基差套利交易

Search documents
当美债开始“需求不足”
远川研究所· 2025-04-30 06:53
远川投资评论 . 看更好的资管内容 以下文章来源于远川投资评论 ,作者吴文涛 即便特朗普已经是第二次担任美国总统,利率依然是横亘在他和鲍威尔之间的一道天堑。 2025年4月16日,美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔在芝加哥经济俱乐部发表演讲时谈到"我们的责任是锚定长期 通胀预期,确保一次性价格冲击不会演变成持续性通胀,"尤其是在针对关税带来的不确定性时,鲍威 尔强调关税极有可能带来短期通胀冲击,也可能会引发更持久的影响。 翻译得直白一点就是:我知道你想我降息,但如果关税首先引发了短期通胀,那么通过加息来平抑通胀 才是我的优先级。 鲍威尔中性偏鹰的发言显然再一次让这位渴望降息的美国总统失望了。次日特朗普就在自创社交媒体平 台Truth Social开始发文抨击鲍威尔,"鲍威尔总是又迟又错,很久以前他就应该像欧洲央行那样降低利 率。"特朗普说道,并且在文末他总结称,"鲍威尔的下台来得还不够快!" 图片来源:X 实际上,根本安静不下来的特朗普早就嘲讽过鲍威尔,说他干着政府里最好的一份工作,每个月来一次 办公室抛一下硬币,就会被所有人奉为上帝。尽管就是特朗普自己在第一个任期亲手提名鲍威尔担任美 联储主席,但自从2018年美联储 ...
当美债开始“需求不足”
远川投资评论· 2025-04-29 06:51
即便特朗普已经是第二次担任美国总统,利率依然是横亘在他和鲍威尔之间的一道天堑。 2025年4月16日,美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔在芝加哥经济俱乐部发表演讲时谈到"我们的责任是锚定长期 通胀预期,确保一次性价格冲击不会演变成持续性通胀,"尤其是在针对关税带来的不确定性时,鲍威 尔强调关税极有可能带来短期通胀冲击,也可能会引发更持久的影响。 翻译得直白一点就是:我知道你想我降息,但如果关税首先引发了短期通胀,那么通过加息来平抑通胀 才是我的优先级。 鲍威尔中性偏鹰的发言显然再一次让这位渴望降息的美国总统失望了。次日特朗普就在自创社交媒体平 台Truth Social开始发文抨击鲍威尔,"鲍威尔总是又迟又错,很久以前他就应该像欧洲央行那样降低利 率。"特朗普说道,并且在文末他总结称,"鲍威尔的下台来得还不够快!" 图片来源:X 实际上,根本安静不下来的特朗普早就嘲讽过鲍威尔,说他干着政府里最好的一份工作,每个月来一次 办公室抛一下硬币,就会被所有人奉为上帝。尽管就是特朗普自己在第一个任期亲手提名鲍威尔担任美 联储主席,但自从2018年美联储开始加息周期之后,他那张天天希望降息的嘴,就再也没有饶过鲍威 尔。 在一次长岛 ...
美国股债汇三杀!道指重挫超1000点,英伟达市值蒸发超1万亿元,美元跳水,黄金新高
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-04-11 00:28
编 辑丨李莹亮,洪晓文,江佩佩 4月10日,美国股债汇三杀,纳指跌超4%,标普500指数跌超3%;十年期美债收益率四连升;美元指数连续第三天下跌,触及半年来最低水平。 | < w | 美国国债 | | | --- | --- | --- | | 名称 | 买入 | 英H | | 10Y 美国国债 | 4.4602 | 4.4582 | | 10YRNOTE.GBM | | | | 1M 美国国债 | 4.3022 | 4.292 | | 1MOBILL.GBM | | | | 2M 美国国债 | 4.3139 | 4.2985 | | 2MOBILL.GBM | | | | 3M 美国国债 | 4.3185 | 4.2947 | | 3MOBILL.GBM | | | | < W | | | 美元指数 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | USDX.FX | | | | | 100.4844 | | 前收 | 100.9372 | 开盘 | | 100.9347 | | -0.4528 - | -0.45% | 菜田 | 100 ...
中金 | 特朗普“大重置”:债务化解、脱虚向实、美元贬值
中金点睛· 2025-03-20 23:24
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential economic and financial implications of Trump's "Great Reset," focusing on the need to address wealth inequality and high government debt through a rebalancing of capital structures and inflationary measures [3][4]. Group 1: Trump's Economic Framework - Trump is seen as attempting to tackle two fundamental issues: the significant wealth gap and the historically high government debt burden [3][4]. - The "Great Reset" aims to adjust the relationship between industrial and financial capital, promoting a shift from financialization to re-industrialization [4][18]. - Without substantial productivity improvements, the policy path is likely to lead to global capital rebalancing, inflationary pressures, dollar depreciation, and financial repression [4][31]. Group 2: Debt and Financial Market Dynamics - The U.S. government debt held by the public is approaching 100% of GDP and is projected to rise to 117% over the next decade, with a persistent deficit rate around 6% [22][26]. - The article highlights the potential for liquidity "drain" and increased volatility in financial markets following the resolution of the debt ceiling, which could trigger risks for high-leverage and credit investors [4][28]. - The anticipated supply shock of U.S. Treasury bonds post-debt ceiling resolution may lead to rising interest rates and liquidity challenges, exacerbating risks in the credit market [28][30]. Group 3: Market Outlook and Asset Reallocation - The article predicts the end of the "U.S. exceptionalism" narrative in the stock market since 2012, with European and emerging markets, particularly China, poised for a trend revaluation [5][39]. - A shift in market style is expected, favoring sectors representing industrial capital such as industrials, materials, energy, and consumer goods over those representing financial capital [5][36]. - The article suggests that the valuation of U.S. stocks may decline, with a transition towards value-oriented investments outperforming growth stocks [36][39]. Group 4: Implications for Global Capital Flows - The "Great Reset" is likely to lead to a rebalancing of global capital flows, with a potential outflow from U.S. assets as the dollar weakens [33][39]. - The article emphasizes that the depreciation of the dollar may manifest more significantly against a basket of physical assets, including commodities and strategic resources [33][34]. - Emerging markets, especially China, are expected to benefit from a weaker dollar, which could enhance local demand and attract foreign investment [39].