如果您希望可以时常见面，欢迎标星收藏哦~ 来 源 ：内容来自检察日报·要闻版，记者： 张羽。 尊湃侵犯华为海思芯片技术 商业秘密案一审判决生效 2024年4月10日，上海市检察院第三分院对张某等14人以侵犯商业秘密罪向法院提起公诉。审查起 诉期间，检察机关依法讯问了被告人，向商业秘密权利人告知诉讼权利义务，并重点对涉案技术信 息是否具备非公知性和同一性进行审查。 据检察机关办案组介绍，这是一起非常典型的"内鬼"侵犯商业秘密案件，办案难度非常大。一方 面，涉案技术信息多达40余项且属于尖端技术，为了打破专业壁垒，办案组聘请了多名通讯行业 的资深专家，借助专家"外脑"对技术事实提供专业解读意见，通过反复、交叉论证研讨，为后续法 律定性分析奠定坚实基础，确保法律判断的精准性；另一方面，被告人有14名，分别涉及不同的 技术信息侵权，办案组要精准区分各被告人在共同犯罪中发挥的作用，认定每名被告人的涉案秘点 及其估值金额。在办理案件过程中，检察机关还针对被害企业内部管理漏洞精准制发检察建议，为 企业提供"漏洞报告"，更为企业"免疫系统"提供"升级蓝图"。面对被告人当庭辩解，公诉人从证 据、法理和情感三层递进式开展法庭教育 ...

新京报讯 据最高检官微消息，近日，记者从最高人民检察院知识产权检察厅获悉，最高检指导上海市 检察机关办理的尊湃侵犯华为海思芯片技术商业秘密案已于7月28日判决，14名被告人十日内均未提起 上诉，目前一审判决已生效。据悉，该案中，被非法获取的技术信息估值达3.17亿元。 据检察机关办案组介绍，这是一起非常典型的"内鬼"侵犯商业秘密案件，办案难度非常大。一方面，涉 案技术信息多达40余项且属于尖端技术，为了打破专业壁垒，办案组聘请了多名通讯行业的资深专家， 借助专家"外脑"对技术事实提供专业解读意见，通过反复、交叉论证研讨，为后续法律定性分析奠定坚 实基础，确保法律判断的精准性；另一方面，被告人有14名，分别涉及不同的技术信息侵权，办案组要 精准区分各被告人在共同犯罪中发挥的作用，认定每名被告人的涉案秘点及其估值金额。在办理案件过 程中，检察机关还针对被害企业内部管理漏洞精准制发检察建议，为企业提供"漏洞报告"，更为企 业"免疫系统"提供"升级蓝图"。面对被告人当庭辩解，公诉人从证据、法理和情感三层递进式开展法庭 教育，最终被告人均自愿认罪。 据了解，海思公司系华为公司的全资子公司。华为公司于2011年启动Wi- ...

据最高人民检察院微信公众号8月27日消息，最高检指导上海市检察机关办理的尊湃侵犯华为海思芯片 技术商业秘密案已于7月28日判决，14名被告人十日内均未提起上诉，目前一审判决已生效。据悉，该 案中，被非法获取的技术信息估值达3.17亿元。 据了解，海思公司系华为公司的全资子公司。华为公司于2011年启动Wi-Fi芯片研发项目，后由海思公 司负责该项目，投入了大量人力物力进行长期自主研发，取得Wi-Fi芯片相应技术信息，并采取了合理 的保密措施。 被告人张某原系海思公司射频芯片开发部门负责人，离职后创立尊湃公司，并在新公司成立前后拉拢周 某甲、刘某、周某乙、顾某等人加入，任命4人担任高管并负责相应技术部门。其间，张某等5人经共同 商议，决定研发与海思公司同类的Wi-Fi芯片。 此后，为了缩短研发周期、迅速投入量产、加快吸引融资，经张某指示，周某甲等人以良好的薪资待 遇、发展前景等为条件，继续招募海思公司员工高某、王某等7人加入尊湃公司。7人在离职前后应尊湃 公司要求，自行或者勾结仍在海思公司任职的员工赵某、屠某，以截屏、抄录、微信传输等不正当手段 获取海思公司技术信息，用于尊湃公司芯片研发。 2024年4月10日 ...

来源|凤凰网财经《公司研究院》 而这片百万科技精英聚集的硅谷圣地，正在上演AI时代最炽烈的人才暗战。今年以来，苹果AI团队十余核心成员相继离职，加入Meta、OpenAI等科技巨 头；微软则将DeepMind超二十名精英纳入麾下；Meta一周挖走OpenAI 8名核心人才（含四位华人）。天价悬赏令下，"挖墙脚"的战火已经烧至年薪上亿。 如今，这场科技圈的"无间道"再添新战：苹果指控OPPO以高薪挖角Apple Watch核心工程师，怂恿其窃取健康传感器等商业机密。 据彭博社报道，当地时间8月21日，科技巨头苹果在美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞联邦法院递交了一份诉状，指控前Apple Watch华裔传感器架构师Chen Shi在离 职前系统性窃取核心商业机密。此后，这位月薪2.8万美元的核心技术骨干，转投OPPO硅谷研发中心带队搞竞品。 苹果怒斥这是"系统性窃密"。凤凰网财经《公司研究院》致电OPPO官方客服，对方的回应是："公司已关注该事件，以官方消息为准"。 这场跨国科技"谍战"，不仅关乎63份核心机密的归属，更是揭开了全球科技巨头在人才争夺战中不为人知的暗面。 作者|DW 当硅谷人才争夺战撞上跨国技术"谍战"，科 ...

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials Inc. for alleged trade secret infringement related to plasma source and wafer surface treatment technologies [1] Group 1: Legal Action - Yitang claims that Applied Materials illegally obtained and used its core technology secrets, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1] - The lawsuit has been filed in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, with a claim amount of 99.99 million RMB [1] - The case has been officially registered as of the announcement date [1] Group 2: Employee Recruitment - Applied Materials is accused of hiring two employees from Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., who possess knowledge of the core technology related to plasma generation and processing methods [1] - Evidence suggests that after their recruitment, these employees contributed to a patent application submitted to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration, with them listed as the main inventors [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the lawsuit filed by Yitang Co., Ltd. against Applied Materials for allegedly misappropriating its core technology related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming damages of 99.99 million RMB [2][5][6]. Group 1: Legal Action - Yitang Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials for illegal acquisition and use of its core technology secrets, specifically related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [2][5]. - The lawsuit claims that Applied Materials violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China by disclosing and claiming ownership of Yitang's technology through a patent application [6]. Group 2: Technology and Business Impact - Yitang's key technology involves high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is widely used in its semiconductor processing equipment [5]. - The company asserts that the two employees hired by Applied Materials had previously worked at Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., and had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the technology [5][6]. - Yitang Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, production, and sales of wafer processing equipment for integrated circuit manufacturing, and is one of the few domestic companies with multiple R&D capabilities in this field [6]. Group 3: Market Position - As of the article's publication, Yitang Co., Ltd. has a market capitalization of approximately 67.623 billion RMB, following its listing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board on July 8 [6].

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. (Yitang) has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) for allegedly misappropriating its trade secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming damages of 99.99 million RMB [1][2] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Yitang has initiated legal action in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, asserting that AMAT unlawfully acquired and utilized its core technology secrets and disclosed them through a patent application in China [1][2] - The lawsuit has been officially filed, but the court has yet to schedule a hearing [1] - Yitang claims that the lawsuit will not significantly impact its operations or production [1] Group 2: Technology and Intellectual Property - The technology in question involves high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma used for wafer surface treatment, which is critical for Yitang's semiconductor processing equipment [1] - The two employees involved in the case were previously employed by Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc. (MTI), and had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the technology [2] - Evidence suggests that AMAT submitted a patent application to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration, naming the two former MTI employees as primary inventors, thereby disclosing Yitang's trade secrets [2] Group 3: Impact on Business - Yitang alleges that AMAT's actions have caused significant damage to its intellectual property and economic interests, including promoting and selling products that utilize the misappropriated technology in China [2]

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for alleged illegal acquisition and use of its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming significant damage to its intellectual property and economic interests [4][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit has been accepted by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court and is currently in the pre-trial stage [2][4]. - The lawsuit amount is set at RMB 99.99 million (approximately 14.1 million USD) [5][6]. - The company requests the court to order the defendant to cease the use and disclosure of its technology secrets and to destroy any related materials [5][6]. Group 2: Company Position and Impact - The company emphasizes that this lawsuit is a legitimate action to protect its intellectual property rights and will not have a significant adverse impact on its operations [3][8]. - The company has a strong commitment to original research and development, and it is closely monitoring the lawsuit's progress [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the lawsuit filed by Yitang Co., a domestic semiconductor equipment manufacturer, against Applied Materials (AMAT) for allegedly misappropriating its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Yitang Co. has filed a lawsuit in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court against AMAT for illegally obtaining and using its core technology secrets, which were disclosed in a patent application in China [2][6]. - The company is seeking a total compensation of 99.99 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses related to the infringement [2][5]. - The lawsuit aims to protect the intellectual property rights of innovators and maintain the company's legal rights without significantly impacting its operations [5]. Group 2: Technology and Market Position - Yitang Co. specializes in high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma technology, which is crucial for its semiconductor processing equipment, including dry stripping, dry etching, and surface treatment [5][6]. - The company claims to possess leading original technology capabilities in this field and has relevant trade secrets [5]. - Applied Materials, founded in 1967, is the second-largest semiconductor equipment supplier globally, with projected revenues exceeding $25 billion in 2024, following ASML [6].

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Co., Ltd. (688729) has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for infringement of trade secrets, claiming damages of 99.99 million yuan [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Action Details - Yitang alleges that Applied Materials illegally obtained and used its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1][4]. - The lawsuit has been filed in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, and the case has been officially registered but has not yet gone to trial [1][6]. Group 2: Technology and Employment Issues - Yitang's key technology involves the use of high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is widely applied in its semiconductor processing equipment [4]. - Two employees, previously working at Yitang's subsidiary Mattson Technology, Inc., were recruited by Applied Materials and are alleged to have disclosed Yitang's trade secrets in a patent application submitted to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration [4][6]. Group 3: Financial Impact and Company Position - Yitang is seeking a court order to stop Applied Materials from using its trade secrets and to compensate for economic losses, including punitive damages amounting to 99.99 million yuan [6]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to original research and development and the importance of intellectual property protection, stating that the lawsuit will not significantly impact its operations [6]. - Yitang reported revenues of 4.763 billion yuan, 3.931 billion yuan, and 4.633 billion yuan for the years 2022 to 2024, with a compound annual growth rate of 18.9% in net profit [6].