Conference Call on Helvetia Baloise Pro Forma Financial Information Matthias Henny, Group CFO Helvetia Baloise 8 December 2025 Overview of contents 2 1) Key messages and preliminary remarks 2) Pro Forma Financial Information 3) Outlook and next milestones 4) Appendix Key messages Merger of equals to form Helvetia Baloise completed on 5 December 2025. Previous communication on benefits of the deal, including on cash and dividend capacity uplift, remain valid. Preparation for operational integration well adva ...

Core Viewpoint - The reverse acquisition of Jiahe Biotech by Yiteng Pharmaceutical marks a significant development in the Hong Kong stock market, being the first case of an unprofitable biotech company under the 18A listing rules completing a reverse merger [1][2]. Group 1: Merger Details - Yiteng Pharmaceutical will acquire Jiahe Biotech through a share swap, with Yiteng valued at $677 million and Jiahe at $197 million, resulting in Yiteng shareholders holding 77.43% and Jiahe shareholders 22.57% of the new entity [2]. - The merger is expected to be finalized by December 30, 2024, with the new company named Yiteng Jiahe Pharmaceutical Group Limited [1]. Group 2: Company Profiles - Jiahe Biotech has a self-research pipeline but has faced slow clinical progress and limited market revenue potential without external commercialization partnerships [2][3]. - Yiteng Pharmaceutical has struggled to achieve an IPO in Hong Kong, lacking a self-research pipeline and functioning more as a Contract Sales Organization (CSO) [2][3]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The merger aims to create a synergistic effect, combining Jiahe's research capabilities with Yiteng's commercialization strengths, enhancing market competitiveness [4]. - Jiahe's CEO highlighted the merger as a critical step towards becoming a mature and fully integrated biopharmaceutical company, focusing on accelerating the commercialization of its lead product, GB491 [4][5]. Group 4: Market Signals - The reverse acquisition is seen as a potential new listing method in Hong Kong, with the market recognizing the value of combining commercialization and self-research capabilities [6]. - The transaction may serve as a model for future mergers in the biotech sector, emphasizing the importance of real value creation through such consolidations [6].

Summary of ITT's Acquisition of SPX FLOW Conference Call Company and Industry - **Company**: ITT Inc. (NYSE: ITT) - **Acquisition Target**: SPX FLOW - **Industry**: Industrial Process and Flow Technologies Core Points and Arguments 1. **Strategic Acquisition**: ITT announced the acquisition of SPX FLOW as a strategic milestone that aligns with its 2030 vision, focusing on high-growth and high-margin businesses [3][19] 2. **Financial Metrics**: The acquisition is valued at $4.775 billion, equating to 14.2 times SPX's forecasted 2026 EBITDA, or 11.5 times including expected cost synergies [6][19] 3. **Market Expansion**: SPX FLOW adds significant market opportunities, expanding ITT's total addressable market to over $60 billion across four verticals, enhancing its leadership in existing markets like chemical, energy, and mining [5][19] 4. **Aftermarket Revenue**: SPX FLOW generates approximately 43% of its revenue from aftermarket sales, which will double ITT's industrial process aftermarket sales to about $1.2 billion [5][12] 5. **Cost Synergies**: ITT expects to achieve $80 million in annual run-rate synergies by the end of year three, primarily from G&A consolidation and procurement efficiencies [13][19] 6. **Cultural Fit**: The acquisition is noted for its strong cultural alignment between ITT and SPX FLOW, which is expected to facilitate integration and operational efficiency [15][19] Additional Important Insights 1. **Growth Trajectory**: SPX FLOW has experienced low to mid-single-digit organic growth from 2022 to 2025, with aftermarket growth in the high single digits [28][46] 2. **Operational Improvements**: Under Lone Star Funds' ownership, SPX FLOW has streamlined operations, leading to improved profitability and a focus on core business areas [23][80] 3. **Production Footprint**: SPX FLOW operates around 15 production sites, with opportunities for optimization and expansion in low-cost regions like Poland and China [38][40] 4. **Management Transition**: The existing SPX FLOW leadership team will remain involved during the transition, ensuring continuity in operations [96] 5. **Future M&A Strategy**: ITT plans to focus on executing the current acquisition and achieving synergies before pursuing additional large-scale M&A opportunities [87] This summary encapsulates the key points discussed during the conference call regarding ITT's acquisition of SPX FLOW, highlighting the strategic, financial, and operational implications of the deal.

Core Insights - The intense competition among Meituan, JD.com, and Alibaba in the food delivery sector has led to a combined loss of nearly 100 billion yuan in profits over the past six months, marking one of the most costly battles in Chinese internet history [1][4][7] - The third quarter saw unprecedented levels of platform subsidies, resulting in significant financial losses for all three companies, with Meituan reporting its largest quarterly loss since its IPO [1][4][12] Financial Performance - Meituan experienced a quarterly loss of approximately 448 million yuan, while Alibaba's e-commerce business saw a staggering 85% year-on-year decline in operating profit [1][4] - JD.com reported a 108% year-on-year drop in overall operating profit, indicating severe financial strain across the board [1][4] - Marketing expenditures surged dramatically, with Alibaba and JD.com increasing their spending by 106% and 110% respectively, while Meituan's marketing costs rose by 91% [4][12] Market Dynamics - The oligopolistic structure of the food delivery market is beginning to shift, with Meituan's market share expected to drop to around 65% in 2024, a decline of nearly 20% from previous levels [4][7] - The competition is not just about food delivery; it serves as a strategic entry point for e-commerce growth, with JD.com and Alibaba leveraging food delivery to drive traffic to their core retail businesses [7][12] User Engagement and Growth - Despite the financial losses, user engagement metrics have shown positive trends, with JD.com's food delivery GMV experiencing triple-digit growth and a nearly 50% conversion rate for new users [7][12] - Meituan's daily active users increased by over 20% year-on-year, indicating a strong user base despite the competitive pressures [7][12] Strategic Shifts - The companies are recognizing the unsustainable nature of the price war, with a collective call to resist "disorderly competition" in the food delivery sector [22][24] - JD.com is reportedly adjusting its strategy by launching an independent app for food delivery and focusing on improving unit economic costs [22][24] - Alibaba plans to significantly reduce its investment in flash sales in the upcoming quarter, indicating a shift towards more sustainable practices [22][24]

Core Viewpoint - The intense competition among Meituan, JD, and Alibaba in the food delivery sector has led to significant financial losses, with nearly 100 billion yuan in profits wiped out over the past six months, marking one of the most costly battles in Chinese internet history [2][6]. Group 1: Financial Performance - Meituan reported its largest quarterly loss since its IPO, while Alibaba's e-commerce business saw operating profits decline by 85% year-on-year, and JD's overall operating profit dropped by 108% [2][6]. - In Q3, Alibaba's EBITDA decreased by approximately 24 billion yuan, while JD and Meituan's EBITDA fell by 17.5 billion yuan and 44.8 billion yuan, respectively [6]. - Marketing expenses surged dramatically, with Alibaba and JD increasing their spending by 106% and 110% year-on-year, while Meituan's marketing costs rose by 91% [6]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The oligopolistic structure of the food delivery market is beginning to shift, with Meituan's market share expected to drop to around 65% in 2024, a decline of nearly 20% this year [6][8]. - The competition is not just about food delivery; it serves as a strategic entry point for e-commerce growth, with JD and Alibaba leveraging food delivery to drive traffic to their core retail businesses [8][9]. Group 3: User Engagement and Growth - JD's food delivery GMV experienced triple-digit growth, with new user conversion rates nearing 50%, leading to a 40% increase in active users and shopping frequency [9]. - Taobao's flash sales in August contributed to a 25% year-on-year increase in monthly active users, while Meituan also saw a more than 20% increase in daily active users [9]. Group 4: Strategic Adjustments - The three major platforms have begun to recognize the unsustainable nature of the price war, with joint statements issued to resist "disorderly competition" in July [22]. - JD has quietly adjusted its strategy, including plans to launch an independent app and improve unit economic costs, while Alibaba aims to significantly reduce its flash sales investments in the upcoming quarter [22]. Group 5: Long-term Outlook - Despite the fierce competition, the platforms are now more focused on survival rather than solely defeating competitors, indicating a potential shift towards more sustainable practices in the industry [22][23]. - The ongoing battle in the food delivery sector is expected to continue, with companies acknowledging that the price war has not created value for the industry and is not sustainable [20][26].

Summary of PROG Holdings Business Update Conference Call Company and Industry Overview - **Company**: PROG Holdings - **Acquisition Target**: Purchasing Power - **Industry**: E-commerce and Financial Services Key Points and Arguments Acquisition Details - PROG Holdings has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Purchasing Power for **$420 million in cash** [15] - The acquisition is expected to close in **early 2026** [15] - Approximately **$330 million** of Purchasing Power's non-recourse funding debt will remain post-transaction [15] Strategic Alignment - The acquisition aligns with PROG's mission to provide **transparent, flexible, and inclusive payment options** to underserved consumers [3] - Purchasing Power adds new capabilities, established partners, and millions of eligible customers to PROG's ecosystem [3] - The acquisition is expected to create **revenue and cost synergies** across PROG's platforms [3][20] Growth Strategy - PROG's three-pillared strategy focuses on **growing GMV**, enhancing consumer experience, and expanding the ecosystem [4] - Purchasing Power expands PROG's partner base into **more than 25 industries**, including **48 Fortune 500 companies** [4] - The expected revenue for Purchasing Power in **2026** is projected to be between **$680 million and $730 million**, with adjusted EBITDA of **$50 million to $60 million** [5] Business Model and Operations - Purchasing Power operates as an e-commerce platform allowing customers to purchase goods and services through **payroll deduction** [5][7] - The platform has relationships with over **360 employers**, providing access to **over 7 million employees** [5] - The business boasts a **98% client revenue retention rate** and strong customer repeat rates [5] Financial Performance and Projections - The current margin profile for Purchasing Power is in the **mid to high single digits**, with expectations to improve to the **low double digits** over the next 24 months [30] - The interest rate on the non-recourse funding debt is approximately **6.5%** [28] - The write-off rate for credit losses is historically around **9%** of revenue [38] Synergies and Future Opportunities - There are significant opportunities for **cross-selling** and introducing PROG's broader ecosystem to Purchasing Power's customer base [8][20] - The integration of Purchasing Power's payroll deduction model is expected to enhance PROG's competitive positioning in the near and subprime market [11] - Cost synergies are anticipated from consolidating operations and leveraging data across both businesses [46][47] Capital Allocation and Financial Strategy - PROG's capital allocation priorities remain focused on investing in product offerings, evaluating M&A opportunities, and returning excess capital to shareholders [12] - The company aims to manage long-term net leverage targets of **1.5 to 2 times**, excluding non-recourse funding debt [12] Additional Important Information - The demographic profile of Purchasing Power's customers shows that approximately **80%** have credit scores below **650** and household incomes around **$78,000** [9] - The acquisition is expected to solidify PROG's foundation for sustained multi-year growth by diversifying its payment solutions [11] This summary encapsulates the key points discussed during the PROG Holdings Business Update conference call, focusing on the acquisition of Purchasing Power and its implications for the company's strategy and financial outlook.

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a joint venture, Hefei Xindongjin New Materials Technology Co., Ltd., by Hanbo High-tech, Beijing Xinjing Technology Co., Ltd., and Qingdao Chuxin Ruibo Venture Capital Fund, aims to invest in or acquire foreign wet electronic chemical projects in China [1][3]. Group 1: Joint Venture Details - The registered capital of the joint venture is 440 million yuan, with Hanbo High-tech and Beijing Xinjing each contributing 200 million yuan for a 45.4545% stake, while Chuxin Ruibo Fund contributes 40 million yuan for a 9.0910% stake [2]. - The joint venture will not be included in Hanbo High-tech's consolidated financial statements and does not constitute a controlling subsidiary [2]. - The joint venture is expected to enhance Hanbo High-tech's strategic layout and create synergies through collaboration with professional investment institutions and industry partners [3]. Group 2: Strategic Importance - The joint venture will serve as a key platform to enter high-tech, high-growth potential areas, helping to acquire advanced production technologies and quality customer resources [3]. - This initiative is anticipated to strengthen the company's core competitiveness in high-end display and semiconductor materials, optimize cost structures, and improve profitability and capital efficiency [3]. Group 3: Financial Performance - In Q3, Hanbo High-tech reported revenue of 870 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 33.34%, and a net profit of 17.66 million yuan, marking a return to profitability [5]. - For the first three quarters, the company achieved a revenue of 2.424 billion yuan, up 44.06% year-on-year, although it recorded a net loss of 87.87 million yuan [5].

为实现该目标，该公司将聚焦以下战略方向： 此外，新公司还将在韩美合作的"让美国造船业再次伟大"计划中发挥关键作用。该计划拟设立1500亿美元投资基金以振兴美国造船业，HD现代集团作为 核心参与方，有望进一步拓展美国市场。 韩国HD现代集团（HD Hyundai）于12月1日（今日）宣布，旗下2家上市公司HD现代重工（HD Hyundai Heavy Industries）与HD现代尾浦（HD Hyundai Mipo）已完成全部合并程序，正式整合为统一的"HD现代重工"，启动一体化运营。 本次合并于今年8月获双方董事会批准，随后在9月通过韩国公平贸易委员会审查，并于11月完成股东表决。合并后，原HD现代尾浦造船法人实体将注 销，其全部业务、资产、人员和产能将并入新体系。 HD现代集团表示，此次整合旨在通过规模扩张与能力互补，最大化协同效应，以应对日益激烈的全球市场竞争，巩固行业领先地位。 据"Businesskorea"报道，合并后的新公司制定了中长期发展目标：计划到2035年实现总销售额37万亿韩元，其中国防业务目标为10万亿韩元。 整合研发与设计资源，加速开发环保船舶及下一代船舶技术； 进军破冰船等特种船 ...

Core Insights - Elon Musk's ambitious goal is to integrate AI into deep space through solar-powered satellites, leveraging the technologies of SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI [1][3] - The concept of "Galaxy Mind" aims to create a platform for AI computation beyond Earth's orbit, utilizing solar energy [1][5] - This vision represents a potential new business model that combines Tesla's energy technology, SpaceX's launch capabilities, and xAI's advanced models [1][6] Group 1: Integration of Technologies - Musk emphasizes the need for solar energy in large-scale AI operations, suggesting that deep space is essential for harnessing solar power effectively [3][6] - The collaboration among SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI is crucial, with each company playing a specific role: SpaceX for satellite deployment, Tesla for energy solutions, and xAI for AI model development [3][7] Group 2: Emergence of New Entities - "Galaxy Mind" is not just a technical concept but may evolve into a commercial entity aimed at preserving human knowledge in space as a safeguard against potential civilization collapse [5][6] - Trademark applications for "Galaxy Mind" and "Galactica" indicate the formalization of this initiative, with "Galactica" potentially becoming the official company name [5][6] Group 3: Business Logic and Market Potential - Musk's strategy focuses on maximizing synergies within his portfolio, building on the existing strengths of each company [6][7] - The integration plan aims to restructure mature technologies to explore new markets, addressing Earth's energy limitations and creating new opportunities for AI development [7]

Core Viewpoint - The news highlights the recent stock performance of Mixue Group, which saw an increase of over 3% during trading, attributed to the company's new breakfast product initiative and positive financial outlook from analysts [1]. Company Developments - Mixue Group's stock rose by 2.81%, reaching 424.6 HKD with a trading volume of 96.6871 million HKD [1]. - The company is testing a "breakfast plan" in select cities including Dalian, Xi'an, Nanning, and Hangzhou, featuring products priced at 5 HKD each, such as various milk options [1]. - Currently, there is no plan for a large-scale rollout of the breakfast products [1]. Analyst Insights - Western Securities expressed optimism regarding the company's supply chain operational capabilities and the potential for expanding different product categories [1]. - Jianyin International noted that Mixue Group's performance in the first half of the year exceeded expectations, demonstrating resilience despite the normalization of delivery subsidies [1]. - The firm projects a revenue growth of 25.4% and a net profit growth of 17% for Mixue Ice City by the second half of 2025 [1].