政治上的挑衅与军事上的躁动互为表里。高市之所以对错误言论拒不悔改，甚至借题发挥，其背后的算 计就是通过渲染所谓"外部威胁"为日本彻底松绑军事限制寻找借口。回顾历史不难发现，以所谓"存亡 危机"和"自卫"为名发动对外侵略，是日本军国主义的惯用手段。日本曾多次以夸大外部威胁、捏造"存 亡危机"为借口，为其发动侵略战争、破坏地区和平的行为进行辩护和动员。对此，国际社会特别是地 区国家都有深切而惨痛的共同记忆。高市妄图再次将这一危险概念具象化，复活军国主义的险恶用心昭 然若揭。 日本首相高市早苗近期在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，粗暴干涉中国内政，且不思悔改，拒 不撤回错误言论。日本政府还频频为其错误言论强行辩解。如此顽固立场，暴露了日本右翼势力的持续 抬头和军国主义的阴魂不散。 25日，日本政府内阁决议通过答辩书，称高市关于"台湾有事"可能构成"存亡危机事态"的国会答辩"不 改变日本政府的一贯立场"。日方所谓"一贯立场"的具体内容到底是什么？日方能不能完整公开地表述 这个"一贯立场"？日方一再重复所谓"立场未变"的概念，却始终没有触及问题实质。答辩书老调重弹， 看似在"找补"高市言论的恶劣影响，实则仍在为错误 ...

2025.11. 26 本文字数：1244，阅读时长大约3分钟 环球时报报道，日本政府近日展开多线行动，为高市早苗的错误言论狡辩。 日本政府确定答辩书 据共同社报道，日本政府在25日的内阁会议上确定了答辩书，称高市早苗关于"台湾有事"可能构 成"存亡危机事态"的国会答辩"并不意味着改变政府的一贯见解"。答辩书声称，对于是否属于"存亡 危机事态""将根据事态的个别具体状况，由政府对所有信息进行综合判断"，指出"政府见解完全维 持不变，并未考虑需要调整或重新探讨"。答辩书还称，台湾海峡的和平与稳定对日本的安全保障乃 至整个国际社会的稳定很重要，表示"期待问题通过对话和平解决"。 对此，毛宁25日表示，日本官方最近多次提到日本政府的"一贯立场"或"立场未变"，我们已经明确 向日方提出，日方所谓"一贯立场"的具体内容到底是什么？日方能不能完整公开地表述这个"一贯立 场"？日方一再重复所谓"立场未变"的概念，但却始终没有触及问题实质。实际上，日方是在刻意回 避中方关于收回错误言论的要求，企图蒙混过关。我们不得不质疑，日方到底有没有反躬自省、纠正 错误的诚意和行动？ 辽宁大学美国与东亚研究院院长吕超25日表示，日本政府的 ...

Group 1 - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's remarks regarding Taiwan have sparked outrage among the Chinese public, with claims that the Republic of China, not the People's Republic of China, is the legitimate authority to discuss Taiwan issues [1] - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized that Japan's historical claims are either based on ignorance or intentional distortion, asserting that Japan's 1945 surrender included a commitment to return Taiwan to China [1][2] - The Japanese government has issued a defense statement asserting that Kishi's comments do not represent a change in its longstanding position, maintaining that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is crucial for Japan's security [2] Group 2 - Japan's actions at the United Nations included a letter from its permanent representative defending its defense policy, claiming that Japan's self-defense strategy is passive and misinterpreted by China [3] - Analysts suggest that the current tensions between China and Japan could escalate beyond previous conflicts, with concerns about potential economic repercussions, such as China's control over rare earth supplies [3] - The Japanese entertainment industry has been affected, with numerous performances and film screenings in China being canceled as a response to the diplomatic tensions [4][5] Group 3 - Public sentiment in Japan has turned against Kishi, with individuals in the entertainment sector expressing disappointment over the impact of his comments on cultural exchanges and tourism [5][6] - Former Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama Yukio criticized the lack of media scrutiny regarding Kishi's remarks, highlighting the historical consequences of media complicity in nationalistic rhetoric [6]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is increasingly expanding its military capabilities and loosening restrictions on arms exports, raising concerns about its intentions and potential return to militarism [1] Group 1: Japan's Military Expansion - Japan has completed the return of "Patriot" missile systems to the U.S., marking its first export of lethal weapons since relaxing arms export restrictions [1] - The Japanese government has been increasing its defense budget for 13 consecutive years and has passed new security laws to allow for collective self-defense [1] - The modification of Japan's arms export principles indicates a significant shift towards a more aggressive military posture [1] Group 2: International Implications - Japan's actions contradict its stated goal of establishing a nuclear-free world, as it seeks to enhance deterrence cooperation and potentially revise its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [1] - The international community, particularly China, expresses strong opposition to Japan's militarization and potential revival of militaristic policies, emphasizing that such actions would disrupt post-war international order [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi's recent remarks regarding Taiwan have raised significant concerns, suggesting that a "Taiwan crisis" could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights, indicating a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait and a blatant interference in China's internal affairs [1][2][3] Group 1: Domestic Reactions - Many Japanese politicians, media, and scholars have criticized Takashi's statements, emphasizing that they violate the One China principle and could jeopardize the peaceful development that Japan and China have maintained for 80 years [1][2][3] - Former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba criticized Takashi's comments as reckless, arguing that they imply "a Taiwan crisis equals a Japan crisis," which has never been defined by previous governments [2][3] - Concerns have been raised about the vagueness of the "survival crisis situation" concept, which could allow for arbitrary interpretations by the current government, potentially leading to military action [6][7] Group 2: Historical Context and Legal Implications - The concept of "survival crisis situation" was established in 2015, and since then, Japan has made legislative preparations for potential involvement in Taiwan-related issues [3][4] - Historically, Japanese cabinets have adhered to a "defensive-only" principle, and Takashi's statements represent a significant departure from this stance, raising alarms about the potential for military escalation [4][5] Group 3: Concerns About Regional Stability - Analysts express fears that Takashi's remarks could exacerbate tensions in the region and undermine Japan's security by entangling it in external geopolitical conflicts that do not align with its national interests [8][10] - There is a growing apprehension about the potential for Japan to revert to militaristic policies under the guise of external threats, reflecting a deep-seated awareness of historical lessons [8][10] Group 4: Future Implications for Japan-China Relations - The current political landscape in Japan, where the ruling party lacks a majority, may lead to further hardline stances against China, complicating diplomatic relations [10][11] - Experts warn that Takashi's comments have severely damaged the political foundation of Japan-China relations, indicating a period of high friction and risk ahead [10][11]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is reportedly considering a "re-examination" of Japan's long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," particularly the aspect concerning the non-introduction of nuclear weapons, raising concerns across various sectors in Japan [1][3]. Group 1: Policy Background - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," established by former Prime Minister Eisaku Satō in 1967, state that Japan will not possess, manufacture, or introduce nuclear weapons, forming a cornerstone of Japan's nuclear policy [3]. - The current government, under Kishida, is contemplating revisions to the National Security Strategy in 2026, which may include a reassessment of the non-introduction principle [3]. Group 2: Political Reactions - Opposition leader Yukio Edano criticized Kishida's remarks as "sudden and inappropriate," emphasizing the need for Japan to maintain a non-nuclear stance, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki [3]. - Several atomic bomb survivors expressed their inability to accept Kishida's views, labeling them as "extremely dangerous" and potentially provocative towards war [4]. Group 3: International Concerns - The Chinese Ministry of National Defense has previously warned that Japan's recent military actions, including increased defense spending and the development of long-range offensive capabilities, are moving away from its "peace constitution" and "self-defense" commitments, which raises alarms among nations historically affected by Japanese militarism [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses serious concern over Japan's recent military and security developments, indicating a potential shift away from its pacifist stance and raising alarms about regional stability [3][4]. Group 1: Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has been vague about the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting a possible abandonment of these principles, which has raised concerns about Japan's intentions regarding nuclear capabilities [3]. - High-ranking Japanese officials have stated that they do not rule out the option of introducing nuclear-powered submarines, signaling a significant policy shift towards military expansion [3]. - Japan has been increasing its defense budget annually and relaxing restrictions on arms exports, indicating a move towards developing offensive military capabilities [3]. Group 2: Regional Security Concerns - The remarks made by Japanese officials regarding potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait have provoked strong reactions from China, which views these statements as a serious violation of its sovereignty and a challenge to the post-war international order [6][7]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that Taiwan is a core interest and any foreign interference in Taiwan's affairs is unacceptable, reiterating its stance against Japan's military provocations [7]. Group 3: Historical Context and Calls for Reflection - The year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, prompting calls for Japan to reflect on its historical actions and adhere to a path of peaceful development [3][7]. - The Chinese government urges Japan to stop using historical grievances as a pretext for military expansion and to take concrete actions to rebuild trust with its Asian neighbors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses serious concern over Japan's recent military and security developments, indicating a potential shift in Japan's defense policy that could have significant implications for regional stability [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has been ambiguous regarding the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting a possible abandonment of these principles [1]. - High-ranking Japanese officials have stated that they do not rule out the option of introducing nuclear-powered submarines, signaling a major policy shift [1]. - The Japanese government is reportedly discussing amendments to Article 9 of its constitution and the establishment of emergency provisions, which could further enhance its military capabilities [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Regional Implications - The Chinese government recalls Japan's militaristic past during World War II, emphasizing the severe consequences of its actions and the need for Japan to reflect on its history [2]. - Japan has significantly increased its defense budget and relaxed restrictions on arms exports, moving towards the development of offensive military capabilities [2]. - The recent provocative statements by Japanese officials regarding Taiwan raise concerns among Asian neighbors and the international community about Japan's commitment to peace and stability in the region [2].

Group 1 - The Chinese government expresses serious concerns over Japan's recent military security developments, urging Japan to stop using excuses for military expansion [1][2] - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has been vague about the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting a potential shift in policy regarding nuclear weapons [1][2] - Japan's government officials have indicated that they do not rule out the option of introducing nuclear-powered submarines, which raises alarms about Japan's military intentions [1][2] Group 2 - Japan has significantly adjusted its security policies in recent years, increasing defense budgets and seeking to develop offensive weapons, which has led to regional and international concerns [2] - The remarks made by Japanese officials regarding potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait have provoked strong doubts among Asian neighbors and the international community about Japan's commitment to peace [2] - The Chinese government calls for Japan to reflect on its militaristic past and adhere to a path of peaceful development, emphasizing the importance of trust-building with neighboring countries [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses serious concerns regarding Japan's recent military and security developments, indicating a potential shift away from its post-war pacifism and nuclear non-proliferation principles [2][3] Summary by Relevant Sections Japan's Military Policy - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has been vague about the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting a possible abandonment of these principles [3] - High-ranking Japanese officials have stated that they do not rule out the option of introducing nuclear-powered submarines, which raises alarms about Japan's military intentions [3] Historical Context - The statement highlights Japan's militaristic past during World War II, where it committed severe crimes against humanity, leading to significant regional and global suffering [3] - The current trajectory of Japan's defense policy, including increased defense budgets and the pursuit of offensive weapons, is seen as a dangerous deviation from its historical commitments to peace [3] Regional Implications - Japan's recent provocative statements regarding Taiwan and potential military intervention have raised concerns among neighboring Asian countries and the international community about Japan's commitment to peaceful development [3] - The Chinese government urges Japan to reflect on its history of aggression and to adhere to a path of peaceful development, emphasizing the need for Japan to build trust with its Asian neighbors and the global community through concrete actions [3]