Workflow
知识产权保护
icon
Search documents
保护在华外企知识产权,他们这样做(我在中外交流第一线)
Core Viewpoint - The importance of intellectual property (IP) protection for foreign enterprises in China is increasingly recognized, leading to proactive measures by local governments to enhance IP services and create a favorable business environment [6][12]. Group 1: Qingdao's IP Services - Qingdao has initiated a "health check" program focusing on IP risks for foreign enterprises, identifying potential risks and providing tailored strategies [7][10]. - The program has already assisted 12 foreign enterprises in conducting customized IP risk assessments since its launch in 2023 [11][12]. - The service team provided detailed reports and recommendations, including strategies for trademark registration and patent application [10][11]. Group 2: Chengdu's Rapid Patent Services - Chengdu has established a fast-track examination process for patent applications, significantly reducing the average authorization time for invention patents from 18 months to 65 days [13][16]. - The city has also implemented a mechanism to address IP-related issues, collecting 57 requests from enterprises and resolving 26 of them [16]. - Chengdu's efforts include enhancing IP financing support by integrating resources from various sectors to assist both domestic and foreign enterprises [15][16]. Group 3: Shanghai's Efficient IP Dispute Resolution - Shanghai has developed a high-efficiency administrative mediation process for IP disputes, with cases typically resolved within four months [17][18]. - The city has successfully handled 87 foreign-related patent infringement cases from 2020 to August 2025, with 98% of cases not leading to administrative litigation [19]. - The collaborative approach among different IP authorities has strengthened the protection network for foreign enterprises in Shanghai [19].
WAKUKU挑战LABUBU:中国潮玩经济进入竞争新阶段
Core Insights - The Chinese潮玩 (trendy toy) market is entering a new competitive phase, with MINISO's own潮玩 brand "WAKUKU" challenging the long-standing dominance of Pop Mart in the industry [3][4] - The潮玩 industry in China is projected to reach a total value of 110.1 billion yuan by 2026, with an average annual growth rate exceeding 20% [4] - The market remains highly fragmented, with even leading players like Pop Mart holding only an 11.5% market share by GMV in 2024, indicating ample room for new entrants [6] Industry Growth and Competition - The潮玩 market has seen a continuous increase in scale, with over 50,000 related enterprises currently in operation [5] - WAKUKU's strategy of offering products at fixed prices rather than through random draws is expected to lower purchase barriers and expand its consumer base [6] - The success of WAKUKU has led to increased attention from investors, with reports of potential investments in潮玩 brands like TNT [7] Brand Development and IP Strategy - The success of LABUBU, a潮玩 brand, highlights the importance of storytelling and cultural integration in building a globally recognized IP [8][11] - Pop Mart has seen a significant increase in its market value, with its stock price rising approximately 470% over the past year, surpassing the combined market value of major international toy companies [11] - The competition between Pop Mart and MINISO reflects different strategic approaches, with Pop Mart focusing on IP ecosystem development and MINISO leveraging its extensive distribution channels [12] Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The潮玩 industry is transitioning from a phase of explosive growth to one of consolidation, where companies with strong original design and cultural branding will dominate [12] - The emergence of imitation products has raised concerns about market trust and product differentiation, potentially impacting the overall潮玩 market [13] - Strengthening IP protection is crucial for maintaining brand integrity and fostering consumer trust in the潮玩 sector [14]
广东法院:妥善处置房地产企业等重大债务纠纷案件17.4万件
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-10-10 13:58
Group 1 - The Guangdong courts have handled 174,000 major debt dispute cases involving real estate companies from 2023 to August 2025 [1] - A total of 21,000 bankruptcy cases have been adjudicated, with assets worth 78.3 billion yuan revitalized and over 40 million square meters of idle land addressed [1] - The courts have facilitated the restructuring of 243 distressed companies while promptly liquidating 5,287 companies that could not be saved [1] Group 2 - Guangdong courts received 5.432 million cases involving various market entities and concluded 5.082 million cases, recovering 334.92 billion yuan in overdue payments for enterprises [1] - The courts have adjudicated 57,000 cases involving foreign and Hong Kong-Macau entities, and handled 14,000 international and inter-regional judicial assistance cases [1] - The courts have also resolved 222,000 intellectual property cases and addressed 5,731 cases related to unfair competition and antitrust issues [2]
深圳发布全国首部空天技术知识产权保护白皮书
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-10 13:27
Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen is leveraging intellectual property (IP) as a shield to support the aerospace technology industry, marking a significant step in IP governance and international protection within this sector [1][12]. Group 1: White Paper Release - The "Shenzhen Aerospace Technology Industry Intellectual Property Protection White Paper" is the first of its kind in China, focusing on IP protection in the aerospace technology sector [1][3]. - As of December 2024, Shenzhen's aerospace technology industry has filed 2,278 patent applications, ranking fifth nationally, with 1,042 effective patents, showcasing strong innovation and technical reserves [3]. Group 2: Innovation and Patent Landscape - Enterprises are the primary drivers of innovation, accounting for 86.74% of patent applications, with leading companies like Huawei and Asia-Pacific Star Communication holding significant patent portfolios in satellite communication and drone technology [3][9]. - Huawei has filed 267 patents in aerospace technology, while ZTE has 75, contributing to Shenzhen's status as a "patent highland" in this field [3]. Group 3: Overseas IP Protection System - Shenzhen has established a "five-in-one" overseas IP protection system, which includes risk prevention, case monitoring, dispute response, capability enhancement, and resource integration, providing comprehensive support for aerospace technology companies venturing abroad [5]. - The city has set up the first overseas IP protection workstation in Germany, offering localized protection services, and has accumulated 226,300 PCT international patent applications, expected to lead the nation for 21 consecutive years [5]. Group 4: Collaborative Protection Mechanism - Shenzhen is innovating in collaborative IP protection mechanisms, having initiated efficient coordination between patent administrative confirmation and judicial infringement processes, significantly improving dispute resolution efficiency [7]. - By 2024, there will be 142 IP protection workstations in Shenzhen, with 62 related to aerospace technology, covering critical areas such as drones, chips, semiconductors, and new materials [7]. Group 5: Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) - The white paper emphasizes the need for strengthening the layout of standard essential patents (SEPs) in aerospace technology and encourages companies to participate in international standard-setting [10]. - Huawei and ZTE have filed 70 and 13 SEPs, respectively, with the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), covering key standards like non-terrestrial networks (NTN) [10]. Group 6: Future Implications - Aerospace technology is viewed as a strategic high ground for future industries, with the competition in IP reflecting the competition in innovation ecosystems and institutional guarantees [12]. - The release of the white paper signals a commitment to valuing, protecting, and empowering every intellectual achievement in Shenzhen's innovative landscape, suggesting a promising future for the aerospace industry [12].
科百特商业秘密侵权案落槌,国产创新如何打赢知识产权保卫战?
Core Viewpoint - The recent criminal judgment in the commercial secret infringement case between Kobot and Saipu marks a significant breakthrough in the protection of intellectual property rights in China's high-end filtration membrane sector, which has been dominated by foreign companies for a long time [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - Kobot, a domestic representative in the filtration membrane industry, won a lawsuit against Saipu for infringing on its commercial secrets, resulting in criminal penalties for Saipu's legal representative and former Kobot employees involved [1][2]. - The court sentenced individuals involved to prison terms ranging from one year and eleven months to two years and nine months, along with a total fine and compensation of 14.5 million yuan [1]. - This case reflects the internal competition and challenges faced by domestic companies in the high-tech sector, emphasizing the need for robust intellectual property protection to ensure that R&D investments translate into market competitiveness [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Context - The filtration membrane market is highly concentrated globally, with major players including Cytiva and Merck dominating the sector, while domestic companies like Kobot are striving to catch up [7]. - In 2023, China's production of virus removal filters reached 0.30 million units, marking a 55.7% increase, driven by local companies' efforts to scale up production [7]. - Kobot's products cover over 90% of domestic microelectronics and large pharmaceutical enterprises, with exports to over 100 countries, indicating its significant market presence [7]. Group 3: Implications for the Industry - The criminal judgment sends a strong signal against technology theft and is expected to deter similar unfair competition practices, particularly among smaller firms that rely on rapid expansion through talent poaching [5][6]. - The case is likely to prompt upstream and downstream companies in the industry to reassess their partners' compliance with intellectual property regulations, leading to a preference for domestic firms with clear technology sources and strict compliance management [6]. - The ongoing strengthening of intellectual property protection in China is anticipated to enhance domestic companies' willingness to invest in innovation, moving the industry from low-end substitution to high-end breakthroughs [8].
科百特商业秘密侵权案落槌 国产创新如何打赢知识产权保卫战?
Core Viewpoint - The recent criminal judgment against Saipu for infringing on the trade secrets of Kebaite marks a significant breakthrough in the protection of high-end filtration membrane technology in China, which has long been dominated by foreign companies like Cytiva and Merck-Millipore [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Developments - The Hangzhou Xiaoshan District People's Court ruled that Saipu (a subsidiary of Dongfulong Life Technology) committed corporate crime by infringing on Kebaite's trade secrets, resulting in prison sentences for involved individuals ranging from 1 year and 11 months to 2 years and 9 months, along with fines and compensation totaling 14.5 million yuan [1][2]. - Kebaite has previously engaged in multiple intellectual property disputes with Saipu, including cases of trade secret and patent infringement, with a notable civil judgment in 2025 ordering Saipu to cease sales of its RC virus removal membranes and pay 5.25 million yuan in damages [3]. Group 2: Industry Context - The filtration membrane industry is highly concentrated globally, with major players including Kebaite, Sartorius AG, Pall Corporation, and Cytiva. The domestic market has seen a significant increase in production, with China's virus removal filter output reaching 0.30 million units in 2023, a growth rate of 55.7% [6]. - Kebaite's filtration products cover over 90% of domestic microelectronics and large pharmaceutical companies, and the company exports to over 100 countries, indicating its strong market presence [6]. Group 3: Implications for the Industry - The court's decision sends a strong signal against technology theft, which could deter similar competitive practices in the industry, particularly among smaller firms that rely on aggressive talent poaching and copying [5]. - The case is expected to prompt upstream and downstream players in the industry to reassess the intellectual property compliance of their partners, potentially leading to a shift towards collaborating with domestic companies that have clear technology sources and strict compliance management [5].
“仿冒餐饮帝国”瓦解,靠不正当竞争发不了财 | 新京报快评
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-10-09 14:48
"当时亏了钱,想把钱尽快挣回来,就通过这种方式快速借力。" 说这话的人是颜文伟,由他实际控制的四川无名餐饮管理有限公司及其关联公司通过抢注、仿冒各地老 店商标,迅速成为拥有十余个品牌、数十家门店的"碰瓷专业户"。 ▲颜文伟构建的"仿冒餐饮帝国"正在迅速瓦解。图/食事新闻视频截图 碰瓷者的行为,扰乱市场竞争秩序,损害老店利益,也损害消费者权益,应承担行政责任和民事责任。 行政责任方面,根据反不正当竞争法,监督检查部门可采取责令停止违法行为、罚款等措施,情节严重 的,并处吊销营业执照。 而在民事责任方面,如果老店的合法权益受到损害,可以向人民法院提起诉讼。赔偿数额,按照老店的 实际损失或者碰瓷者获得的利益确定。 在经历媒体连续曝光、监管部门介入、老店联合维权后,颜文伟构建的"仿冒餐饮帝国"正在迅速瓦解。 日前接受红星新闻采访时,他说了这句话。 颜文伟这么说,看似醒悟和忏悔,但这话从一个靠"快速借力"挣了大钱的人嘴里说出来,却颇有些讽刺 意味。 颜文伟接受采访时承认,"借力"方式是不道德和急功近利的。"不道德",从其精心设计的一套程序可见 一斑: 先寻找目标,由专人筛选无商标或可擦边注册商标的高流量老店;再将打包的 ...
星源材质:公司所生产的隔膜产品均具备完全自主知识产权或已取得相关知识产权许可
Core Viewpoint - The company has developed high-strength heat-resistant composite skeleton membranes and other related products, which have been sent to leading battery manufacturers for sampling [1] Group 1: Product Development - The company is focusing on the development of high-strength heat-resistant composite skeleton membranes, high porosity skeleton membranes, and high heat-resistant large pore skeleton membranes [1] - These rigid skeleton membrane products are being sampled by top battery enterprises [1] Group 2: Intellectual Property - The company places a high emphasis on intellectual property protection [1] - All membrane products produced by the company possess complete independent intellectual property rights or have obtained relevant intellectual property licenses [1] Group 3: Financial Disclosure - The company advises stakeholders to refer to its periodic reports disclosed in designated information disclosure media for specific operational data [1]
来得真快:中国商务部通告全球,特朗普想不到,中国还留了一手
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-09 09:09
Core Viewpoint - The announcement from China's Ministry of Commerce on October 9 outlines a comprehensive regulatory framework for rare earth technology, aiming to protect the entire industry chain and prevent technology leakage, especially in the context of ongoing U.S.-China trade negotiations [2][16][24]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The announcement, numbered "2025 No. 62," establishes a multi-layered firewall system covering the entire rare earth industry chain, from mining to high-value production [4][6]. - It includes regulations on recycling technologies for rare earth secondary resources and related service knowledge, creating a complete technological closed loop [6][8]. - A notable provision requires licenses for exports of non-restricted items if the exporter is aware that they will be used for rare earth-related activities abroad, indicating a proactive approach to prevent technology outflow [8][10]. Group 2: Knowledge and Human Capital - The announcement identifies all Chinese citizens, legal entities, and organizations as applicable subjects, emphasizing the protection of human capital as a core asset [12][14]. - It redefines knowledge transfer, including investment, education, and joint research, as controlled technology transfer, thus placing restrictions on previously normal international collaborations [14][16]. - The regulation aims to prevent the acquisition of sensitive technologies through high-salary recruitment and other means, highlighting the importance of protecting expert knowledge [10][12]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The timing of the announcement is strategically significant, as it coincides with ongoing trade negotiations, positioning it as a countermeasure against Western technology restrictions [16][18]. - China's control over rare earth technology is seen as a non-symmetric tool to counteract efforts by the U.S. and its allies to reduce reliance on Chinese supply chains [18][20]. - The announcement effectively disrupts Western countries' attempts to develop alternative supply chains, as they lack the necessary purification technology and complete industry chain that China possesses [20][22]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The regulatory measures signify a shift in the global technology landscape, with China asserting that core technologies will not be relinquished easily [24][26]. - The focus on intellectual property and knowledge as strategic resources suggests that future international competition will increasingly revolve around technological sovereignty [26].
高凌信息:公司及全资子公司共获得7项发明专利证书
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-09 09:05
高凌信息公告,公司及全资子公司河南信大网御科技有限公司于2025年第三季度收到7项国家知识产权 局颁发的发明专利证书。这些专利包括脱机license时间管控方法、一种拟态执行体的随机文件系统、一 种有害短信的封堵方法等。这些发明专利的取得是公司重要核心技术的体现和延伸,有利于进一步完善 公司知识产权保护体系,发挥自主知识产权的技术优势,促进技术创新,保持技术领先,提升公司核心 竞争力。 ...