"拥核绝不会给日本带来正面影响。"日本前首相石破茂20日做客日本富士电视台，在相关节目中如此表 示。 日本首相官邸一名负责安保政策的官员18日向官邸记者团表达了"日本应拥有核武器"的想法，在日本引 发舆论批评。执政党自民党内部对日本是否应拥有核武器意见不一，在野党公明党、立宪民主党、日本 共产党等更是对拥核说加以多重驳斥。 核政策欲调整 尽管诸多媒体在报道时没有点名日本首相官邸中何人打出"拥核说"，但显而易见这代表了自民党内高市 早苗派系所主张的突破"无核三原则"。1971年日本正式确立"无核三原则"，即不拥有、不制造、不引进 核武器。高市早苗派系中有人想首先突破"不引进核武器"条款，为美军核武器进驻日本打开通道，甚至 讨论日本自主拥核。 在上海社科院国际问题研究所助理研究员王梦雪看来，自民党内妄图突破"无核三原则"者的意图，在于 提升对美战略价值、转移国内矛盾并积累政治资本，这就与自民党内其他派系有了矛盾。刚离任不久的 石破茂直言，一旦日本拥有核武器，将不得不退出《核不扩散条约》和国际原子能机构，还将导致支持 日本能源供应的核能政策难以维持。 王梦雪认为，自民党内部关于核武器政策的分歧，反映了日本安保政策的 ...

日本政府日前批准2025财年（2025年4月至2026年3月）补充预算案，防卫省再获8472亿日元拨款。叠加 相关经费及初始预算，本财年日本防卫开支总额将达创纪录的约11万亿日元。 根据日本防卫省的数据，日本防卫费连续13年上涨。当前，在日本现任政府主导下，日本军备扩张更是 按下"加速键"。 日本政府不断提升的防卫开支暴露怎样图谋？将给地区安全环境以及日本自身带来哪些危险？本报采访 中国社会科学院日本研究所研究员吕耀东、中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院教授孙承，就此进行解 读。 防卫开支创下新高，动因何在？ 日本防卫费逐年增长，一方面是延续日本前首相安倍晋三以安全政策突破为核心的政治路线；另一方面 则为迎合美国军事安全战略目标，绑定日美同盟关系 一系列军事扩张动向，危险何在？ 【观察】 据《日本经济新闻》报道，日本内阁会议11月下旬批准的2025财年补充预算中包括防卫相关费用1.1万 亿日元，连同9.9万亿日元的初始预算，2025财年防卫开支合计达到约11万亿日元，在GDP中占比达到 2%。 据悉，日本防卫省在此次补充预算案中拨款8472亿日元，其中1222亿日元用于购置护卫舰、潜艇等装 备，另有566亿日元将 ...

日本首相高市早苗涉台错误言论及日本政府加速推进军备扩张等动向在日本国内持续招致强烈批评。8日，长崎市市民团体表示，已经向高市早苗及多位内 阁高官寄送抗议声明，要求高市撤回相关言论；此外，熊本市多个市民团体举行集会，反对日本政府部署远程导弹。 首支地面部队将于2026年3月底前进驻熊本市陆上自卫队健军驻地，升级型12式岸舰导弹的射程已延长至约1000公里。 12月8日，熊本市多个市民团体在市中心举行集会，反对日本政府在陆上自卫队健军驻地部署远程导弹等。 0:00 针对高市早苗涉台错误言论及修改"无核三原则"的动向，长崎市市民团体8日举行新闻发布会，宣布已向首相高市早苗、外务大臣茂木敏充以及防卫大臣小 泉进次郎寄送了抗议声明。 长崎市市民团体发言人 大薮朝祥：战败80年后的今天，日本究竟会再次走上战争之路，还是能让日中关系重新走向改善，可以说正处于历史性的岔路口。 发布抗议声明的是主张反对修改宪法的市民团体，该团体指出，高市早苗的涉台错误言论使日中关系进一步冷却，并加剧军事紧张，要求撤回相关言论。声 明还要求高市政府坚守"无核三原则"。 熊本市民团体抗议日政府部署远程导弹 11月以来，日本多地举行大规模市民集会， ...

Core Points - Japan is enhancing its military capabilities, particularly in the southwestern islands, with a focus on Amami Oshima and Mako Island, which are strategically important [1] - A new runway of approximately 2000 meters is planned on Mako Island for U.S. aircraft carrier operations, with construction ongoing to meet a completion deadline of March 2030 [4] - Japan's defense budget for the fiscal year 2025 is set to reach approximately 11 trillion yen (about 498.2 billion RMB), marking a significant increase and a departure from the historical limit of defense spending being under 1% of GDP [8] Military Developments - Japan's military preparations are becoming more practical and detailed, indicating a shift towards a more proactive defense strategy in response to potential regional conflicts, particularly concerning Taiwan [6] - The Japanese government is investing in various defense-related initiatives, including the development of "universal plasma" and legal frameworks for wartime scenarios, reflecting a comprehensive approach to national security [6] Budgetary Changes - The approved supplementary budget for defense in 2025 includes 1.1 trillion yen (approximately 49.8 billion RMB), contributing to a total defense expenditure that will account for about 2% of Japan's GDP [8] - Japan's defense spending has seen a continuous increase for 13 consecutive years, indicating a significant shift in defense policy since 2012 [8] International Reactions - China's Foreign Ministry has expressed concerns over Japan's military expansion and changes to its defense policies, warning against a return to militarism and the potential disruption of post-war international order [10]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is significantly increasing its military preparedness, reflecting a shift towards a more proactive and practical defense strategy, particularly in response to potential conflicts in the Taiwan Strait [1][4]. Group 1: Military Spending and Policy Changes - Japan's defense budget has been on the rise for 13 consecutive years, with a notable increase from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2025 [3]. - The Japanese cabinet approved a supplementary budget for fiscal year 2025 that includes defense-related expenses of 1.1 trillion yen (approximately 49.8 billion yuan), bringing the total defense spending for that year to about 11 trillion yen (approximately 498.2 billion yuan), which constitutes 2% of GDP [4]. - The new "security three documents" emphasize a fundamental strengthening of defense capabilities and the development of "counter-strike capabilities," which undermines Japan's principle of "defensive defense" [4]. Group 2: International Reactions and Concerns - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has expressed strong opposition to Japan's militaristic tendencies, viewing them as a revival of militarism [5][6]. - The Chinese government has criticized Japan's recent military policy changes, including the loosening of weapon export restrictions and the pursuit of collective self-defense, as violations of post-war international agreements [6].

【环球时报综合报道】12月1日，中国常驻联合国代表傅聪再次致函联合国秘书长古特雷斯，针对日本常驻联合国代表山崎和之11月24日给古特雷斯致函中 有关无理狡辩言论予以严正批驳。中国外交部发言人林剑在2日的例行记者会上表示，日本首相高市早苗涉台错误言论公然挑战二战胜利成果和战后国际秩 序，严重违反《联合国宪章》宗旨和原则。中方向联合国秘书长致函阐明严正立场，完全正当必要。日方信函充斥错误观点和虚伪谎言。11月21日，傅聪就 曾致函联合国秘书长古特雷斯，就高市早苗涉华错误言行阐明中国政府立场。在高市早苗未撤回错误言论、中日关系恶化的背景下，一些日本团体希望能够 加强交流、缓和紧张局势。日本共同社2日披露，日本经济团体联合会、日中友好议员联盟最近先后向中方表达了访华的意愿。接受《环球时报》记者采访 的专家表示，这反映出日本国内一些理性力量的担忧，许多日本人依旧希望稳定日中关系。 外交学院教授周永生2日接受《环球时报》记者采访时表示，中国海警舰艇对非法进入钓鱼岛领海的日本渔船进行警告驱离，是合法合理的常规执法行动。 这同时表明，中国一直对钓鱼岛海域实施有效管控。 日本两个团体希望近期访华 在1日向古特雷斯的致函中，傅聪 ...

Group 1 - Japan is investing part of its defense budget into "security resilience" initiatives, including the development of "universal plasma" and legal frameworks for wartime scenarios [1] - Japan's military preparations are becoming more practical and detailed, indicating a serious consideration of potential conflicts, particularly regarding the Taiwan Strait [1] - The post-World War II constitution of Japan, particularly Article 9, emphasizes a commitment to peace and the renunciation of war, which has historically shaped its defense policy [1] Group 2 - Japan's security policy has undergone a fundamental shift, moving away from its "exclusive defense" principle, which has been gradually eroded [2] - The Japanese defense budget has seen a continuous increase for thirteen consecutive years, reflecting a trend towards military expansion [2] - Recent changes in Japan's defense laws have allowed for collective self-defense and relaxed restrictions on arms exports, including lethal weapons [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses China's firm rebuttal to Japan's claims regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that Japan has not provided a clear stance on its position despite multiple inquiries from China [2][3] - It highlights that historical international legal documents, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan and Japan's obligation to return territories taken during wartime [2] - The article criticizes Japan's defense strategy, stating that recent comments by Japanese officials contradict their claimed passive defense posture and suggest a potential military threat to China [3] Group 2 - It points out Japan's increasing military budget, which has seen thirteen consecutive years of growth, and the modification of its post-war defense policies, indicating a shift away from its historical stance on military engagement [3] - The article warns that Japan's actions, framed as self-defense, echo historical militaristic tendencies and could pose a threat to regional stability [3] - It calls for international vigilance regarding Japan's military ambitions and the implications of its recent rhetoric on global peace and security [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly rebuts the recent statements made by Japan's permanent representative to the UN, emphasizing its stance on Taiwan and Japan's historical commitments regarding territorial integrity [1][4][6]. Group 1: China's Position on Taiwan - China questions Japan's so-called "consistent position" on Taiwan, demanding clarity and a direct response from Japan regarding its stance [4][5]. - Historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration, and Japan's surrender documents affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which Japan is obligated to recognize and respect [5][6]. Group 2: Japan's Defense Strategy - Japan's representative claims adherence to a "passive defense strategy," yet recent statements by Japanese officials suggest a potential military response concerning Taiwan, contradicting their stated defense posture [5][7]. - Japan's defense budget has seen continuous increases, indicating a shift away from its post-war defense principles, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism [7][8]. Group 3: Bilateral Relations and Trust - The remarks made by Japanese officials have severely damaged mutual trust and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations, necessitating Japan to reaffirm its commitment to the One China principle [8]. - Japan is urged to retract its erroneous statements and align its actions with its commitments to China to avoid further consequences [8].

Core Points - The Japanese government has approved a supplementary budget for the fiscal year 2025, increasing defense spending to 2% of GDP, raising concerns across various sectors [1][6] - The total defense-related expenses for fiscal year 2025 will reach approximately 11 trillion yen (about 498.3 billion RMB), including an initial budget of over 9.9 trillion yen [1][4] Group 1: Defense Budget Details - The supplementary budget allocates 847.2 billion yen for the purchase of naval vessels, including two "Maya" class destroyers and four "Taigei" class submarines [2] - The Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force plans to construct 12 "Maya" class destroyers from 2024 to 2028, with upgrades for two existing destroyers funded separately [2] - The total defense-related budget, including missile procurement and other security-related expenditures, exceeds 1 trillion yen [3] Group 2: Historical Context and Policy Changes - Japan's post-World War II defense policy has historically adhered to a "self-defense" principle, with a self-imposed limit of 1% of GNP for defense spending established in 1976 [5] - The limit was theoretically lifted in 1987 but remained a practical constraint for two decades due to domestic opposition [5] - The U.S. has pressured Japan to increase military spending to share the burden of global military responsibilities, aligning with the ambitions of Japan's hawkish political factions [5][6] Group 3: Recent Developments and Public Sentiment - The current government aims to achieve a defense spending ratio of over 2% by fiscal year 2027, a target accelerated to be met within the current fiscal year [8] - The rapid increase in defense spending has been influenced by the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, which has shifted public sentiment towards supporting military expansion [7][8] - Critics argue that the rising defense budget, exceeding 10 trillion yen, poses a heavy burden on the economy and neglects public welfare [9]