法》《上市公司股东会规则》 以及《天合光能股份有限公司章程》《天合光能股份有限公司股东会议事规则》等相关规 定，特制定 2025 年第三次临时股东会参会须知。 一、为保证股东会的严肃性和正常秩序，切实维护与会股东（或股东代表）的合法权 益，除出席会议的股东（或股东代表）、公司董事、监事、高级管理人员、见证律师及董 事会邀请的人员外，公司有权依法拒绝其他人员进入会场。 六、本次股东会采取现场投票和网络投票相结合的方式表决，结合现场投票和网络投 票的表决结果发布股东会决议公告。 七、公司聘请北京市金杜律师事务所上海分所律师列席本次股东会，并出具法律意见。 八、股东（或股东代表）参加股东会会议，应当认真履行其法定义务，会议开始后请 将手机铃声置于无声状态，尊重和维护其他股东合法权益，保障大会的正常秩序。对 ...

本报告依据中国资产评估准则编制 江苏天合储能有限公司 拟企业增资所涉及的 江苏天合储能有限公司 股东全部权益价值 资产评估报告 信资评报字(2025)第 090040 号 京信 上海立信资产评估有限公司 二〇二五年六月五日 i 中国资产评估协会 资产评估业务报告备案回执 | 报告编码: | 3131020006202500798 | | | --- | --- | --- | | 合同编号: | HT-2025-1080 | | | 报告类型: | 法定评估业务资产评估报告 | | | 报告文号: | 信资评报字[2025]第090040号 | | | 报告名称: | 江苏天合储能有限公司拟企业增资所涉及的江苏天合储能有限公 司股东全部权益价值资产评估报告 | | | 评估结论: | 4,025,000,000.00元 | | | 评估报告日: | 2025年06月05日 | | | 评估机构名称: | 上海立信资产评估有限公司 | | | 签名人员: | 陈欣然 (资产评估师) 正式会员 | 编号:31170058 | | | 鲍蕾 (资产评估师) | 正式会员 编号:31220040 | | | 陈欣然、 ...