本报记者 葛孟超 外部形势依然复杂严峻，主要经济体利率调整幅度和节奏还有不确定性，地缘政治冲击可能持续存在， 对汇率走势会有一定的扰动。邹澜表示，人民币汇率预计将继续双向浮动、保持弹性。 《 人民日报 》( 2026年01月24日 02 版) 1月23日，中国人民银行授权中国外汇交易中心公布，当日银行间外汇市场人民币汇率中间价为1美元对 人民币6.9929元，相较前一交易日中间价7.0019，调升90个基点，创下2023年5月以来的新高。 当日，离岸、在岸人民币对美元汇率双双升值。2025年末，离岸、在岸人民币对美元汇率相继破"7"， 目前维持在"7"的上方运行。 中国邮政储蓄银行研究员娄飞鹏表示，这反映出人民币汇率在内外因素共振下呈现阶段性走强态势，这 一变化是市场供求、政策引导与外部环境协同作用的结果。"2026年影响人民币汇率涨跌的因素同时存 在。"中银证券全球首席经济学家管涛说。 此前在国务院新闻办新闻发布会上，中国人民银行副行长邹澜表示，向前看，中国具有超大规模市场和 完整产业链，科技创新和产业创新加速融合，新动能蓬勃发展，内需潜力不断释放，国内国际双循环更 加畅通，宏观经济基本面长期向好，这对人民 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the unethical practices of real estate agents, including hiring "actors" to create false demand and pressure sellers into quick transactions, which has led to public outrage and skepticism towards the industry [1][9][10]. Group 1: Industry Practices - Some second-hand housing agents recruit "actors" on social media to view properties and create a false sense of urgency for sellers [1][9]. - An example is provided where an "actor" offered a significantly lower price than the listing, causing the seller to leave in anger [2][5]. - The article discusses the prevalence of such deceptive practices in the real estate industry, indicating that many buyers and sellers have experienced similar issues [3][4]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The article notes that real estate agents often shift their stance based on market conditions, currently favoring buyers due to a surplus of listings compared to potential buyers [18][20]. - It explains that during market downturns, agents are more likely to assist buyers in negotiating lower prices, as buyers have become scarce [23][22]. - The article suggests that agents are primarily motivated by commission and are more concerned with transaction volume than the actual price fluctuations of properties [17][21]. Group 3: Public Sentiment - The public's anger is directed towards agents, with many blaming them for the decline in property prices, reflecting a broader frustration with the market [10][11]. - The article mentions that sellers often fail to accept market realities, leading them to attribute price drops to "black agents" or "malicious buyers" [30][32]. - It highlights a disconnect between sellers' expectations and market conditions, with many sellers believing that collective action can maintain property values [31][32].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that in July, the consumer price index (CPI) for residents turned from a decline to an increase, driven by rising prices in services and industrial consumer goods, indicating positive changes in market supply and demand [1][2] - The core CPI, which excludes food and energy, increased by 0.8% year-on-year in July, marking a 0.1 percentage point rise from the previous month, and has shown a continuous upward trend for three months [1][3] - The increase in core CPI is attributed to effective implementation of consumption-boosting policies, gradual release of consumption potential, and steady progress in building a unified domestic market, which collectively promote price recovery [1][2] Group 2 - The overall stability of consumer prices in July reflects positive changes, although the market still faces strong supply and weak demand, leading to low price levels [2] - Factors contributing to the reasonable recovery of overall price levels include the expansion of domestic demand and the deepening of the national unified market construction [2] - Seasonal factors such as the peak travel season in summer have led to significant increases in transportation-related service prices, contributing to the rise in service prices [3]