近年来，中央商场业绩低迷。2018年至2024年，该公司营收连降7年。其中，2022年至2024年，中央商场连亏3年。 2025年12月25日，中央商场公告称，公司控股子公司江苏中央新亚百货股份有限公司(以下简称"新亚百货")近期按税务部门风险提示对涉税业务开展了自 查。经自查，新亚百货需补缴税款及滞纳金约7392.04万元，其中税款本金约4841.45万元，滞纳金约2550.59万元。 中央商场表示，上述补缴税款事项不属于前期会计差错，不涉及前期财务数据追溯调整。新亚百货补缴上述税款将计入公司2025年当期损益，预计将影响 公司2025年度归属于上市公司股东的净利润约6132.94万元，最终以2025年度经审计的财务报表为准。公司对上述事项高度重视，将继续积极与税务机关 进行沟通，并依据相关法律法规及通过合适途径维护公司及股东的合法权益。 另需注意的是，中央商场合同纠纷缠身。 此外，2025年12月30日，中央商场发布公告称，公司近日分别收到了泗阳县人民法院送达的两份诉讼材料。其中，因国有建设用地使用权出让合同纠纷， 公司控股子公司泗阳雨润中央购物广场有限公司(简称"泗阳雨润")被泗阳县自然资源和规划局提起 ...

海南华铁（维权）1月6日晚间公告，截至本公告披露日，公司及子公司连续十二个月内累计发生的诉 讼、仲裁事项涉案金额合计为6.02亿元，占公司最近一期经审计净资产的9.81%。其中，公司及子公司 作为原告方或申请人涉及诉讼、仲裁案件金额合计为4.72亿元，占涉诉案件总金额的78.36%。公告显 示，公司及子公司涉诉案件主要为与公司日常经营管理相关的合同纠纷，多数案件为公司及子公司作为 起诉方要求交易对方支付拖欠公司及子公司的业务款项。当前，公司正积极推动相关款项的回收工作， 持续改善公司的经营质量和经营业绩，维护公司合法权益。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Oulin Biotech is facing a lawsuit involving a contract dispute with an individual, Wang Jianhua, over a total amount of 19.2 million yuan, which includes penalties and is currently under court proceedings [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Wang Jianhua is entitled to a commission of 16 million yuan for providing technical materials related to specific vaccines, along with a penalty of 3.2 million yuan calculated at 20% of the commission [3]. - Oulin Biotech has acknowledged receipt of the legal documents and asserts that the claims lack sufficient factual and legal basis, thus rejecting the plaintiff's demands [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The court has frozen 1 non-basic bank account of the company, with the frozen amount of 19.2 million yuan representing 2.06% of the company's latest audited net assets and 8.57% of its cash balance, indicating a relatively minor impact on daily operations [4]. - The company reported a revenue of 589 million yuan in 2024, marking an 18.69% year-on-year increase, and a net profit of 20.76 million yuan, up 18.24% from the previous year [5]. Group 3: Company Background - Oulin Biotech specializes in the research, production, and sales of human vaccines and was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board in June 2021 [5]. - The company has only three commercialized products and has experienced significant profit declines in 2022 and 2023, with net profits dropping by 75.38% and 33.94%, respectively [5].

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Xinri Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. is involved in a legal dispute with Nandu Power regarding a contract worth 565 million yuan, with the Jiangsu High Court ordering a retrial due to procedural issues in the initial ruling [2][4] Group 1: Legal Dispute Details - The dispute originated from a lithium battery procurement contract signed in 2019, where Xinri claimed that Nandu delivered batteries with significant quality issues [4] - Xinri filed a lawsuit in February 2023, seeking to terminate the contract, recover the batteries, and claim damages totaling 565 million yuan [4] - Nandu Power denied the quality issues, with third-party inspections confirming product compliance [4] Group 2: Court Rulings and Implications - The first-instance ruling by Wuxi Intermediate Court in December 2024 terminated the contract and ordered Nandu to pay 100 million yuan in damages, but both parties appealed the decision [4] - The Jiangsu High Court's decision to send the case back for retrial resulted in the full refund of the appellate court fees paid by both parties [4] Group 3: Business Impact - The affected batteries were used in customized models for B-end customers, and Xinri indicated that any losses incurred would be compensated to these customers based on the lawsuit's outcome [4] - Xinri's main business includes the research, production, and sales of electric bicycles, electric light motorcycles, and electric motorcycles, utilizing various sales channels including distribution, direct sales, and overseas operations [4]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jingyuntong, is currently involved in a legal dispute regarding a contract with the Ulaanbaatar City Construction Investment Company, which has resulted in a significant financial judgment against the company [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Dispute - Jingyuntong and its wholly-owned subsidiary have received a civil judgment requiring them to pay 210 million yuan in construction fees and 22.42 million yuan in interest for the period from June 1, 2017, to August 19, 2019 [4]. - The company plans to appeal the judgment, indicating uncertainty regarding the impact of this lawsuit on current and future profits [4]. - The dispute traces back to a 2017 investment agreement where the construction company was supposed to invest in the project but failed to complete the necessary procedures [4]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Jingyuntong has reported a significant loss of 2.36 billion yuan in net profit for 2024, with revenue halving compared to previous years [5]. - In the first three quarters of the current year, the company achieved revenue of 2.457 billion yuan, a year-on-year decline of 37.55%, and a net loss of 227 million yuan [5]. - The company attributes its financial downturn to adjustments in its new materials business, aiming to improve operational efficiency and control costs [5]. Group 3: Litigation Context - Over the past 12 months, Jingyuntong has been involved in litigation and arbitration cases amounting to 1.05 billion yuan, which represents 11.73% of its latest audited net assets [4]. - The types of disputes include various contract issues, with amounts ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions [4].

Core Points - A scrap metal dealer, Zhang Ruijing, reported that her shipment of iron wire blocks weighing 35.77 tons was confiscated by Chifeng Zhongtang Special Steel Company due to alleged contamination, despite her lack of knowledge about the issue [1][2] - The steel company conducted a post-delivery inspection, which is contrary to the usual practice of inspecting goods before unloading, leading to the confiscation of the goods and a fine of 1,000 yuan [1][2] - Zhang Ruijing's total cost for the scrap metal purchase and transportation was over 90,000 yuan, and she is facing significant financial loss due to the confiscation [3] Company and Industry Summary - Chifeng Zhongtang Special Steel Company is involved in a dispute regarding the confiscation of scrap metal, which raises questions about their authority to seize goods as they are not a law enforcement entity [1][10] - The company has not responded to multiple inquiries from the media, indicating a lack of communication and transparency in handling the situation [10] - Legal experts suggest that the steel company’s actions may be invalid under contract law, as they do not have the right to confiscate goods and should return them if they are deemed non-compliant [10]

Core Viewpoint - The court upheld the original ruling in a contract dispute involving Zhou Dasheng, resulting in a compensation of 2.78 million yuan, significantly lower than the plaintiff's claim of 211 million yuan, while the company's financial performance showed a substantial decline in revenue but stable net profit due to improved gross margin [1][2]. Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, Zhou Dasheng reported a revenue of 4.597 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 43.92% [2]. - The net profit attributable to shareholders was 594 million yuan, reflecting a slight decline of 1.27% year-on-year [2]. - The gross margin increased to 30.34%, up by 11.96 percentage points compared to the same period last year, indicating product structure optimization and pricing benefits from rising gold prices [2]. Revenue Trends - Zhou Dasheng's revenue has experienced a continuous decline for five consecutive quarters from Q2 2024 to Q2 2025, with year-on-year decreases of 20.89%, 40.91%, 18.79%, 47.28%, and 38.47% respectively [2]. Store Operations - As of June 30, 2025, Zhou Dasheng had a total of 4,718 brand terminal stores, including 4,311 franchise stores and 407 self-operated stores [3]. - In the first half of 2025, the company reduced its total number of stores by 494, comprising 32 self-operated stores and 462 franchise stores [3].

Core Viewpoint - Huatai Technology (603679) announced that its basic account and fundraising special account have been judicially frozen, with a total frozen amount of 34.11 million yuan [1]. Financial Impact - The frozen funds account for 4.1% of the company's most recent audited net assets and 16.25% of its audited monetary funds [4]. - The frozen amount also represents 4.21% of net assets and 19.96% of monetary funds on the day of the announcement [4]. - As of the mid-year report, Huatai Technology had monetary funds of 171 million yuan, indicating that the freeze may exert some pressure on short-term cash flow [4]. Legal Context - The freeze is due to a contractual dispute with Shanghai Zhongdian Electronic System Technology Co., Ltd. regarding procurement contract acceptance, settlement, and payment for projects related to the Chengdu Ring Eco-City Smart Greenway and Smart Agriculture [4]. - The core dispute centers on the failure to meet the contractually agreed settlement milestones, leading Shanghai Zhongdian to apply for judicial preservation at the Chengdu Shuangliu District People's Court [4]. Company Response - Huatai Technology is actively contacting the court to verify the situation and has stated that, as of the announcement, this matter has not caused any substantial impact on the normal operation of its main business [4].

Core Points - The company has filed a lawsuit against the Qingdao Laoshan District Science and Technology Innovation Committee for a contract dispute, with the amount in question being 23.71 million yuan, calculated until August 29, 2025 [1] - The lawsuit has been accepted by the Qingdao Laoshan District People's Court, but has not yet officially commenced [1] - The company claims that the defendant's actions have severely harmed its legitimate rights and caused significant economic losses [1]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Daqo Energy (688303.SH) has received a civil judgment from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Eighth Division Intermediate People's Court regarding a lawsuit filed by Xianan New Materials [2] - In 2022, Daqo Energy signed a business cooperation agreement with Xianan New Materials to outsource silicon material processing, but did not renew contracts with other suppliers after April 2023 [4] - The plaintiff claims that Daqo Energy's shift to other suppliers constitutes a fundamental breach of the cooperation agreement, leading to a series of adjustments in the compensation amount sought, from 388 million yuan in June 2023 to 1.959 billion yuan in September 2023, and finally to 743 million yuan in April 2025 [6] Group 2 - The court's first-instance retrial judgment requires Daqo Energy to compensate Xianan New Materials for factory rent, personnel salary losses, and legal fees totaling 3.2971 million yuan, while rejecting other claims including a profit loss compensation of 541 million yuan and a share transfer payment of 190 million yuan [6] - Daqo Energy stated that the judgment amount would not adversely affect its daily operations or significantly impact its current and future financial results [6] - The judgment is still in the appeal period and has not yet taken effect, leaving the final outcome uncertain and dependent on the actual execution of the effective judgment [6]