围绕美国与马来西亚签署的贸易协定，马来西亚国内的反对声升高。原因是此项协定含有如果马来西亚 与其他国家签署威胁美国利益或安全的协定，美国可以单方面撕毁该贸易协定的条款。有人批评称这是 侵犯主权的行为，专家指出这是一项"毒丸条款"。 此项贸易协定虽然未指名具体国家，但明显是针对中国。美国与柬埔寨也签署了类似协定。今后与泰 国、越南谈判时可能也会列入该条款。东南亚有很多国家奉行中立外交，美国此举被认为意在阻碍这些 国家与中国接近。 马来西亚国内出现批评声音 "这既不是投降、背叛，也不是卖国、新型殖民地化"，在11月4日的国会上，马来西亚总理安瓦尔不得 不对贸易协定引发的批评进行反驳。 美国特朗普总统（左）与马来西亚总理安瓦尔在东盟相关首脑会议期间签署了双边贸易协定（10月26 日，吉隆坡市内，Reuters） 美国10月与马来西亚签署《互惠贸易协定》。允许美国因马来西亚与第三国签署威胁美国利 益的协议而单方面撕毁协定，且美国拥有单方面解释权。虽然未指名具体国家，但明显是针 对中国。类似协定可能会扩大到泰国、越南等…… 马来西亚政府有着迫不得已的苦衷。作为签署协定的交换条件，马来西亚获得了将对等关税降至19%、 以 ...

美国特朗普总统（左）与马来西亚总理安瓦尔在东盟相关首脑会议期间签署了双边贸易协定（10月26日，吉隆坡市内，Reuters） 受到严厉批评的是美国在协定中列入的"第三国"相关条款。该条款规定，如果马来西亚与"损害美国重 要利益的国家"签署新的贸易和经济协定，美国可以撕毁《互惠贸易协定》并恢复最初的对等关税税率 （25%）。 美国10月与马来西亚签署《互惠贸易协定》。允许美国因马来西亚与第三国签署威胁美国利益的协议而 单方面撕毁协定，且美国拥有单方面解释权。虽然未指名具体国家，但明显是针对中国。类似协定可能 会扩大到泰国、越南等…… 围绕美国与马来西亚签署的贸易协定，马来西亚国内的反对声升高。原因是此项协定含有如果马来西亚 与其他国家签署威胁美国利益或安全的协定，美国可以单方面撕毁该贸易协定的条款。有人批评称这是 侵犯主权的行为，专家指出这是一项"毒丸条款"。 此项贸易协定虽然未指名具体国家，但明显是针对中国。美国与柬埔寨也签署了类似协定。今后与泰 国、越南谈判时可能也会列入该条款。东南亚有很多国家奉行中立外交，美国此举被认为意在阻碍这些 国家与中国接近。 马来西亚国内出现批评声音 "这既不是投降、背叛，也不是 ...

2025年10月26日，在吉隆坡举行的第47届东盟峰会上，美国总统特朗普与马来西亚总理安瓦尔签署了一 份名为《美国与马来西亚互惠贸易协定》的双边协定。协定签署后，马来西亚国内立即掀起轩然大波。 前总理马哈蒂尔愤怒地表示："我从未想过自己能活着见证这种投降"，反对党痛批协定是"主权的出 卖"，民间组织呼吁议会否决这一"危害国家主权"的协定。 美国总统特朗普与马来西亚总理安瓦尔 为何一份贸易协定会引发如此强烈的反弹？当协定全文公布后，原因显而易见。这是一份极端不平等的 协定——专业贸易法专家对协定进行逐条统计后发现，马来西亚承担了104项具体约束性义务，而美国 仅承担4项，比例高达26:1。 更令人震惊的是，长达14页的附件III完全是针对马来西亚的单向承诺清单，涵盖税收政策、互联网控 制、技术标准等国内政策领域，而美国没有任何对等承诺。这种绝对的单向性，让人不禁想起19世纪殖 民时期的不平等条约附件，宗主国单方面列出殖民地必须遵守的规定。只不过，21世纪的不平等条约不 再割地赔款，而是剥夺数字主权和政策自主权。 这不仅仅是一份贸易协定，而是21世纪数字时代主权沦丧的典型案例。通过这份协定，美国系统性地削 弱了马 ...

Core Viewpoint - Canada has announced a 100% tariff on electric vehicles from China and a 25% tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum products, raising questions about the rationale behind these actions [1][3][5] Group 1: Trade Policies and Implications - The tariffs imposed by Canada are seen as discriminatory and violate the 1994 GATT agreement, as there is no substantial evidence that Chinese products have harmed the Canadian market [3][5] - The concept of "trade diversion" mentioned by Canada appears to be overstretched and used to justify its actions, which seem to align closely with U.S. policies against China [5][7] - The close cooperation between Canada and the U.S. may provide Canada with some support, but it raises concerns about whether the U.S. will uphold its commitments when interests conflict [7] Group 2: Impact on Chinese Electric Vehicles - Chinese electric vehicles have gained significant market share due to their high cost-performance ratio and superior performance, posing a challenge to European brands that are increasing in price [9][21] - The new tariffs will likely increase the prices of Chinese electric vehicles, potentially reducing their competitiveness in the market, although consumer willingness to pay higher prices remains uncertain [9][11] - China is actively working to adjust its supply chain to lower costs, but this is a long-term challenge that may be hindered by Canada's tariff policies [11][20] Group 3: China's Response - China plans to counteract Canada's tariffs through the WTO dispute resolution mechanism and has initiated anti-discrimination investigations against Canada [13][18] - The measures taken by China are compliant with international rules and aim to protect its interests against what is perceived as an unfounded attack by Canada [20] - The rapid growth of Chinese electric vehicles in the global market is a testament to their development, despite facing jealousy and pushback from other countries [21][23] Group 4: Global Supply Chain Considerations - Canada's tariff policy is expected to have negative implications not only for China but also for the stability of the global supply chain [23] - The attempt to suppress China's technological progress and market share through tariffs is viewed as counterproductive in an increasingly interconnected global economy [23]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the Trump administration's high tariff policies and the potential risks they pose to global economic security, particularly in relation to supply chains and trade relationships with countries like China and Vietnam [1][4][5]. Group 1: Tariff Policies and Trade Deficits - The Trump administration has initiated high tariffs, including a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and increased tariffs on Chinese products from 10% to 20% [1]. - In 2024, China is projected to have a trade deficit with the U.S. of $295.4 billion, leading the list of countries with significant trade deficits [2]. - Vietnam, as the third-largest country with a trade surplus with the U.S., is expected to see its surplus increase by 20% in 2024, reaching $123.4 billion [2]. Group 2: Responses from Affected Countries - Countries like Vietnam are diversifying their export destinations to mitigate the impact of the tariff wars, having signed various trade agreements such as CPTPP and RCEP [3]. - India has resumed negotiations for a free trade agreement with the UK and aims to finalize an agreement with the EU within the year, responding to criticisms of high tariffs [3]. Group 3: Implications for Global Trade Agreements - The U.S. has created barriers to China's entry into CPTPP, with existing members needing unanimous consent for new members, complicating China's potential accession [6]. - The shifting stance of the U.S. on tariffs has raised uncertainties, as seen in the temporary suspension of additional tariffs on products meeting USMCA requirements [6][7]. - The global economic order is at a crossroads, with the U.S. high tariff policies potentially leading to significant changes in international trade dynamics [7].