前言 欧盟突然挥起贸易大棒，拟将钢铁进口关税暴涨 50%，还削减近半数免税配额，美其名曰 "救本土行 业"，却把英国坑惨了！ 这表明欧盟在经济政策上，正在向美国靠拢，试图通过"抱团取暖"来强化其在跨大西洋贸易秩序中的影 响力。 提案还包括要求外国供应商申报钢铁熔炼与浇铸地点，这无疑增加了进口流程的复杂性和成本。 英国 80% 钢铁出口靠欧盟，刚挨过美国25% 关税，又要被欧盟关税砸懵，行业警告 "这是生存威胁"。 英首相斯塔默急了，忙着跟欧盟、美国双线磋商，可脱欧后的英国，这次能躲过这场危机吗？ 欧盟的"保护主义大棒" 欧盟此次提出将钢铁进口关税提高一倍至50%，并削减47%的免税进口配额，降至每年1830万吨。这套 组合拳，无疑是瞄准了所谓的"过剩产能"和"不公平竞争"。 欧盟工业事务专员斯特凡・塞茹尔内直言不讳："欧洲钢铁行业濒临崩溃——我们正通过保护措施助力 其投资、脱碳并重获竞争力。" 这背后是欧盟对自身钢铁产业陷入困境的深切焦虑，在能源成本高企、全球钢铁产能过剩的背景下，欧 洲本土钢铁企业面临巨大的生存压力，然而这套"自救"方案，却充满了"排外"色彩。 此举与美国总统特朗普的钢铁关税政策保持一致，并 ...

在全球贸易保护主义日益严重的背景下，欧盟宣布将实施新的钢铁关税配额制度，并大幅提高部分进口钢铁产品的关税，从原先的25%提升至50%。这一举 措紧随美国之后，预计将对韩国的钢铁出口造成严重打击，引起了韩国政府和相关产业的高度关注。 根据韩国产业通商资源部8日发布的消息，欧盟计划用新的关税配额机制取代即将到期的现行钢铁保障措施。草案显示，欧盟的钢铁进口配额总量将从目前 的3053万吨减少47%，降至1830万吨。同时，超出配额的进口钢铁将面临从25%翻倍至50%的关税。这一新政策预计将在明年6月底通过欧盟立法程序并正式 生效。 对此，韩国产业通商资源部表示深切关注。由于欧盟尚未公布具体的国别配额分配方案，韩国方面尚难以准确评估这一新政策的具体影响。但根据初步估 算，新的配额体系可能会导致韩国对欧盟的钢铁出口总量大幅减少，预计会比去年减少接近一半，这无疑给韩国钢铁产业带来了巨大的压力。 政策的深切关切。 与此同时，韩国政府已启动全面的应对机制。韩国产业通商资源部副部长文慎鹤将亲自走访钢铁出口企业，了解当前行业所面临的困境，并收集企业的反馈 信息。此外，韩国政府还将在10日召开由产业供应链政策主任主持的公私部门联合 ...

欧盟委员会分管产业战略的执行副主席塞茹尔内在公布上述计划前表示，"欧洲钢铁行业正处于崩溃的 边缘。我们将保护它，以便它能够投资、脱碳，从而重新恢复竞争力。"据介绍，上述提案须得到欧洲 议会和欧盟27个成员国的批准，欧盟委员会希望尽快实施这些措施。 香港《南华早报》称，欧盟没有点名中国，称关税和配额将适用于全球进口。但一名匿名欧盟官员宣 称，对于欧盟钢铁行业来说，"中国是迄今最大的问题"。据英国《金融时报》报道，欧盟试图通过反华 钢铁措施与美国捆绑在一起。"这一提议……将成为我们与美国接触的一个非常好的基础，我们可以借 此表明，我们现在拥有一套非常强大的钢铁产业保护体系。"欧盟委员会一名高级官员表示，"这使我们 能够与美国就隔离产能过剩问题展开讨论。" 【环球时报报道 记者 倪浩】欧盟计划大幅削减进口钢铁免税配额，并将超出配额部分关税上调至 50%。这一保护主义举措被认为效仿美国政府，令英韩等国十分担忧。 据法国国际广播电台报道，欧盟7日公布的这项史无前例的措施包括：将每年可免税进口到欧盟的外国 钢铁配额削减47%至1830万吨，超过配额部分加倍征收关税，从25%提高到50%。另外，欧盟进口商将 被要求申报原始 ...

（原标题：欧盟需要更多美国以外的贸易协议） 《爱尔兰观察者报》9月28日报道，周二公布的一项调查显示，尽管法国经济持续疲软，德国需求 放缓，但欧元区9月临时综合采购经理人指数（PMI）升至16个月高点。9月经济活动的增长掩盖了欧元 区潜在的疲软。尽管欧洲央行上调了欧元区今年的增长预测，但警告称，欧盟企业适应日益保护主义的 全球贸易环境的能力存在"相当大的不确定性"。经合组织在9月发布的报告中也警告称，虽然全球增长 在2025年上半年比预期更具韧性，但美国加征关税的全部影响仍在显现，对消费者行为、劳动力市场和 价格的影响已经显现。人们似乎已达成共识，欧盟需要寻求并敲定更多美国以外的贸易协议，以保护其 经济利益。与印尼、墨西哥和加拿大等国家以及南方共同市场等集团达成的协议将为欧盟的出口创造新 的机会，减少对特定市场的依赖。但一些欧盟国家正在阻止通过这些已经谈判达成的自由贸易协议，爱 尔兰尤其如此。ESRI在秋季季度报告中向政府提出了一些强有力的建议，以应对国际贸易面临的威 胁，并表示"在南方共同市场协议的情况下，我们敦促政府仔细考虑其保留意见"。在经济政策应着眼于 保护和加强自由贸易的时候，反对自由贸易协定似乎适 ...

Core Viewpoint - President Donald Trump announced a 100% tariff on all movies produced overseas and imported into the United States, extending trade protectionism to the cultural industry, creating uncertainty for film companies reliant on international collaboration and box office revenue [1] Industry Impact - The implementation of movie tariffs raises concerns among film executives, as film production, financing, post-production, and visual effects often involve multiple countries, leading to confusion regarding the execution of these tariffs [1] - Hollywood's increasing dependence on overseas production centers, such as Canada, the UK, and Australia, is driven by tax incentives that attract high-budget films, including superhero blockbusters and streaming series [1] - The tariffs could adversely affect thousands of American workers involved in overseas filming and production, as their work typically requires coordination across multiple countries [1]

Now the European Commission has announced plans to double tariffs on steel imports matching the 50% levy imposed by the United States. Under the proposal, the amount of steel which can be imported tax-free will also be slashed by almost half. Now the measures head to the blocks member states and if approved will then take effect from next year.But top European officials stress the tariffs are in line with international trade law and are a move to protect the European industry. Listen in what uh was uh clear ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unexpected decision of Mexico to impose tariffs on Chinese imports, aligning with the U.S. under Trump's administration, which aims to exclude China from global supply chains [1][2]. Group 1: Mexico's Tariff Decision - Mexico announced a 50% tariff on automobiles imported from China, a move interpreted as an attempt to appease the U.S. and abandon its previous stance of protecting Chinese interests [1][4]. - This decision marks a significant shift in Mexico's position, which had previously maintained neutrality between the U.S. and China, now responding to U.S. pressure [4][5]. Group 2: China's Response - In retaliation, China initiated a "trade investment barrier investigation" against Mexico and announced an anti-dumping investigation on pecans imported from Mexico and the U.S. [1][5]. - China's swift countermeasures highlight the risks associated with Mexico's decision to sacrifice Chinese interests for U.S. favor, as warned by Chinese officials earlier [5][6]. Group 3: Economic Implications for Mexico - The tariff policy is expected to have a significant negative impact on Mexico's economy, potentially leading to a decline in trade volume with China [7]. - Mexico's reliance on the U.S. for trade agreements may leave it vulnerable to future escalations in tariffs from Trump, creating a precarious situation for the country [7].

在全球化日益加深的今天，贸易和经济政策的变化往往成为国际博弈的风向标。特朗普政府宣布自8月1 日起对部分商品加征高额关税的决定，毫无疑问引发了全球市场的震荡。这一举措不仅对美国本土经济 构成压力，更令与中国有着深厚经贸关系的东盟国家陷入了进退两难的境地。中美博弈的加剧，不仅使 全球经济形势更加复杂化，也将国际力量对比推向了一个关键节点。在此背景下，中国外交团队，尤其 是中国外交部长，凭借坚定而智慧的应对方式，成功化解了来自美国方面的压力，展现了中国在全球经 济治理中的领导力。 今年7月，在马来西亚吉隆坡举行的东盟外长会议上，美国国务卿鲁比奥的"印太经济框架"倡议，企图 通过拉拢东盟国家，共同对抗中国。然而，特朗普政府的高额关税政策却暴露了这一倡议的内在矛盾。 美国单方面加税的行为不仅损害了美国本土企业的利益，更令东盟国家陷入了贸易成本上升的困境。尤 其是对于东盟这些依赖对华贸易的国家来说，美国的政策几乎成了"口惠而实不至"的空头支票。相比之 下，中国凭借稳定的经济合作关系，展现了更多的诚意和行动，这使得东盟各国对于鲁比奥的倡议反应 冷淡，选择站在中国一边。 与美国的单边主义形成鲜明对比，中国则秉持平等互利的原 ...

Core Viewpoint - The adverse effects of Trump's tariff policy are leading to significant financial losses for American farmers, with potential losses estimated at $45 billion due to plummeting exports to China and rising costs for fertilizers and machinery [1][4]. Group 1: Economic Impact on Farmers - U.S. soybean exports to China have decreased by $2.5 billion compared to the previous year, with no purchases made since May [1]. - If the current trend continues, U.S. soybean exports to China could drop by $10 billion this year [1]. - The decline in sorghum exports is even more severe, with a 97% drop from last year's $1.3 billion [1]. - Republican lawmakers estimate that farmers may require up to $50 billion in economic support, significantly exceeding the aid provided in 2018 [4]. - The total losses for U.S. farmers across nine major crops are projected to reach $45 billion this year, with corn, soybeans, wheat, and cotton accounting for the majority of these losses [5]. Group 2: Government Response and Support - The Trump administration is expected to announce a new economic support plan for farmers, although the specifics and scale of the aid remain unclear [1][2]. - The previous fund established for agricultural support has been depleted, and the source of funding for the new aid is uncertain [4]. - Farmers express a need for immediate assistance, with some indicating that government aid is a temporary solution, and many may still face bankruptcy [6]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The U.S. is attempting to diversify its soybean export markets to countries like Mexico, the EU, Japan, and Indonesia, but the scale of the Chinese market makes it challenging to find immediate alternatives [8]. - There are ongoing discussions about potential trade negotiations between the U.S. and China, but industry representatives believe that any agreements may come too late to benefit many farmers [9]. - Long-term prospects for U.S. soybean exports to China appear bleak, as China shifts its sourcing to Latin American suppliers and emphasizes self-sufficiency [10].

Core Points - Spain's initial strong support for EU tariffs on China has shifted towards seeking cooperation, particularly in the electric vehicle sector, due to economic repercussions from China's countermeasures [1][10] - The Spanish Prime Minister's upcoming visit to China aims to discuss bilateral trade and strengthen economic ties amidst EU-China trade tensions [3][9] - Spain's proactive approach to attract Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers reflects a broader trend among EU countries to engage with China despite initial opposition [6][8] Group 1: Spain's Changing Stance - Spain's government has softened its hardline stance on tariffs against China, now focusing on collaboration in the electric vehicle industry [1][10] - The visit of the Andalusian regional government leader to China highlights Spain's efforts to promote local investment from Chinese car manufacturers [8] - Spain's shift indicates a recognition of the negative effects of trade protectionism and the growing importance of China in global trade [10] Group 2: Economic Implications - The EU's anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles has led to significant tensions, prompting Spain to reconsider its position due to potential impacts on its own exports [5][9] - Spain's agricultural sectors, particularly pork and brandy, are at risk due to China's retaliatory measures, emphasizing the importance of maintaining access to the Chinese market [9][10] - The potential loss of the Chinese market could severely impact Spain's economy, as other countries are also vying for market share [10] Group 3: Future Cooperation - The evolving relationship between Spain and China may lead to expanded cooperation in various sectors, including electric vehicles, agriculture, and technology [12] - Spain's government aims to resolve trade disputes through dialogue, indicating a desire for a more collaborative approach moving forward [9][12]