本文首发于公众号"私募排排网"。 （点击↑↑ 上图查看详情 ） 今年以来，A股继续迎来强劲的上涨，其中沪指创下近十年新高；创业板指年内最新涨幅达到约45%，领衔A股三大主要股指。板块方面，近 日，以算力为核心的新科技板块，俨然成为撬动指数上涨的主引擎。在此基础上，不少近5年才成立的新锐私募崭露头角，成为私募市场上一股 重要的力量。 （注：本文业绩数据截至2025年9月12日，近5年成立的新锐私募即2020年9月12日后成立的私募） 0 1 私募公司：北京禧悦夺冠！量化私募巨量均衡进入 从私募公司的角度看，近5年成立的新锐私募共有1056家，其中今年来至少有3只产品符合排名规则的私募共有60家，收益20强的公司的上榜"门 槛"为 *** %。（ 点此查看收益 ） [应监管要求，私募基金不能公开展示业绩，文中涉及收益数据用***替代，合格投资者可扫描图中二维码或点击文末阅读原文，查看收益数据。] 在这20家私募中，主观私募共有12家，量化私募、混合型（"主观+量化"）私募各有4家。从公司规模来看，这20家私募的管理规模均不足50 亿。 10 强 | 排名 | 公司简称 | 实控人 | | 公司规模 投资模式 核心 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market showed strong performance in August, with major indices rising significantly, yet the excess returns of stock strategy private equity products were disappointing, marking the worst monthly performance of the year [1][2]. Group 1: Market Performance - In August, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 7.97%, the Shenzhen Component Index increased by 15.32%, and the ChiNext Index surged over 24% [1]. - Despite the strong market, the average excess return of 3,122 stock strategy private equity products was -1.97%, the worst monthly performance this year [1]. Group 2: Quantitative vs. Subjective Strategies - Quantitative private equity products experienced a notable decline, with an average excess return of -3.94% in August, while subjective private equity products had an average excess return of -1.00% [1]. - The significant decline in quantitative products is attributed to a reversal in style, particularly the outperformance of large-cap stocks over small-cap stocks, and severe sector differentiation due to rapid growth in financing scale [1][2]. Group 3: Consistent Performers - As of August 2025, only 95 stock strategy private equity products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, representing about 3% of the total [2]. - Among private equity firms with over 10 billion in assets, 46 products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, all of which were quantitative products, with an average excess return of 0.63% in August and 17.91% year-to-date [3]. Group 4: Top Performers by Asset Size - In the 20-100 billion category, 14 products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, with an average excess return of 1.83% in August and 22.48% year-to-date [7]. - The top three products in this category were "New Thinking Multi-Strategy 3", "Pansong Micro-Cap Index Enhanced 1", and "Giraffe 7", with year-to-date excess returns of ***% [11]. Group 5: Small and Emerging Firms - In the 5-20 billion category, 13 products achieved positive excess returns for eight consecutive months, with an average excess return of 5.34% in August and 57.58% year-to-date [13]. - The leading product in the 0-5 billion category was "Zijin Yunsong", achieving a year-to-date excess return of ***% [18].

Core Insights - The article discusses the performance and ranking of subjective private equity funds in China, highlighting their reliance on active management and individual fund manager expertise rather than algorithmic strategies [1][2]. Group 1: Overview of Subjective Private Equity - As of August 2025, there are 5,423 subjective private equity firms, accounting for over 70% of the total in the securities investment category [1]. - In the past year, 294 firms have at least three products displayed on the private equity ranking platform, with 213 of them focusing on stock strategies [1]. Group 2: Performance Rankings - Among the 100 billion yuan and above category, the top three firms by average returns are: Jiuzhi Investment, Fusheng Asset, and Rido Investment, with average returns of ***%, ***%, and ***% respectively [2]. - The average return for the 100 billion yuan category is 32.50%, with a total of 186 products meeting ranking criteria [1][2]. Group 3: Notable Firms and Their Strategies - Rido Investment, established in March 2016, has quickly become a leading firm, achieving significant returns through a customer-centric value investment approach [4][5]. - The top firm in the 50-100 billion yuan category is Tongben Investment, with an average return of ***% [7][10]. Group 4: Performance in Smaller Categories - In the 20-50 billion yuan category, Haokun Shengfa Asset leads with an average return of ***%, while in the 10-20 billion yuan category, Nengjing Investment Holdings tops the list with an average return of ***% [11][15]. - The 5-10 billion yuan category sees Yijiu Private Fund at the top, achieving an average return of ***% [18][20]. Group 5: Emerging Trends and Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of fundamental research and value investment strategies among successful private equity firms, particularly in sectors like consumer goods and technology [10][14]. - The performance of these funds suggests a growing confidence in the Chinese stock market, with expectations of a bullish trend in the near future [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market in August experienced significant structural differentiation, with the CSI 300 index rising by 10.33%, led by technology sectors such as electronics, computers, communications, and non-ferrous metals, while other sectors lagged behind [2][4]. Performance of Private Equity Funds - In August, 5,098 private equity products reported an average return of 6.50%, with an average excess return of -1.56%. Quantitative long-only products had an average return of 8.96%, but an excess return of -2.36%, indicating challenges in outperforming the index in a highly differentiated market [4][5]. - Subjective long-only products also underperformed, with an average return of 9.21%, which was still below the CSI 300 index's performance [4][5]. Top Performing Private Equity Firms - Among large private equity firms (over 100 billion), only two firms, Fusheng Asset and Xuanyuan Investment, managed to outperform the market in August, with average returns of approximately 3.42% and 15.89% year-to-date [5][7]. - In the 50-100 billion category, five firms, including Tongben Investment and Huaxin, achieved an average return of 12.16% in August, outperforming the market [10][11]. - In the 20-50 billion category, seven firms, led by Zige Investment and Shengqi Asset, reported an average return of 11.11% in August [15][16]. - In the 10-20 billion category, nine firms, including Liangli Private Equity and Jiuge Investment, managed to outperform the market with an average return of 8.90% [19][21]. - In the 5-10 billion category, twelve firms, led by Yijiu Private Equity, achieved an average return of 10.47% [22][23]. - In the 0-5 billion category, 37 firms, with Huichuang Fuxiang at the forefront, reported an average return of 9.56% [25][27]. Investment Strategies and Insights - Fusheng Asset focuses on a "compound interest victory" investment philosophy, emphasizing stable excess returns through a deep understanding of underlying business barriers [8][9]. - Xuanyuan Investment adopts a multi-strategy approach based on industry profitability and market conditions, maintaining a positive outlook on the market while managing risks [9]. - Shengqi Asset's founder has expressed optimism about gold prices, which have risen significantly this year [15][16]. - The overall sentiment among private equity firms indicates a cautious yet optimistic view on market conditions, with a focus on identifying undervalued companies and managing risk effectively [14][19].

Group 1 - The total number of billion-dollar private equity firms remains at 90 as of July 2025, with a notable increase in quantitative firms to 44, marking a historical high, while subjective firms decreased to 39 [1][2] - The average return for the 55 billion-dollar private equity firms with performance data reached 16.60%, with quantitative firms outperforming subjective firms, achieving a full profit status [1][4] - The distribution of billion-dollar private equity firms is concentrated in major cities, with Shanghai having 39 firms, Beijing 24, and Shenzhen 6 [3] Group 2 - The quantitative private equity sector is expanding, now comprising 49% of the billion-dollar firms, indicating a shift in strategy focus within the industry [2] - Among the 42 billion-dollar private equity firms with returns exceeding 10%, 32 are quantitative, highlighting their strong performance compared to subjective firms [4] - The average return for 16 billion-dollar subjective private equity firms is 13.59%, with a significant portion achieving positive returns, but the performance gap between quantitative and subjective firms is widening [5]

Core Viewpoint - The differentiation between quantitative and subjective billion-dollar private equity firms continues, with quantitative firms gaining a larger share of the market and demonstrating superior performance [1][2][3]. Group 1: Market Structure - As of July 2025, the total number of billion-dollar private equity firms remains at 90, with quantitative firms increasing to 44, representing 49% of the total, while subjective firms decreased to 39, representing 43% [2][3]. - The recent changes include three subjective firms exiting the billion-dollar club and three new entrants, two of which are quantitative [3]. - The shift indicates a significant transition in strategy focus within the industry, with quantitative strategies gaining prominence [3]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - The average return for the 55 billion-dollar private equity firms with performance data reached 16.60% as of July 2025, with 54 firms achieving positive returns, equating to 98.18% [5]. - Among the quantitative firms, 32 out of 42 firms with returns over 10% achieved this milestone, showcasing their strong performance [5]. - In contrast, the average return for the 16 subjective firms was 13.59%, with 15 achieving positive returns, indicating a widening performance gap [6]. Group 3: Regional Distribution - The majority of billion-dollar private equity firms are concentrated in major cities, with Shanghai housing 39 firms, Beijing 24, and Shenzhen 6 [4].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights a significant reshuffling within the billion-yuan private equity sector, with a notable increase in quantitative private equity firms and a decline in subjective ones [1][6][11] - As of July 23, the number of billion-yuan private equity firms stands at 91, with 16 firms dropping out and 19 new entrants, indicating that nearly 20% of the members are new faces compared to the beginning of the year [1][4] - Among the 91 billion-yuan private equity firms, 42 are quantitative, 40 are subjective, and 8 are a combination of both, reflecting a trend of "quantitative explosion and subjective decline" [1][4] Group 2 - Notable firms that have dropped below the billion-yuan threshold include He Yuan Private Equity and Yi Cun Investment, with the latter recently rebranded as "Shanghai Chengyi Private Equity" [4][5] - The article lists several firms that have successfully crossed the billion-yuan mark this year, including Shanghai Dapu Investment and Rido Investment, among others [4][8] - The performance of some firms, such as He Yuan Private Equity, has been underwhelming, with certain products experiencing cumulative losses exceeding 22% [5][6] Group 3 - The article notes that 12 subjective private equity firms have fallen below the billion-yuan scale this year, while 7 have successfully entered the billion-yuan club, resulting in a net decrease of 5 firms in this category [7][11] - In contrast, the quantitative private equity sector has seen a net increase of 10 firms reaching the billion-yuan scale, with 11 firms raising their management scale to over 100 billion yuan [6][10] - The average return for subjective long-only products in the first half of the year was 11.57%, while quantitative long-only products achieved an average return of 17.54% [11]

Core Insights - The overall performance of private fund managers in the first half of 2025 shows an average return of approximately 10.56%, significantly outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index (2.76%) and the Shenzhen Component Index (0.48%) [1][2][3] Group 1: Performance by Fund Size - Fund managers from private funds with a scale of 10-20 billion have led in average returns, followed by those from funds over 100 billion [2] - Among the 513 fund managers with three or more products displayed, 73 achieved returns above a certain threshold [2] - In the top 10 fund managers across six size categories, five champions came from subjective private funds, while the top managers in funds over 50 billion were predominantly from quantitative private funds [2][3] Group 2: Top Performers in 100 Billion and Above - The top fund manager in the 100 billion and above category is Lu Hang from Fusheng Asset, with an average return of approximately ***% [3][8] - Other notable managers in this category include Yin Tao from Wengbo Investment and Wang Chen from Jiukun Investment, both of whom also achieved significant returns [3][9] Group 3: Top Performers in 50-100 Billion - The champion in the 50-100 billion category is Tong Xun from Tongben Investment, focusing on large consumer sectors [10][13] - The top five managers in this category predominantly employ stock strategies [10] Group 4: Top Performers in 20-50 Billion - The top fund manager in the 20-50 billion category is Shi En from Yunqi Quantitative, with an average return exceeding ***% [14][16] - This category also features a mix of subjective and quantitative fund managers [14] Group 5: Top Performers in 10-20 Billion - The champion in the 10-20 billion category is Sun Jie from Nengjing Investment Holdings, with a focus on subjective investment strategies [17][20] - The top five managers in this category are all from subjective private funds [17] Group 6: Top Performers in 5-10 Billion - The top fund manager in the 5-10 billion category is Chen Long from Youbo Capital, with a strong performance in stock strategies [21][24] - The top five managers in this category are primarily from subjective private funds [21] Group 7: Top Performers in Below 5 Billion - In the below 5 billion category, all top managers are from subjective private funds, with Liu Xianglong from Fuyuan Capital leading the pack [25][26] - The average return for this group is also noteworthy, although specific figures are not disclosed [25]

Group 1 - The A-share market showed a fluctuating upward trend in the first half of the year, with small-cap growth style indices performing strongly and significant structural market characteristics [1] - The average return of 50 billion private equity firms reached 10.93% in the first half of the year, significantly outperforming the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 Index, with 94% of firms achieving positive returns [1] - Among the profitable billion private equity firms, 20 firms had returns within 10%, 21 firms had returns between 10% and 19.99%, and 6 firms had returns of no less than 20% [1] Group 2 - Quantitative private equity firms benefited from the active small-cap market and improved liquidity, achieving an average return of 13.72% in the first half of the year, with all firms reporting positive returns [2] - In the 27 billion private equity firms with returns of no less than 10%, 24 were quantitative firms, indicating a strong performance in this category [2] - The average return of 14 subjective billion private equity firms was 5.51%, with only 85.71% achieving positive returns, showing a significant underperformance compared to quantitative firms [2] Group 3 - Mixed strategy private equity firms outperformed subjective firms, with an average return of 7.62% and 75% achieving positive returns [2] - The market outlook for the second half of the year suggests a potential recovery in profit factors during the mid-year performance window, supported by a favorable liquidity environment [2] - Financial securities indicate that the market may continue to experience wide fluctuations in the third quarter, with ongoing rotation among market styles [3]

Group 1 - The private equity fund industry is undergoing a new round of reshuffling, with the number of private securities investment fund managers reaching 87 as of May 12 [1] - The industry is experiencing a "survival of the fittest" trend, with 4 firms temporarily exiting the "100 billion club" while 7 firms have newly entered or returned, including 4 quantitative and 3 discretionary firms [1] - Three positive changes in the market since the beginning of the year include increased trading activity, improved investor sentiment, and validated risk control capabilities of leading private equity firms [1] Group 2 - As of April 30, the average return of the 49 disclosed 100 billion-level private equity firms is 4.14% year-to-date, with nearly 90% achieving positive returns [2] - Quantitative private equity firms have shown outstanding performance, with all 30 firms achieving positive returns and an average return of 5.90% [2] - The success of quantitative private equity firms is attributed to five core advantages, including a robust data analysis system, strict risk control mechanisms, and adaptability to current market conditions [2] Group 3 - Investors are increasingly inclined to choose established firms with mature strategies, and the trend of "the strong getting stronger" in the private equity fund industry is expected to continue [3] - Future challenges for private equity firms include balancing scale expansion with performance stability and enhancing adaptability while maintaining strategic uniqueness [3]