【环球时报综合报道】5月6日，国家主席习近平同欧洲理事会主席科斯塔、欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩互致贺电，热烈庆祝中国和欧盟建交50周年。同日，中 国外交部发言人介绍今年中欧之间的重要议程：中方欢迎科斯塔、冯德莱恩适时联袂来华举行新一次中欧领导人会晤，双方还将举行战略、经贸、绿色、数 字等高层对话；从6日起，双方将先后举办4场庆祝建交的高规格招待会，以及经贸、文化、青年、体育、学术等领域系列活动。此前有媒体分析称，欧盟领 导人联袂访华、中欧峰会连续第二次在中国举行，这很不寻常。发言人同时表示，经双方商定，中方和欧洲议会决定同步全面取消对相互交往的限制。这被 认为是一个具有实质性意义的举措。路透社6日评论称：在美国全面关税加剧全球贸易不确定性的情况下，中国和欧盟正在解冻双方关系。北京外国语大学 教授崔洪建对《环球时报》记者表示，在中欧建交50周年之际，双方发出了清晰的信号：一方面要回顾历史、总结经验，倍加珍惜此前的合作成果；另一方 面要针对之前出现的问题，进一步优化合作环境，增强合作信心。 比利时通讯社6日称，在全球贸易不确定性日益增加的情况下，欧盟和中国一直在加强对话。新一轮的接触正值北京希望缓解紧张局势并使伙伴关 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the diminishing trust among U.S. allies due to President Trump's aggressive tariff policies and the call for allies to "de-risk" from the U.S. as they reassess their relationships with both the U.S. and China [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Allies' Response - Allies are increasingly uncertain about their status as U.S. partners, with many European and Asian countries feeling that they are treated the same as adversaries under Trump's tariff policies [3][4]. - The European Union is showing signs of distancing from the U.S. stance on China, with calls for a reassessment of its China policy and discussions for upcoming EU-China summits [4][5]. - Experts suggest that the current U.S. approach is alienating allies, leading them to seek alternative partnerships, particularly with China, which is seen as a more stable partner [9][10]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The article highlights that many countries now have China as their largest trading partner, with Australia exporting only 15% of its goods to the U.S. compared to its exports to China [6]. - The U.S. tariffs have disproportionately affected poorer nations, with some countries reconsidering their economic ties to the U.S. due to the unpredictability of its policies [10]. - There is a growing sentiment that the risks of relying on the U.S. for technology and trade outweigh those of engaging with China, prompting calls for a strategic shift among U.S. allies [8][9]. Group 3: Strategic Recommendations - Analysts recommend that U.S. allies should reduce their dependency on both the U.S. and China by developing alternative technologies and forming a more independent strategic position in global supply chains [8]. - The article suggests that allies should focus on creating a "strategic irreplacability" in key sectors like digital technology, rather than following the U.S. blindly in its anti-China stance [8][9].