需要注意的是，如果董某借挂证之名行收受好处之实，即董某利用职权为黄某提供帮助，明知B公司并 无挂证需求而收取报酬或收受黄某送给的明显高于支付给其他挂证人员标准的报酬，那么董某的行为本 质上属于受贿。 实践中，存在党员干部违规在管理和服务对象公司挂证取酬现象，这种行为中，因党员干部主体身份的 特殊性、侵犯客体的复合性，容易导致对行为定性存在不同认识。笔者认为，要坚持从实质分析，仔细 甄别行为属于受贿、违反国家法律法规还是违反廉洁纪律。 有这样一起案例。董某，中共党员，A区国资委副主任。黄某，B公司（私企）总经理。2012年至2021 年，B公司先后在A区国资委及其管理的国企承接了多项业务。董某因工作与黄某相识，二人之间无请 托谋利事项。2013年下半年，董某提出将本人的一级造价工程师证书挂靠在B公司，一方面可以让证书 保持注册使用记录不被注销，另一方面也可以增加本人收入。黄某考虑到B公司确有证书使用上的需 求，行业主管部门对公司资质有明确要求，而是否拥有相应证书是一项衡量标准，并且同期还有其他人 员在其公司挂证，因此同意董某要求，并与董某约定，按照B公司支付给其他挂证人员的标准和方式向 董某支付报酬。2014年 ...

Core Viewpoint - The former director of the Nanjing Municipal People's Congress, Long Xiang, has been prosecuted for serious charges including bribery, embezzlement, abuse of power, and insider trading [1][2] Group 1: Charges and Legal Proceedings - Long Xiang is accused of illegally occupying public property through fraudulent means, with the amount involved being particularly large [2] - He allegedly used his positions in various governmental roles to benefit others and illegally accepted significant amounts of money [2] - The prosecution has been initiated by the Jingzhou Municipal People's Procuratorate, which has combined the cases against Long Xiang for a comprehensive legal approach [1][2] Group 2: Specific Allegations - The charges include serious abuse of power that resulted in significant losses to public property and the interests of the state and people [2] - Long Xiang is also accused of illegally obtaining insider information related to securities trading and making trades before the information was publicly disclosed, which is considered particularly severe [2]

Core Viewpoint - The case of Long Xiang, former director of the Nanjing Municipal People's Congress, involves serious allegations of corruption, bribery, abuse of power, and insider trading, leading to his arrest and prosecution by the judicial authorities [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Charges - Long Xiang is accused of embezzling and illegally occupying public property through fraudulent means, with the amount involved being particularly large [2]. - He allegedly used his positions in various governmental roles to benefit others and illegally accepted substantial amounts of money [2]. - The charges also include serious abuse of power that resulted in significant losses to public property and the interests of the state and people [2]. - Long Xiang is implicated in insider trading, having illegally obtained confidential information that significantly affected securities trading prices before such information was made public [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The National Supervisory Commission concluded its investigation and transferred the case to the prosecutorial authorities for review and prosecution [1]. - The Hubei Provincial Jingzhou People's Procuratorate has been designated to handle the case, which has now been combined with the insider trading investigation [1]. - The Jingzhou People's Procuratorate has formally filed a public prosecution against Long Xiang in the Jingzhou Intermediate People's Court [1].

1月6日，天津市第二中级人民法院一审公开宣判甘肃省政府原副省长赵金云受贿、内幕交易一案，对被告人赵金云以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十三年，并处罚金人民币 三百万元，以内幕交易罪判处有期徒刑五年，并处罚金人民币五十万元，决定执行有期徒刑十五年，并处罚金人民币三百五十万元；对赵金云犯罪所得财物及孳息 依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 经审理查明： 天津市第二中级人民法院认为，被告人赵金云的行为构成受贿罪、内幕交易罪。鉴于赵金云受贿犯罪中有未遂情节；到案后如实供述罪行，主动交代办案机关尚未 掌握的部分受贿事实和大部分内幕交易事实；认罪悔罪，积极退赃，涉案赃款赃物及孳息已全部追缴，具有法定、酌定从宽处罚情节，可对其依法从轻处罚。法庭 遂作出上述判决。 据悉，天津市第二中级人民法院于2025年10月22日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中，检察机关出示了相关证据，被告人赵金云及其辩护人进行了质证，控辩双方在法 庭的主持下充分发表了意见，赵金云进行了最后陈述，并当庭表示认罪悔罪。人大代表、政协委员和各界群众二十余人旁听了庭审。 来源：央视新闻微信公众号 责编：汪云鹏 校对： 李凌锋 百万用户都在看 机器人，突传重磅！黄仁勋：ChatGPT时刻已 ...

2018年6月至2022年3月，被告人赵金云利用在工作中获悉的内幕信息，使用其控制的亲友证券账户多次买入相关股票，成交额共计人民币702万余元。赵 金云将上述股票卖出后，非法获利人民币30万余元。 天津市第二中级人民法院认为，被告人赵金云的行为构成受贿罪、内幕交易罪。鉴于赵金云受贿犯罪中有未遂情节；到案后如实供述罪行，主动交代办案 机关尚未掌握的部分受贿事实和大部分内幕交易事实；认罪悔罪，积极退赃，涉案赃款赃物及孳息已全部追缴，具有法定、酌定从宽处罚情节，可对其依 法从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 央视网消息：据最高法微信公众号消息，2026年1月6日，天津市第二中级人民法院一审公开宣判甘肃省政府原副省长赵金云受贿、内幕交易一案，对被告 人赵金云以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十三年，并处罚金人民币三百万元，以内幕交易罪判处有期徒刑五年，并处罚金人民币五十万元，决定执行有期徒刑十五 年，并处罚金人民币三百五十万元；对赵金云犯罪所得财物及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 经审理查明： 2005年上半年至2024年10月，被告人赵金云单独或伙同其丈夫包东红（另案处理），利用赵金云担任甘肃省国土资源厅耕地保护处副处长、甘肃省公路航 ...

2026年1月6日，天津市第二中级人民法院一审公开宣判甘肃省政府原副省长赵金云受贿、内幕交易一案，对被告人赵金云以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十三年，并 处罚金人民币三百万元，以内幕交易罪判处有期徒刑五年，并处罚金人民币五十万元，决定执行有期徒刑十五年，并处罚金人民币三百五十万元；对赵金云 犯罪所得财物及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 景期留 a - III 單 N EN I 天津市第二中级人民法院认为，被告人赵金云的行为构成受贿罪、内幕交易罪。鉴于赵金云受贿犯罪中有未遂情节；到案后如实供述罪行，主动交代办案机 关尚未掌握的部分受贿事实和大部分内幕交易事实；认罪悔罪，积极退赃，涉案赃款赃物及孳息已全部追缴，具有法定、酌定从宽处罚情节，可对其依法从 轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 经审理查明： 2005年上半年至2024年10月，被告人赵金云单独或伙同其丈夫包东红（另案处理），利用赵金云担任甘肃省国土资源厅耕地保护处副处长、甘肃省公路航空 旅游投资集团有限公司副总经理、甘肃机场运营管理有限公司董事长、甘肃省政府副省长，以及利用包东红担任甘肃省敦煌市委副书记、市长、市委书记， 甘肃省发展和改革委员会党组成员、副主任，国家税务总 ...

Group 1 - The news highlights a case in Shanxi where a village cadre was detained for 15 days and fined 1,000 yuan for assaulting a resident after drinking [1] - In Yunnan, a man was penalized for refusing military service, facing a fine of 27,187.2 yuan and being barred from public service employment [2] - A significant safety incident in Fujian resulted in the investigation of 14 public officials following a construction accident that caused five fatalities and economic losses of 8.93 million yuan [4] Group 2 - In Shanghai, a new policy was introduced to establish a guardianship system for the elderly, including a city-level information platform for monitoring [3] - Beijing's health commission released plans to integrate artificial intelligence into healthcare, emphasizing the importance of human oversight in medical decisions [6]

炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 来源：董秘第一圈 近日，中信建投3名投行人员因受贿罪被判刑一事又有新进展。 据相关媒体报道，中信建投投行部门前债承销部总监房蓓蓓因在路劲境内债发行及后续"出货"过程中收 取返费，被黑龙江齐齐哈尔市龙沙区法院一审认定构成受贿罪、涉案金额逾540万元并判处有期徒刑10 年6个月。 图片来源：公开信息 2019年，港交所上市公司路劲（01098.HK）旗下北京路劲隽御房地产开发有限公司2016年发行的"16路 劲01"期限为"3+2"，到2019年回售窗口时，发行人面临15亿元存量债券的回售压力。 但依靠"借新还旧"，路劲仍拿到了新债发行批文。 路劲公司委托中信建投作为独家主承销商，以余额包销方式发行"19路劲01"。这意味着若市场认购不 足，中信建投需自行购入剩余份额，确保发行成功，房蓓蓓时任中信建投债券承销部总监，被指定为项 目负责人。 债券上市后，面临变现问题，房蓓蓓在其中扮演了关键角色，其帮助路劲联络资金中介，寻找接盘方， 最终促成约7亿元的交易。该资金中介在获取逾千万元利差后，将其中的约440万元私下分给房蓓蓓。此 外，房蓓蓓还自行 ...

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has initiated prosecutions against four individuals for corruption-related charges [1] - Zou Lisheng, former Secretary and Director of the Yunnan Coal Mine Safety Supervision Bureau, is accused of bribery and having a large amount of unexplained property [2] - Liu Haifang, former Secretary and Director of the Qujing Municipal People's Congress, is also facing bribery charges for illegally accepting substantial amounts of money [3] - Wu Dan, former Deputy Director of Guizhou Open University, is charged with bribery for accepting significant sums while in various official positions [4] - Zhang Fujun, former Executive Deputy Director of the Qinghai National High-tech Industrial Development Zone, is accused of bribery for receiving large amounts of money during his tenure [5] Group 2 - The cases against these individuals are currently under further processing by the respective local procuratorates [2][3][4][5] - Each accused has been informed of their legal rights and has had the opportunity to consult with their defense attorneys during the prosecution phase [2][3][4][5]

Core Viewpoint - Xu Zuo, former deputy general manager of China CITIC Group, was sentenced to life imprisonment for bribery and illegal business operations, involving over 1.47 billion yuan in illicit gains [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Shenyang Intermediate People's Court publicly announced the verdict on December 12, sentencing Xu Zuo to life imprisonment for bribery and a seven-year term for illegal business operations, with a fine of 10 million yuan [1]. - The court found that from 1999 to 2024, Xu Zuo used his positions at CITIC Dicastal Co., Ltd. and China CITIC Group to illegally accept over 1.47 billion yuan in bribes [2]. - The court acknowledged Xu's cooperation during the investigation, including confessing to most of the bribery facts and returning all illicit gains, which led to a lighter sentence for the bribery charge [2]. Group 2: Background Information - Xu Zuo was born in October 1965 in Hubei Province and was investigated in June 2024, subsequently expelled from the Party and public office in December of the same year [1]. - He was accused of engaging in "eating from enterprises" and violating regulations by operating similar businesses to those of his employer, resulting in significant illegal profits and damaging the political ecology of the enterprises he managed [1].