证券日报网讯12月29日，旗滨集团（601636）在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，公司放弃优先购买权 主要基于三方面战略考量：一是审慎应对行业周期性调整，主动放缓大额收购、留存现金为产业发展预 留空间并做好行业波动应对；二是引入具备"产业投资经验+资源网络+政策协同"三重优势的战略伙伴 东方资产，旨在为旗滨光能带来治理、资源、资本和政策等多维度赋能，破解发展制约；三是实现集团 整体价值最大化，通过构建"集团聚焦核心、子公司借力发展"的协同格局，从整体上提升集团长期竞争 力与股东回报水平，而非弱化对子公司的核心掌控。 ...

美国的大米种植者在白宫的一次会议上，向特朗普提出投诉，表示他们在波多黎各的市场被印度、泰国 甚至中国抢走了。特朗普听到这个问题后，立刻转头质问财政部长贝森特：印度是不是免关税了？还没 有等贝森特回应，特朗普就打断他，继续质问：为什么允许印度这样做？他们应该缴关税，怎么可能让 大米免税？当时，气氛顿时变得紧张。虽然涉及的国家有几个，但特朗普的焦点完全放在了印度，毫不 留情地追问关税问题和贸易协议的执行情况，仿佛是在现场制定规则。 许多人对此感到困惑，认为中国这次怎么没有被批评？实际上，背后有着更深层次的逻辑，这一切远比 表面看起来复杂。特朗普选择印度而非中国，实际上是对实力的排序问题。他知道谁能反击他，谁能承 受他的压力，而中国早已不再是一个可以随便指责的对象。 这场农业座谈会发生在2025年12月8日。美国的一家大米公司在会上抱怨，波多黎各的市场份额正在被 印度、泰国和中国蚕食。特朗普听到后立刻问财政部长贝森特，是否印度的关税被免除。贝森特尚未回 答时，特朗普便打断并继续询问，为什么印度能这么做，难道大米可以免税吗？现场气氛显得紧张而严 肃。 印度方面对此反应强烈，认为自己与中国做的事情相同，凭什么只针对他们 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses why the United States, despite its military and economic power, does not seek to annex neighboring countries Canada and Mexico, highlighting the complexities and costs associated with such actions [1][16]. Group 1: Military and Strategic Considerations - Modern warfare has evolved, making direct annexation of countries through military force increasingly complex and challenging [3][6]. - Canada and Mexico are not easily conquerable due to their significant military capabilities and large populations, which would pose substantial challenges for the U.S. [4][8]. - The potential costs of war with these countries would be enormous, including high casualties and resource depletion, even for a military superpower like the U.S. [8][10]. Group 2: Political and Cultural Challenges - Annexing Canada and Mexico would involve intricate political, economic, and cultural integration, which is significantly more difficult with larger nations [6][12]. - The cultural differences between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico could exacerbate existing social tensions within the U.S., making integration problematic [12][16]. Group 3: Economic and Humanitarian Implications - A conflict with Canada and Mexico could lead to a massive refugee crisis, placing additional strain on U.S. resources and social systems [11][12]. - The U.S. can achieve its economic goals through non-military means, such as financial strategies and influence, making military annexation unnecessary [13][16].