长沙晚报掌上长沙12月19日讯 截至12月19日收盘：沪指涨0.36%，报3890.4475点；深证成指涨0.66%，报 13140.215点。 湘股12月19日跌幅TOP5 恒立退开盘价0.160，收盘报0.150元，当日跌-11.76%，当日最高价为0.170元，最低价为0.150元，成交量 61.1606万手。 凯美特气开盘价20.800，收盘报21.090元，当日跌-3.12%，当日最高价为21.340元，最低价为20.680元，成 交量107.3767万手。 奥士康开盘价43.330，收盘报41.720元，当日跌-2.32%，当日最高价为43.340元，最低价为41.560元，成交 量5.8799万手。 湘股12月19日涨幅TOP5 电广传媒开盘价9.380，收盘报10.290元，当日涨10.05%，当日最高价为10.290元，最低价为9.330元，成交 量180.4179万手。 通程控股开盘价6.430，收盘报7.050元，当日涨9.98%，当日最高价为7.050元，最低价为6.370元，成交量 62.3909万手。 湘潭电化开盘价13.750，收盘报14.470元，当日涨7.82%，当日最高价为 ...

Core Viewpoint - The long-term and systematic financial fraud at Hengli Industrial has led to significant regulatory penalties even after the company's delisting, with a total fine of nearly 40 million yuan imposed on the company and 19 related individuals [2][4]. Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - Hengli Industrial's financial fraud primarily involved trade business falsification, particularly in ethylene glycol trading, resulting in inflated revenues [3]. - From 2020 to mid-2023, the company inflated its operating income for three and a half consecutive years, with specific figures: 2020 - approximately 227 million yuan (74.24% of reported income), 2021 - 181 million yuan (52.27%), 2022 - 135 million yuan (55.08%), and the first half of 2023 - 5.119 million yuan (47.77%) [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau has imposed penalties on both the company and individual responsible parties, reflecting a "personal accountability" approach in regulation [4]. - The company was fined 8 million yuan and 19 individuals received a total of 31.4 million yuan in fines, with the former chairman receiving a 4.5 million yuan fine and a five-year market ban [4]. Group 3: Delisting and Consequences - Hengli Industrial's stock was subject to delisting warnings due to negative net profits and low operating income, leading to its formal delisting on July 16, 2025 [5][6]. - The company failed to disclose its annual report on time, which was linked to significant disagreements with its auditing firm regarding reported revenues [6]. Group 4: Investor Reactions - Following the revelation of the financial fraud details, investors who suffered losses during the period of false statements are beginning to seek legal recourse [7].

Core Viewpoint - Hengli Industrial has been penalized for inflating its operating income by a total of 595 million yuan from 2020 to the first half of 2023, leading to false financial statements. The Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau plans to impose fines totaling 39.4 million yuan on the company and 19 responsible individuals, highlighting the principle of "delisting does not exempt from liability" in securities regulation [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Financial Misconduct - From 2020 to the first half of 2023, Hengli Industrial inflated its operating income by 227 million yuan, 181 million yuan, 136 million yuan, and 51 million yuan, representing 74.24%, 52.27%, 55.08%, and 47.77% of the reported operating income for those periods respectively [2] - The company also inflated its operating costs by 220 million yuan, 175 million yuan, 132 million yuan, and 49 million yuan, accounting for 77.53%, 53.9%, 55.45%, and 50.43% of the reported operating costs respectively [2] - The financial fraud was facilitated by third-party cooperation, where Hengli Industrial used its wholly-owned subsidiary to coordinate with suppliers and customers to create fictitious transactions [2][3]. Regulatory Actions - The Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau intends to impose an 8 million yuan fine on Hengli Industrial and a total of 31.4 million yuan in fines on 19 responsible individuals, including the former chairman [3] - This is not the first penalty for Hengli Industrial post-delisting; previously, on September 19, the company and seven individuals were fined 11.5 million yuan for information disclosure violations [3]. Audit and Legal Issues - Hengli Industrial changed its auditing firm to Shenzhen Xutai Accounting Firm, which reported an adjusted revenue of 196 million yuan, leading to a significant disagreement between the two parties [4][5] - The company filed a lawsuit against the previous auditing firm, claiming damages of 38.27 million yuan due to alleged negligence and failure to provide timely audit evidence [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authority maintains a "zero tolerance" stance towards violations in the capital market, emphasizing that delisting does not equate to immunity from penalties [1][8]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - On November 21, the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a notice of administrative penalty to Hengli Industrial Development Group Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Hengli Industrial" or "R Hengli 1") and 19 related individuals, proposing a total fine of 39.4 million yuan [1][6]. - Hengli Industrial has been subjected to two investigations by the regulatory authority due to suspected violations of financial data disclosure [1][7]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct - Hengli Industrial inflated its revenue through fictitious transactions in ethylene glycol trading, resulting in inflated revenues of approximately 227 million yuan, 181 million yuan, 135 million yuan, and 51.19 million yuan from 2020 to the first half of 2023, representing 74.24%, 52.27%, 55.08%, and 47.77% of the reported revenues for those periods [2][4]. - The company also inflated its costs by approximately 220 million yuan, 175 million yuan, 132 million yuan, and 49.41 million yuan during the same periods, constituting 77.53%, 53.9%, 55.45%, and 50.43% of the reported costs [2][4]. Group 3: Accountability of Executives - The investigation identified five key executives, including the former chairman and president, as directly responsible for the violations related to financial disclosures [4][5]. - Additional executives, including the former financial director and other board members, were also implicated for failing to exercise due diligence regarding the abnormal trading activities [5][6]. Group 4: Consequences and Future Implications - The regulatory authority plans to impose an 8 million yuan fine on Hengli Industrial and a total of 31.4 million yuan in fines on the 19 responsible individuals, with some facing market bans of 3 to 5 years due to the severity of their violations [6][7]. - The case serves as a precedent, reinforcing the message that delisting does not exempt companies from accountability, and it highlights the ongoing commitment to investor protection even after a company has been delisted [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authority demonstrates a "zero tolerance" approach towards violations in the capital market, as evidenced by the administrative penalties imposed on Hengli Industrial Development Group Co., Ltd. for false financial disclosures [3][10][14]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Actions - On November 21, the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau issued an administrative penalty notice to Hengli Industrial and 19 related individuals, proposing a total fine of 39.4 million yuan [3][9]. - The penalties reflect the regulatory body's commitment to addressing illegal activities in the capital market, with ongoing investigations into Hengli Industrial's irregularities [3][10]. Financial Misconduct - Hengli Industrial was found to have inflated its revenue and costs through fictitious transactions in its glycol trading business, leading to significant discrepancies in its financial reports from 2020 to the first half of 2023 [4][5]. - The company reported inflated revenues of approximately 227 million yuan, 181 million yuan, 135 million yuan, and 51.19 million yuan for the respective years, constituting 74.24%, 52.27%, 55.08%, and 47.77% of the reported revenues [5]. Accountability of Executives - Key executives, including the chairman and president, were identified as directly responsible for the violations, with penalties totaling 31.4 million yuan for these individuals [6][9]. - Additional executives and board members were also implicated for failing to exercise due diligence regarding the company's trading activities and financial disclosures [7][8]. Consequences of Delisting - Hengli Industrial's stock was delisted on July 16 due to failure to disclose its 2024 annual report within the legal timeframe, marking a significant decline in its operational status [10][14]. - The company faced two separate investigations within a month, highlighting the regulatory body's swift action against non-compliance [13][14]. Investor Protection - Despite the company's delisting, the protection of investor rights remains a priority, with ongoing legal actions against companies for false disclosures, reinforcing the message that delisting does not equate to immunity from accountability [14].

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authority maintains a "zero tolerance" stance towards violations in the capital market, emphasizing that delisting does not equate to immunity from penalties [4][10][18]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - On November 21, the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a notice to Hengli Industrial Development Group Co., Ltd. regarding a proposed fine of 39.4 million yuan for suspected false disclosures in financial data [4][10]. - Hengli Industrial has been under scrutiny for its financial practices, leading to two investigations by the regulatory authority [4][16]. - The company was found to have inflated revenue and costs significantly from 2020 to the first half of 2023, with inflated revenues of approximately 227 million yuan in 2020, 181 million yuan in 2021, 135 million yuan in 2022, and 51.19 million yuan in the first half of 2023 [6][10]. Group 2: Company Misconduct - Hengli Industrial used its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hunan Hengsheng International Trade Co., Ltd., to conduct fictitious transactions, thereby inflating its revenue without any commercial substance [5][6]. - The company’s actions led to false records in its annual reports from 2020 to 2022 and the first half of 2023, with the inflated revenue constituting 74.24%, 52.27%, 55.08%, and 47.77% of the reported figures for those periods [6][10]. Group 3: Consequences for Executives - The former chairman, president, and vice president of Hengli Industrial were identified as directly responsible for the violations, with fines totaling 31.4 million yuan proposed for 19 related individuals [7][10]. - Five key executives are facing market bans ranging from three to five years due to their severe involvement in the misconduct [10][18]. Group 4: Delisting and Future Implications - Hengli Industrial's stock was officially delisted on July 16, 2024, after failing to disclose its annual report within the legal timeframe, which triggered a series of regulatory actions [11][16]. - The regulatory body has signaled that delisting does not exempt companies from accountability, reinforcing the message that investor rights protection will continue despite a company's delisting status [18].

Core Viewpoint - The Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning letter to Shenzhen Tangtang Accounting Firm and related personnel due to multiple issues found during the special verification of Hengli Industrial Development Group Co., Ltd.'s 2023 annual revenue deduction [1] Group 1: Business Conduct Issues - The firm failed to obtain a written statement from Hengli Industrial's management regarding the responsibility for the preparation of the revenue deduction situation table [2] - There was a lack of timely archiving of modified strategies and plans, and specific procedures to address significant misstatement risks were not listed [3] - The risk identification and assessment were inadequate, with contradictions in the risk assessment documents [4] Group 2: Substantive Procedures Deficiencies - The firm did not perform appropriate further procedures to assess whether the revenue recognition conditions were met when actual installation quantities were found to be lower than contractually agreed [5] - There were deficiencies in confirmation procedures, including failure to confirm relevant income situations and inadequate documentation of confirmation details [6] - Interview procedures were lacking, with some questionnaires missing signatures and identification materials, and important stakeholders were not interviewed [7] Group 3: Inappropriate Verification Conclusions - The conclusion that equipment installation income was "non-occasional" was deemed inappropriate, as the firm failed to recognize the occasional nature of the related income [8] - The firm did not deduct non-standard opinion income as required by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's guidelines [9] - The conclusions drawn lacked sufficient evidence, failing to reduce audit risks to an acceptable low level [10] Group 4: Internal Management Failures - Project partner Zhu Zheng did not participate in the special verification work, and the verification report was issued without his review and confirmation [12] - The firm has a history of insufficient audit evidence, as seen in a previous case involving Huqing Gaobao Company, leading to administrative penalties [14]

Core Points - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.41% to close at 3960.1860 points, while the Shenzhen Component Index dropped by 1.71% to 13175.221 points as of November 4 [1] Group 1: Top Gainers in Hunan Stocks - Changlan Technology opened at 16.740 and closed at 17.050, gaining 1.85% with a highest price of 17.720 and a lowest of 16.690, trading volume was 52,194 lots [2] - Mengjie Co., Ltd. opened at 4.270 and closed at 4.340, increasing by 1.64% with a highest price of 4.380 and a lowest of 4.260, trading volume was 239,327 lots [2] - Hunan Development opened at 13.100 and closed at 13.190, up by 1.46% with a highest price of 13.360 and a lowest of 13.020, trading volume was 247,072 lots [2] - Hunan Investment opened at 5.710 and closed at 5.780, rising by 1.40% with a highest price of 5.790 and a lowest of 5.660, trading volume was 170,367 lots [2] - Tianqiao Hoisting opened at 4.400 and closed at 4.510, increasing by 1.35% with a highest price of 4.530 and a lowest of 4.390, trading volume was 787,041 lots [2] Group 2: Top Losers in Hunan Stocks - Hengli Retreat opened at 0.160 and closed at 0.150, decreasing by 11.76% with a highest price of 0.170 and a lowest of 0.150, trading volume was 611,606 lots [3] - Qidi Pharmaceutical opened at 12.090 and closed at 11.450, down by 5.61% with a highest price of 12.090 and a lowest of 11.430, trading volume was 145,241 lots [3] - Kaimete Gas opened at 23.830 and closed at 23.340, falling by 4.70% with a highest price of 24.290 and a lowest of 23.130, trading volume was 763,116 lots [3] - Hunan Silver opened at 6.280 and closed at 6.130, declining by 3.46% with a highest price of 6.300 and a lowest of 6.090, trading volume was 991,979 lots [3] - Hunan Gold opened at 20.980 and closed at 20.530, decreasing by 3.16% with a highest price of 21.170 and a lowest of 20.260, trading volume was 473,720 lots [3]

Market Overview - As of October 27, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 1.18%, closing at 3996.9445 points, while the Shenzhen Component Index increased by 1.51%, closing at 13489.403 points [1]. Top Gainers in Hunan Stocks - *ST Jingfeng opened at 7.690 and closed at 7.690, with a daily increase of 5.05%, maintaining the same price throughout the day, with a trading volume of 24,128 lots [2]. - Tianqiao Crane opened at 4.210 and closed at 4.340, rising by 4.08%, with a daily high of 4.350 and a low of 4.150, and a trading volume of 1,184,114 lots [2]. - Aoshikang opened at 39.620 and closed at 40.920, up by 3.52%, reaching a high of 41.240 and a low of 39.600, with a trading volume of 62,736 lots [2]. - Yanjinpuzi opened at 69.010 and closed at 70.350, increasing by 3.30%, with a daily high of 71.120 and a low of 68.500, and a trading volume of 36,492 lots [2]. - Hualing Steel opened at 5.740 and closed at 5.910, up by 2.96%, with a high of 5.970 and a low of 5.740, and a trading volume of 1,103,156 lots [2]. Top Losers in Hunan Stocks - Hengli Tui opened at 0.160 and closed at 0.150, experiencing a decline of 11.76%, with a daily high of 0.170 and a low of 0.150, and a trading volume of 611,606 lots [3]. - *ST Gaosi opened at 8.300 and closed at 8.350, down by 2.45%, with a high of 8.450 and a low of 8.130, and a trading volume of 58,408 lots [3]. - Changlan Technology opened at 17.700 and closed at 17.410, decreasing by 1.97%, with a high of 17.780 and a low of 17.200, and a trading volume of 45,737 lots [3]. - Hansen Pharmaceutical opened at 6.620 and closed at 6.510, down by 1.06%, with a high of 6.620 and a low of 6.480, and a trading volume of 94,306 lots [3]. - Hunan Investment opened at 5.730 and closed at 5.630, decreasing by 1.05%, with a high of 5.740 and a low of 5.580, and a trading volume of 171,054 lots [3].

Core Viewpoint - The long and tumultuous capital journey of *ST Hengli, a veteran listed company, is set to conclude in June 2025, as it faces delisting after failing to disclose a majority of its board's assurance on the authenticity of its 2024 annual report within the legal timeframe [1] Group 1: Company History - *ST Hengli was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 1996, initially focusing on manufacturing automotive air conditioning equipment [3] - The company was first subjected to ST status in 2005 due to poor performance [4] - From 2006 to 2013, *ST Hengli faced a seven-year suspension from trading, during which it attempted various self-rescue operations, including asset sales and debt restructuring, to avoid delisting [5] - After regaining its listing, *ST Hengli quickly returned to losses, reporting net losses of 37 million yuan and 47 million yuan in 2014 and 2015, respectively [5][6] - In 2021, the company reported a profit of 171,960 yuan, but it suffered losses exceeding 10 million yuan in both 2022 and 2023, with revenue declining from 346 million yuan in 2021 to 111 million yuan in 2023 [7] Group 2: Efforts to Avoid Delisting - In August 2024, *ST Hengli announced that Xiangcheng Shenzhou acquired 76 million shares, becoming the largest shareholder, with plans to pivot towards lithium carbonate processing [8][9] - Following the acquisition, *ST Hengli projected a revenue increase to between 300 million and 350 million yuan for 2024, with over 200 million yuan expected from the newly acquired assets in Q4 [10] Group 3: Audit Controversy - The company's efforts to avoid delisting faced significant challenges when its auditor, Shenzhen Xutai Accounting Firm, raised serious doubts about its revenue figures, suggesting a reduction to 196 million yuan [11][12] - *ST Hengli disagreed with the auditor's assessment, leading to a major dispute over revenue recognition methods [14] - The company opted to sue the auditor for alleged obstruction during the audit process, seeking 38.27 million yuan in damages [16][17] Group 4: Final Penalties - Despite the lawsuit, *ST Hengli's delisting fate remained unchanged, as it received a warning and a fine of 3.5 million yuan from the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau [18] - Key executives, including the chairman and financial director, were also penalized with fines totaling 1.8 million yuan for their roles in the situation [19] - As of June 25, *ST Hengli entered a 15-day delisting preparation period, with the final trading day expected to be July 15, 2025, marking the end of its 29-year journey in the capital market [19]