特朗普政策反复，中方280亿静悄悄撤，美国金融命门被慢刀割开？ 最近有种分析是这样的，特朗普反倒成为了其领导班子中最不鹰派的人，那么这样分析合理吗？又有什么样的依据？ 其实，之所以有这样的分析，是因为特朗普如今一段时间对华的态度和之前大相径庭。 那么，为什么一下子美国就同意英伟达向中国出口他们的H20AI芯片，是想要换取中国在稀土领域的更大便利？还是想在8月12日之前尽早与中国开始第 三次的谈判？ 其实，这两个原因都是，美国既希望中国能扩大对他们的稀土出口，也希望能够与中国尽快进行第三的谈判。 所以，美国财长贝森特才会在7月15日的时候表示，"原定于下个月的中美关税战的休战截止日期具有灵活性"。 自从，中美两国就稀土、关税问题达成协议之后，特朗普政府对华的态度确实软化了许多。 对二十多个国家加征关税的名单里没有中国，而且他们还对中国解除了好几种禁令，最早是取消了对C919发动机的断供，也解除了对乙烷出口限制的禁 令，而最近便是允许英伟达向中国出口H20的芯片。 要知道，在6月份的时候，美国就将限制英伟达高端芯片出口到中国，视为他们对中国态度强硬的证据。 然而，该法案签署以后，特朗普又恢复了以往对中国的抹黑和指 ...

Group 1 - The European Parliament passed a resolution condemning China's restrictions on rare earth exports, highlighting China's "quasi-monopoly" in the sector and its significant market influence [1] - The resolution received overwhelming support with 523 votes in favor, 75 against, and 14 abstentions, indicating strong political consensus in Europe against China's trade practices [1] Group 2 - China's EU delegation expressed strong dissatisfaction and urged the European Parliament to refrain from politicizing trade and economic issues, advocating for a rational and pragmatic approach to cooperation [4] - Since May 13, the U.S. has adopted a tough stance on China's rare earth issues, with some progress in negotiations, but U.S. rare earth magnet manufacturers still face low approval rates for exports [4] - Europe has begun to emulate U.S. strategies, initiating investigations into Chinese electric vehicles and banning Chinese companies from participating in EU public procurement projects exceeding 5 million euros [5] Group 3 - China has responded to European pressure with countermeasures, including new policies that exclude EU companies from participating in government procurement for medical devices over 45 million yuan [5] - The article suggests that Europe misjudges its position in the trade conflict, believing it can pressure China without facing repercussions, which may lead to strategic miscalculations [5][7] Group 4 - Both Europe and China share similar positions regarding the rare earth issue, with China's export restrictions seen as a strategic response to U.S. and European sanctions on its high-tech sectors [11] - China's advancements in rare earth processing technology have allowed it to achieve high purity levels and efficiency, reinforcing its dominant position in the market [11] Group 5 - The article references past conflicts, such as the 2010 rare earth dispute between China and Japan, to illustrate the cyclical nature of trade tensions and the potential for retaliatory measures [12] - It emphasizes that while Europe expresses frustration, it must demonstrate genuine commitment and financial investment to achieve fair trade with China [14]

前言 7月3日，特朗普在去艾奥瓦州的路上突然放话，明天起每天给10个国家发关税账单。 可这场席卷170国的征税大戏里，中国却神奇地"消失"了，连90天缓冲期都没熬完就翻脸。 这葫芦里到底卖的啥药？中国怎么就成了这场加税风暴里的唯一幸免者？ 说翻脸就翻脸的政策大变脸 90天变1天，特朗普不装了，这变脸速度，比川剧还快，7月4日起，美国真的开始天天发信催税了，每天10个国家，像发传单一样，告诉你该交多少钱，到 了8月1日，就要见真金白银，这节奏，比讨债公司还专业。 要知道，4月2日那会儿，特朗普还摆出一副"咱们好好谈"的姿态，什么"对等关税"，什么90天宽限期，听起来还挺人性化，各国政府也真信了，派出贸易代 表团，准备材料，想着能谈个好价钱。 这份170国的税单可不是闹着玩的，欧盟得交20%，印度26%，日本24%。连一向跟美国关系不错的盟友，这次也一个都跑不了，什么北约伙伴，什么特殊关 系，到了收钱的时候，一律按价格表来。 结果呢？7月3日直接下最后通牒，连谈判桌都不要了，就一句话：交钱。 更绝的是，美国海关现在都开始招兵买马了，据说要增聘数千名关税稽查员，连区块链技术都用上了，就怕有人偷跑漏税，这架势，像要打 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the intensifying trade conflict initiated by the U.S., with President Trump planning to notify over 170 countries about impending tariffs, indicating a shift towards a more aggressive trade stance [1][3][10] - The U.S. has only successfully negotiated agreements with the UK and Vietnam, with both countries accepting tariffs of 10% and 20% respectively, showcasing the slow progress in negotiations with other nations [1][3] - Trump’s frustration with the slow negotiation process has led him to opt for a direct communication method, sending approximately 10 letters daily to inform countries of their respective tariff rates [1][3] Group 2 - The potential tariff rates for countries could range from 20% to 30%, with Japan facing threats of 30% to 35% tariffs due to stalled negotiations on key issues like rice and automobiles [3][7] - The European Union has taken a hardline stance, demanding the U.S. lift existing tariffs before any agreements can be made, while also preparing for potential retaliatory measures [3][10] - The passage of the "Big and Beautiful Act" has emboldened Trump’s tariff policies, as it aims to fill the fiscal gap created by tax cuts and increased government spending through tariff revenues [4][5][7] Group 3 - The U.S. has made recent moves to ease restrictions on exports to China, indicating a potential de-escalation in the trade war, contrasting with the aggressive tariff strategy towards other nations [8] - The imposition of tariffs is expected to raise export costs for countries closely trading with the U.S., potentially harming their economic growth and employment [10] - While tariffs may temporarily boost U.S. fiscal revenues, they could lead to higher consumer prices and inflation in the long run, negatively impacting American consumers [10]

Group 1 - The article discusses the provocative remarks made by U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin during the Shangri-La Dialogue, asserting that "the U.S. can defeat China" despite recent agreements on tariffs and trade issues [1][10][12] - Following Austin's comments, three other U.S. ministers also expressed anti-China sentiments, indicating a coordinated effort to challenge China's position [3][12][18] - The U.S. government's actions, including the imposition of high tariffs on 180 countries and regions, have led to significant backlash from China, resulting in a deterioration of U.S. economic conditions rather than the intended economic recovery [6][22] Group 2 - The U.S. Secretary of Commerce criticized China for allegedly delaying trade commitments, while the Secretary of the Treasury emphasized reducing U.S. dependency on Chinese resources and technology [14][16] - The article highlights the U.S. ministers' focus on portraying China as a threat in various sectors, including education and technology, which reflects a broader strategy of economic and ideological confrontation [18][20] - China's response to the U.S. actions has been one of strong opposition, emphasizing its commitment to enhancing its own capabilities and warning the U.S. against escalating tensions [22][25][27]