Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding "pre-made dishes" has escalated between Luo Yonghao and Xibei, with both parties presenting conflicting narratives, leading to significant public discourse [1]. Group 1: Controversy Overview - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei for serving mostly pre-made dishes at high prices, calling for legislation to require restaurants to disclose the use of pre-made ingredients [1]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, announced plans to sue Luo for damaging the restaurant's reputation and invited customers to observe the cooking process in their kitchens [1]. Group 2: Employee Insights - A former Xibei kitchen employee commented on the perception of pre-made dishes, acknowledging that while the portions may be small and prices high, the preparation involves fresh ingredients and cooking processes [3][4]. - The employee explained that dishes like "potato stewed beef" are prepared fresh in the morning and served later, which may lead to consumer confusion regarding the freshness of the food [6][7]. Group 3: Cooking Processes - The cooking process involves preparing ingredients in advance, with some dishes being cooked on-site while others are reheated from earlier preparations [19][20]. - The employee clarified that while some items are prepared ahead of time, they are not classified as pre-made dishes in the traditional sense, as they still undergo cooking processes before serving [23][28]. Group 4: Menu and Pricing - A detailed menu was provided, showcasing various dishes and their prices, indicating a total bill of 663.00 [16]. - The pricing reflects the perceived quality and preparation methods, with some dishes being freshly cooked while others are prepared in advance [19][20].

Group 1 - The public sentiment towards Jia Guolong's confrontation with Luo Yonghao is largely negative, questioning the rationale behind his actions [1][2] - Luo Yonghao expressed confusion and fatigue over the situation, indicating that he finds the confrontation unnecessary [2][4] - There is a perception that Jia Guolong, as a prominent restaurant owner, should not engage in disputes with influential figures like Luo Yonghao, as the odds are against him [5][11] Group 2 - The underlying logic suggests that one should only engage in battles they can win, highlighting the disparity in influence between Jia Guolong and Luo Yonghao [6][10] - Observers believe that Jia Guolong's response may inadvertently reveal operational secrets about his restaurant chain, which could be detrimental to his business [13][16] - The public's concern seems to stem from a desire to protect the status quo of perceived business practices, even if they are not entirely transparent [14][15] Group 3 - Luo Yonghao's past experiences of standing up to bullies are referenced to illustrate the importance of asserting oneself in the face of adversity [17] - The discussion raises questions about consumer rights to know the origins of food products, particularly regarding pre-prepared dishes served in restaurants [18][19] - The narrative suggests that consumers may prefer to remain unaware of certain business practices to maintain a sense of comfort regarding their dining experiences [16][19]

你对餐厅使用预制菜的态度是？ ...

Core Viewpoint - The takeaway from the article is that the instant noodle industry is facing significant challenges due to the rise of food delivery services and the expansion of pre-packaged meals, leading to a decline in instant noodle sales [1] Industry Summary - The emergence of the food delivery battle in 2015 has negatively impacted the sales of instant noodles, which were once a staple food in the country [1] - The current second wave of the food delivery battle, along with the rapid growth of pre-packaged meals, has further exacerbated the already struggling instant noodle industry [1] - Despite the decline in popularity, instant noodles still hold sentimental value for many individuals, particularly as a source of comfort during late-night cravings [1]

Core Viewpoint - Shennong Group's stock has shown significant growth this year, with a notable increase in both revenue and net profit for the first half of 2025, indicating strong operational performance and investor interest [2][3]. Group 1: Stock Performance - As of September 12, Shennong Group's stock price increased by 2.06%, reaching 34.20 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 99.56 million CNY and a turnover rate of 0.56% [1]. - The stock has risen by 23.47% year-to-date, with recent gains of 8.99% over the last five trading days, 7.21% over the last 20 days, and 5.82% over the last 60 days [2]. Group 2: Financial Performance - For the period from January to June 2025, Shennong Group reported a revenue of 2.798 billion CNY, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 12.16%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 388 million CNY, which is a remarkable increase of 212.65% [2]. - The company has distributed a total of 331 million CNY in dividends since its A-share listing, with 131 million CNY distributed over the past three years [3]. Group 3: Shareholder and Institutional Holdings - As of June 30, 2025, Shennong Group had 20,700 shareholders, an increase of 3.64% from the previous period, with an average of 25,338 circulating shares per shareholder, down by 3.52% [2]. - Among the top ten circulating shareholders, Hong Kong Central Clearing Limited is the sixth largest with 2.0472 million shares, while several other funds have made notable changes in their holdings [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that Longda Food's stock has shown fluctuations, with a recent increase of 2.11% and a year-to-date decline of 26.64% [1] - As of September 12, Longda Food's stock price is 5.81 CNY per share, with a total market capitalization of 6.27 billion CNY [1] - The company has seen a net inflow of main funds amounting to 13.14 million CNY, with significant buying and selling activities from large orders [1] Group 2 - Longda Food's main business includes pig farming, slaughtering, and the production and sale of fresh and frozen meat, accounting for 81.87% of its revenue [1] - The company reported a revenue of 4.98 billion CNY for the first half of 2025, a year-on-year decrease of 1.38%, and a net profit of 35.17 million CNY, down 39.52% year-on-year [2] - Since its A-share listing, Longda Food has distributed a total of 443 million CNY in dividends, with no dividends paid in the last three years [3]

Company Overview - Liren Lizhuang, established on May 27, 2010, and listed on September 29, 2020, is located at 876 Panyu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai. The company primarily engages in e-commerce retail and brand marketing services, with 95.06% of its revenue coming from beauty and personal care products and 4.94% from other categories [1]. Stock Performance - On September 12, Liren Lizhuang's stock price decreased by 2.05%, reaching 10.49 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 145 million CNY and a turnover rate of 3.40%. The total market capitalization is 4.201 billion CNY [1]. - Year-to-date, the stock price has increased by 21.55%, with a 3.05% rise over the last five trading days, an 8.03% increase over the last 20 days, and a slight decline of 0.10% over the last 60 days [1]. Capital Flow - In terms of capital flow, there was a net outflow of 9.9124 million CNY from major funds, with large orders buying 14.4167 million CNY (9.96% of total) and selling 22.8434 million CNY (15.78% of total). Notably, special orders bought 2.4419 million CNY (1.69% of total) and sold 3.9276 million CNY (2.71% of total) [1]. Shareholder Information - As of June 30, the number of shareholders for Liren Lizhuang reached 42,000, an increase of 47.49% from the previous period. The average number of circulating shares per person decreased by 32.20% to 9,540 shares [2]. Financial Performance - For the first half of 2025, Liren Lizhuang reported a revenue of 831 million CNY, a year-on-year decrease of 13.98%. The net profit attributable to the parent company was -32.7597 million CNY, representing a significant decline of 1315.98% compared to the previous year [2]. Dividend Distribution - Since its A-share listing, Liren Lizhuang has distributed a total of 179 million CNY in dividends, with 22.4257 million CNY distributed over the past three years [3].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the use of pre-prepared dishes in restaurants, particularly highlighted by the public dispute between Luo Yonghao and the restaurant chain Xibei, raises significant questions about consumer rights and transparency in the food industry [1][21][23]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei for allegedly serving pre-prepared dishes, prompting a strong response from the restaurant chain, which denied the claims and threatened legal action [1][3]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, expressed concern over the impact of Luo's comments on the brand's reputation and stated that the restaurant uses fresh ingredients [1][3]. - The incident has sparked widespread public interest, with many netizens supporting Luo and questioning the pricing and quality of Xibei's offerings [5][6]. Group 2: Consumer Sentiment and Industry Trends - There is a growing distrust among consumers regarding pre-prepared dishes, with many preferring transparency about the food they consume [8][12]. - The acceptance of pre-prepared dishes has increased among younger consumers, particularly during peak seasons like the Spring Festival, indicating a shift in market dynamics [9][10]. - Consumers are sensitive to the distinction between pre-prepared and freshly made dishes, often feeling uncomfortable when paying premium prices for what they perceive as lower-quality food [12][14]. Group 3: Regulatory Landscape - The lack of a formal national standard for pre-prepared dishes has led to confusion and inconsistency in the industry, with various local and corporate standards in place [19][20]. - Upcoming regulations are expected to clarify the definition and safety standards for pre-prepared dishes, which could significantly impact the industry [20][21]. - The need for restaurants to disclose the use of pre-prepared dishes to consumers remains a contentious issue, with many restaurant owners reluctant to reveal such information for fear of losing customers [21][22].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the accusation made by Luo Yonghao that Xibei serves mostly pre-made dishes at high prices, which has led to significant public attention and controversy [1][2] - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, has expressed a strong intention to sue Luo Yonghao, emphasizing the damage caused to the brand by his statements [1][2] - Xibei's customer service has denied the use of pre-made dishes, stating that their signature dishes are freshly prepared, which contrasts with Jia Guolong's previous comments about the prevalence of pre-made dishes in high-end cuisine [2][3] Group 2 - The incident has sparked a broader public discussion regarding the definition and labeling of pre-made dishes, as well as consumer rights [2][5] - Luo Yonghao has called for legislation to require restaurants to disclose the use of pre-made dishes, highlighting consumer rights to information [2][5] - The situation is reminiscent of a previous conflict involving Luo Yonghao and Siemens, where he publicly criticized the quality of Siemens products, leading to significant media coverage and consumer awareness regarding product quality [6]

据新黄河报道，9月11日晚，西贝创始人贾国龙在最新的采访中，再次详细复盘了罗永浩的就餐过程，并抛出了两个关键细节：罗永浩一行人当场反馈"挺 好"，且结账时累积了会员积分。但这一切都发生在他发布"真恶心"微博的"1个小时之前"。 贾国龙还原的场景，描绘了一次看似愉快且正常的消费体验。罗永浩一行四男一女点单丰盛，含双份菜在内共15道菜，且几乎全部吃完，仅剩下最后因上 菜较晚而未吃完的羊排和烤鱼。在用餐结束，服务员询问"吃的怎么样？"时，得到的现场回复是"挺好"。 在结账环节，据贾国龙透露，服务员当时询问是否需要累积会员积分，付款的随行人员表示"要"。这一举动，通常被视为消费者对品牌有一定认可度、并 愿意进行复购或深度绑定的信号。贾国龙推断，付款和操作积分的应该不是罗永浩本人，而是其助理或朋友。 与此同时，为了让消费者亲身体验"值不值"，西贝宣布将从明天起，在全国所有门店上线"罗永浩菜单"。贾国龙澄清，这不是一个固定的套餐，而是罗永 浩点过的菜品列表，消费者可以任意点选。西贝为此提供了两大承诺：第一，"不好吃，不要钱"，顾客可以随时退单；第二，欢迎顾客随时进入后厨，参 观任何一道菜的制作全过程。 同时，他还发布10 ...