受贿

Search documents
辽宁检察机关依法对谭瑞松涉嫌贪污、受贿和内幕交易、泄露内幕信息案提起公诉
Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang· 2025-08-05 02:06
Core Viewpoint - The former Party Secretary and Chairman of Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Tan Ruishong, is under investigation for corruption, bribery, insider trading, and leaking insider information, with the case now being prosecuted by the Dalian Intermediate People's Court [1] Group 1 - The investigation was conducted by the National Supervisory Commission and the Public Security Bureau of Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, which concluded their inquiries [1] - The case has been designated for prosecution by the Supreme People's Procuratorate, indicating a high level of scrutiny and seriousness [1] - The Dalian People's Procuratorate has formally filed charges against Tan Ruishong, moving the case to the court system [1]
检察机关依法分别对陈少荣、彭红圃、王川、陈波、蔡光辉决定逮捕
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-08-04 08:43
央视网消息:据"最高人民检察院"微信公众号消息,检察机关依法分别对陈少荣、彭红圃、王川、陈 波、蔡光辉决定逮捕。 贵州检察机关依法对陈少荣决定逮捕 贵州省人大常委会法制工作委员会原副主任陈少荣(正厅级)涉嫌受贿一案,由贵州省监察委员会调查 终结,移送检察机关审查起诉。经贵州省人民检察院指定管辖,由黔南州人民检察院审查起诉。日前, 黔南州人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对陈少荣作出逮捕决定。该案正在进一步办理中。 广西检察机关依法对彭红圃决定逮捕 广西建设职业技术学院原党委副书记、院长彭红圃(副厅级)涉嫌受贿一案,由广西壮族自治区监察委 员会调查终结,移送检察机关审查起诉。经广西壮族自治区人民检察院指定管辖,由来宾市人民检察院 审查起诉。日前,来宾市人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对彭红圃作出逮捕决定。该案正在进一步办理 中。 广西检察机关依法对王川决定逮捕 广西壮族自治区合浦县委原书记、二级巡视员王川涉嫌受贿一案,由广西壮族自治区监察委员会调查终 结,移送检察机关审查起诉。经广西壮族自治区人民检察院指定管辖,由广西壮族自治区人民检察院南 宁铁路运输分院审查起诉。日前,广西壮族自治区人民检察院南宁铁路运输分院依法以涉嫌受贿 ...
检察机关依法对赵金云涉嫌受贿、内幕交易案提起公诉
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-07-30 02:04
Group 1 - The case against Zhao Jinyun, former Vice Governor of Gansu Province, involves allegations of bribery and insider trading, with the investigation concluded by the National Supervisory Commission and transferred to the procuratorial authority for prosecution [1][2] - Zhao Jinyun is accused of leveraging her various official positions to illegally accept significant amounts of money and benefits, with the total amount being particularly large [2] - The prosecution also highlights that Zhao Jinyun, as an insider, engaged in securities trading based on undisclosed information that significantly affected stock prices, which is considered a serious offense [2]
司法部原党组成员、副部长刘志强受贿案一审宣判
news flash· 2025-07-22 09:02
芜湖市中级人民法院认为,被告人刘志强的行为构成受贿罪,受贿数额特别巨大,应依法惩处。鉴于其 到案后如实供述罪行,主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的部分受贿事实,认罪悔罪,积极退赃,涉案赃款赃 物大部分已追缴到案,具有法定、酌定从轻处罚情节,依法可对其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 据悉,芜湖市中级人民法院于2025年5月9日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中,检察机关出示了相关证据, 被告人刘志强及其辩护人进行了质证,控辩双方在法庭的主持下充分发表了意见,刘志强进行了最后陈 述,并当庭表示认罪悔罪。人大代表、政协委员和各界群众30余人旁听了庭审。 2025年7月22日,安徽省芜湖市中级人民法院一审公开宣判司法部原党组成员、副部长刘志强受贿案, 对被告人刘志强以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十三年,并处罚金人民币三百万元;对追缴在案的刘志强受贿所 得财物及其孳息依法上缴国库,不足部分继续追缴。 经审理查明:2007年至2024年4月,被告人刘志强利用担任公安部国际合作局局长,青海省副省长、省 公安厅厅长,司法部党组成员、副部长,国家禁毒委员会委员等职务上的便利以及职权、地位形成的便 利条件,为他人在企业经营、项目承揽、业务推广、职务晋升等 ...
骆玉林,死缓!
券商中国· 2025-07-14 10:40
Core Viewpoint - The case of Luo Yulin, a former deputy minister-level official of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, highlights severe corruption and insider trading within the Chinese government, resulting in a death sentence with a two-year reprieve and significant financial penalties [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Corruption and Insider Trading - Luo Yulin was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling over 220 million RMB (approximately 32 million USD) from 1997 to 2023 while holding various high-ranking positions in the Qinghai provincial government and the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission [2]. - His insider trading activities involved providing confidential information that significantly affected stock prices, with the court deeming the circumstances particularly severe [2][3]. Court Ruling - The Qingdao Intermediate People's Court ruled that Luo's actions constituted both bribery and insider trading, with the severity of his crimes warranting a death sentence, which will be commuted to life imprisonment after a two-year reprieve [1][3]. - The court acknowledged Luo's cooperation during the investigation, including confessing to many of his crimes and returning a significant portion of the illicit gains, which influenced the decision to suspend the death penalty [3].
骆玉林,一审被判死缓
财联社· 2025-07-14 09:11
山东省青岛市中级人民法院一审公开宣判国务院国有资产监督管理委员会原副部长级干部骆玉 林受贿、内幕交易一案,对被告人骆玉林以受贿罪判处死刑,缓期二年执行,剥夺政治权利终 身,并处没收个人全部财产,在其死刑缓期执行二年期满依法减为无期徒刑后,终身监禁,不 得减刑、假释;以内幕交易罪判处有期徒刑六年,并处罚金人民币八百万元,决定执行死刑, 缓期二年执行,剥夺政治权利终身,并处没收个人全部财产,在其死刑缓期执行二年期满依法 减为无期徒刑后,终身监禁,不得减刑、假释。追缴在案的骆玉林犯罪所得财物及孳息依法上 缴国库,不足部分继续追缴。 经审理查明:1997年至2023年,被告人骆玉林先后利用担任青海省国有资产管理局局长,原 青海省经济贸易委员会党委书记、主任,原青海省经济委员会党组书记、主任,青海省人民政 府党组成员、副省长,青海省委常委,青海省人民政府党组副书记,国务院国有重点大型企业 监事会主席,国务院国有资产监督管理委员会副部长级干部等职务上的便利以及职权、地位形 成的便利条件,为有关单位和个人在企业经营、项目承揽等事项上提供帮助,直接或通过他人 非法收受财物,共计折合人民币2.2亿余元。2013年至2014年, ...
国务院国资委原副部长级干部骆玉林受贿、内幕交易案一审被判死缓
news flash· 2025-07-14 09:04
经审理查明:1997年至2023年,被告人骆玉林先后利用担任青海省国有资产管理局局长,原青海省经济 贸易委员会党委书记、主任,原青海省经济委员会党组书记、主任,青海省人民政府党组成员、副省 长,青海省委常委,青海省人民政府党组副书记,国务院国有重点大型企业监事会主席,国务院国有资 产监督管理委员会副部长级干部等职务上的便利以及职权、地位形成的便利条件,为有关单位和个人在 企业经营、项目承揽等事项上提供帮助,直接或通过他人非法收受财物,共计折合人民币2.2亿余元。 2013年至2014年,骆玉林作为内幕信息的知情人,在涉及对证券交易价格有重大影响的信息尚未公开 前,明示他人从事相关交易活动,情节特别严重。 国务院国资委原副部长级干部骆玉林受贿、内幕交易案一审被判死缓 智通财经7月14日电,山东省青岛市中级人民法院一审公开宣判国务院国有资产监督管理委员会原副部 长级干部骆玉林受贿、内幕交易一案,对被告人骆玉林以受贿罪判处死刑,缓期二年执行,剥夺政治权 利终身,并处没收个人全部财产,在其死刑缓期执行二年期满依法减为无期徒刑后,终身监禁,不得减 刑、假释;以内幕交易罪判处有期徒刑六年,并处罚金人民币八百万元,决定执行 ...
阿根廷前总统费尔南德斯涉嫌贪腐被起诉
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-07-11 04:31
Group 1 - The former President of Argentina, Alberto Fernández, has been charged with corruption, specifically for engaging in incompatible business transactions during his presidency from 2019 to 2023 [1][2] - Fernández allegedly used his position to benefit insurance broker Héctor Martínez Sosa, who is married to his private secretary, María Cantero, resulting in Martínez Sosa earning commissions of 2.252 billion pesos (approximately 1.793 million USD), which accounted for nearly 60% of the total commissions paid by the national insurance company [1] - The court has frozen Fernández's assets amounting to 14.634 billion pesos (approximately 11.654 million USD), and the case also involves money laundering, bribery, and misconduct, with 33 individuals, including Martínez Sosa, Cantero, and former president of the national insurance company Alberto Pagliano, being prosecuted [1] Group 2 - This is the second lawsuit faced by Fernández after leaving office, and it is the first involving corruption allegations; earlier this year, he was charged with gender violence against former First Lady Fabiola Yáñez [2] - The investigation into the allegations against Fernández regarding Yáñez led to the examination of Cantero's phone records, which uncovered evidence of Fernández's alleged corruption [2]
“90后”苟某,单笔收了900万现金
中国基金报· 2025-07-09 05:59
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the bribery case of Gou, a director at a construction company, highlighting the methods and amounts involved in the corruption, as well as the legal consequences faced by Gou for his actions [1][2][4][6]. Group 1: Bribery Details - Gou utilized his position to solicit and accept bribes totaling 10.467 million yuan, with the largest single bribe being 9 million yuan in cash [1][2]. - The bribery scheme involved multiple companies and individuals, including Gou's collusion with Hu to extract bribes from project owners in exchange for project contracts and favorable treatment [2][4]. - Specific instances of bribery included cash payments of 300,000 yuan and 996,000 yuan from various companies for project assistance [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After being investigated by the supervisory commission, Gou was prosecuted for bribery and money laundering, ultimately receiving a sentence of nine years and three months in prison, along with a fine of 660,000 yuan [1][6][7]. - The court ordered the confiscation of 8.3051 million yuan of Gou's illicit gains, which will be deposited into the national treasury, with further efforts to recover remaining illegal assets [7].
三堂会审丨出资假象难掩受贿实质
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-06-11 00:10
Core Viewpoint - The case involves Wu, a former leader of a state-owned enterprise, who engaged in corrupt practices by investing in a real estate project through relatives and receiving illicit profits, leading to serious disciplinary actions and legal consequences [3][4][10]. Group 1: Background of the Case - Wu served as the Party Secretary and Chairman of A Province Investment Company and Chairman of B Investment Management Company until his resignation in January 2021 [3]. - Wu violated integrity discipline by investing 3.08 million RMB in a real estate project through relatives, earning a total profit of 786,500 RMB from 2019 to 2021, with Wu personally profiting 418,600 RMB [3][4]. Group 2: Corruption Details - Wu and Zhang conspired to receive 10.14 million RMB from D Investment Partnership, manipulating the shareholding structure of B Investment Management Company to benefit themselves [4][5]. - They arranged for Zhang to take out a loan in the name of D Investment Partnership to cover their investment, agreeing to repay the loan with the investment returns, which was deemed a form of bribery [12][15]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The investigation into Wu's misconduct began on May 27, 2023, leading to his expulsion from the Party on November 27, 2023, and subsequent criminal charges for bribery [7][8]. - On February 5, 2024, the court sentenced Wu to ten and a half years in prison and imposed a fine of 2 million RMB for his bribery offenses [9]. Group 4: Expert Opinions on Misconduct - Experts argue that Wu's actions constituted a violation of integrity regulations, as he used his position to engage in profit-making activities that conflicted with his official duties [10][11]. - The nature of Wu's investment in the real estate project was scrutinized, with opinions suggesting it was a facade for receiving bribes rather than a legitimate investment [18][19]. Group 5: Implications for State-Owned Enterprises - The case highlights the risks associated with leadership positions in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to integrity and anti-corruption regulations [10][20]. - It serves as a cautionary tale regarding the potential for abuse of power and the importance of transparency in investment activities within state-owned entities [20].