当"济南第5、广州第7"的城市排名出炉时，不少人感到困惑：传统一线城市广州为何会落后于济南？这 排名的对比逻辑靠谱吗？ 说实话，真不怎么靠谱，它压根就不是济南和广州点对点的公平较量，而是挑着数据说，硬生生造出 了"济南碾压广州"的错觉。 就说宜居得分吧，排名一个劲夸济南宜居，却绝口不提广州的具体分数，广州宜居得分是82.1分，就比 济南低2分啊！这么小的差距，愣是被说得好像济南甩了广州几条街，这不是误导人嘛。 再说说人口那事儿，排名把广州曾经的人口负增长全赖在"生活性价比低"上，这就更离谱了。 2022年广州少了5.8万人，可这里面65%都是疫情闹的短期问题，比如高校延迟返校，学生没回来；跨 境物流停摆，打工人暂时走了。 还有城中村拆迁，居民临时搬了。这些跟城市好不好住、值不值得留，根本没啥关系，结果被当成"年 轻人用脚投票"的证据，反过来衬济南宜居，这道理说不通。 还有个更让人不服气的，排名说广州"产业单一"，这纯属没搞懂实际情况，广州的工业门类全得很，41 个大类一个不落，汽车、石化、电子、医药这些产业，还有会展、跨境电商，随便拎一个出来规模都超 千亿，怎么就单一了？ 说白了，这排名就是捡着对自己结论有利 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of utilizing the intellectual property (IP) system to enhance urban innovation capabilities and overall strength, as highlighted in the "China Urban Intellectual Property Index Report 2025" [1][2] - In 2024, the National Intellectual Property Administration will complete various tasks related to the innovation pilot of the business environment, with 34 cities participating in the standardization of IP public services and the establishment of 28 key industry patent databases, significantly boosting urban competitiveness [1][2] - There has been a notable increase in IP creation capabilities, with improvements in IP output levels and conversion efficiency, driven by increased R&D investment and supportive policies in representative cities like Beijing [1][2] Group 2 - The business environment for intellectual property has improved significantly, supported by strong administrative and judicial enforcement, with 16 specific measures outlined to enhance policy support and service guarantees for business entities [2][3] - The urban IP development index reveals disparities between cities and regions, with Beijing, Shenzhen, and Shanghai leading the rankings, while Northeast and Northwest regions lag behind, indicating a correlation between economic development and IP maturity [2][3] - To enhance urban core competitiveness through the IP system, a multi-faceted approach is recommended, focusing on strategic emerging industries, establishing coordination mechanisms for knowledge sharing and IP protection, and improving regional IP strategies [3]