平台规则

Search documents
让家长扇孩子耳光才退款?平台规则不能践踏人性与法律
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-20 13:25
平台放任此类玩法,是将自身利益建立在用户非理性消费的基础之上,是一种危险的商业模式。 "让家长扇孩子5分钟耳光"与"福袋赌博"都反映了同一个问题:平台在追逐流量与利润的过程中,放弃 了应有的价值判断与监管责任。前者是对人性尊严的漠视,后者是对法律红线的试探。两者共同指向一 种畸形的"规则观",只要能促成交易、增加活跃度,任何手段都可以被包装成"规则"或"玩法"。 平台对卖家单方面设置的"扇耳光视频"等侮辱性条款未作审核,放任其成为阻碍退款的工具。更关键的 是,平台客服未启动调查程序,仅以"协商"敷衍,实质是逃避管理责任。当卖家以伤害儿童作为退款条 件,平台默许此类条款存在,已涉嫌违反《未成年人保护法》中关于禁止侵害未成年人身心健康的规 定。 更深层的问题在于,该平台对"福袋"这类玩法的长期纵容。此类设计的核心,不是提供商品价值,而是 利用对人们攀比心理的诱导,制造不确定的奖励预期,诱导用户产生冲动消费甚至沉迷行为。对于心智 尚未成熟的未成年人而言,这种风险尤为巨大。 近日,11岁女孩母亲李云向媒体爆料,其孩子在千岛App购买500多元卡牌后申请退款,被要求上传一 段"家长狂扇孩子耳光5分钟"的视频,且必须有清 ...
让创新窒息的苹果App Store竞价排名
Tai Mei Ti A P P· 2025-06-06 06:38
Core Viewpoint - Apple, once a pioneer of innovation, now faces challenges in balancing platform rules with the innovation ecosystem, particularly through its App Store's paid ranking mechanism [1][4][10] Group 1: Impact on Developers - The introduction of paid search ads in the App Store has led to a situation where developers must pay to achieve visibility, disadvantaging smaller companies and independent developers who lack marketing budgets [1][2][4] - The App Store's ranking system has transformed into a survival game, where developers are forced to participate in costly advertising to gain exposure, leading to a decline in innovation [3][4][7] - The concentration of traffic towards larger companies with substantial advertising budgets has made it increasingly difficult for smaller innovators to compete, resulting in a loss of diversity in the app ecosystem [7][9][10] Group 2: Ecosystem and User Experience - The App Store's current model compromises user experience by prioritizing paid advertisements over organic search results, which can mislead users and diminish the quality of app discovery [2][4][10] - The shift towards a pay-to-play model has eroded the original value proposition of the App Store as a platform for innovation, where quality and user feedback once determined success [9][12] - The ecosystem is at risk of collapse if the platform continues to extract more value than it provides to innovators, as evidenced by the increasing frustration among developers [11][12] Group 3: Future Considerations - There is a call for Apple to reform its App Store policies to ensure fairer distribution of traffic and visibility for all developers, particularly those creating original applications [12][13] - The need for a balance between commercial interests and social responsibility is emphasized, as the future of innovation may depend on how platforms like Apple adapt to support smaller developers [11][12] - The potential for groundbreaking applications remains, but they risk being overlooked in the current competitive landscape dominated by advertising budgets [13]