Workflow
货币主权
icon
Search documents
沈建光:厘清稳定币认识的六大误区
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-06-03 11:43
Core Insights - The article emphasizes the need to clarify misconceptions about stablecoins and to recognize their functional attributes and strategic value, particularly in the context of developing offshore and onshore RMB stablecoins [1][2]. Group 1: Market Growth and Regulatory Landscape - Since the second half of 2023, the stablecoin market has entered a rapid growth phase, with a current market size exceeding $230 billion and over 250 million active accounts [1]. - Various countries, including the EU, Japan, Singapore, the UAE, and Hong Kong, have introduced regulations to support stablecoin innovation, with more than ten major countries planning related legislative initiatives by 2025 [1]. - The recent passage of the "GENIUS Act" in the U.S. Senate significantly increases the likelihood of further development in the stablecoin market [1]. Group 2: Misconceptions about Stablecoins - Misconception 1: Stablecoins are equated with general cryptocurrencies, overlooking their unique characteristics and governance mechanisms [3][4]. - Misconception 2: The belief that stablecoins lack stability is challenged by the fact that most stablecoins are backed by fiat currencies or assets, with the highest stability observed in fiat-backed stablecoins [5][6]. - Misconception 3: The notion that stablecoins conflict with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) is addressed by highlighting their complementary roles in different transaction scenarios [9][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Developments and Transparency - Regulatory frameworks for stablecoin issuers are being established globally, focusing on aspects such as licensing, operational management, and reserve asset investment [8]. - Major stablecoin issuers are improving transparency and compliance, with USDC being a notable example of regular independent audits and reserve disclosures [7][8]. - The "GENIUS Act" in the U.S. sets specific capital, liquidity, and risk management requirements for stablecoin issuers, enhancing the stability of the market [8]. Group 4: Impact on Monetary Sovereignty and Internationalization - Concerns about stablecoins undermining domestic monetary sovereignty can be mitigated through regulatory measures that restrict their domestic use and manage reserve assets [13][14]. - The development of RMB stablecoins is positioned as a new engine for promoting the internationalization of the RMB, complementing existing cross-border payment systems [15][16]. - The potential of stablecoins to enhance the efficiency of cross-border payments is highlighted, with significant advantages over traditional banking systems [10][16]. Group 5: Addressing Illegal Financial Activities - The perception that stablecoins exacerbate illegal financial activities is countered by advancements in anti-money laundering (AML) technologies and regulatory frameworks [19][20]. - Blockchain technology can be utilized for monitoring stablecoin transactions, enabling regulatory bodies to track the flow of funds effectively [20][21]. - Global AML regulations are evolving to include stablecoins and cryptocurrencies, with specific compliance requirements being established in various jurisdictions [21].
总统可以死,美元不能动:共济会的金融铁律
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-10 05:38
Group 1 - The article discusses the assassination of President Kennedy and its connection to the control of the U.S. dollar issuance, suggesting that he attempted to reclaim monetary sovereignty through Executive Order 11110, which allowed the Treasury to issue silver certificates without Federal Reserve involvement [2] - It draws parallels with President Lincoln, who issued "greenbacks" during the Civil War, and was assassinated shortly after, implying a pattern of presidential assassinations linked to monetary reform efforts [4] - The Federal Reserve, established in 1913, is described as a consortium of private banks that profits from government debt, with data indicating that for every dollar collected in taxes, 30 cents goes to pay interest to the Federal Reserve [5] Group 2 - Following Kennedy's assassination, the issuance of silver certificates was immediately halted by his successor, Lyndon Johnson, indicating a power struggle behind the scenes [7] - The article outlines a timeline of events post-1971, including the establishment of the petrodollar system and military interventions in oil-rich regions, suggesting a financial warfare strategy [9] - It highlights the influence of the Freemasons in controlling media and educational institutions, with a significant presence in major media boards and funding for think tanks [11] Group 3 - The article asserts that modern empires do not require territorial conquest but can destabilize nations through monetary control, exemplified by the collapse of the Soviet Union following IMF intervention [13] - It concludes that the tragedies of Kennedy and Lincoln are not coincidences but rather a reflection of a systemic issue where presidents are mere temporary figures, while the true power remains hidden [15]