Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the commitment of Li Auto to user safety by conducting collision tests on the Li Auto i8 to validate and enhance its passive safety performance [1][2]. Group 1: Purpose of the Collision Test - Li Auto prioritizes user safety and aims to create a secure travel environment for families, utilizing a "short front suspension safety structure" in the i8 design [1]. - The company commissioned a third-party authority, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, to conduct high-intensity collision tests to transparently demonstrate the safety efforts and results of the i8 [1]. Group 2: Performance of the Collision Test - The collision test was based on common traffic accident scenarios, with China Automotive Engineering Research Institute recognized for its professional capabilities and impartiality [2]. - The innovative short front suspension safety structure of the i8 includes three longitudinal force transmission paths and 11 energy-absorbing structures, effectively mitigating impact forces from frontal collisions [2]. - The test results showed no significant deformation in the A, B, and C pillars, all nine airbags deployed correctly, and there were no leaks or fires from the battery pack, indicating the vehicle's high safety standards [2]. Group 3: Public Opinion Impact - The purpose of the test was solely to validate the i8's safety performance and not to evaluate other brands, clarifying that the test vehicle used was not intended for quality comparison [3]. - Li Auto clarified that there is no direct competition with Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, emphasizing respect for the truck brand and its established reputation in the industry [3]. Group 4: Discussion on Safety Standards - The i8 was developed in accordance with the latest national standards and has undergone rigorous testing, achieving top evaluations from authoritative third-party organizations [4]. - Li Auto expresses confidence in the i8's safety and the overall progress of the automotive industry's safety development, committing to continuous innovation in automotive safety technology [4].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test video released by Li Auto featuring its new electric SUV, the Li i8, has sparked significant controversy, leading to a notable decline in Li Auto's stock price and increased public attention on the traditional truck manufacturer, Chenglong Trucks [3][14][17]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Li Auto showcased a collision test video during the launch of the Li i8, demonstrating its safety features against an 8-ton Chenglong truck, which led to public curiosity about the truck's safety [5][7]. - Chenglong Trucks quickly responded to the incident, claiming they were misrepresented and released their own safety test video to counter Li Auto's claims [7][8]. - Li Auto defended its testing process, stating it was conducted by a third-party organization, China Automotive Research, ensuring compliance with all standards [7][8]. Group 2: Stock Market Impact - Following the incident, Li Auto's stock experienced significant volatility, with a drop of 6.20% on the day of the i8 launch, and further declines in subsequent days, totaling over 27.3% from its peak [14][16]. - The market capitalization of Li Auto decreased by nearly 33 billion HKD in a single day due to the negative market reaction [14]. Group 3: Social Media and Public Perception - Li Auto's founder, Li Xiang, faced backlash on social media, with his newly opened Douyin account becoming a platform for public debate and mockery regarding the incident [17]. - Chenglong Trucks' social media presence surged, gaining significant followers and engagement as they responded to the controversy [11][12]. Group 4: Industry Analysis - Experts noted that the collision test lacked national standards, questioning the validity of using such tests for marketing purposes [18][19]. - The incident highlighted the risks of using competitors in promotional materials, as it can lead to unintended negative perceptions and backlash [19].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test video released by Li Auto featuring its new electric SUV, the Li i8, has sparked significant controversy, leading to a decline in Li Auto's stock price and increased visibility for the traditional truck manufacturer, Chenglong Trucks [2][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 29, Li Auto showcased a collision test video during the launch of the Li i8, demonstrating its safety features against an 8-ton Chenglong truck [3]. - The video, which clearly displayed the Chenglong brand, led to public curiosity about the truck's safety after it appeared to be severely damaged in the test [3][5]. - Chenglong Trucks responded quickly, claiming the video misrepresented their vehicle's safety and initiated legal action against Li Auto for perceived infringement [5][6]. Group 2: Stock Market Impact - Following the incident, Li Auto's stock price fell significantly, dropping over 27.3% from its peak earlier in the year [11]. - On July 30, Li Auto's stock experienced a 12.84% decline in Hong Kong, with a market capitalization loss of nearly 330 billion HKD [9]. - The downward trend continued with further declines on July 31 and August 1, indicating ongoing investor concern [11]. Group 3: Social Media and Public Perception - Chenglong Trucks capitalized on the situation by releasing multiple social media posts and videos to counter Li Auto's claims, resulting in a substantial increase in their social media following [8]. - Li Auto's founder, Li Xiang, faced backlash on his newly created Douyin account, which became a platform for public criticism and jokes about the incident [12]. - The incident has led to a broader discussion in the automotive industry regarding marketing practices and the implications of using competitors in promotional materials [13][14].

新浪科技讯 8月3日下午消息，乘龙卡车官方公众号发布海报称"龙的脊梁，无惧挑战"，疑似再回应理 想i8碰撞事件。这已经是乘龙卡车官方连续第四天回应此次事件。 据悉，7月29日晚，理想汽车发布首款纯电SUV理想i8时，公布与乘龙卡车的碰撞测试视频，视频里乘 龙卡车四轮弹起、驾驶室与货厢分离，理想i8却车身完好 。因原始视频未对乘龙车标打码，引发网友 对乘龙安全性的质疑。次日，乘龙卡车回应称 "被摆一道，测试有假"，并发布自身安全测试视频。31 日，理想称测试由第三方进行，基于真实场景模拟；当晚东风柳汽（乘龙所属公司）发声明，指责理想 侵权，称其测试场景与实际差异大、未公开关键信息。 随后在8月1日，乘龙卡车发布《致乘龙卡友的一封信》，文中表示"近日，理想汽车在其产品发布会及 网络传播中，使用涉及我公司乘龙旧车的碰撞测试视频，引发社会广泛关注。经我公司技术核查及专业 评估，该视频相关测试场景及设备与实际交通情况存在极大差异。" 责任编辑：王其霖 8月2日，乘龙卡车发布海报称"活着才有资格谈理想"，8月2日晚间，乘龙卡车官方发布视频称"东风柳 汽全系车型申请出战"，8月3日，乘龙卡车官方公众号发文称"龙的脊梁，无惧 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck has sparked significant controversy, with Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile (Dongfeng Liuqi) claiming that the portrayal is misleading and has harmed their brand reputation [8][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The controversy began during the launch of the Li Auto i8 on July 29, where a video showed the i8 colliding with a heavy truck, which was later identified as a Chenglong truck [8]. - Chenglong responded to the incident, stating that the testing conditions depicted in the video were not representative of real-world scenarios and urged consumers to view the situation rationally [3][8]. - Following the incident, Chenglong's social media presence surged, gaining over 50,000 new followers on Douyin within two days [4]. Group 2: Company Responses - Chenglong issued a statement asserting that the video used by Li Auto constituted serious infringement and misled the public, damaging their brand and commercial reputation [9]. - Li Auto defended its testing methodology, claiming it was conducted by a third-party organization, China Automotive Research, which confirmed that the testing adhered to all regulations and standards [9][10]. - Li Auto executives publicly challenged Chenglong to a live retest of the collision scenario, indicating confidence in their vehicle's safety performance [10]. Group 3: Company Background - Dongfeng Liuqi, established in 1954, is a major state-owned enterprise with a production capacity of 100,000 commercial vehicles and 400,000 passenger vehicles annually [10]. - The Chenglong brand serves significant clients in logistics and transportation, including major companies like SF Express and JD Logistics [10]. - In the first half of 2025, Dongfeng Liuqi reported a commercial vehicle sales volume of 23,348 units, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 24.3% [10].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck has sparked significant controversy, with both parties exchanging statements regarding the validity and implications of the test results [11][12][13]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The incident began during the launch of the Li Auto i8 on July 29, where a video showed the i8 colliding with a heavy truck, resulting in dramatic outcomes for the truck [11]. - Following the video, the truck manufacturer, Chenglong, issued statements claiming the test conditions were misleading and not reflective of real-world scenarios [3][12]. - Chenglong's social media presence saw a significant increase in engagement, with over 50,000 new followers on Douyin within two days, indicating heightened public interest [5]. Group 2: Responses from Li Auto and Chenglong - Li Auto defended the test, stating it was conducted by a third-party organization, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and adhered to all regulations [13]. - Chenglong's parent company, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, issued a formal statement claiming the video constituted serious infringement and misled the public, damaging their brand reputation [13][14]. - Li Auto executives publicly challenged Chenglong to a live retest, emphasizing confidence in their vehicle's safety [14]. Group 3: Company Background and Performance - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, established in 1954, produces both commercial and passenger vehicles, with a production capacity of 100,000 commercial vehicles and 400,000 passenger vehicles annually [14]. - In the first half of 2025, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor reported sales of 23,348 commercial vehicles, marking a 24.3% year-on-year increase, with a target of 40,000 to 43,000 units for the full year [14].

编辑 / 张 南 设计 / 柴文静 理想i8撞击乘龙8吨卡车事件持续发酵，并且有可能正在朝着不可收拾的方向狂奔。 作者 / 涂彦 平 2025年7月29日晚，理想i8发布会，厂家在展示理想i8安全性时，播放了一段"重卡连环撞击"试验视频。 视频中，理想i8和一辆8吨卡车以100公里/小时(双车均50km/h)的相对速度对撞。两辆车车身均贴有"中国汽研SUPER CRASH超级试验"字样。 碰撞结束，理想汽车得到了理想的结果：理想i8 A\B\C柱、门梁均无变形。 最初发布视频的时候，由于碰撞的重卡车型方向盘没有打码，网友发现该卡车品牌为乘龙卡车。 于是，一场将理想汽车、东风柳汽、中国汽研涉事三方裹挟其中的舆论风暴就此爆发。 中国汽研回复媒体：测试的全过程肯定符合所有的规定和标准，不会刻意调节车辆参数。"这次测试不属于公告准入测试，我们理解应该不是强制性 必须做的一个（项目）业务，（测试结果）一般用于车辆的开发验证。" 理想汽车回复媒体：实验基于用户真实交通会车场景的模拟，全权委托专业的第三方检测机构测试认证，试验场地、测试设备以及市场端随机购买的 测试卡车均由检测机构提供，理想没有任何指定。 理想汽车产品线负 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video involving the Li Auto i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked significant industry attention, with Chenglong Truck asserting that the video misrepresents actual traffic conditions and calling for a rational perspective on safety [3][4][5]. Group 1: Chenglong Truck's Response - Chenglong Truck issued a statement emphasizing the importance of adhering to traffic regulations and regular maintenance to ensure safety, rather than relying solely on test results [4]. - The company has raised concerns about the legality of the video used by Li Auto, claiming it constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, potentially violating multiple laws [16]. - Chenglong Truck's social media response indicated that their legal department is addressing the situation, and they criticized the portrayal of their vehicle in the test [7][16]. Group 2: Li Auto's Position - Li Auto defended the collision test, stating it was conducted by a third-party testing agency and adhered to all relevant standards, asserting that the test was a simulation of real-world scenarios [15]. - The company has invited further testing to validate the results, suggesting transparency in the testing process [15]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The incident has drawn attention from the broader automotive industry, with Dongfeng Group expressing support for Chenglong Truck in protecting its brand reputation and legal rights [4]. - The controversy has led to discussions about competition and safety standards within the industry, highlighting the need for responsible marketing practices [4][15].

8月2日，乘龙卡车发布海报并配文：活着，才有资格谈理想，再次回应近期"理想i8撞重卡"视频风波。 每经编辑｜何小桃 8月1日晚，乘龙卡车公众号发布《致乘龙卡友的一封信》。 据上游新闻，8月1日晚，东风奕派科技战略发布会暨新车发布会在武汉经开区举行。发布会上，东风集团新闻发言人、战略规划部副总经理吕海涛针对理 想i8对撞乘龙卡车事件表示，此事已成为行业关注的热点，东风柳汽也已经作了正式的声明，从东风集团的角度，全力支持东风柳汽去依法维护自己的合 法权益和品牌的声誉。"现在这个件事，我们还在对相关方，做相应的了解，包括碰撞产品本身的状况，目前实际上是在整个测试的了解过程中。"他还表 示，东风集团坚决贯彻落实高质量发展要求，反对内卷式竞争。 信中称："近日，理想汽车在其产品发布会及网络传播中，使用涉及我公司乘龙旧车的碰撞测试视频，引发社会广泛关注。经我公司技术核查及专业评 估，该视频相关测试场景及设备与实际交通情况存在极大差异，我们倡导大家从科学角度理性看待。" 乘龙卡车表示："道路安全，生命攸关。我们呼吁：严守交通法规、坚持定期维保、提升主动预防意识——这比任何测试都更能构筑起坚实可靠的安全壁 垒。请各位卡友放心 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video involving the Ideal i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked significant public attention, with Chenglong Truck calling for rational evaluation based on scientific principles and emphasizing the importance of road safety and adherence to traffic regulations [2][3][15]. Group 1: Chenglong Truck's Response - Chenglong Truck issued a statement addressing the use of its vehicle in the collision test video, asserting that the testing conditions were significantly different from real traffic scenarios and urging the public to view the situation rationally [2]. - The company emphasized the importance of following traffic laws, regular maintenance, and proactive safety awareness as more effective measures for ensuring safety than any test [3]. - Chenglong Truck's legal department is currently handling the situation, indicating that they believe the video misrepresents their brand and could mislead consumers [6][15]. Group 2: Ideal Automotive's Position - Ideal Automotive defended the collision test, stating it was conducted by a third-party testing agency and adhered to all relevant standards, with no manipulation of vehicle parameters [14]. - The company expressed confidence in the authority of the testing agency and suggested a live retest to validate the results, indicating transparency in their testing process [14]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The incident has drawn attention from the industry, with Dongfeng Group supporting Chenglong Truck in protecting its legal rights and brand reputation [3]. - The collision test video has generated considerable debate online, with many users questioning the validity of the test and expressing concerns about the safety implications of the results [4][6].