风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 10月15日，港股消费ETF易方达（513070）涨2.44%，成交额4628.65万元。当日份额减少600.00万份， 最新份额为5.78亿份，近20个交易日份额增加500.00万份。最新资产净值计算值为8.19亿元。 港股消费ETF易方达（513070）业绩比较基准为中证港股通消费主题指数收益率(使用估值汇率折算)， 管理人为易方达基金管理有限公司，基金经理为刘树荣，成立（2022-03-14）以来回报为41.72%，近一 个月回报为-1.01%。 来源：新浪基金∞工作室 ...

Group 1 - Hong Kong stocks strengthened today, with technology-related concepts such as semiconductors, integrated circuits, and chips leading the gains [1] - As of the market close, the CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet Index rose by 2.3%, the Hang Seng Technology Index increased by 2.1%, and the Hang Seng Hong Kong Stock Connect New Economy Index climbed by 1.9% [1] - The CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Medical and Health Comprehensive Index and the CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Consumer Theme Index both rose by 1.8% [1] Group 2 - According to Wind data, as of last Friday, the net inflow for the E Fund Hang Seng Technology ETF (513010) exceeded 4 billion yuan in the past month, ranking first among similar ETFs [1] - The Hang Seng New Economy ETF tracks the Hang Seng Hong Kong Stock Connect New Economy Index, which consists of the 50 largest stocks in "new economy" sectors within the Stock Connect range [2] - The Hang Seng Technology ETF tracks the Hang Seng Technology Index, composed of the 30 largest stocks highly related to technology, with over 90% of the index comprising information technology and consumer discretionary sectors [2] Group 3 - The Hang Seng Medical ETF tracks the CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Medical and Health Comprehensive Index, which includes 50 highly liquid and large-cap stocks in the healthcare sector, accounting for over 90% of the index [2] - The Hang Seng Internet ETF tracks the CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet Index, consisting of stocks from 30 leading internet companies, primarily in information technology and consumer discretionary sectors [2] - The Hang Seng Consumer ETF tracks the CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Consumer Theme Index, which includes 50 large-cap consumer stocks, with nearly 60% in consumer discretionary [3]

9月24日，港股消费ETF（159735）涨1.84%，成交额7239.83万元。当日份额减少700.00万份，最新份额 为9.52亿份，近20个交易日份额增加5300.00万份。最新资产净值计算值为8.47亿元。 来源：新浪基金∞工作室 港股消费ETF（159735）业绩比较基准为经估值汇率调整的中证港股通消费主题指数收益率，管理人为 银华基金管理股份有限公司，基金经理为李宜璇，成立（2021-05-25）以来回报为-11.01%，近一个月 回报为4.95%。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 ...

Group 1: Core Insights - The report analyzes the fund flow of exchange-traded index funds from September 15 to September 19, 2025, highlighting significant trends in various categories [1][2]. - The overall fund flow indicates a mixed performance across different index categories, with notable outflows in major indices like the Shanghai Composite and CSI 300 [6][7]. Group 2: Fund Flow by Category - The Shanghai 50 index had a fund size of 159.46 billion yuan, with a weekly decline of 1.71% and a net outflow of 5.98 billion yuan [6]. - The CSI 300 index, with a fund size of 983.45 billion yuan, experienced a slight decline of 0.39% and a significant net outflow of 33.92 billion yuan [6]. - The ChiNext index showed a positive trend with a weekly increase of 2.17% and a net inflow of 5.76 billion yuan, indicating investor interest in growth sectors [6]. - In the technology sector, the large technology category saw a fund size of 216.69 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 2.20% and a substantial net inflow of 58.01 billion yuan [7]. - The large financial category faced a decline of 3.20% with a net inflow of 140.61 billion yuan, suggesting a shift in investor sentiment [7]. Group 3: Sector Performance - The healthcare sector had a fund size of 100.16 billion yuan, with a weekly decline of 2.11% and a modest net inflow of 5.94 billion yuan, reflecting cautious investor behavior [7]. - The manufacturing sector reported a fund size of 72.82 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 2.19% and a net inflow of 64.79 billion yuan, indicating resilience in this area [7]. - The consumer sector showed a slight decline of 0.24% with a net inflow of 32.55 billion yuan, suggesting mixed investor confidence [7]. Group 4: International Indices - The Nasdaq 100 index had a fund size of 78.42 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 1.84% and a net outflow of 0.67 billion yuan, indicating fluctuating investor interest [11]. - The S&P 500 index reported a fund size of 20.84 billion yuan, with a slight increase of 0.50% and a net inflow of 0.77 billion yuan, reflecting stable performance [11]. - The Hang Seng index had a fund size of 19.17 billion yuan, with a weekly increase of 0.40% and a net outflow of 3.72 billion yuan, suggesting challenges in the Hong Kong market [11].

1. Report Information - Report Title: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds - Data Date: September 8 - 12, 2025 - Research Institution: Great Wall Securities Industrial Finance Research Institute - Analyst: Jin Ling - Report Date: September 17, 2025 [1] 2. Core View - The report presents the capital flow, fund scale, and weekly price change data of various exchange-traded index funds from September 8 - 12, 2025, covering comprehensive, industry theme, style strategy, enterprise nature, regional, QDII, bond, commodity, and index-enhanced funds. 3. Summary by Category Comprehensive Index Funds - **Fund Performance**: The Shanghai Composite 50 had a fund scale of 15.9456 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 0.99%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 394 million yuan; the CSI 300 had a scale of 98.3449 billion yuan, a rise of 1.51%, and an outflow of 4.095 billion yuan; the CSI 500 had a scale of 14.012 billion yuan, a 3.41% increase, and an inflow of 1.174 billion yuan [6]. Industry Theme Index Funds - **Sector Performance**: The large technology sector had a fund scale of 21.6688 billion yuan, a 5.13% increase, and an outflow of 6.616 billion yuan; the large finance sector had a scale of 12.8483 billion yuan, a 0.92% rise, and an inflow of 11.468 billion yuan; the large health sector had a scale of 10.0161 billion yuan, a 0.50% decline, and an inflow of 6.432 billion yuan [7]. Style Strategy Index Funds - **Style Performance**: The dividend style had a fund scale of 5.9877 billion yuan, a 1.01% increase, and an inflow of 633 million yuan; the growth style had a scale of 730.6 million yuan, a 3.02% increase, and an outflow of 252 million yuan; the value style had a scale of 330.8 million yuan, a 1.11% increase, and an outflow of 102 million yuan [9]. QDII Index Funds - **Overseas Market Performance**: The Nasdaq 100 had a fund scale of 7.8421 billion yuan, a 0.73% increase, and an outflow of 197 million yuan; the S&P 500 had a scale of 2.0837 billion yuan, a 0.69% increase, and an outflow of 38 million yuan; the German DAX had a scale of 975 million yuan, a 0.43% decline, and an inflow of 101 million yuan [11]. Bond Index Funds - **Bond Type Performance**: The 30-year bond had a fund scale of 896.9 million yuan, a 1.18% decline, and an inflow of 149 million yuan; the 10-year bond had a scale of 409 million yuan, a 0.20% decline, and no net inflow; the 5 - 10-year bond had a scale of 3.8952 billion yuan, a 0.26% decline, and an outflow of 302 million yuan [12]. Commodity Index Funds - **Commodity Performance**: Gold had a fund scale of 7.0887 billion yuan, a 2.33% increase, and an inflow of 2.095 billion yuan; soybean meal had a scale of 419.3 million yuan, a 0.75% increase, and an inflow of 12 million yuan; non-ferrous metals had a scale of 74.5 million yuan, a 1.40% increase, and an inflow of 7.7 million yuan [12]. Index-Enhanced Funds - **Index Enhancement Performance**: The Shanghai Composite 50 index-enhanced fund had a scale of 76 million yuan, a 0.99% increase, and no net inflow; the CSI 300 had a scale of 320.9 million yuan, a 1.30% increase, and an outflow of 108 million yuan; the CSI 500 had a scale of 197.8 million yuan, a 2.72% increase, and an inflow of 21.6 million yuan [12].

风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 来源：新浪基金∞工作室 9月11日，港股消费ETF易方达（513070）跌0.28%，成交额4149.58万元。当日份额减少300.00万份，最 新份额为5.67亿份，近20个交易日份额增加7600.00万份。最新资产净值计算值为7.92亿元。 港股消费ETF易方达（513070）业绩比较基准为中证港股通消费主题指数收益率(使用估值汇率折算)， 管理人为易方达基金管理有限公司，基金经理为刘树荣，成立（2022-03-14）以来回报为39.70%，近一 个月回报为4.91%。 ...

Report Information - Report Title: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds [1] - Data Date: August 18 - 22, 2025 [1] - Analyst: Jin Ling [1] - Report Date: August 28, 2025 [1] Core Findings Domestic Passive Equity Funds - Different index funds showed varying performance in terms of fund size, weekly returns, and net weekly capital inflows. For example, the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 index fund had a size of 983.449 billion yuan, a weekly return of 4.27%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 34.74 billion yuan; while the ChiNext Index fund had a size of 126.448 billion yuan, a weekly return of 5.81%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 22.61 billion yuan [4]. Overseas Index Funds - International index funds also had diverse performance. The Nasdaq 100 index fund had a size of 78.421 billion yuan, a weekly return of -3.08%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 7.78 billion yuan; the S&P 500 index fund had a size of 20.837 billion yuan, a weekly return of -1.63%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 1.44 billion yuan [5]. Bond Funds - Bond funds had different performance based on factors such as maturity and credit rating. The 30 - year bond fund had a size of 8.969 billion yuan, a weekly return of -1.25%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 59.60 billion yuan; the short - term financing bond fund had a size of 29.341 billion yuan, a weekly return of 0.01%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 28.50 billion yuan [6]. Commodity Funds - Commodity funds, including gold, soybean meal, and others, also had distinct performance. The gold fund had a size of 70.887 billion yuan, a weekly return of -0.29%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.94 billion yuan; the energy and chemical fund had a size of 2.93 billion yuan, a weekly return of 0.76%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.88 billion yuan [6]. Index - Enhanced Funds - Index - enhanced funds based on different indices had different performance. The CSI 500 index - enhanced fund had a size of 1.978 billion yuan, a weekly return of 3.76%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.12 billion yuan; the ChiNext Index - enhanced fund had a size of 0.469 billion yuan, a weekly return of 5.46%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.04 billion yuan [6].

Group 1 - The Hong Kong consumer sector showed positive performance in early trading, with new consumption "three sisters" continuing to rise, including Pop Mart up over 1%, and Lao Pu Gold up 0.6% [1] - The CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Consumer Theme Index (931454) rose by 1.21%, with notable increases in stocks such as Yu Wen Group up 7.00%, Kuaishou-W up 6.07%, and Budweiser APAC up 3.80% [1] - The Hong Kong Consumer ETF (513590) increased by 1.18%, marking a three-day consecutive rise, with the latest price at 0.95 HKD [2] Group 2 - Tmall reported that during the first phase of the 618 shopping festival, the total transaction amount for home appliances, digital products, and other categories participating in national subsidies increased by 283% compared to last year's Double 11 [2] - JD.com indicated that over 500 million consumers placed orders during its shopping season, with nearly 80,000 brands seeing their transaction amounts double year-on-year [2] - Yu Wen Group announced plans to acquire a 26.67% stake in the animation production company Yihua Kaitian for 325 million RMB, increasing its total stake to approximately 31.48% [2] Group 3 - As of May 30, 2025, the top ten weighted stocks in the CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Consumer Theme Index (931454) accounted for 76.06% of the index, including Alibaba-W, Tencent Holdings, Xiaomi Group-W, and Meituan-W [3]

Report Overview - Report name: Weekly Report on Capital Flows of Exchange-Traded Index Funds - Data date: May 26 - May 30, 2025 - Report date: June 3, 2025 - Analyst: Jin Ling - Analyst's certificate number: S1070521040001 [1] 1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Report's Core View - Not explicitly stated in the given content 3. Summary by Related Catalogs Domestic Passive Stock Funds - Different concepts have varying fund scales, weekly price changes, and net weekly capital inflows. For example, the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 has a large fund scale of 9834.49 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 0.81%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 22.15 billion yuan; the ChiNext Index has a scale of 1264.48 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 1.00%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 12.57 billion yuan [4]. Overseas - Related Index Funds - Overseas indexes also show different performance. The Nasdaq 100 has a fund scale of 784.21 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 1.18%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.55 billion yuan; the Hong Kong Stock Technology concept has a scale of 926.09 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 1.45%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.28 billion yuan [5]. Other Types of Index Funds - Bond funds: Different maturities and types of bonds have different performance. For example, 30 - year bonds have a scale of 89.69 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 0.32%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 8.64 billion yuan; 5 - year - below bonds have a scale of 227.25 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 0.02%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 16.65 billion yuan. - Commodity funds: Gold funds have a scale of 708.87 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 1.11%, and a net weekly capital outflow of 0.95 billion yuan. - Index - enhanced funds: Different indexes also show different performance. For example, the CSI 1000 index - enhanced fund has a scale of 6.56 billion yuan, a weekly increase of 0.87%, and a net weekly capital inflow of 0.18 billion yuan [6].

Group 1: Report Information - Report Title: Transactional Index Fund Capital Flow Weekly Report [1] - Data Date: May 19 - May 23, 2025 [1] - Analyst: Jin Ling [1] - Report Date: May 29, 2025 [1] Group 2: Domestic Passive Stock Funds - **Comprehensive Category**: - Funds like Shanghai Composite 50 had a scale of 159.456 billion yuan, a weekly decline of 0.09%, and a net capital outflow of 912 million yuan; CSI 300 had a scale of 983.449 billion yuan, a decline of 0.04%, and an outflow of 2.504 billion yuan; CSI 500 had a scale of 140.12 billion yuan, a decline of 0.81%, and an outflow of 624 million yuan; CSI 1000 had a scale of 116.917 billion yuan, a decline of 1.09%, and an outflow of 1.163 billion yuan; ChiNext Index had a scale of 126.448 billion yuan, a decline of 0.79%, and an outflow of 1.876 billion yuan; STAR Market and ChiNext 50 had a scale of 32.965 billion yuan, a decline of 0.94%, and an outflow of 59 million yuan; STAR 50 had a scale of 181.221 billion yuan, a decline of 1.28%, and an inflow of 1.227 billion yuan; STAR 100 had a scale of 25.701 billion yuan, a decline of 1.28%, and an inflow of 237 million yuan; STAR 200 had a scale of 547 million yuan, a decline of 1.31%, and no net inflow; A50 had a scale of 36.101 billion yuan, an increase of 0.24%, and an outflow of 741 million yuan; A500 had a scale of 198.099 billion yuan, a decline of 0.10%, and an outflow of 4.363 billion yuan; Hang Seng Index had a scale of 6.723 billion yuan, an increase of 0.38%, and an inflow of 14 million yuan; Hang Seng China Enterprises Index had a scale of 915 million yuan, an increase of 0.71%, and an outflow of 1 million yuan; Others had a scale of 129.449 billion yuan, a decline of 0.20%, and an outflow of 1.715 billion yuan [4]. - **Industry - Theme Category**: - Big Technology funds had a scale of 216.688 billion yuan, a decline of 1.56%, and an outflow of 375 million yuan; Big Finance had a scale of 128.483 billion yuan, a decline of 1.15%, and an inflow of 1.136 billion yuan; Big Health had a scale of 100.161 billion yuan, an increase of 2.41%, and an outflow of 4.06 billion yuan; Big Manufacturing had a scale of 72.818 billion yuan, a decline of 1.03%, and an inflow of 2.928 billion yuan; Big Consumption had a scale of 56.089 billion yuan, a decline of 0.09%, and an outflow of 45.5 million yuan; Big Cycle had a scale of 21.416 billion yuan, an increase of 0.35%, and an inflow of 137 million yuan; Public Utilities had a scale of 6.614 billion yuan, a decline of 0.05%, and an outflow of 6.5 million yuan; Carbon Neutrality had a scale of 13.051 billion yuan, an increase of 0.21%, and an outflow of 9.8 million yuan; State - owned Enterprise Reform had a scale of 61 million yuan, a decline of 0.68%, and no net inflow; Others had a scale of 74.2 million yuan, an increase of 0.24%, and an outflow of 200,000 yuan [4]. - **Style - Strategy Category**: - Dividend funds had a scale of 59.877 billion yuan, an increase of 0.90%, and an outflow of 56.9 million yuan; Growth had a scale of 7.306 billion yuan, a decline of 0.48%, and an inflow of 1.1 million yuan; Value had a scale of 3.308 billion yuan, an increase of 0.18%, and an outflow of 300,000 yuan; Dividend Low - Volatility had a scale of 43.535 billion yuan, an increase of 0.59%, and an inflow of 52.9 million yuan; Quality had a scale of 1.332 billion yuan, an increase of 0.27%, and an outflow of 30,000 yuan; Low - Volatility had a scale of 25.5 million yuan, a decline of 0.27%, and no net inflow; Others had a scale of 11.1 million yuan, a decline of 0.14%, and no net inflow [4]. - **Enterprise - Nature and Region Category**: - China Special Valuation had a scale of 51.633 billion yuan, an increase of 0.20%, and an outflow of 78.3 million yuan; Regional funds had a scale of 4.342 billion yuan, a decline of 0.07%, and an outflow of 300,000 yuan [4]. Group 3: Overseas - Related Funds - **Comprehensive Category**: - Nasdaq 100 had a scale of 78.421 billion yuan, a decline of 1.22%, and an outflow of 994 million yuan; S&P 500 had a scale of 20.837 billion yuan, a decline of 0.92%, and an outflow of 60 million yuan; Dow Jones had a scale of 1.708 billion yuan, a decline of 1.18%, and an outflow of 60 million yuan; German DAX had a scale of 975 million yuan, an increase of 1.19%, and an inflow of 44 million yuan; French CAC40 had a scale of 601 million yuan, an increase of 1.14%, and no net inflow; Nikkei 225 had a scale of 3.611 billion yuan, a decline of 0.41%, and an outflow of 8.2 million yuan; Tokyo Stock Price Index had a scale of 771 million yuan, an increase of 0.69%, and an outflow of 5.6 million yuan; Saudi Arabia had a scale of 540 million yuan, a decline of 1.86%, and an inflow of 6.2 million yuan; Hang Seng Index had a scale of 19.174 billion yuan, an increase of 0.45%, and an outflow of 7.7 million yuan; Hang Seng China Enterprises Index had a scale of 12.002 billion yuan, an increase of 0.54%, and an outflow of 6.9 million yuan; Others had a scale of 3.713 billion yuan, an increase of 0.10%, and an outflow of 11.5 million yuan [5]. - **Industry - Theme Category**: - Hong Kong Stock Technology had a scale of 92.609 billion yuan, a decline of 1.18%, and an outflow of 3.8 million yuan; Chinese Internet had a scale of 45.35 billion yuan, a decline of 1.13%, and an outflow of 25.4 million yuan; Hong Kong Stock Medical had a scale of 27.231 billion yuan, an increase of 5.49%, and an outflow of 239 million yuan; Hong Kong Stock Consumption had a scale of 968 million yuan, an increase of 0.04%, and an outflow of 9.8 million yuan; Others had a scale of 16.931 billion yuan, a decline of 0.95%, and an inflow of 6.2 million yuan [5]. - **Style - Strategy Category**: - Dividend had a scale of 1.269 billion yuan, an increase of 2.40%, and an inflow of 10.9 million yuan; Dividend Low - Volatility had a scale of 77.7 million yuan, an increase of 0.95%, and an inflow of 1.8 million yuan [5]. Group 4: Bond and Commodity Funds - **Bond Funds**: - **Interest - Rate Bonds**: 30 - year bonds had a scale of 8.969 billion yuan, an increase of 0.28%, and an inflow of 821 million yuan; 10 - year bonds had a scale of 4.09 billion yuan, an increase of 0.16%, and an inflow of 113 million yuan; 5 - 10 - year bonds had a scale of 38.952 billion yuan, an increase of 0.18%, and an inflow of 365 million yuan; 5 - year bonds had a scale of 6.948 billion yuan, an increase of 0.09%, and an inflow of 66 million yuan; Bonds under 5 - year had a scale of 22.725 billion yuan, an increase of 0.02%, and an outflow of 195 million yuan; Others had a scale of 371 million yuan, an increase of 0.10%, and an outflow of 2.8 million yuan [6]. - **Credit Bonds**: Medium - to - high - grade bonds had a scale of 10.916 billion yuan, an increase of 0.12%, and an inflow of 893 million yuan; Urban Investment Bonds had a scale of 13.817 billion yuan, an increase of 0.18%, and an inflow of 328 million yuan; Short - term Commercial Papers had a scale of 29.341 billion yuan, an increase of 0.03%, and an inflow of 1.707 billion yuan [6]. - **Convertible Bonds**: Had a scale of 43.859 billion yuan, an increase of 0.07%, and an outflow of 688 million yuan [6]. - **Commodity Funds**: - Gold had a scale of 70.887 billion yuan, an increase of 3.78%, and an outflow of 563 million yuan; Soybean Meal had a scale of 4.193 billion yuan, an increase of 0.84%, and an inflow of 11 million yuan; Non - ferrous Metals had a scale of 745 million yuan, a decline of 0.36%, and an inflow of 1.5 million yuan; Energy and Chemicals had a scale of 293 million yuan, a decline of 1.75%, and an outflow of 3 million yuan [6]. Group 5: Index - Enhanced Funds - Index - enhanced funds related to Shanghai Composite 50 had a scale of 76 million yuan, a decline of 0.38%, and no net inflow; CSI 300 had a scale of 3.209 billion yuan, an increase of 0.13%, and an outflow of 1.5 million yuan; CSI 500 had a scale of 1.978 billion yuan, a decline of 0.50%, and an outflow of 500,000 yuan; CSI 1000 had a scale of 656 million yuan, a decline of 0.97%, and an outflow of 70,000 yuan; ChiNext Index had a scale of 469 million yuan, a decline of 0.92%, and an outflow of 50,000 yuan; STAR Market and ChiNext 50 had a scale of 62 million yuan, a decline of 1.38%, and no net inflow; STAR 50 had a scale of 935 million yuan, a decline of 1.63%, and an inflow of 1.5 million yuan; STAR 100 had a scale of 317 million yuan, a decline of 1.49%, and an inflow of 10,000 yuan; Others had a scale of 194 million yuan, a decline of 0.70%, and an outflow of 90,000 yuan [6]