丨证券研究报告丨 金融工程丨专题报告 [Table_Title] 质量风格占优，攻守兼备红利组合持续跑出 超额 [Table_Summary] 本周 A 股市场整体回暖，科创板块表现强势，红利资产也实现正收益；红利内细分板块来看， 红利增长和红利质量相对纯粹红利资产存在超额收益。从市场表现来看，本周 A 股内各板块均 实现正收益，但收益分化较大，TMT 板块持续领涨，而医疗板块涨幅较小；聚焦电子板块内部， 半导体赛道表现活跃，集成电路设计周度涨幅大幅领先电子其他子赛道。策略表现上，本周红 利增强组合均跑赢中证红利全收益，而电子增强组合受周五半导体快速拉升行情影响，均未能 跑赢电子行业指数。 分析师及联系人 [Table_Author] 冷旭晟 蔡文捷 覃川桃 SAC：S0490524080001 SAC：S0490523120001 SAC：S0490513030001 SFC：BUT353 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 %% %% %% %% 报告要点 [Table_Title 质量风格占优，攻守兼备红利组合持续跑出超 2] 额 [Table_Summary2] 自 2023 年 7 月以来，长江金工团队先 ...

证券研究报告 | 2025年08月23日 主动量化策略周报 双创板块大涨，优基增强组合本周上涨 4.17% 本年，股票收益中位数 23.19%，87%的股票上涨，13%的股票下跌；主动 股基中位数 22.06%，99%的基金上涨，1%的基金下跌。 优秀基金业绩增强组合： 在构建量化组合时，从传统地对标宽基指数，转变为对标主动股基。在借鉴 优秀基金持仓的基础上，采用量化方法进行增强，达到优中选优的目的。 国信金工主动量化策略表现跟踪： 本周，优秀基金业绩增强组合绝对收益 4.17%，相对偏股混合型基金指数超 额收益 0.65%。本年，优秀基金业绩增强组合绝对收益 22.11%，相对偏股 混合型基金指数超额收益-2.61%。今年以来，优秀基金业绩增强组合在主动 股基中排名 49.21%分位点（1707/3469）。 本周，超预期精选组合绝对收益 3.71%，相对偏股混合型基金指数超额收益 0.19%。本年，超预期精选组合绝对收益 39.73%，相对偏股混合型基金指 数超额收益 15.01%。今年以来，超预期精选组合在主动股基中排名 14.36% 分位点（498/3469）。 本周，券商金股业绩增强组合绝对收益 3 ...

一、国信金工主动量化策略表现跟踪 本周， 优秀基金业绩增强组合 绝对收益4.17%，相对偏股混合型基金指数超额收 益0.65%。本年，优秀基金业绩增强组合绝对收益22.11%，相对偏股混合型基金 指数超额收益-2.61%。 今年以来，优秀基金业绩增强组合在主动股基中排名 49.21%分位点（1707/3469）。 本周， 超预期精选组合 绝对收益3.71%，相对偏股混合型基金指数超额收益 0.19%。本年，超预期精选组合绝对收益39.73%，相对偏股混合型基金指数超额 收益15.01%。 今年以来，超预期精选组合在主动股基中排名14.36%分位点 （498/3469）。 本周， 券商金股业绩增强组合 绝对收益3.94%，相对偏股混合型基金指数超额收 益0.42%。本年，券商金股业绩增强组合绝对收益27.90%，相对偏股混合型基金 指数超额收益3.18%。 今年以来，券商金股业绩增强组合在主动股基中排名 33.90%分位点（1176/3469）。 本 周 ， 成 长 稳 健 组 合 绝 对 收 益 3.38% ， 相 对 偏 股 混 合 型 基 金 指 数 超 额 收 益-0.14%。本年，成长稳健组合绝对收益 ...

- The report introduces several active quantitative strategies launched by the Changjiang Quantitative Team since July 2023, including the Dividend Selection Strategy and the Industry High Winning Rate Strategy[6][13] - The "Dividend Quality" segment showed relatively active performance with a weekly average return of approximately 1.64%, indicating excess returns compared to pure dividend assets[6][16] - The "Central State-Owned Enterprises High Dividend 30 Portfolio" and the "Balanced Dividend 50 Portfolio" both outperformed the CSI Dividend Total Return Index this week, with excess returns of approximately 0.61% and 1.51%, respectively[6][22] - The "Balanced Dividend 50 Portfolio" achieved positive returns this week[6][22] - The "Electronic Balanced Allocation Enhanced Portfolio" and the "Electronic Sector Preferred Enhanced Portfolio" both achieved positive returns this week, although they did not outperform the electronic industry index[7][31] - The "Electronic Sector Preferred Enhanced Portfolio" had a weekly return of approximately 6.20%, outperforming the median of technology-themed fund products[7][31] Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: Dividend Selection Strategy; Model Construction Idea: Focuses on selecting stocks with high dividend yields and quality; Model Construction Process: The strategy involves screening stocks based on dividend yield, payout ratio, and other fundamental factors to construct a portfolio that aims to provide stable and high returns; Model Evaluation: The strategy has shown to provide excess returns compared to pure dividend assets[6][13][16] 2. Model Name: Industry High Winning Rate Strategy; Model Construction Idea: Focuses on selecting stocks within high-performing industries; Model Construction Process: The strategy involves identifying industries with strong performance and selecting stocks within those industries based on various fundamental and technical factors; Model Evaluation: The strategy aims to provide alternative perspectives and investment choices for investors by tracking market hotspots and selecting individual stocks within high-performing industries[6][13] Model Backtesting Results 1. Dividend Selection Strategy, Excess Return: 1.64%[6][16] 2. Central State-Owned Enterprises High Dividend 30 Portfolio, Excess Return: 0.61%[6][22] 3. Balanced Dividend 50 Portfolio, Excess Return: 1.51%[6][22] 4. Electronic Sector Preferred Enhanced Portfolio, Weekly Return: 6.20%[7][31] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: Dividend Quality; Factor Construction Idea: Focuses on stocks with high dividend quality; Factor Construction Process: The factor involves screening stocks based on dividend yield, payout ratio, and other fundamental factors to identify stocks with high dividend quality; Factor Evaluation: The factor has shown to provide excess returns compared to pure dividend assets[6][16] 2. Factor Name: Industry Performance; Factor Construction Idea: Focuses on stocks within high-performing industries; Factor Construction Process: The factor involves identifying industries with strong performance and selecting stocks within those industries based on various fundamental and technical factors; Factor Evaluation: The factor aims to provide alternative perspectives and investment choices for investors by tracking market hotspots and selecting individual stocks within high-performing industries[6][13] Factor Backtesting Results 1. Dividend Quality Factor, Weekly Average Return: 1.64%[6][16] 2. Industry Performance Factor, Weekly Return: 6.20%[7][31]

Core Insights - The report highlights the performance tracking of Guosen Securities' active quantitative strategies, indicating that the excellent fund performance enhancement portfolio achieved an absolute return of 3.70% this week and 17.22% year-to-date, ranking in the 49.35th percentile among active equity funds [1][12][23] - The report emphasizes the strong performance of the expected selection portfolio, which recorded an absolute return of 3.78% this week and 34.72% year-to-date, ranking in the 12.68th percentile among active equity funds [1][12][33] - The brokerage gold stock performance enhancement portfolio achieved an absolute return of 4.00% this week and 23.05% year-to-date, ranking in the 33.58th percentile among active equity funds [1][12][39] - The growth and stability portfolio reported an absolute return of 3.65% this week and 40.87% year-to-date, ranking in the 8.30th percentile among active equity funds [1][12][46] Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio - The strategy aims to benchmark against the median return of active equity funds, utilizing a quantitative approach to enhance performance based on the holdings of top-performing funds [3][17][52] - The portfolio's year-to-date performance shows a relative underperformance of -3.26% compared to the mixed equity fund index [16][23] Expected Selection Portfolio - This strategy selects stocks based on expected performance and analyst profit upgrades, focusing on both fundamental and technical criteria to build a robust portfolio [4][24][58] - The portfolio has outperformed the mixed equity fund index by 14.24% year-to-date [16][33] Brokerage Gold Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio - The strategy utilizes a selection from the brokerage gold stock pool, optimizing the portfolio to minimize deviations from the benchmark [5][34][63] - Year-to-date, this portfolio has outperformed the mixed equity fund index by 2.57% [16][39] Growth and Stability Portfolio - The strategy employs a two-dimensional evaluation system for growth stocks, prioritizing those with upcoming earnings announcements to capture potential excess returns [6][40][68] - The portfolio has achieved a year-to-date return of 40.87%, significantly outperforming the mixed equity fund index by 20.39% [16][46]

Core Viewpoint - The report tracks the performance of various active quantitative strategies by Guosen Securities, focusing on their absolute and relative returns against benchmarks, particularly the active equity fund median [2][4]. Group 1: Performance Overview - The "Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio" achieved an absolute return of 3.70% this week and 17.22% year-to-date, ranking in the 49.35th percentile among active equity funds [4][9]. - The "Super Expected Selection Portfolio" recorded an absolute return of 3.78% this week and 34.72% year-to-date, ranking in the 12.68th percentile among active equity funds [4][18]. - The "Brokerage Golden Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio" had an absolute return of 4.00% this week and 23.05% year-to-date, ranking in the 33.58th percentile among active equity funds [4][19]. - The "Growth and Stability Portfolio" achieved an absolute return of 3.65% this week and 40.87% year-to-date, ranking in the 8.30th percentile among active equity funds [4][27]. Group 2: Strategy Summaries - The "Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio" aims to outperform the median of active equity funds by utilizing a quantitative approach based on the holdings of top-performing funds [6][34]. - The "Super Expected Selection Portfolio" selects stocks based on positive earnings surprises and analyst upgrades, focusing on both fundamental and technical criteria [12][39]. - The "Brokerage Golden Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio" is constructed using a stock pool from brokerage recommendations, optimizing for performance while controlling for deviations in stock selection and style [15][41]. - The "Growth and Stability Portfolio" employs a time-series approach to identify growth stocks that are likely to outperform around earnings announcements, incorporating various risk management mechanisms [24][45].

金融工程丨专题报告 [Table_Title] 电子增强组合周度收益跑至主动型科技基金 产品前列 报告要点 [Table_Summary] 本周 A 股市场整体呈现回暖态势，但部分板块出现波动，小微盘和红利资产相对占优。红利内 细分板块来看，红利价值表现活跃，相对纯粹红利资产存在超额收益；从市场表现来看，本周 A 股内行业持续分化，资源股行情回暖，电子板块内部其他电子产品制造和电子终端品表现活 跃，周度涨幅大幅领先电子其他子赛道。策略表现上，本周红利增强组合相对表现疲软，电子 增强组合均跑赢行业指数，周度收益均跑至主动型科技基金产品前列。 分析师及联系人 丨证券研究报告丨 [Table_Author] 冷旭晟 蔡文捷 覃川桃 SAC：S0490524080001 SAC：S0490523120001 SAC：S0490513030001 SFC：BUT353 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 1 主动量化产品周报（五） cjzqdt11111 [Table_Title 电子增强组合周度收益跑至主动型科技 2] 基金产 品前列 [Table_Summar ...

Core Insights - The report highlights the performance of various active quantitative strategies, with the Growth and Stability Portfolio achieving a year-to-date return of 40.33%, ranking in the top 7.12% among active equity funds [1][2][12] - The report tracks the absolute and relative performance of several enhanced portfolios, including the Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio, the Exceeding Expectations Selection Portfolio, and the Broker's Golden Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio [1][12][13] Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio - This portfolio aims to outperform the median return of active equity funds by utilizing a quantitative approach based on the holdings of top-performing funds [3][16] - Year-to-date, the portfolio has achieved an absolute return of 13.04%, with a relative underperformance of -2.98% compared to the mixed equity fund index [20][21] Exceeding Expectations Selection Portfolio - The strategy involves selecting stocks based on exceeding expectations and analyst upgrades, focusing on both fundamental and technical criteria [4][21] - The portfolio has delivered a year-to-date absolute return of 29.80%, outperforming the mixed equity fund index by 13.79% [30][58] Broker's Golden Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio - This portfolio is constructed using a selection of stocks identified by brokers, aiming to optimize performance while maintaining alignment with the broker's stock pool [5][62] - Year-to-date, it has achieved an absolute return of 18.31%, with a relative outperformance of 2.29% compared to the mixed equity fund index [37][63] Growth and Stability Portfolio - The strategy employs a two-dimensional evaluation system for growth stocks, prioritizing those with upcoming earnings announcements [6][38] - It has achieved a year-to-date absolute return of 35.91%, outperforming the mixed equity fund index by 19.89% [45][68]

Core Viewpoint - The report tracks the performance of various active quantitative strategies by GuoXin Securities, focusing on their absolute and relative returns against benchmarks, particularly the active equity fund median [2][3]. Group 1: Performance Overview - The "Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio" achieved an absolute return of 1.20% this week and 13.04% year-to-date, with a relative underperformance of -0.53% and -2.98% against the mixed equity fund index respectively [1][10]. - The "Super Expected Selection Portfolio" recorded an absolute return of 1.66% this week and 29.80% year-to-date, outperforming the mixed equity fund index by 13.79% this year [1][19]. - The "Brokerage Golden Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio" had an absolute return of 2.51% this week and 18.31% year-to-date, with a relative outperformance of 2.29% against the mixed equity fund index [1][20]. - The "Growth and Stability Portfolio" achieved an absolute return of 3.30% this week and 35.91% year-to-date, outperforming the mixed equity fund index by 19.89% this year [1][27]. Group 2: Strategy Summaries - The "Excellent Fund Performance Enhancement Portfolio" aims to outperform the median returns of active equity funds by utilizing a quantitative approach based on the holdings of top-performing funds [7][33]. - The "Super Expected Selection Portfolio" selects stocks based on positive earnings surprises and analyst upgrades, focusing on both fundamental and technical criteria to build a robust stock selection [13][39]. - The "Brokerage Golden Stock Performance Enhancement Portfolio" is constructed using a selection of stocks from the brokerage's recommended list, optimizing for minimal deviation from the benchmark [16][43]. - The "Growth and Stability Portfolio" employs a two-dimensional evaluation system for growth stocks, prioritizing those with upcoming earnings announcements to capture potential excess returns [25][47].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: "Offense and Defense Dividend 50 Portfolio" **Model Construction Idea**: This model aims to enhance returns by selecting high-dividend stocks with a balance of growth and stability, outperforming the benchmark dividend indices[6][15] **Model Construction Process**: The portfolio is constructed by combining stocks with high dividend yields, growth potential, and low volatility. The selection process involves filtering stocks based on dividend-related factors and optimizing the portfolio to achieve a balance between growth and defensive characteristics[6][15] **Model Evaluation**: The model demonstrates strong performance, consistently outperforming the benchmark dividend indices and ranking in the top percentile among dividend-focused funds[6][21] - **Model Name**: "Central SOE High Dividend 30 Portfolio" **Model Construction Idea**: This model focuses on central state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with high dividend payouts, aiming to capture stable returns from these entities[15] **Model Construction Process**: The portfolio is constructed by selecting 30 central SOEs with the highest dividend yields. The selection criteria emphasize stability and consistent dividend payouts[15] **Model Evaluation**: The model shows stable performance, delivering excess returns over the benchmark dividend indices[15][21] - **Model Name**: "Electronic Sector Enhanced Portfolios" **Model Construction Idea**: These models aim to enhance returns within the electronic sector by focusing on high-growth sub-sectors and leading companies in mature sub-sectors[15][31] **Model Construction Process**: 1. **Balanced Allocation Enhanced Portfolio**: This portfolio is constructed by evenly allocating weights across various electronic sub-sectors to achieve diversification[15] 2. **Sector Leader Enhanced Portfolio**: This portfolio focuses on leading companies in mature sub-sectors, emphasizing their growth potential and market dominance[15][31] **Model Evaluation**: Both portfolios demonstrate positive returns, with the Sector Leader Enhanced Portfolio delivering higher excess returns relative to the electronic sector index[31] Model Backtesting Results - **Offense and Defense Dividend 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly excess return: ~1.41% over the CSI Dividend Total Return Index[6][21] - Year-to-date excess return: ~3.52% over the CSI Dividend Total Return Index[21] - Weekly performance percentile: ~11% among dividend-focused funds[6][21] - **Central SOE High Dividend 30 Portfolio**: - Weekly excess return: ~0.35% over the CSI Dividend Total Return Index[6][21] - **Electronic Sector Enhanced Portfolios**: - **Balanced Allocation Enhanced Portfolio**: Weekly excess return: ~0.89% over the electronic sector index[31] - **Sector Leader Enhanced Portfolio**: Weekly excess return: ~0.89% over the electronic sector index[31] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: Dividend Quality **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor evaluates the stability and sustainability of a company's dividend payouts[16][18] **Factor Construction Process**: The factor is calculated using metrics such as dividend payout ratio, historical dividend growth rate, and earnings stability. Companies with higher scores on these metrics are ranked higher[16][18] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor demonstrates strong predictive power for identifying high-performing dividend stocks[16][18] - **Factor Name**: Dividend Growth **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor focuses on the growth potential of a company's dividends over time[16][18] **Factor Construction Process**: The factor is derived from the historical growth rate of dividends and projected earnings growth. Companies with consistent and high dividend growth rates are ranked higher[16][18] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor shows significant excess returns compared to pure dividend yield factors[16][18] - **Factor Name**: Low Volatility Dividend **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor targets stocks with high dividend yields and low price volatility[16][18] **Factor Construction Process**: The factor is constructed by combining dividend yield with a volatility measure (e.g., standard deviation of returns). Stocks with high yields and low volatility are ranked higher[16][18] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor provides a defensive characteristic, outperforming during market downturns[16][18] Factor Backtesting Results - **Dividend Quality Factor**: - Weekly excess return: ~1.94% over the CSI Dividend Index[18] - **Dividend Growth Factor**: - Weekly excess return: ~0.92% over the CSI Dividend Index[18] - **Low Volatility Dividend Factor**: - Weekly excess return: ~0.69% over the CSI Dividend Index[18]