何咏前表示，中方注意到有关情况，已通过中美经贸磋商机制向美方提出严正交涉。中方不认同美方 301调查的所谓结论，坚决反对美对华半导体产品加征301关税。 12月25日，商务部举行例行新闻发布会，新闻发言人何咏前对TikTok将成立新的美国合资公司、美国拦 截委内瑞拉油轮、美国将对部分中国半导体产品加征301关税等议题进行回应。 商务部新闻发言人何咏前。 坚决反对美对华半导体产业加征301关税 美东时间12月23日，美国贸易代表办公室发布针对中国半导体政策301调查结果，宣布对部分中国半导 体产品加征301关税，目前税率为0%。18个月后，即2027年6月再提高税率。 何咏前回应称，中方一贯坚决反对有关国家滥施单边制裁和所谓的"长臂管辖"，随意拦截他国油轮不仅 可能扰动国际能源市场正常运行，还有可能引发其他安全风险。 "委内瑞拉同其他国家在国际法框架内开展经贸合作是正常的，也是合理、合法的，这一权利应当得到 尊重和支持。"何咏前说。 美单边关税违反世贸组织规则，破坏国际经贸秩序，扰乱全球产业链供应链，损害美国企业和消费者利 益，损人不利己。中方敦促美方尽快纠正错误做法，取消相关措施。中方愿与美方在相互尊重、和平 ...

更为深远的影响在于，欧盟的声誉正遭受不可逆的重创。长期以来，欧盟以"法治、公正、守信"的形象自居，吸引着全球资本参与其经济循环。但此次企图 没收俄资产的行为，让国际社会看清其规则外衣下的双重标准——所谓的"法治"只适用于符合其利益的场景，一旦触及地缘政治诉求，规则便可以被随意践 踏。俄罗斯圣彼得堡国立大学教授就指出，这一举措将对欧盟的财政和信用评级造成沉重冲击。对于广大发展中国家而言，欧盟的做法彻底打破了其对西方 市场经济体系的信任幻想，更多国家可能会加速推动国际经贸多元化，减少对欧盟市场和金融体系的依赖。 值得注意的是，欧盟的冒险之举还将加剧地缘冲突的升级。俄方已明确发出反制警告，俄罗斯央行已对欧洲清算银行提起诉讼，俄国家杜马更是直言此举 将"启动欧盟自杀程序"，俄方将采取大量反制措施。同时，斯洛伐克总理也警告，动用冻结资产可能直接危及俄乌和平谈判的努力。在欧盟自身对乌融资已 显现乏力迹象的背景下，企图通过没收资产"输血"乌克兰，不仅难以解决根本问题，反而会让国际格局更加分裂，经贸合作的信任土壤更加贫瘠。 当地时间12月19日，俄罗斯总统普京在年度记者会上的表态掷地有声，将欧盟企图没收俄罗斯资产的行为直斥为 ...

Group 1 - Recent negotiations between China and the US in the economic and trade sector have shown both sides' willingness to make adjustments, with the US suspending the export control rule for one year and China announcing a similar suspension [1] - The US has set a benchmark for tariffs on Chinese goods, expressing surprise if other countries do not follow suit, as many have already imposed tariffs on Chinese exports [3] - Despite initial optimism about a potential trade agreement, no formal agreement was reached during the recent talks, and the US Treasury Secretary indicated that an agreement could be signed soon, which was later contradicted by further US actions [4][6] Group 2 - The US has initiated an investigation into whether China has complied with the trade agreement from the Trump administration, with plans to gather public comments and hold hearings [6][8] - The investigation is based on the claim that China failed to meet a target of purchasing an additional $200 billion worth of US goods, a situation complicated by the global pandemic and logistics challenges [8] - The US appears to be attempting to establish its tariff standards as global norms, with other countries like the EU and Australia already imposing tariffs on Chinese products, suggesting a coordinated effort influenced by the US [9] Group 3 - The timing of the US investigation suggests an attempt to shift blame onto China while the US itself has violated agreement terms through various export controls, disrupting normal trade and investment [11] - Following a meeting between the leaders of China and the US, there was no indication from the US of pausing the investigation, highlighting a unilateral approach that prioritizes US interests over bilateral agreements [13] - The investigation and related actions may serve as a political strategy for the Trump administration to manage domestic pressures while using these issues as leverage in future negotiations with China [15][17] Group 4 - The US's approach to trade negotiations, characterized by creating uncertainty, aims to keep China in a reactive position, potentially using these investigations as bargaining chips for concessions in other areas [17] - The unilateral actions by the US could hinder the recovery of US-China trade relations and disrupt the global economic landscape, affecting companies reliant on stable US-China trade [17] - The maintenance of international economic order requires collective efforts, and the US's unilateralism may lead to a decline in its credibility in the global economic arena [19]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between China's Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao and Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Akira Amari highlights the importance of maintaining stable and constructive economic relations between China and Japan amidst rising unilateralism and protectionism in international trade [1] Group 1: Economic Relations - Wang Wentao emphasized the need for both countries to work together to counter the impacts of unilateralism and protectionism on international economic order [1] - The Chinese side urged Japan to remove relevant Chinese entities from the export control end-user list as a step towards improving bilateral trade relations [1] Group 2: Trade Mechanisms - Both parties discussed the importance of utilizing export control dialogue mechanisms to ensure the stability and smooth operation of industrial and supply chains [1] - Akira Amari expressed Japan's commitment to developing constructive and stable economic relations with China, indicating a willingness to engage in policy dialogue to enhance mutual understanding and trust [1] Group 3: Multilateral Trade System - Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining a multilateral trading system centered around the World Trade Organization (WTO) [1] - The discussion included a focus on promoting regional economic cooperation to inject more stability into the global economy [1]

Core Viewpoint - The current international economic and trade order and multilateral trade system are facing severe challenges, making global economic recovery difficult [1] Group 1: International Economic Order - The "Big BRICS Cooperation" should adhere to its founding purpose, align with the needs of the times, and uphold multilateralism [1] - There is a call to promote the construction of a fair and open international economic order [1] Group 2: Global South Cooperation - The meeting aims to unite the global South to contribute more to world stability and development [1]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Tajik President Rahmon emphasizes the strengthening of the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Tajikistan, focusing on practical cooperation and high-quality development of the China-Tajikistan community of shared destiny [1][2]. Group 1: Bilateral Cooperation - Both countries aim to implement the outcomes of Xi's previous state visit to Tajikistan, enhancing all-round cooperation and achieving more practical results [1]. - There is a commitment to expand bilateral trade and investment, accelerate transportation infrastructure projects, and improve connectivity [1]. - The establishment of cultural exchanges, such as the "China Cultural Day" in Tajikistan, is highlighted as a means to deepen mutual understanding [1][2]. Group 2: Security and Multilateral Cooperation - The two leaders agreed to strengthen law enforcement and security cooperation, particularly in combating the "three forces" (terrorism, extremism, and separatism) [1]. - Both sides share common interests in upholding multilateralism and defending international economic order, with a focus on enhancing coordination within multilateral mechanisms like the China-Central Asia cooperation [1][2]. - Tajikistan expresses its willingness to play a significant role in international climate governance, supported by China [1].

Group 1 - The first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism was held in London, resulting in a framework to implement the Geneva consensus, with 53 countries supporting China in a joint declaration [1] - The China-Africa Cooperation Forum's ministerial meeting in Changsha, Hunan, saw over 100 officials from African countries and the African Union affirming the importance of China and Africa as key components of the Global South [3] - The declaration criticized the US for using tariffs to disrupt the existing international economic order and called for all countries, especially the US, to return to negotiations based on equality and mutual respect [3][5] Group 2 - African countries expressed appreciation for China's defense of international fairness and justice, opposing any compromises that sacrifice the interests of others [5] - China has maintained a firm stance in the trade war with the US, with the US being the one to initiate talks and show willingness to make concessions, including lifting some technology restrictions on China [7] - Unlike the US's tariff policies, China is adopting a more open approach, announcing zero tariffs on 100% of products for African countries, which reflects China's commitment to supporting African development [7][9] Group 3 - The long-standing economic difficulties faced by Africa have been exacerbated by the West's reduction of development aid, while China has been genuinely promoting African development [9] - The narrative of a "debt trap" aimed at discrediting China is seen as an attempt to hinder African nations' progress, but African countries recognize who is truly supportive of their development [9]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between China's Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang and Dutch Foreign Minister Wopke Hoekstra emphasizes the importance of strengthening bilateral relations and cooperation between China and the Netherlands in the face of global challenges [1] Group 1: Bilateral Relations - Ding Xuexiang highlighted the direction for the development of China-Netherlands relations, referencing multiple meetings between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Dutch leaders [1] - Both countries are recognized as significant global economies and comprehensive cooperative partners, indicating a mutual interest in maintaining strong ties [1] Group 2: Cooperation and Trade - China expresses willingness to continue friendly exchanges and enhance practical cooperation in key areas, aiming to safeguard the multilateral trading system and the stability of global supply chains [1] - The Dutch side views China as an important partner and is open to strengthening comprehensive exchanges and cooperation to address various challenges and uphold free trade [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's unwavering stance in maintaining international economic and trade order, highlighting the negative impacts of the U.S. unilateral tariff war on its own economy and global supply chains [1] Group 1: Impact of U.S. Tariff War - The U.S. initiated tariff war has caused significant economic repercussions for itself and has adversely affected the stability of global industrial and supply chains [1] - Dialogue between the two parties is seen as a positive step towards resolving differences and preventing escalation of conflicts [1] Group 2: Conditions for Dialogue - The effectiveness of any dialogue is contingent upon the sincerity and efforts of both parties, particularly the U.S. demonstrating rationality and pragmatism [1] - China insists that any negotiations must be based on mutual respect, equal consultation, and mutual benefit [1] Group 3: U.S. Responsibilities - The U.S. must acknowledge the severe negative impacts of its unilateral tariff measures on both the world and its own economy [1] - There is a call for the U.S. to recognize international economic rules, fairness, and rational voices from various sectors, and to show genuine willingness to negotiate [1] Group 4: Stance on Coercion - China firmly states that it will not compromise its principles or sacrifice international fairness and justice for any agreement if the U.S. continues to use coercion and intimidation under the guise of negotiation [1]