1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core Views of the Report - From February 24 to February 27, 2026, all major equity market indices rose, with the CSI 500 having the largest increase of 4.32%. Among the 31 Shenwan primary industries, 25 industries rose, with the top five gainers being steel, non-ferrous metals, chemicals, environmental protection, and coal; the top five decliners were media, commercial trade, food and beverages, non-bank finance, and banks [1][12]. - The CSRC issued the "Administrative Measures for the Supervision of Information Disclosure of Private Investment Funds", which takes effect on September 1, 2026. The Shanghai Stock Exchange and China Securities Index Co., Ltd. announced the adjustment of constituent stocks of key indices such as the STAR 50, to be implemented after the close on March 13, 2026 [2][31][33]. - In terms of fund performance, quantitative funds had the largest increase, with an average increase of 2.22% and a positive return ratio of 92.26%. Fixed - income + funds rose 0.30% on average, with a positive return ratio of 73.12%. Pure - bond funds rose 0.01% on average, with a positive return ratio of 60.51%. Pension target FOFs rose 0.93% on average, with a positive return ratio of 99.50%. QDII funds fell 0.11% on average, with a positive return ratio of 58.16% [2][34]. - The top three sectors with the largest increase in positions of active equity funds last week were media, commerce and retail, and real estate; the top three sectors with the largest decrease in positions were electronics, non - ferrous metals, and pharmaceutical biology. As of February 27, 2026, the overall position of active equity funds was 77.23%, an increase of 0.81 pct from the previous period [2][40][42]. - Last week, the overall ETF market had a net capital outflow of 22.828 billion yuan. Stock - type ETFs had a relatively large net outflow of 36.286 billion yuan. The daily average trading volume of the overall ETF market reached 476.804 billion yuan, the daily average trading volume reached 168.72 billion shares, and the daily average turnover rate was 7.40%. The Hang Seng Technology, power grid equipment, securities, and Internet sectors had net capital inflows, with the Hang Seng Technology having a capital inflow close to 10 billion yuan. Broad - based indices such as the CSI 1000, CSI A500, CSI Small Cap 500, CSI 300, and SSE STAR 50 were the main varieties with capital outflows [3][46][49]. - Last week, 36 new funds were issued, an increase of 28 from the previous period; 5 new funds were established, a decrease of 59 from the previous period. New funds raised a total of 1.451 billion yuan, a decrease of 56.879 billion yuan from the previous period [4][54][59]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Market Review 3.1.1 Domestic Market Situation - From February 24 to February 27, 2026, all major equity market indices rose, with the CSI 500 rising 4.32%. Among the 31 Shenwan primary industries, 25 industries rose, and 6 industries fell. The top five gainers were steel, non - ferrous metals, chemicals, environmental protection, and coal; the top five decliners were media, commercial trade, food and beverages, non - bank finance, and banks. In the bond market, the ChinaBond Composite Full - Price Index fell 0.14%, and the total full - price indices of ChinaBond Treasury bonds, financial bonds, and credit bonds fell between 0.01% and 0.31%. The CSI Convertible Bond Index fell 0.23%. In the commodity market, the Nanhua Commodity Index rose 3.56% [12]. 3.1.2 European, American, and Asia - Pacific Market Situation - Last week, most major indices in European, American, and Asia - Pacific markets rose. In the US stock market, the S&P 500 rose 0.21%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.34%, and the Nasdaq rose 0.18%. In the European market, the French CAC40 rose 0.98%, and the German DAX rose 1.17%. In the Asia - Pacific market, the Hang Seng Index fell 1.67%, and the Nikkei 225 rose 3.56% [20]. 3.1.3 Market Valuation Situation - Last week, the valuation quantiles of most major market indices rose. In terms of the historical quantile of price - to - earnings ratio, the CSI All - Share Index had the largest increase of 8.6 pct. In terms of the historical quantile of price - to - book ratio, the CSI 1000 had the largest increase of 5.4 pct. Among industries, the top five industries with the highest historical quantiles of price - to - earnings ratio of the Shenwan primary index were real estate, electronics, building materials, comprehensive, and chemicals. The price - to - earnings ratio quantile of real estate remained at a high level, and that of electronics reached 96.9%. The bottom five industries with the lowest historical quantiles of price - to - earnings ratio were non - bank finance, agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, food and beverages, beauty care, and pharmaceutical biology. The valuation of the non - bank finance industry was close to its historical low since 2013 [23]. 3.2 Active Public - Offering Fund Situation - Market hotspots: The CSRC issued the "Administrative Measures for the Supervision of Information Disclosure of Private Investment Funds", which takes effect on September 1, 2026. The Shanghai Stock Exchange and China Securities Index Co., Ltd. announced the adjustment of constituent stocks of key indices such as the STAR 50, to be implemented after the close on March 13, 2026 [31][33]. - Fund performance: Quantitative funds had the largest increase, with an average increase of 2.22% and a positive return ratio of 92.26%. Fixed - income + funds rose 0.30% on average, with a positive return ratio of 73.12%. Pure - bond funds rose 0.01% on average, with a positive return ratio of 60.51%. Pension target FOFs rose 0.93% on average, with a positive return ratio of 99.50%. QDII funds fell 0.11% on average, with a positive return ratio of 58.16% [34]. - The top three sectors with the largest increase in positions of active equity funds last week were media, commerce and retail, and real estate; the top three sectors with the largest decrease in positions were electronics, non - ferrous metals, and pharmaceutical biology. As of February 27, 2026, the overall position of active equity funds was 77.23%, an increase of 0.81 pct from the previous period [40][42]. 3.3 ETF Fund Situation - Last week, the overall ETF market had a net capital outflow of 22.828 billion yuan. Stock - type ETFs had a relatively large net outflow of 36.286 billion yuan. The daily average trading volume of the overall ETF market reached 476.804 billion yuan, the daily average trading volume reached 168.72 billion shares, and the daily average turnover rate was 7.40%. The Hang Seng Technology, power grid equipment, securities, and Internet sectors had net capital inflows, with the Hang Seng Technology having a capital inflow close to 10 billion yuan. Broad - based indices such as the CSI 1000, CSI A500, CSI Small Cap 500, CSI 300, and SSE STAR 50 were the main varieties with capital outflows [3][46][49]. 3.4 Fund Issuance Statistics - Last week, 36 new funds were issued, an increase of 28 from the previous period, including 15 active equity - biased funds and 10 passive index funds. The 10 passive index funds were all stock - type, mainly tracking indices such as the CSI Battery Theme, Hang Seng Biotechnology, ChiNext 50, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery. Currently, the issuance share of active equity funds is still at a historical low, but there has been an obvious upward trend since this year. - Five new funds were established last week, a decrease of 59 from the previous period. New funds raised a total of 1.451 billion yuan, a decrease of 56.879 billion yuan from the previous period. The E Fund CSI Battery Theme ETF managed by Li Xu had the largest raised scale of about 859 million yuan [54][59].

Report Summary 1. Investment Rating The document does not mention the investment rating of the industry. 2. Core Views The report reviews the fund market in 2025, including the overall situation of the public - offering fund industry, the development of various sub - categories of public - offering funds, and the situation of private - offering securities investment funds. It also provides a market outlook for 2026 and selects several types of funds for attention. In 2025, the public - offering fund market achieved significant positive returns, and the private - offering securities investment fund market expanded in scale. In 2026, with the resonance of China's and the US policies, the A - share market is expected to shift from liquidity - driven to profit - driven, and attention should be paid to specific investment directions and the rhythm of the fixed - income market [2][9]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Public Fund Overall Overview - **Asset Management Market Overview**: By the end of Q3 2025, the total scale of China's asset management business reached 80.03 trillion yuan. Public - offering funds and private - offering funds drove the growth of the asset management scale, with public - offering funds contributing 3.92 trillion yuan to the scale growth. The public - offering fund market maintained strong vitality, with a total scale of 36.67 trillion yuan and a total share of 31.30 trillion shares by the end of 2025, showing year - on - year growth [16][20]. - **Public Fund New - issuance Market**: In 2025, stock - type and bond - type funds were the main new - issuance products. The new - issuance volume of stock - type funds was large, and the new - issuance scale was comparable to that of bond - type funds, mainly relying on passive products [40]. - **Non - monetary Head Managers of Public Funds**: Since 2021, the top - three managers in terms of non - monetary fund scale have been relatively stable. In 2025, E Fund, China Asset Management, and GF Fund had different product line focuses in terms of stock and incremental scale. Huatai - Peregrine Fund and Invesco Great Wall Fund showed good performance [47][48]. - **Performance of Public Fund Products**: In 2025, the public - offering fund market achieved significant positive returns. Commodity - type funds represented by gold performed excellently, and stock - type funds also received good returns with reduced volatility and drawdown [3][56]. 3.2 Hot Topics in the Fund Industry - **Reform of Public - offering Fund Policies**: In 2025, a series of reform measures were introduced to promote the transformation of the public - offering fund industry from "scale - oriented" to "return - oriented" [59]. - **New - style Floating - rate Funds**: In 2025, new - style floating - rate funds were successively launched, which had important impacts on the public - offering fund market, such as guiding long - term holding and strengthening the binding mechanism between fund companies and investors [67][69]. - **Commercial Real Estate REITs**: In 2025, the pilot of commercial real estate REITs was officially launched, and 12 products had been officially declared by February 13, 2026 [73][75]. - **Development of the Fund Investment Advisory Industry**: Policy support, product expansion, and institutional empowerment promoted the development of the fund investment advisory industry. The investment scope of fund investment advisors was gradually broadened, and leading public - offering funds entered the market [77][79]. 3.3 Overview of Sub - categories of Public Funds - **Active Equity Funds**: In 2025, the scale of active equity funds rebounded, with an average return of 33.29%. Funds focusing on the AI industry chain led the gains [101]. - **Industry Theme Funds**: By the end of 2025, there were 2,009 industry theme funds, with a significant increase in scale. Funds in technology communication, large - scale technology, and large - scale manufacturing sectors led the gains [4][150]. - **Active Fixed - income Funds**: In the low - interest - rate environment and the rising equity market in 2025, the management pressure of pure - bond portfolios increased, while the scale of bond - containing funds increased significantly [170][174]. - **Passive Funds**: By the end of 2025, the total scale of passive funds exceeded 7.5 trillion yuan. ETFs continued to expand, and industry themes and bonds frequently created hot topics [205]. - **FOF Funds**: By the end of 2025, the total scale of FOF funds increased significantly, with performance showing significant differentiation. The new - issuance market recovered [296][309]. - **Quantitative Funds**: The scale of quantitative funds expanded rapidly, with index - enhanced funds dominating the scale. The new - issuance market of A500 and ChiNext/Science and Technology Innovation Board index - enhanced funds was hot, and small - cap products had outstanding returns [334][346]. 3.4 Overall Situation of Private - offering Securities Investment Funds - **Existing Situation**: By the end of December 2025, the existing scale of private - offering securities investment funds reached a record high of 7.08 trillion yuan, a year - on - year increase of 35.82%. The number of funds decreased, and fund managers continued to be cleared out [377]. - **New - issuance Market**: In 2025, the number and scale of newly - registered private - offering securities investment funds both increased. The access for new fund managers remained strict [382]. - **Industry Pattern**: The number of private - offering funds with a scale of over 10 billion yuan increased, while the number of those with a scale of less than 500 million yuan decreased significantly [391]. - **Market Trends**: In 2025, the scale of quantitative private - offering funds expanded again, and 14 new quantitative private - offering funds exceeded 10 billion yuan in scale. The regulatory rules for program trading were implemented [394][399]. - **Market Trends**: The number of insurance - funded private - offering securities investment funds increased to 7, and insurance funds increased their layout in the equity market through private - offering funds [400]. 3.5 Market Outlook in 2026 - **Macroeconomic Outlook**: In 2026, China's fiscal policy aims to balance "stable growth" and "structural transformation." If the fiscal space is fully released, a series of positive macroeconomic changes are expected. The total demand growth rate is expected to return to expansion [402][404]. - **Investment Direction**: In the equity market, attention should be paid to computing power, AI applications, AI power, cutting - edge technologies proposed in the 14th Five - Year Plan, pro - cyclical sectors, and domestic demand expansion and consumption recovery. In the fixed - income market, the interest rate center may rise, and the trading rhythm should be grasped [9]. - **Fund Selection**: The report selects several types of funds, including all - market investment equity funds, equity funds under different investment themes, fixed - income funds, and index - enhanced funds [10][11][12].

- The median excess return for CSI 500 Index Enhanced Funds this week was 0.38%[3][4] - The median excess return for CSI 1000 Index Enhanced Funds this week was 0.34%[3][4] - The median excess return for CSI A500 Index Enhanced Funds this week was 0.31%[3][4] - The median return for other Index Enhanced Funds this week was 0.01%[3][4] - The median return for Absolute Return (Hedge) Funds this week was 0.11%[3][4] - The median return for other Active Quantitative Funds this week was -1.35%[3][4] - The median return for Thematic Funds this week was -0.83%[15][16] - The median return for Performance Fee Funds this week was -1.14%[15][17] - The median return for Sector Rotation Funds this week was -2.12%[15][18] - The median return for Multi-Factor Funds this week was -1.84%[15][19] - The median return for Big Data Driven Active Funds this week was -0.67%[15][20]

- The report categorizes quantitative funds into three main types: active quantitative funds, enhanced index quantitative funds, and hedged quantitative funds, each with distinct characteristics and advantages suitable for different trading needs[10] - Active quantitative funds are further divided based on the indices they track, including CSI 300, CSI 500, other broad-based indices, industry theme indices, and smart beta indices[13] - Enhanced index quantitative funds are also categorized similarly, tracking indices such as CSI 300, CSI 500, other broad-based indices, industry theme indices, and smart beta indices[13] - In January 2026, the median return rates for active quantitative funds tracking CSI 500, other broad-based indices, and CSI 300 were 8.63%, 8.02%, and 6.54%, respectively[14][18] - The median excess returns for active quantitative funds tracking CSI 500, other broad-based indices, and CSI 300 in January 2026 were 10.33%, 8.63%, and 6.54%, respectively[18] - The median annualized volatility for active quantitative funds tracking CSI 300 in January 2026 was 13.55%, with a maximum drawdown of -1.97%[26][27] - The median annualized volatility for active quantitative funds tracking CSI 500 in January 2026 was 15.09%, with a maximum drawdown of -2.06%[28][33] - The top three active quantitative funds tracking other broad-based indices in January 2026 were those tracking the ChiNext Index and CSI 800[34][39] - The top three active quantitative funds tracking industry theme indices in January 2026 were those tracking the CSI Leading Enterprises, CSI High-end Equipment, and CICC Electronic Components indices[40][41] - The top smart beta active quantitative fund in January 2026 was the one tracking the CSI 800 Value Index[42][43] - Enhanced index funds tracking CSI 500 and CSI 300 had median excess returns of -2.0% and 1.1%, respectively, in January 2026[46][50] - The median annualized volatility for enhanced index funds tracking CSI 500 in January 2026 was 16.93%, with a maximum drawdown of -2.44%[46][47] - The median annualized volatility for enhanced index funds tracking CSI 300 in January 2026 was 12.0%, with a maximum drawdown of -2.44%[50][53] - The top three enhanced index funds tracking other broad-based indices in January 2026 were those tracking CSI 800, CSI A500, and CSI 800[57] - The top three enhanced index funds tracking industry theme indices in January 2026 were those tracking the photovoltaic industry, chip industry, and consumer leaders indices[58] - The top smart beta enhanced index fund in January 2026 was the one tracking the CSI State-owned Enterprise Dividend Index[59][61] - Hedged quantitative funds had an average absolute return of 0.25% in January 2026, with higher net asset value volatility compared to December 2025[62][63]

Core Insights - The private equity funds in 2025 have shown strong performance, with an average return of 34.86% among 57 billion-yuan private equity funds, significantly outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index, which rose by 18.41% [1] - Quantitative strategies have emerged as the dominant approach among leading private equity firms, with 17 out of the top 20 funds utilizing this strategy [5] Performance of Private Equity Funds - Lingjun Investment achieved the highest average return of 73.51% in 2025, leading the market [2] - Yuanxin Investment and Fusheng Asset followed closely with returns exceeding 70%, ranking second and third respectively [3] - Lin Yuan Investment was the only fund with a negative average return in 2025, attributed to its heavy investment in "old stocks" [3] Quantitative Strategies - The success of quantitative strategies in 2025 is not solely due to a bull market; rather, it is linked to improvements in trading volume, volatility, and liquidity [6] - Quantitative strategies are predominantly employed by larger private equity funds, with less than 10% of funds below 50 million yuan utilizing this approach [7] Regional Distribution of Private Equity Funds - The majority of billion-yuan private equity managers are concentrated in first-tier and strong second-tier cities, with Shanghai, Guangdong, and Beijing leading in numbers [9] - Guangdong's private equity funds benefit from a complete industrial chain and high information flow efficiency, particularly in emerging industries [10] Talent and Investment Preferences - Talent availability significantly influences the performance of private equity funds, with the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta regions each having their unique advantages [10][11] - The investment mindset in the Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai region is more progressive, showing a higher acceptance of new strategies and innovative products [11]

- The report does not contain any specific quantitative models or factors for analysis[1][2][3]

- The report highlights the performance of quantitative funds, particularly index-enhanced funds, with the China Securities 1000 Index Enhanced Fund achieving a weekly median excess return of 0.72%[3][4][7] - The China Securities 500 Index Enhanced Fund showed a weekly median excess return of -0.13%, while the CSI 300 Index Enhanced Fund achieved 0.42% during the same period[3][4][5] - Other index-enhanced funds recorded a weekly median return of 0.14%, with the best-performing fund achieving a return of 7.42% and the worst-performing fund at -3.19%[3][4][8] - Absolute return (hedging) funds had a weekly median return of 0.12%, while other active quantitative funds achieved a significantly higher weekly median return of 2.35%[3][8][10] - Multi-factor funds demonstrated strong performance with a weekly median return of 3.78%, and the best-performing fund in this category achieved a return of 5.32%[15][19][20] - Big data-driven active investment funds achieved a weekly median return of 1.50%, with the best-performing fund reaching 6.00% and the worst-performing fund at -1.59%[15][20]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that quantitative funds, despite their popularity and perceived effectiveness, did not significantly outperform actively managed funds in 2025, challenging the notion of their invincibility [10][12]. - In 2025, the average return of public quantitative stock selection funds was 30.3%, which was 5.7% higher than the CSI All Share Index, but lower than the 33.2% return of the 885001 index, indicating a slight underperformance compared to actively managed funds [5][6]. - The article highlights that quantitative strategies have been perceived as superior due to their performance in the bear market from 2021 to 2024, but the performance in 2025 has dispelled the illusion of continuous technical progress [10][11]. Group 2 - The article discusses the characteristics of quantitative strategies, noting that while they tend to have lower error rates, they can accumulate significant mistakes over time due to their reliance on multiple factors and market conditions [14][16]. - It emphasizes that the failure of certain factors in a market downturn can lead to collective underperformance of quantitative strategies, as seen in the market shifts in August 2025 [18][20]. - The article warns that when the protective layers of quantitative strategies fail, they can lead to significant market risks, similar to historical market crashes [20][28]. Group 3 - The article suggests that both quantitative and active funds have potential advantages depending on market conditions, with quantitative funds excelling in certain environments while active funds may outperform in others, particularly during macroeconomic recoveries [30][32]. - It identifies three scenarios where active funds could outperform quantitative strategies: macroeconomic improvements, significant policy shifts, and changes in trading regulations that affect market structure [33][34][35]. - The article concludes that investors should be aware of the risks associated with quantitative strategies, especially during periods of extreme market conditions where multiple factors may fail simultaneously [36][37].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report The report focuses on the performance of the quantitative fund market, summarizing the performance of major indices and quantitative funds, the overall performance and distribution of different types of public - offering quantitative funds, and the better - performing quantitative funds from January 12 to January 16, 2026, for investors' reference [1]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Main Index and Quantitative Fund Performance - This week (January 12 - January 16), A - shares showed mixed performance, with small - cap growth stocks leading the rise and large - cap value stocks falling. Quantitative funds recorded positive returns, and the excess returns of index - enhanced funds were divergent. Active quantitative funds rose by an average of 1.21%. The excess returns of CSI 300 Index - enhanced, CSI 500 Index - enhanced, and CSI 1000 Index - enhanced funds were 0.63%, - 0.34%, and 0.34% respectively, and the average excess return of other index - enhanced funds was 0.25%. Market - neutral funds rose by 0.16% [2][4][6]. - The weekly returns of the CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 were - 0.57%, 2.18%, and 1.27% respectively [3][6]. 3.2 Performance of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 0.06%, the excess return was 0.63%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.72%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.19%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.53% [14]. - **CSI 500 Index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 1.84%, the excess return was - 0.34%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.18%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 1.08%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.48% [14]. - **CSI 1000 Index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 1.61%, the excess return was 0.34%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.46%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.79%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.44% [15]. - **Other index - enhanced funds**: The weekly return was 1.23%, the excess return was 0.25%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.38%, the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.50%, and the excess return dispersion was 0.68% [15]. - **Active quantitative funds**: The weekly return was 1.21%, the maximum drawdown was - 1.16%, and the return dispersion was 1.61% [16]. - **Market - neutral funds**: The weekly return was 0.16%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.13%, and the return dispersion was 0.61% [16]. 3.3 Performance Distribution of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds The report shows the performance trends of different types of public - offering quantitative funds in the past six months, as well as the performance distribution this week and in the past year. Index - enhanced funds show the performance of excess returns, but specific data is not further elaborated in the text [17]. 3.4 High - Performing Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - enhanced high - performing funds**: Such as E Fund CSI 300 Selected Enhanced (managed by Zhang Shengji, with a scale of 4024 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 2.15%), and others [31]. - **CSI 500 Index - enhanced high - performing funds**: For example, Bosera CSI 500 Index - enhanced (managed by Yang Meng, with a scale of 2764 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 0.31%) [32]. - **CSI 1000 Index - enhanced high - performing funds**: Like Huatai - Peregrine CSI 1000 Enhanced Strategy ETF (managed by Da Huang and Liu Jun, with a scale of 40 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 1.12%) [33]. - **Other index - enhanced high - performing funds**: Such as E Fund SSE 50 Enhanced Strategy ETF (managed by Zhang Shengji, with a scale of 49 million yuan, and a weekly excess return of 2.04%) [34]. - **Active quantitative high - performing funds**: For instance, Huian Quantitative Selection (managed by Wang Minglu, with a scale of 3 million yuan, and a weekly return of 8.68%) [35]. - **Market - neutral high - performing funds**: Such as China Post Absolute Return Strategy (managed by Yao Yi and Xing Rufeng, with a scale of 48 million yuan, and a weekly return of 2.39%) [36].

Core Insights - The private equity quantitative fund managers are positioned at the intersection of finance and technology, acting as "strategy scientists" and "capital managers" who utilize algorithms to interpret the market and execute trades in a highly uncertain financial environment [1] - As of December 2025, there are 1,600 quantitative products with a total scale of approximately 135.05 billion, achieving an average return of 30.91%, significantly outperforming the market [2][3] - Among the 386 quantitative products managed by billion-yuan private equity managers, the average return reached 38.52%, yielding an excess return of 13.59%, marking them as the top performers [2][3] Summary by Scale 100 Billion and Above - In 2025, 49 billion-yuan private equity quantitative managers had three or more products that met ranking criteria, with all achieving positive returns; 32 of them had returns exceeding 30% [3] - The top ten quantitative fund managers in this category include Ma Zhiyu from Lingjun Investment and Wang Chen from Jiukun Investment, both of whom have made significant advancements in AI applications [3][7] 50-100 Billion - The average return for quantitative products in the 50-100 billion category was approximately 27.69%, with 93.45% of products yielding positive returns [9] - The top managers include Shi En from Yunqi Quantitative and Huang Hui from Qianshu Investment, both of whom achieved notable returns [9][12] 20-50 Billion - The average return for this category was around 30.69%, with 97.58% of products generating positive returns [13] - The leading managers are Nie Shouhua and He Jie from Hanrong Investment, who have demonstrated strong performance [13][16] 10-20 Billion - The average return for quantitative products in this range was approximately 28.83%, with 99.46% of products achieving positive returns [17] - Wu Yintong from Longyin Huxiao topped this category, showcasing effective strategies [17][20] 5-10 Billion - The average return for this scale was about 30.26%, with 92.44% of products yielding positive returns [21] - The top managers include Yan Xuejie from Huacheng Private Equity and Cheng Zhitian from Juliang Junheng, both of whom have excelled in their strategies [21][24] 0-5 Billion - The average return for products in this category was approximately 27.56%, with 92.02% of products achieving positive returns [25] - The leading manager is Xie Libo from Jingying Zhito, who has shown strong performance in this segment [25][27]