汽车碰撞测试
Search documents
理想、中国汽研深夜回应“撞飞卡车”,乘龙卡车连续四天发声
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-08-03 15:31
Core Viewpoint - The collision test conducted by Li Auto for the i8 model aimed to validate and enhance its passive safety performance, not to evaluate the quality of other brands, particularly Dongfeng Liuzhou's "Chenglong" trucks [1][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Li Auto's i8 launch event included a collision test demonstration, which led to public speculation about the involvement of Chenglong trucks, causing significant backlash and a drop in Li Auto's stock price [2][3]. - Following the incident, Li Auto's stock price fell by 13.53% by August 1, with a notable drop of 6.20% on the day of the launch [2][3]. Group 2: Market Impact - On July 30, Li Auto's market capitalization decreased by nearly 33 billion HKD in a single day, with the stock price falling over 27% from its peak of 138.3 HKD earlier in the year [3]. Group 3: Responses from Involved Parties - China Automotive Research (China Qiyuan) clarified that the test was solely for the i8's safety validation and did not involve safety evaluations of other brands [6][9]. - Chenglong trucks issued multiple statements addressing the incident, emphasizing that the test scenario did not reflect real-world conditions and asserting their commitment to industry integrity [12][14].
中国汽研就理想i8碰撞测试发布声明:非标准车对车碰撞试验 不涉及其他品牌车辆的安全性能评价
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-03 15:26
Core Viewpoint - China Automotive Research (中国汽研) issued a statement clarifying that the recent crash test of the Li Auto i8 was a non-standard vehicle-to-vehicle collision test, and it does not evaluate the safety performance of other brands' vehicles [1] Group 1 - The crash test conducted by China Automotive Research was specifically designed to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8 vehicle [1] - The testing framework was based on typical traffic accident scenarios on ordinary roads, developed by the company [1] - China Automotive Research has not released any test data, reports, or video materials related to this incident on any platform prior to the statement [1] Group 2 - The organization urged the industry, media, and public platforms to maintain objectivity and rationality to protect the industry ecosystem and ensure a clear online environment [1] - China Automotive Research reserves the right to pursue legal and reputational actions against platforms and individuals that maliciously misinterpret or mislead regarding this matter [1]
乘龙卡车,连着3天“内涵”理想
新浪财经· 2025-08-03 07:39
Core Viewpoint - The collision test video released by Li Auto featuring its new electric SUV, the Li i8, has sparked significant controversy, leading to a notable decline in Li Auto's stock price and increased public attention on the traditional truck manufacturer, Chenglong Trucks [3][14][17]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Li Auto showcased a collision test video during the launch of the Li i8, demonstrating its safety features against an 8-ton Chenglong truck, which led to public curiosity about the truck's safety [5][7]. - Chenglong Trucks quickly responded to the incident, claiming they were misrepresented and released their own safety test video to counter Li Auto's claims [7][8]. - Li Auto defended its testing process, stating it was conducted by a third-party organization, China Automotive Research, ensuring compliance with all standards [7][8]. Group 2: Stock Market Impact - Following the incident, Li Auto's stock experienced significant volatility, with a drop of 6.20% on the day of the i8 launch, and further declines in subsequent days, totaling over 27.3% from its peak [14][16]. - The market capitalization of Li Auto decreased by nearly 33 billion HKD in a single day due to the negative market reaction [14]. Group 3: Social Media and Public Perception - Li Auto's founder, Li Xiang, faced backlash on social media, with his newly opened Douyin account becoming a platform for public debate and mockery regarding the incident [17]. - Chenglong Trucks' social media presence surged, gaining significant followers and engagement as they responded to the controversy [11][12]. Group 4: Industry Analysis - Experts noted that the collision test lacked national standards, questioning the validity of using such tests for marketing purposes [18][19]. - The incident highlighted the risks of using competitors in promotional materials, as it can lead to unintended negative perceptions and backlash [19].
乘龙卡车,连着3天“内涵”理想
Xin Lang Ke Ji· 2025-08-03 07:27
Core Viewpoint - The collision test video released by Li Auto featuring its new electric SUV, the Li i8, has sparked significant controversy, leading to a decline in Li Auto's stock price and increased visibility for the traditional truck manufacturer, Chenglong Trucks [2][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 29, Li Auto showcased a collision test video during the launch of the Li i8, demonstrating its safety features against an 8-ton Chenglong truck [3]. - The video, which clearly displayed the Chenglong brand, led to public curiosity about the truck's safety after it appeared to be severely damaged in the test [3][5]. - Chenglong Trucks responded quickly, claiming the video misrepresented their vehicle's safety and initiated legal action against Li Auto for perceived infringement [5][6]. Group 2: Stock Market Impact - Following the incident, Li Auto's stock price fell significantly, dropping over 27.3% from its peak earlier in the year [11]. - On July 30, Li Auto's stock experienced a 12.84% decline in Hong Kong, with a market capitalization loss of nearly 330 billion HKD [9]. - The downward trend continued with further declines on July 31 and August 1, indicating ongoing investor concern [11]. Group 3: Social Media and Public Perception - Chenglong Trucks capitalized on the situation by releasing multiple social media posts and videos to counter Li Auto's claims, resulting in a substantial increase in their social media following [8]. - Li Auto's founder, Li Xiang, faced backlash on his newly created Douyin account, which became a platform for public criticism and jokes about the incident [12]. - The incident has led to a broader discussion in the automotive industry regarding marketing practices and the implications of using competitors in promotional materials [13][14].
2天涨粉5万,乘龙卡车发内涵海报“活着才有资格谈理想”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-03 03:08
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck has sparked significant controversy, with Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile (Dongfeng Liuqi) claiming that the portrayal is misleading and has harmed their brand reputation [8][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The controversy began during the launch of the Li Auto i8 on July 29, where a video showed the i8 colliding with a heavy truck, which was later identified as a Chenglong truck [8]. - Chenglong responded to the incident, stating that the testing conditions depicted in the video were not representative of real-world scenarios and urged consumers to view the situation rationally [3][8]. - Following the incident, Chenglong's social media presence surged, gaining over 50,000 new followers on Douyin within two days [4]. Group 2: Company Responses - Chenglong issued a statement asserting that the video used by Li Auto constituted serious infringement and misled the public, damaging their brand and commercial reputation [9]. - Li Auto defended its testing methodology, claiming it was conducted by a third-party organization, China Automotive Research, which confirmed that the testing adhered to all regulations and standards [9][10]. - Li Auto executives publicly challenged Chenglong to a live retest of the collision scenario, indicating confidence in their vehicle's safety performance [10]. Group 3: Company Background - Dongfeng Liuqi, established in 1954, is a major state-owned enterprise with a production capacity of 100,000 commercial vehicles and 400,000 passenger vehicles annually [10]. - The Chenglong brand serves significant clients in logistics and transportation, including major companies like SF Express and JD Logistics [10]. - In the first half of 2025, Dongfeng Liuqi reported a commercial vehicle sales volume of 23,348 units, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 24.3% [10].
“撞”出流量后:理想隔空邀约再撞 乘龙卡车内涵“活着,才有资格谈理想”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-03 02:12
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck has sparked significant controversy, with both parties exchanging statements regarding the validity and implications of the test results [11][12][13]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The incident began during the launch of the Li Auto i8 on July 29, where a video showed the i8 colliding with a heavy truck, resulting in dramatic outcomes for the truck [11]. - Following the video, the truck manufacturer, Chenglong, issued statements claiming the test conditions were misleading and not reflective of real-world scenarios [3][12]. - Chenglong's social media presence saw a significant increase in engagement, with over 50,000 new followers on Douyin within two days, indicating heightened public interest [5]. Group 2: Responses from Li Auto and Chenglong - Li Auto defended the test, stating it was conducted by a third-party organization, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and adhered to all regulations [13]. - Chenglong's parent company, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, issued a formal statement claiming the video constituted serious infringement and misled the public, damaging their brand reputation [13][14]. - Li Auto executives publicly challenged Chenglong to a live retest, emphasizing confidence in their vehicle's safety [14]. Group 3: Company Background and Performance - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, established in 1954, produces both commercial and passenger vehicles, with a production capacity of 100,000 commercial vehicles and 400,000 passenger vehicles annually [14]. - In the first half of 2025, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor reported sales of 23,348 commercial vehicles, marking a 24.3% year-on-year increase, with a target of 40,000 to 43,000 units for the full year [14].
理想隔空邀约再撞,乘龙卡车内涵“活着,才有资格谈理想”
Feng Huang Wang· 2025-08-02 23:40
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the collision test video of the Li Auto i8 and a truck from Chenglong Truck has sparked significant public attention and controversy, leading to increased visibility and engagement for Chenglong Truck on social media platforms [1][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 29, Li Auto showcased a collision test video during the launch of its new model, the i8, which depicted a severe impact with a heavy truck, identified as Chenglong Truck [10][11]. - Chenglong Truck responded to the incident by questioning the validity of the test, stating that the conditions depicted in the video were not representative of real-world scenarios [3][11]. - Following the incident, Chenglong Truck's social media presence surged, gaining over 50,000 new followers on Douyin within two days, and their video engagement increased significantly [3][11]. Group 2: Company Responses - Chenglong Truck issued a statement emphasizing the need for rational evaluation of the collision test, without pursuing legal action against Li Auto or the testing agency [3][12]. - Li Auto defended its testing methodology, asserting that the tests were conducted by a reputable third-party agency, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and were compliant with all regulations [11][12]. - The incident prompted Li Auto executives to challenge Chenglong Truck to a live retest, indicating a willingness to engage in public discourse regarding the test's legitimacy [12]. Group 3: Company Background - Chenglong Truck is a brand under Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor Co., Ltd., which was established in 1954 and is recognized as a major state-owned enterprise in China [12]. - The company has a production capacity of 100,000 commercial vehicles and 400,000 passenger vehicles annually, serving major clients in logistics and transportation sectors [12][13]. - In the first half of 2025, Dongfeng Liuzhou's commercial vehicle sales reached 23,348 units, marking a year-on-year increase of 24.3%, with a target of 40,000 units for the full year [13].
乘龙卡车再回应理想i8撞重卡:活着才有资格谈理想,碰撞视频用的旧车
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-08-02 08:11
Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video involving the Li Auto i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked significant industry attention, with Chenglong Truck asserting that the video misrepresents actual traffic conditions and calling for a rational perspective on safety [3][4][5]. Group 1: Chenglong Truck's Response - Chenglong Truck issued a statement emphasizing the importance of adhering to traffic regulations and regular maintenance to ensure safety, rather than relying solely on test results [4]. - The company has raised concerns about the legality of the video used by Li Auto, claiming it constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, potentially violating multiple laws [16]. - Chenglong Truck's social media response indicated that their legal department is addressing the situation, and they criticized the portrayal of their vehicle in the test [7][16]. Group 2: Li Auto's Position - Li Auto defended the collision test, stating it was conducted by a third-party testing agency and adhered to all relevant standards, asserting that the test was a simulation of real-world scenarios [15]. - The company has invited further testing to validate the results, suggesting transparency in the testing process [15]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The incident has drawn attention from the broader automotive industry, with Dongfeng Group expressing support for Chenglong Truck in protecting its brand reputation and legal rights [4]. - The controversy has led to discussions about competition and safety standards within the industry, highlighting the need for responsible marketing practices [4][15].
乘龙卡车再回应“理想i8撞重卡”:活着才有资格谈理想 碰撞视频用的旧车!东风高管:全力支持东风柳汽维权
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-08-02 08:00
Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video involving the Ideal i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked significant public attention, with Chenglong Truck calling for rational evaluation based on scientific principles and emphasizing the importance of road safety and adherence to traffic regulations [2][3][15]. Group 1: Chenglong Truck's Response - Chenglong Truck issued a statement addressing the use of its vehicle in the collision test video, asserting that the testing conditions were significantly different from real traffic scenarios and urging the public to view the situation rationally [2]. - The company emphasized the importance of following traffic laws, regular maintenance, and proactive safety awareness as more effective measures for ensuring safety than any test [3]. - Chenglong Truck's legal department is currently handling the situation, indicating that they believe the video misrepresents their brand and could mislead consumers [6][15]. Group 2: Ideal Automotive's Position - Ideal Automotive defended the collision test, stating it was conducted by a third-party testing agency and adhered to all relevant standards, with no manipulation of vehicle parameters [14]. - The company expressed confidence in the authority of the testing agency and suggested a live retest to validate the results, indicating transparency in their testing process [14]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The incident has drawn attention from the industry, with Dongfeng Group supporting Chenglong Truck in protecting its legal rights and brand reputation [3]. - The collision test video has generated considerable debate online, with many users questioning the validity of the test and expressing concerns about the safety implications of the results [4][6].
理想汽车7月交付同比跌近四成,此前陷入重卡对撞测试争议
Xin Lang Ke Ji· 2025-08-01 09:08
Group 1 - In July 2025, Li Auto delivered 30,731 new vehicles, a 39.74% decrease compared to 51,000 vehicles delivered in July 2024 [1] - As of July 31, 2025, Li Auto's cumulative delivery volume reached 1,368,541 vehicles [1] Group 2 - Li Auto launched its first pure electric SUV, the Li Auto i8, on July 29, 2025, amidst controversy regarding crash test results [2] - Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Co., Ltd. responded to the crash test controversy, claiming that the test misled the public and significantly differed from real-world scenarios, reserving the right to pursue legal action [2]