2月14日晚，话题"曝黄子弘凡爸爸诈骗学生"冲上热搜。有网友爆料称，黄子弘凡父亲、四川师范大学 教授黄金中涉嫌以留学保录名义诈骗学生。随后@黄子弘凡工作室 发文回应，表示已针对相关不实信 息与恶意造谣完成取证，稍后将公布事实答复。 2月15日凌晨，孙茂成律师受黄子弘凡及其父亲黄金中教授委托，就网友发布不实言论、侵害名誉并涉 嫌诽谤一事发布律师声明。 公开信息显示，黄子弘凡父亲黄金中为国家一级演员、著名男高音歌唱家，现任四川师范大学教授。 黄子弘凡，1999年4月出生于甘肃省兰州市，中国内地男歌手、音乐剧演员，美声歌者。2018年11月， 黄子弘凡参加湖南卫视原创新形态声乐演唱节目《声入人心》，从而走入大众视线。 资料图 图片来源： @黄子弘凡工作室 来源 | 中国新闻社综合 黄子弘凡 黄子弘凡工作室转发表示：网络空间并非法外之地，提醒广大公众切勿轻信、转载、传播无事实依据的 虚假内容。对于编造、扩散谣言，恶意诋毁、诽谤的行为，我方将依法追责到底，绝不姑息。 如何抓住黄金波段机会？聪明钱的选择，黄金+股票一键搞定>> ...

如何抓住黄金波段机会？聪明钱的选择，黄金+股票一键搞定>> 【#黄子弘凡声明后伤心swimming再爆料#：晒转账记录】#伤心swimming爆料后再怒发8条#近日，网友 @伤心swimming 发文爆料称黄子弘凡父亲涉嫌诈骗学生，相关内容引发网络关注。针对此事，黄子弘 凡工作室回应表示，已收集网络上针对黄子弘凡父亲的不实信息与恶意造谣证据，将稍后公布事实答 复。2月15日凌晨，@孙茂成律师 发布律师声明，称受黄子弘凡及其父亲黄金中教授委托，就用户@伤 心swimming 发布不实言论、侵害名誉及涉嫌诽谤犯罪一事作出正式声明。随后，@伤心swimming 再次 发布内容，晒出完整时间线与转账记录，爆料后已累计发布8条相关微博。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The first-instance judgment in the defamation case between the leading domestic sports apps "Zhibo8" and "Dongqiudi" has been made, with the court ruling that the content published by the defendants constitutes defamation [1][5]. Group 1: Case Background - The defamation case was filed on December 19, 2024, and is linked to a prior trademark dispute between the two companies [2]. - The operators of "Zhibo8" are Xiamen Aobo Network Technology Co., while "Dongqiudi" is operated by Beijing Duoge Technology Co., which is owned by Chen Cong [2]. - A financial dispute arose between Tianxing Capital Co. and Duoge Technology, leading to an arbitration ruling that required Duoge to return an investment of 31.06 million yuan and penalties [2]. Group 2: Court Proceedings - Duoge Technology filed an objection to the enforcement of a court ruling regarding the auction of 40 trademarks, claiming that the auction process was flawed [3]. - The Beijing High Court upheld the lower court's decision to cancel the auction of the trademarks due to the existence of similar trademarks owned by Duoge [3]. Group 3: Defamation Claims - The court found that multiple articles published by Duoge, including accusations against Aobo and Tianxing of collusion, contained defamatory content against Aobo [5]. - Aobo claimed damages totaling 10 million yuan from Duoge and the other defendants for the defamation [6]. Group 4: Responses from Companies - Following the judgment, Chen Cong, CEO of "Dongqiudi," announced plans to appeal the decision and indicated that the company is in good operational condition [7]. - Lin Yufeng, CEO of "Zhibo8," stated that the company would continue to comply with the court's ruling while focusing on its business development [8].

Core Viewpoint - The first-instance judgment in the defamation case between the leading domestic sports apps "Zhibo8" and "Dongqiudi" has been made, with the court ruling that the content published by the defendants constitutes defamation [1][7]. Group 1: Case Background - The defamation case was filed on December 19, 2024, and is linked to a prior trademark dispute between the two companies [2]. - "Zhibo8" is operated by Xiamen Aobo Network Technology Co., while "Dongqiudi" is operated by Beijing Duoge Technology Co., with Chen Cong as its legal representative [2]. - A financial dispute arose between Tianxing Capital Co. and Duoge Technology, leading to an arbitration ruling that required Duoge to return an investment of 31.06 million yuan and penalties [2]. Group 2: Trademark Auction and Legal Proceedings - During the enforcement of the arbitration ruling, the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court seized 163 trademarks held by Duoge and auctioned 40 of them, which were won by Aobo for approximately 20.92 million yuan [3]. - Duoge contested the auction, claiming that similar trademarks were not evaluated and auctioned together, which led to the court supporting Duoge's request to annul the auction [3]. - The Beijing High Court upheld the original ruling of the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court regarding the auction [3]. Group 3: Defamation Claims and Court Ruling - Chen Cong, through the "Dongqiudi" account, accused Aobo and Tianxing of colluding to auction trademarks, alleging that the auction was a scheme to acquire Duoge's core assets at a low price [5][6]. - The court found that several articles published by Duoge contained defamatory content against Aobo, leading to a ruling that required the defendants to delete the articles, publicly apologize, and compensate Aobo a total of 121,748 yuan [7]. Group 4: Responses from Companies - Following the judgment, Chen Cong announced an appeal against the ruling, stating that the company is in good operational condition and is preparing for future litigation against Aobo for trademark infringement and unfair competition [8]. - Lin Yufeng, CEO of "Zhibo8," indicated that the company would continue to respond legally to the defamation case and focus on its business development [9].

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling in favor of "Live Bar" against "Dongqiudi" highlights the ongoing legal disputes in the sports app industry, emphasizing the importance of reputation management and the potential financial implications of defamation claims [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Xiamen Siming District People's Court ruled that certain content published by four defendants, including Chen Cong and Beijing Duoge Technology Co., constituted defamation, ordering them to delete related articles, publicly apologize, and jointly compensate Xiamen Aobo Network Technology Co., totaling 121,748 yuan [1][5]. - The legal battle stemmed from a previous investment dispute between Beijing Tianxing Capital and Beijing Duoge Technology, which led to the forced auction of the "Dongqiudi" trademark, ultimately acquired by Aobo for 20.9184 million yuan [3][4]. Group 2: Background and Context - The conflict traces back to 2016 when an investment agreement led to disputes over repayment, culminating in a 2022 arbitration ruling requiring Duoge to return 31.06 million yuan, which was not fulfilled, prompting further legal actions [3][4]. - In October 2024, Chen Cong publicly accused Aobo of colluding with Tianxing to undermine "Dongqiudi," which sparked significant user discussions and negative comments affecting "Live Bar's" brand reputation [4][5]. Group 3: Court's Findings - The court found that the terms "collusion" and "setup" were presented as established facts without sufficient evidence, constituting defamation [5]. - The defendants are required to delete five specific articles within three days and issue a public apology within seven days, with the apology content subject to court approval and to remain visible for at least 30 days [5].

Group 1 - Lan Shili, the former richest man in Hubei, issued an apology to Yihai Kerry for making false statements about Jinlongyu, acknowledging that his comments constituted defamation [1] - The court found that Lan's statements, including claims that "Jinlongyu lost 650 billion in two days" and "should be delisted," were untrue, leading to a civil judgment against him [1][3] - Lan was ordered to pay Yihai Kerry 10,000 yuan in damages and legal fees, and to publish a statement of apology on relevant online platforms [3] Group 2 - Yihai Kerry Food Marketing Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Yihai Kerry Jinlongyu Food Group, was established in 2009 with a registered capital of 68 million yuan [3] - The company emphasized strict regulations on the transportation of bulk edible oil following media reports of improper practices, asserting that all transport vehicles undergo rigorous checks [5] - Lan Shili, who founded Dongxing Airlines and was once listed as the richest man in Hubei, has faced significant business setbacks, including the bankruptcy of his airline and multiple company dissolutions [5]

Core Viewpoint - The well-known "fake goods fighter" Wang Hai has been sued by the organic fresh food brand Rainbow Planet for defamation, and the case has reached a final judgment where Rainbow Planet won, requiring Wang to compensate 97,800 yuan for damages to its reputation [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On October 17, the Xi'an Intermediate People's Court ruled in favor of Rainbow Planet, stating that Wang Hai's public comments about the brand's products lacked factual basis and distorted the truth, damaging the company's reputation [2][3]. - The court ordered Wang Hai to delete all defamatory content from his social media accounts and to publicly apologize for three consecutive days [2][3]. Group 2: Company Background and Issues - Rainbow Planet, established in 2015, positions itself as a brand focused on food safety and organic fresh products, but has faced multiple controversies regarding its promotional practices [4]. - In December 2023, Rainbow Planet was fined 470,000 yuan for violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law due to misleading product information and promotional practices [4][5]. Group 3: Ongoing Controversies - Wang Hai has continued to express doubts about Rainbow Planet's products, claiming that 49 of its products have been found to have false advertising, including allegations of "fake organic" claims [3][5]. - Following a series of complaints, the Xi'an Market Supervision Bureau initiated an investigation into Rainbow Planet's sales practices, particularly regarding its Salted Shrimp product [5].

Core Points - The court ruled that two 17-year-old boys, Tang and Wu, along with their parents, must publicly apologize to Haidilao and compensate for damages totaling 2.2 million yuan [1][4] - The incident involved the boys urinating in a hot pot at Haidilao, which was deemed a serious violation of public decency and caused reputational harm to the company [2][3] Legal Proceedings - The Shanghai Huangpu District Court found that the actions of Tang and Wu constituted both property and reputation infringement against Haidilao [2][3] - Despite being minors, the court determined that the boys were aware of the legal implications of their actions and thus held them accountable for their behavior [3][4] Financial Implications - The total compensation of 2.2 million yuan includes 130,000 yuan for the loss of utensils and cleaning costs, and 2 million yuan for operational and reputational losses [4]

Core Points - The court ruled in favor of Li Yang in a defamation case against his ex-wife, ordering her to apologize publicly and pay compensation for emotional damages [1][4][6] Group 1: Case Background - Li Yang's ex-wife accused him of domestic violence against their daughter in a series of social media posts, which led to significant public attention [1][4] - The court found that Li Yang's ex-wife failed to provide sufficient evidence to support her claims of abuse, leading to the ruling in favor of Li Yang [3][4] Group 2: Court Proceedings - The trial included the submission of 40 pieces of evidence by Li Yang's legal team, while the ex-wife's legal team presented 11 pieces to argue the platform's non-responsibility [2] - The court noted that the ex-wife's claims were not substantiated by the evidence presented, including audio and photographic evidence [3][4] Group 3: Ruling Details - The court ordered Li Yang's ex-wife to issue a public apology within 72 hours and pay 20,000 yuan in damages [1][4] - The ruling emphasized that while Li Yang's parenting methods were criticized, the ex-wife's statements constituted defamation and harmed his reputation [3][4] Group 4: Future Implications - Li Yang expressed satisfaction with the ruling and plans to donate the compensation amount, indicating a desire to clear his name [6] - The case highlights the legal boundaries between public scrutiny and defamation, particularly concerning allegations of domestic violence [7]

Group 1 - Zhang Xiaoling, a female lawyer, revealed that she was diagnosed with late-stage cancer after 10 years of health check-ups, which has attracted significant attention [1][4] - Aikang Guobin, the health check-up institution, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Zhang Xiaoling, seeking 10 million yuan in damages [1][4] - The Shanghai Pudong New District People's Court initially scheduled a hearing for September 11, 2025, but this was canceled due to Zhang's jurisdictional objection [1][4] Group 2 - Aikang Guobin claims that Zhang Xiaoling misrepresented her diagnosis timeline, stating she was diagnosed with early-stage kidney cancer a year after her check-up, while she alleged she was diagnosed with late-stage cancer in 2024 [4] - Aikang Group held a media briefing on July 30, confirming that there were no missed or misdiagnosed cases regarding Zhang's health check-up, emphasizing that a basic health check cannot guarantee the detection of all diseases [4][5] - Zhang Xiaoling has filed a request to transfer the case to the Beijing Internet Court, expressing her desire to prevent Aikang Guobin from withdrawing the lawsuit midway [4]