1月27日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 彭博社记者提问，日本首相高市早苗表示，任何发生在台海的危机，都可能促使美日采取联合行动，以 撤离各自的公民。她还称，在这种情况下，日本不可能抛弃其长期盟友美国。中方对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆 资料图。 郭嘉昆表示，需要提醒日方的是，1972年《中日联合声明》明确，日本国政府承认中华人民共和国政府 是中国的唯一合法政府，中华人民共和国政府重申台湾是中华人民共和国领土不可分割的一部分，日本 国政府充分理解和尊重中国政府的这一立场，并坚持遵循《波茨坦公告》第八条的立场。1978年《中日 和平友好条约》经中日两国立法机构批准确认《中日联合声明》所表明的各项原则应予以严格遵守。 他指出，根据《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》和《日本投降书》等一系列具有充分国际法效力的文件，日 本窃取于中国之台湾必须归还中国，日本应完全解除武装，不得维持能使其重新武装的产业。日本宪法 对军力交战权、战争权也作出严格限制。以上这些都是日本必须严格履行的政治承诺和不容推卸的法律 义务。日方声称要在法律范围内行动，却一再粗暴干涉中国内政，甚至对中国发出武力威胁，这完全是 自相矛盾。 郭嘉昆指出，日本曾对台湾 ...

外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持1月27日例行记者会。会上有外媒记者提问称：日本首相高市早苗称，台海出 现的任何危机将导致美日采取联合行动营救他们的在台公民。她补充说，在这种情况下，日本不可能放 弃其长期盟友美国。中方对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆表示，日本曾对台湾殖民统治长达半个世纪犯下罄竹难书的罪行，对中国人民负有严重历史罪 责。无论在历史上、法律上，日方都没有任何资格对中国台湾置喙。日方有关言论再次暴露，日本右翼 势力挑动对立，制造事端，借机推进"再军事化"，挑战战后国际秩序的野心。这已经对地区和平稳定和 中日关系政治基础构成严重威胁，国际社会必须高度警惕，坚决抵制。我们再次敦促日方恪守中日四个 政治文件精神和所作政治承诺，切实反思纠错，停止在台湾问题上的操弄和妄动。 环球时报-环球网报道 记者 索炎琦 郭嘉昆对此表示，需要提醒日方的是，1972年《中日联合声明》明确，日本国政府承认中华人民共和国 政府是中国的唯一合法政府。中华人民共和国政府重申，台湾是中华人民共和国领土不可分割的一部 分，日本国政府充分理解和尊重中国政府的这一立场，并坚持遵循《波茨坦公告》第八条的立场。1978 年《中日和平友好条约》经中日两国立法机构 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights Japan's Prime Minister's statement regarding potential joint actions with the U.S. in the event of a crisis in the Taiwan Strait, emphasizing Japan's commitment to its allies [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized Japan for its contradictory stance of claiming to act within legal boundaries while interfering in China's internal affairs and issuing threats, which undermines regional stability [3] - The historical context is provided, noting Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan for half a century and the associated historical responsibilities towards the Chinese people, asserting that Japan has no right to comment on Taiwan [3] Group 2 - The article points out that Japan's recent rhetoric reflects the ambitions of right-wing forces to provoke tensions and advance militarization, posing a serious threat to the post-war international order [3] - There is a call for the international community to remain vigilant and resist Japan's actions, which are seen as detrimental to peace and stability in the region [3] - The Chinese side urges Japan to adhere to the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan and to cease its manipulations regarding the Taiwan issue [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry regarding Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's comments on Taiwan, emphasizing that Japan has no right to interfere in Taiwan's affairs and highlighting historical grievances between China and Japan [1]. Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jia Kun, stated that Japan's comments reveal the ambitions of Japanese right-wing forces to provoke conflict and advance militarization, posing a serious threat to regional peace and stability as well as to Sino-Japanese relations [1]. - Guo emphasized that Japan's historical colonial rule over Taiwan for half a century has resulted in severe historical grievances towards the Chinese people, and urged Japan to adhere to the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan [1]. - The article calls for the international community to remain vigilant and firmly resist Japan's actions regarding the Taiwan issue, indicating a need for Japan to reflect and correct its stance [1].

我们再次敦促日方恪守中日四个政治文件精神和所作政治承诺，切实反思纠错，停止在台湾问题上的操 弄和妄动。 （总台央视记者 赵晶） 1月27日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。有报道说，日本首相高市早苗称，如果台海发生危 机，美日可能采取联合行动撤离美日公民，在这样的情况下，日本不可能抛弃它的盟友。中方对此有何 评论？ 郭嘉昆表示，日方声称要在法律范围内行动，却一再粗暴干涉中国内政，甚至对中国发出武力威胁，这 完全是自相矛盾。日本曾对台湾殖民统治长达半个世纪，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，对中国人民负有严重历 史罪责。无论在历史上、法律上，日方都没有任何资格对中国台湾置喙。日方有关言论再次暴露日本右 翼势力挑动对立、制造事端，借机推进"再军事化"，挑战战后国际秩序的野心。这已经对地区和平稳定 和中日关系政治基础构成严重威胁，国际社会必须高度警惕、坚决抵制。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The 2026 U.S. Defense Strategy Report reflects a shift in language regarding China, indicating a potential easing of tensions and a focus on mutual respect in bilateral relations [2][3] Group 1: U.S. Defense Strategy Priorities - The report outlines four main priorities: safeguarding U.S. homeland security and interests in the Western Hemisphere, deterring China in the Indo-Pacific through strength rather than confrontation, increasing the responsibility of U.S. allies and partners, and fully strengthening the U.S. defense industrial base [1] - The prioritization of these issues indicates a recalibration of U.S. interests rather than a simple fluctuation in attitudes towards China, emphasizing a reassessment of the costs and benefits of global strategic expansion [1] Group 2: China’s Position and Response - The report marks a significant change in the U.S. stance towards China, no longer emphasizing the "China threat" but rather recognizing China as a "definite power" in the Indo-Pacific, which may open avenues for cooperation in various fields [2] - Despite the U.S. adjustments, China remains committed to its core interests and principles, particularly regarding Taiwan, which is viewed as an inseparable part of its territory [3] Group 3: Ongoing Strategic Dynamics - The essence of U.S. strategic containment towards China remains unchanged, necessitating vigilance and awareness of ongoing military confrontations in the Indo-Pacific [4] - China continues to advocate for peaceful development and resolution of international disputes through dialogue, contrasting with the U.S. approach centered on deterrence and confrontation [4] Group 4: Future of U.S.-China Relations - The relationship between the U.S. and China is crucial, and both nations should aim to be partners and friends, respecting each other's core interests and development paths to foster a stable foundation for cooperation [5] - Focusing on building a new type of major power relationship based on mutual respect and cooperation is deemed essential for the benefit of both nations and the global community [5]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Sanae regarding Taiwan are criticized as reckless, suggesting a dangerous approach to international relations that could lead to conflict [1][2]. Group 1: Critique of Kishi Sanae's Statements - Kishi's remarks imply that Japan would intervene militarily if there were issues concerning Taiwan, which is framed as exercising collective self-defense, but this is not recognized internationally [1][2]. - The historical context of Japan's relations with China and the commitments made in four political documents, including the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué and the 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, are not well understood by many Japanese citizens [1]. Group 2: Legal and Historical Perspectives - From both legal and historical perspectives, Kishi's statements are problematic, as Japan's constitution explicitly renounces the use of military force to resolve international disputes [2]. - The historical context of Japan's past aggressions, including its colonial rule over Taiwan, must be acknowledged, as Kishi's comments deeply hurt the sentiments of the Chinese people [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that any measures capable of severely punishing "Taiwan independence" elements are considered options by the Chinese government [5]. Group 1 - The spokesperson of the Ministry of National Defense, Zhang Xiaogang, addressed recent military-related issues on January 16 [4]. - The article discusses concerns in Taiwan regarding the possibility of China adopting a similar approach to the U.S. in Venezuela to justify actions against Taiwan, highlighting that the costs and risks would be significantly higher [5]. - It asserts that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China, and external forces have no right to interfere [5].

Group 1 - The spokesperson of the Ministry of National Defense, Zhang Xiaogang, emphasized that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter of China, and external forces have no right to interfere [3] - Zhang highlighted that over 60% of surveyed Taiwanese citizens do not wish to see themselves or their families go to war, indicating a strong desire for peace and development among the majority [3] - The current Taiwanese administration's actions are viewed as detrimental to peace, and the "Taiwan independence" movement is increasingly recognized as a threat by the public [3]

Group 1 - The core concern for both the US and Japan regarding Taiwan is the potential disruption in chip supply and rare earth resources if unification occurs [1][4][7] - Japan's recent actions, including the deep-sea drilling expedition for rare earths near Minami-Torishima, indicate a proactive approach to reduce dependence on Chinese resources, with an estimated 16 million tons of rare earths available in the area [2][6] - The US is attempting to secure semiconductor production by encouraging TSMC to build multiple factories in Arizona, reflecting a strategic move to mitigate risks associated with reliance on Taiwan [2][4][7] Group 2 - The geopolitical dynamics surrounding Taiwan are driving a race against time for China, the US, and Japan, each with their own strategic objectives related to Taiwan's status and resource security [7] - Market forces will play a crucial role in determining the future of chip and rare earth supply chains, as long as peaceful conditions prevail between the involved parties [7] - The uncertainty surrounding Japan's rare earth mining prospects and the US's ability to successfully relocate semiconductor production highlights the complexities of the current geopolitical landscape [7]