Group 1 - The recent tariff measures announced by the Trump administration are causing businesses in the Midwest to adopt a wait-and-see approach, leading to concerns over stalled investment decisions [1] - The impact of tariffs on heavy trucks, lumber, and cabinets is particularly significant in manufacturing hubs like Michigan and Iowa, with many businesses postponing major investment plans due to uncertainty [1] - The Federal Reserve recently lowered the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to 4% to 4.25% to mitigate employment market risks, but there is notable disagreement among officials regarding future rate paths [1] Group 2 - Concerns over the independence of monetary policy have been expressed, particularly regarding proposals that would allow the Trump administration to directly influence interest rate decisions, which could lead to higher inflation and poorer economic performance [2] - Other Federal Reserve officials have emphasized the need for caution in accelerating rate cuts, as inflation pressures remain significant despite signs of softening in the labor market [2] - The current financial environment is still supportive of economic growth, allowing the Federal Reserve some flexibility in assessing the situation [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution of China's monetary policy and its relationship with exchange rate policy, emphasizing the need for increased issuance of short-term government bonds to enhance the independence of the central bank's monetary policy [1][11]. Group 1: Historical Context of Monetary Policy - Before the "8·11" exchange rate reform in 2015, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) used foreign exchange reserves to prevent rapid appreciation of the RMB, which limited its monetary policy autonomy [1][3]. - Following the "8·11" reform, the PBOC shifted to a more neutral exchange rate policy, reducing its intervention in the foreign exchange market and focusing on domestic credit channels for monetary supply [1][6]. - The ratio of new foreign exchange reserves to new base money supply was significantly high during various periods, indicating a reliance on foreign exchange reserves for monetary control, which weakened the independence of the PBOC's monetary policy [3][4][10]. Group 2: Current Monetary Policy Challenges - The PBOC's monetary policy has been constrained by a lack of short-term government bonds, which are essential for effective open market operations [12][14]. - Recent measures to adjust interest rates and reserve requirements have not fully addressed the challenges posed by the current lending environment, where banks are cautious about lending [12][15]. - The introduction of government bond trading in the open market is seen as a step towards improving liquidity management, but the current supply of short-term bonds remains insufficient [13][14]. Group 3: Future Directions - There is a growing recognition of the need to issue more short-term government bonds to facilitate the PBOC's monetary policy operations and enhance its ability to manage liquidity effectively [11][15]. - The collaboration between the Ministry of Finance and the PBOC aims to explore the reintroduction of net purchases of government bonds, which could improve market conditions and support monetary policy objectives [14][15].

Group 1 - The core argument emphasizes the need for the central bank to enhance its monetary policy independence by increasing the issuance of short-term government bonds to improve the monetary control mechanism [1][11][15] - The central bank's monetary policy has historically been constrained by exchange rate policies, which limited its ability to manage domestic liquidity effectively [2][6][10] - The transition from relying on foreign exchange reserves to domestic credit channels for monetary policy implementation marks a significant shift in China's monetary control strategy [10][12] Group 2 - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has gradually shifted its focus from foreign exchange interventions to domestic liquidity management, particularly through the use of medium-term lending facilities and other monetary policy tools [8][12][13] - The lack of short-term government bonds has been identified as a critical issue for the PBOC's open market operations, which traditionally rely on such instruments for liquidity management [14][15] - Recent policy changes, including the resumption of government bond trading in the open market, indicate a move towards a more flexible and responsive monetary policy framework [12][13][15]

Core Insights - Moody's warns that the rise of "cryptoization" driven by stablecoins poses significant challenges to monetary sovereignty and financial stability in emerging markets [1][2] - The report highlights that the increasing adoption of stablecoins, particularly those pegged to fiat currencies like the US dollar, undermines central banks' control over interest rates and exchange rates [1][2] Group 1: Risks to Monetary Policy and Financial Stability - The core risk of "cryptoization" is its erosion of a country's monetary policy independence and the stability of its financial system [2] - When a significant portion of economic activity is conducted through stablecoins, central banks' ability to manage the economy via interest rate adjustments is weakened [2] - The potential dominance of dollar-pegged stablecoins as a medium of exchange could directly impact the stability of local currencies' exchange rates [2] Group 2: Systemic Risks of Stablecoins - Moody's warns that stablecoins themselves carry systemic risks despite being perceived as relatively safe [3] - The rapid growth of stablecoins introduces systemic vulnerabilities, with insufficient regulation potentially leading to runs on reserves [3] - A de-pegging event could force governments to undertake costly rescue measures [3] Group 3: Imbalance in Growth and Regulatory Gaps - The global adoption of crypto assets shows significant regional imbalances, with emerging markets facing heightened risks due to regulatory lag [4] - Currently, less than one-third of countries have implemented comprehensive digital asset regulations, exposing many economies to market volatility and systemic shocks [4] - The disparity in regulatory frameworks contrasts with the differing growth patterns, where developed markets focus on investment while emerging markets prioritize practical needs like cross-border remittances and inflation hedging [4] - This divergence highlights both the potential of digital assets in promoting financial inclusion and the accumulating risks of financial instability in the absence of adequate regulation [4]

古尔斯比的观点颇具深度，尤其在当前美国经济面临众多不确定因素的背景下。他明确表示，尽管美国 劳动力市场的放缓引发了一些经济学家的警惕，但他并不认为这种放缓是即将到来的衰退的前兆。 特别是在低失业率和劳动力市场的"温和降温"背景下，古尔斯比坚持认为，美国经济的基本面仍然坚 实。 随着2025年接近，全球经济的动态变化引起了市场和政策制定者的广泛关注。特别是在美国，金融政策 的调整和国内经济的波动成了关注的焦点之一。近期，芝加哥联储主席古尔斯比在接受《金融时报》采 访时，分享了他对美联储未来货币政策的看法，以及对美国经济的判断。这些言论为我们提供了一个不 同于常规经济解读的视角，也引发了关于经济与政策未来走向的新思考。 在美联储的货币政策走向上，古尔斯比的立场相对谨慎。他支持上周美联储决定降息25个基点，但对于 是否继续大幅降息，他持保留意见。美联储的利率政策不仅关乎当前经济的调整，更直接影响到未来经 济的稳定性和增长潜力。 古尔斯比指出，美国经济的低失业率和劳动力市场的适度降温表明，美联储无需急于采取激进的降息措 施。相反，逐步走向中性利率水平可能是更为合理的选择。中性利率的目标并不是通过刺激经济增长， 而是通 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President, Goolsbee, emphasizes the need for substantial justification before implementing further monetary easing beyond the recent 25 basis point rate cut [1][3]. Group 1: Monetary Policy Insights - Goolsbee warns against hastily initiating consecutive rate cuts based on the assumption that inflation will naturally decline, as this could lead to policy misjudgments [3]. - The current unemployment rate of 4.3% is considered healthy, and labor market indicators suggest moderate cooling rather than a sharp contraction typical of historical recessions [3]. - The recent adjustment of the Federal Reserve's interest rate to a range of 4% to 4.25% reflects an assessment of trade war impacts, with retaliatory tariffs from major trading partners being less severe than anticipated, resulting in weaker inflationary pressures [3]. Group 2: Political Influence and Economic Predictions - Goolsbee reaffirms the importance of the independence of monetary policy, stating that the Federal Reserve has never altered its standards due to political interference, with professional competence being the primary criterion for reappointment [3]. - Investors generally expect the Federal Reserve to implement two more 25 basis point rate cuts within the year, supported by the latest economic forecasts from the Fed [3]. - Goolsbee expresses caution regarding aggressive easing paths, noting that the Trump administration's trade policies have disrupted the economic environment, which previously seemed to be moving towards neutral interest rates [3]. Group 3: Concerns on Talent Mobility - Goolsbee raises concerns about the proposed significant increase in H-1B visa application fees to $100,000, highlighting the positive correlation between high-skilled talent mobility and technological innovation, as well as productivity growth [4]. - He warns that restricting the influx of scientific talent could lead to insufficient productivity growth in the long term [4]. Group 4: Employment Data Risks - Federal Reserve Governor Bowman identifies potential risks in current employment data, suggesting that moderate rate cuts may be necessary to prevent sudden deterioration in the labor market [5].

今日必读🧮TikTok美国版将重新训练算法🪙紫金黄金国际或因台风推迟上市💴中国央行行长强调货币政策独立性获取免费中文电子报《彭博财经早茶》，洞悉全球市场动态。Catch up on what's moving China's markets in our free Chinese language newsletter.️ https://t.co/m6tr8EaL8O ...

人们常说，世界上有两件事最难预料：一是国产剧的剧情走向，二是美联储的利率调整。 表面上看，美联储的决策似乎基于严谨的经济分析，实则暗藏玄机；看似遵循市场规律，背后却充满政治博弈。 然而降息消息公布后，美股市场不涨反跌，华尔街一片惨淡。令人意外的是，中概股却逆势大涨。这一反常现象反映出全球资本流动逻辑正在发生深刻变 化，也暴露出美联储温和调控策略的失效。当央行独立性受到挑战，全球经济格局正在重新洗牌。 这场酝酿已久的降息最终落地，却带来了意想不到的市场反应。美联储25个基点的微调，与其说是及时雨，不如说是一记响亮的耳光。此前高调要求大幅降 息的特朗普突然沉默，而华尔街则用暴跌表达不满。鲍威尔在记者会上将问题归咎于外部因素，一场预期中的市场狂欢变成了多方皆输的困局。 特朗普试图将美联储变成白宫的政策工具，但这次他显然失算了。八个月来，他不断施压，甚至威胁要撤换不配合的理事，只为促成大规模宽松政策。然而 最终仅获得象征性的25个基点降息。更尴尬的是，他提名的亲信在会议上激烈争取50个基点未果，最终愤然离场。11:1的投票结果充分暴露了特朗普对美联 储影响力的局限。 鲍威尔同样面临两难处境。经济增速从2.5%放缓至1 ...

9月17日这场议息会议堪称一场白宫与美联储的巅峰对决。面对来自政府方面的巨大压力，美联储内部却出人意料地展现出高度团结，最终以11:1的压倒性 票数通过了25个基点的预防性降息决议。然而，随着鲍威尔主席任期临近结束，以及白宫对美联储人事任命的频繁干预，这场关乎货币政策独立性的拉锯 战，其实才刚刚开始。 【第三段改写】 2025年9月18日凌晨，全球投资者的目光都聚焦在美联储总部。随着公开市场委员会宣布将联邦基金利率下调25个基点至4?.25%区间，市场屏住的呼吸终于 可以稍稍放松。这是2025年的首次降息，距离2024年的三次降息已经过去了整整九个月。 【第四段改写】 在决议公布前，特朗普总统就不断在社交媒体上造势，他不仅要求美联储大幅快速降息，更直言希望降息幅度能超出市场预期。这些言论给美联储带来了前 所未有的政治压力。 好的，我将按照您的要求逐段改写这篇文章，在保持原意的基础上提升可读性和细节描写： 【第一段改写】 坊间流传着一个有趣的说法：世界上有两件事最难预料，一是国产剧的剧情走向，二是美联储的利率决策。表面上看，美联储的决策应该基于严谨的经济模 型和数据测算，但实际上却充满了不确定性；看似遵循市场规 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve's decision to lower the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to 4.00%-4.25% marks the beginning of a monetary easing cycle, which will have significant implications for global liquidity, capital flows, and exchange rate dynamics, particularly affecting China's economic recovery efforts [1][4][10]. Summary by Sections Federal Reserve's Decision - The 25 basis point rate cut reflects a careful balance between persistent inflation and economic growth challenges, with a 96.1% probability of this outcome predicted by CME Group data prior to the meeting [4]. - The Fed's cautious approach aims to avoid reigniting inflation expectations while providing room for future adjustments based on economic conditions [5][6]. Global Impact - The Fed's rate cut will lead to a depreciation of the US dollar, which fell to 96.22, the lowest since February 2022, affecting commodity prices and creating opportunities for resource-exporting countries while increasing production costs for manufacturing nations like China and Germany [8][9]. - International capital flows are expected to shift towards emerging markets as the attractiveness of dollar-denominated assets declines, potentially boosting stock and bond markets in those regions [9]. Implications for China - The weakening dollar may enhance the competitiveness of Chinese exports while reducing the costs of imported commodities, benefiting manufacturing sectors [10]. - However, the potential for the renminbi to appreciate poses challenges for export-oriented businesses, particularly those reliant on low-cost advantages [10][11]. - The narrowing of interest rate differentials may alleviate capital outflow pressures, providing short-term support for China's capital markets [10]. Policy Recommendations for China - China should maintain monetary policy autonomy while ensuring liquidity remains adequate, focusing on targeted measures to support sectors like technology and small enterprises [14]. - To address the dual challenges of exports and imports, China should promote industry upgrades and enhance the competitiveness of its exports through innovation and technology [14][15]. - Long-term capital attraction should focus on institutional reforms rather than short-term incentives, ensuring a stable and transparent investment environment [15]. Conclusion - The Fed's rate cut signifies a transition from a high-interest rate environment to a more accommodative one, providing a temporary easing of external pressures for China [16]. - However, sustainable economic growth in China will depend on strengthening internal drivers, including technological independence and structural upgrades [16].