湖南华纳大药厂股份有限公司 关于完成工商变更登记并换发营业执照的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 湖南华纳大药厂股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 12 月 10 日召 开第四届董事会第四次会议和第四届监事会第四次会议、2025 年 12 月 26 日召 开 2025 年第二次临时股东大会，审议通过了《关于变更注册资本、取消监事会、 调整董事会人数、修订<公司章程>并办理工商变更登记的议案》。具体内容详见 公司于 2025 年 12 月 11 日在上海证券交易所网站（www.sse.com.cn）披露的《湖 南华纳大药厂股份有限公司关于变更注册资本、取消监事会、调整董事会人数、 修订<公司章程>并办理工商变更登记及修订、制定公司部分治理制度的公告》 （公告编号：2025-090）。 近日，公司已完成上述事项的工商变更登记及变更后《公司章程》的备案手 续，并取得了长沙市市场监督管理局换发的《营业执照》，变更后的具体登记事 项如下： 名称：湖南华纳大药厂股份有限公司 证券代码：688799 证 ...

Core Viewpoint - Warner Pharmaceuticals has voluntarily withdrawn its drug registration application for Lidocaine Gel Patch, which is primarily used for alleviating postherpetic neuralgia, indicating a strategic decision based on research and development considerations [1] Group 1: Company Actions - The company received a termination notice from the National Medical Products Administration regarding the drug registration application for Lidocaine Gel Patch [1] - Warner Pharmaceuticals submitted the application for market approval in March 2025, which was accepted by the regulatory authority [1] - The decision to withdraw the application will not have a significant impact on the company's current or future operations and performance [1]

公司于 2025 年 3 月向国家药品监督管理局递交该产品的上市许可申请并获 得受理。经审慎研究，结合研发策略，公司决定主动撤回本次药品注册申请。 该药品注册申请的主动撤回并终止不会对公司当期及未来生产经营与业绩 产生重大影响。敬请广大投资者注意投资风险。 特此公告。 公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 近日，湖南华纳大药厂股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）收到国家药品监 督管理局核准签发的《药品注册申请终止通知书》，同意公司撤回利多卡因凝胶 贴膏的注册申请。现将相关情况公告如下： | 药品名称 | 注册分类 | 受理号 | 通知书编号 | 审批结论 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | CYHS2501139 | 2026L00051 | 根据《药品注册管理办法》第八十九条以 及申请人的撤回申请《关于撤回利多卡因 凝胶贴膏药品注册上市许可申请的请示报 | | 利多卡因 | 化学药品 | | | | | 凝胶贴膏 | 4 类 | | | | | | | | | 告》，同意本 ...

Core Viewpoint - Warner Pharmaceuticals (688799.SH) has voluntarily withdrawn its drug registration application for Lidocaine Gel Patch, which is primarily used for alleviating postherpetic neuralgia without broken skin, as per the approval from the National Medical Products Administration [1] Group 1 - The company received a termination notice for the drug registration application from the National Medical Products Administration [1] - The application for the Lidocaine Gel Patch was submitted in March 2025 and was accepted, but the company decided to withdraw it after careful consideration of its R&D strategy [1] - The withdrawal of the drug registration application will not have a significant impact on the company's current and future operations and performance [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that the A-share market is seeing a strong performance in innovative drug concept stocks, driven by a policy encouraging the sale of innovative drugs and reference preparations in retail pharmacies [1] Group 2 - Guangshentang (300436) experienced a 20% increase, with a total market value of 15.3 billion and a year-to-date increase of 8% [2] - Zhongsan Co. (301093) rose by 12%, with a market capitalization of 13.8 billion and a year-to-date increase of 63.89% [2] - Hanshang Group (600774) saw a 10% increase, with a market value of 3.408 billion and a year-to-date increase of 26.37% [2] - Hite Bio (300683) increased by 7.92%, with a market capitalization of 4.371 billion and a year-to-date increase of 20.41% [2] - Bibete (688759) rose by 6.64%, with a market value of 24.9 billion and a year-to-date increase of 90.09% [2] - Shutaishen (300204) increased by 5.78%, with a market capitalization of 13.6 billion and a year-to-date increase of 4.58% [2] - Chengdu Xian Dao (688222) rose by 5.42%, with a market value of 13.8 billion and a year-to-date increase of 46.78% [2] - Haiwang Bio (000078) increased by 5.23%, with a market capitalization of 10.1 billion and a year-to-date increase of 10.40% [2] - Jiuzhoutong (600998) rose by 4.71%, with a market value of 28 billion and a year-to-date increase of 8.59% [2] - Hongbo Pharmaceutical (301230) increased by 4.60%, with a market capitalization of 6.76 billion and a year-to-date increase of 62.48% [2] - Huana Pharmaceutical (688799) rose by 4.09%, with a market value of 6.882 billion and a year-to-date increase of 9.87% [2]

Group 1 - Warner Pharmaceutical's stock increased by 5.52%, reaching 49.88 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 177 million CNY and a turnover rate of 2.77%, resulting in a total market capitalization of 6.55 billion CNY [1] - The company, established on April 30, 2001, and listed on July 13, 2021, is located in Changsha, Hunan Province, and specializes in the research, production, and sales of chemical raw materials, chemical drug formulations, and traditional Chinese medicine formulations [1] - The revenue composition of the company includes 73.19% from formulation products, 25.22% from raw materials and intermediates, 1.52% from technical services, 0.06% from plant extracts and food, and 0.01% from other sources [1] Group 2 - Anxin Fund's Anxin Medical Health Stock A (010709) holds 1.2294 million shares of Warner Pharmaceutical, unchanged from the previous period, representing 0.94% of the circulating shares, with an estimated floating profit of approximately 3.2088 million CNY [2] - The fund, established on January 12, 2021, has a current scale of 362 million CNY, with a year-to-date return of 10.02%, ranking 1184 out of 5542 in its category, and a one-year return of 74.07%, ranking 305 out of 4256 [2] - The fund manager, Chi Chenshen, has been in position for 5 years and 12 days, managing a total asset scale of 1.691 billion CNY, with the best fund return during his tenure at 57.47% and the worst at 53.57% [3] Group 3 - Anxin Medical Health Stock A (010709) has Warner Pharmaceutical as its eighth largest holding, with 1.2294 million shares, unchanged from the previous period, accounting for 3.47% of the fund's net value, and an estimated floating profit of approximately 3.2088 million CNY [4]

Core Viewpoint - The significant price discrepancies between hospital and retail pharmacy prices for the same medication raise concerns about the effectiveness of centralized procurement policies and the trust in public healthcare systems [2][3]. Price Discrepancies - A specific example highlights that the price of pediatric calcium carbonate D3 granules is 34.93 yuan in a hospital, while the same product is priced at approximately 19 yuan in pharmacies and e-commerce platforms, resulting in a price difference of 15.93 yuan [2]. - The price of the same medication can vary significantly across different sales channels, with instances of hospital prices being higher than retail prices and vice versa [3]. Centralized Procurement Issues - The pediatric calcium carbonate D3 granules were included in centralized procurement in 2022, with a winning bid price of 3.795 yuan per bag, which was further reduced to 2.495 yuan per bag in subsequent procurement rounds [3][4]. - Despite the centralized procurement prices, hospitals are reportedly selling the medication at prices that exceed these rates, indicating a disconnect between procurement prices and actual supply costs [4][6]. Factors Contributing to Price Differences - The pricing discrepancies are attributed to several factors, including the dynamic nature of market conditions, hidden service costs in hospitals, and the competitive pricing strategies of retail pharmacies and e-commerce platforms [6][7]. - Regulatory gaps and insufficient monitoring of real-time prices across different sales channels contribute to the lack of price uniformity [8]. Regulatory Responses - The National Medical Insurance Administration has initiated measures to address price discrepancies, including monitoring and comparing prices across various platforms to ensure compliance with procurement guidelines [10][11]. - Local governments are also implementing stricter regulations to align hospital prices with those of retail pharmacies and e-commerce platforms, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in drug pricing [11][12]. Future Directions - Experts suggest that a more transparent pricing mechanism is necessary, potentially resembling e-commerce platforms, to allow for direct price comparisons and foster competition among pharmaceutical companies [12].

Core Viewpoint - The significant price discrepancies between hospital and retail prices for pediatric calcium D3 granules raise concerns about the effectiveness of centralized procurement policies and public trust in healthcare systems [1][3][8]. Price Discrepancies - Pediatric calcium D3 granules sold in hospitals can be priced at 34.93 yuan for a 14-bag pack, while the same product is available for approximately 19 yuan in pharmacies and e-commerce platforms, resulting in a price difference of 15.93 yuan [1]. - Similar price discrepancies exist for other medications, with examples showing hospital prices exceeding retail prices and vice versa [2]. Centralized Procurement and Pricing - The pediatric calcium D3 granules were included in centralized procurement in 2022, with the winning bid price set at 3.795 yuan per bag, which was later reduced to 2.495 yuan per bag in 2025 [3][4]. - Despite the centralized procurement prices, hospitals are selling the product at prices that deviate from these rates, indicating a disconnect between procurement prices and actual supply costs [3][8]. Factors Contributing to Price Differences - The price differences can be attributed to several factors, including the dynamic nature of market conditions, hidden service costs in hospitals, and the competitive pricing strategies of retail and online pharmacies [9][10]. - Regulatory gaps and the lack of real-time monitoring of drug prices contribute to the persistence of these discrepancies [10][11]. Regulatory Responses - The National Medical Insurance Administration has acknowledged these pricing issues and is working on measures to align hospital prices with those of retail pharmacies and e-commerce platforms [11][13]. - Local governments are also implementing stricter regulations to ensure that procurement prices are consistent with market prices, with penalties for non-compliance [14][15]. Future Directions - Experts suggest that a transparent pricing mechanism similar to e-commerce platforms should be established to allow for better price comparisons and competition among suppliers [17].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights significant price discrepancies between hospital and retail prices for pediatric calcium D3 granules, raising concerns about the effectiveness of centralized procurement policies and the trust in public healthcare systems [1][2][3]. Price Discrepancies - A notable price difference of 80% was reported for pediatric calcium D3 granules, with hospital prices reaching 34.93 yuan compared to 19 yuan in pharmacies and e-commerce platforms [1]. - Similar instances of price variation exist, such as a consumer purchasing a vitamin D product for 47.4 yuan in a hospital, while the same product was priced at 63 yuan in a retail pharmacy and only 29.8 yuan online [2]. Centralized Procurement Issues - Pediatric calcium D3 granules were included in centralized procurement in 2022, with the winning bid price set at 3.795 yuan per bag, which was later reduced to 2.495 yuan per bag in 2025 [3]. - Despite the procurement price, the hospital price for the same product was found to be 3.31 yuan per bag, indicating a discrepancy between procurement prices and actual hospital pricing [3]. Factors Contributing to Price Differences - Experts suggest that the price differences stem from various factors, including the dynamic nature of market conditions, raw material costs, and the potential disconnect between procurement prices and actual supply costs [6]. - Public hospitals are expected to adhere to a zero-markup policy, but the actual supply prices may lead to higher hospital prices if they exceed the procurement prices [6]. Regulatory Responses - The National Medical Insurance Administration has initiated measures to address price discrepancies, including monitoring and adjusting prices to align with market conditions [15][16]. - Local governments have also implemented regulations to ensure that procurement prices remain comparable to retail prices, with specific thresholds for price adjustments [16]. Future Directions - Experts advocate for a transparent pricing mechanism that allows for real-time price comparisons across different sales channels, aiming to reduce reliance on administrative controls and enhance market competition [18].

Core Viewpoint - Warner Pharmaceuticals reported a slight increase in revenue and a significant rise in net profit for the first three quarters of 2025, indicating overall growth despite a decline in adjusted net profit [1] Financial Performance - The company achieved an operating revenue of 1.086 billion yuan, representing a year-on-year growth of 1.55% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders reached 207 million yuan, showing a year-on-year increase of 30.75% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders after deducting non-recurring gains and losses was 99 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year decline of 26.52% [1] - After excluding the impact of share-based payments, the adjusted net profit attributable to shareholders was 133 million yuan, with a slight year-on-year decrease of 1.48% [1] Product Revenue Breakdown - Revenue from formulation products amounted to 805 million yuan, marking a year-on-year growth of 0.55% [1] - Revenue from raw materials and intermediates reached 262 million yuan, with a year-on-year increase of 2.06% [1]