Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that Japan lacks the qualifications to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council due to its failure to acknowledge historical war crimes and its militaristic tendencies, which pose threats to international peace and security [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Historical Accountability - Japan has not fully reckoned with its militaristic past, as evidenced by its attempts to beautify its invasion history and deny atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre and the forced recruitment of "comfort women" [1]. - Current Japanese leaders have shown support for militarism by visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, which honors war criminals, and making provocative statements regarding Taiwan and nuclear armament [1][2]. Group 2: China's Position and Advocacy - China, as a permanent member of the Security Council, expresses its commitment to uphold the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, advocating for collective efforts with peace-loving nations [2]. - The article highlights China's support for necessary reforms in the Security Council to enhance the representation and voice of developing countries, emphasizing that reforms should address fundamental issues through a comprehensive approach [2].

Core Viewpoint - China asserts that Japan has no qualifications to demand a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, citing historical grievances and Japan's current political stance as reasons for this position [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The UN Security Council is described as the core of the international collective security mechanism, essential for maintaining post-war international order and peace [2]. - The Tokyo Trials, which began in January 1946, are highlighted as a significant event that punished Japanese war criminals and upheld international justice [2]. - Japan's militarism is said to have not been fully addressed, with current right-wing elements in Japan attempting to revise historical narratives and deny past atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre and the comfort women issue [2]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - Recent actions by Japanese leaders, including statements regarding Taiwan and nuclear armament, are viewed as indications of a resurgence of militarism, posing new threats to regional and global peace [2]. - The Chinese representative emphasizes that a country that does not acknowledge its historical crimes and challenges the post-war international order cannot be trusted to maintain international peace and security [2]. Group 3: Reform of the Security Council - China supports necessary and reasonable reforms of the Security Council to enhance its authority and efficiency, with a focus on increasing the representation and voice of developing countries [3]. - The need to address historical injustices faced by Africa is highlighted, with a call for special arrangements to prioritize African demands [3]. - There is a growing consensus among member states to enhance the representation of cross-regional groups, moving away from a lifetime selection model and being open to regional and rotating seats [3].

Core Viewpoint - Japan is deemed unqualified to assume responsibilities for maintaining international peace and security, and to be a permanent member of the UN Security Council due to its historical actions and current political stance [2][3][6][7]. Group 1: Historical Context - The UN Security Council is described as the core of the international collective security mechanism, crucial for maintaining post-war international order and peace [2][6]. - The Tokyo Trials, which took place 80 years ago, served to punish Japanese war criminals and uphold international justice, acting as a strong warning against the resurgence of militarism and expansionist ambitions [2][6]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - Japanese right-wing forces are accused of beautifying their invasion history and denying historical atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre and the forced conscription of "comfort women" and laborers [2][6]. - Current Japanese leaders have been noted for visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, a symbol of militarism, and for making provocative statements regarding Taiwan and nuclear policies, indicating a push towards re-militarization [2][6][7]. Group 3: China's Position - China, as a permanent member of the Security Council, expresses its commitment to defending the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, advocating for unity and constructive roles in maintaining international peace [3][7]. - China supports necessary and reasonable reforms of the Security Council to enhance its authority and efficiency, emphasizing the importance of increasing the representation and voice of developing countries [3][7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Japanese officials, including Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, are pushing to amend the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which is deemed unacceptable by various stakeholders [1][2] - There is a strong call from international figures for the global community to remain vigilant against Japan's potential re-militarization, as the push to modify these principles poses a serious challenge to the post-war international order [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent remarks by Japan's Prime Minister, Sanna Takashi, regarding Taiwan have provoked strong outrage among the Chinese populace, raising concerns about the resurgence of Japanese militarism [3][4][12]. Group 1: Political Context - Takashi's statement that "Taiwan's issues constitute a survival crisis for Japan" implies potential military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait, which has been met with significant backlash from China [3][4]. - The comments are seen as undermining the political foundation established by the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Communiqué, prompting discussions about revisiting war reparations from Japan for its actions during the Second Sino-Japanese War [4][6][12]. Group 2: Public Sentiment and Media Response - A short video of the response to Takashi's remarks garnered over a million views on major social media platforms, reflecting a strong public sentiment against Japanese militarism [3][4]. - The program "This is China" serves as a platform for gathering public opinion and promoting consensus on significant issues, indicating a shift towards a more assertive stance in addressing Japan's actions [4][6]. Group 3: Strategic Recommendations - There is a call to accelerate the process of national reunification with Taiwan, suggesting that resolving this issue could diminish the influence of Japanese militarism [6][12]. - Recommendations include implementing various measures—political, military, economic, and legal—to expedite reunification and counteract Japanese militaristic tendencies [6][8]. Group 4: International Relations and Legal Framework - The U.S. National Security Strategy report indicates a shift in global power dynamics, suggesting that the U.S. may no longer maintain its previous level of dominance, which could impact Japan's military ambitions [6][12]. - The discussion includes the potential application of the "enemy clauses" in the UN Charter, which could allow for military action against Japan if it pursues aggressive policies [12][20]. Group 5: Historical Context and Future Implications - The historical context of Japan's militarism and its implications for regional stability are emphasized, with references to past conflicts and the need for accountability regarding Japan's wartime actions [4][12][20]. - The potential for Japan to seek a permanent seat on the UN Security Council is challenged, as its actions are viewed as a violation of post-war international order [20][22].

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's stance on historical issues, particularly regarding the "comfort women" controversy, highlighting her attempts to downplay Japan's wartime responsibilities and promote a narrative that challenges the post-war international order [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Takaichi's characterization of the "Taiwan contingency" as a potential "survival crisis" for Japan reflects her confrontational attitude towards post-war international norms and historical accountability [1]. - Her approach to the "comfort women" issue is marked by a refusal to engage in genuine reflection, instead opting for a combative stance that seeks to delegitimize the narratives of historical accountability from China and South Korea [1][2]. - Takaichi has been involved in efforts to revise Japan's historical narrative since at least 1997, advocating for a "correction" of what she perceives as a self-deprecating historical view [1]. Group 2: Rhetoric and Responsibility - Takaichi employs two main rhetorical strategies regarding the "comfort women" issue: one that disputes the terminology used and another that denies the existence of state responsibility for the coercive nature of the system [2]. - The term "comfort women" has been established in academic discourse to refer specifically to women forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military, despite Takaichi's attempts to redefine it [2][3]. - The "Kono Statement," which acknowledges the Japanese military's involvement in the "comfort women" system, is a critical document that Takaichi's narrative seeks to undermine, as it contradicts her claims of non-coercion [3]. Group 3: International Response - The article calls for regional countries and the international community to uphold historical justice and the post-war international order in response to Takaichi's dual revisionism [4]. - There is an emphasis on the need to counter any attempts to glorify aggression or justify war through factual evidence and international law [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent comments made by a Chinese defense spokesperson regarding Japan's military expansion and nuclear ambitions, emphasizing the concerns of the international community, particularly Southeast Asian nations, about Japan's militarization efforts and the potential revival of militarism [1]. Summary by Sections Japan's Military Expansion - The Japanese government is reportedly considering nuclear capabilities and has significantly increased its budget for "government security enhancement support," which includes providing advanced military equipment to Southeast Asian countries [1]. International Response - There is a growing criticism from the international community, including Southeast Asian nations, regarding Japan's military actions. The spokesperson highlights that Japan is not reflecting on these criticisms but is instead escalating its military buildup and arms exports [1]. Concerns Over Militarism - The spokesperson warns that Japan's actions reveal the dangerous intentions of right-wing forces in Japan to promote militarization and revive militarism, urging peace-loving nations to recognize and counter Japan's ambitions to prevent a resurgence of militarism [1].

1月8日上午，国防部新闻发言人张晓刚大校就近期涉军问题发布消息。 张晓刚：国际社会包括东南亚国家对日本军事安全动向批评声音不断，日方不但不反省收敛，反而编造 各种借口，变本加厉地扩军备武，明目张胆地出口杀伤性武器，甚至冒天下之大不韪鼓吹拥核，更加暴 露出日本右翼势力推动"再军事化"、企图让军国主义死灰复燃的险恶用心。所有爱好和平的国家和人民 都应认清日本政府的不轨图谋，防止日本军国主义借尸还魂，共同捍卫战后国际秩序，坚决维护世界和 地区和平稳定。 记者：据报道，日本政府官员称，日方考虑拥核并非不负责任，在采购核潜艇问题上不排除任何可能 性。日外务省大幅增加"政府安全保障能力强化支援"项目预算，拟向东南亚等国军队提供包括先进雷达 在内的国防装备和物资。请问对此有何评论？ ...

毛宁表示，根据日本媒体披露，此次日方修订安保三文件的重点内容，包括增加防卫费、修改"无核三 原则"、取消武器出口限制和大力发展进攻性军事力量等。这反映出日本加速推进"再军事化"的危险动 向，势必损害地区和平稳定，国际社会必须高度警惕。 毛宁指出，为了防止日本军国主义死灰复燃，《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等具有国际法效力的文件明 确规定，日本应完全解除武装，不得维持能使其重新武装的产业。日本宪法对军力、交战权、战争权也 作出了严格限制。 然而，近年来日本右翼势力加速推进扩武强军，一步一步突破"专守防卫原则"等战后规则和国际规定， 挑战战后国际秩序，他们惯于伪装和炮制虚假叙事，不断转移视线、挑衅近邻、制造事端、渲染紧张， 还炮制出"受人威胁、无处可退"的假象，以"生存防卫"为借口，把本国民众绑上战车，以实现其背后的 野心。 1月6日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者提问，据报道，日本首相高市早苗在新年记者会上 表示，基于法治的自由开放国际秩序面临的挑战增多。在印太地区，中国与朝鲜持续扩充军力、中俄及 俄朝加强合作。为妥善应对安全保障环境的急剧变化，全力守护日本的独立、和平以及国民的生命与生 活，将以年内修订安 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 12月30日，2025年国际形势与中国外交研讨会在钓鱼台国宾馆芳菲苑举行。作为每年年终探讨国际形 势、盘点中国外交的高级别会议，会上的很多内容反映着中国外交的政策关注方向，是观察中国外交的 风向标之一。 会上，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅谈到台湾问题时，说道： 越来越多的国家和中国站在一起，不仅重申坚持一个中国原则、承认台湾是中国的领土，还明确反对一 切"台独"分裂行径，支持中国统一大业。 什么叫"越来越多"？ 谭主做了一个统计：今年，中国与100多个国家举行的领导人级双边和多边会议，都重申了坚持一个中 国原则。 今年是世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年，也是台湾光复80周年。一个中国原则是战后国际秩序的重要组成 部分。然而，80年过去，许多国家和国际社会的政治环境已发生深刻变化，一些政治势力正企图模糊、 掏空战后关于台湾问题的既有安排。 重申，不仅再次明确了战后秩序的安排，也为解决相关遗留问题提供了重要契机。 在这些沟通中，共有400多句涉及台湾问题的表述。具体内容，不仅限于重申一个中国原则。 比如对美国，中方要求美方应坚决反对"台独"；对德国，中方提出，希望德方坚决反对和抵制任何"台 ...