每经记者｜刘志远 每经编辑｜段炼 陈俊杰 42亿元 上市公司市值 常环武行罚〔2025〕49号 处罚书文号 2025年度已受罚次数 | 次 ~j本期所涉数据概览 涉及行业 涉及区域 上市公司 河景泉频 涉及股票 > 环境风险榜涉及上市公司分布情况 | | 建筑装饰 | 北京市 | | --- | --- | --- | | | 煤炭 | 山西省 | | 环境违法违规 | 有色金属 | 内蒙古自治区 | | | 电力设备 | 江苏省 | | | 公用事业 | 河北省 | | | 家用电器 | 广东省 | 未按规定对受托方的主体资格和技术能力进行审查核实，赤峰黄金（SH600988）控股公司被罚28.8万元；逃避监管排放大气污染物，吉鑫科技 （SH601218）控股公司被罚20万元⋯⋯ 一周绿鉴：赤峰黄金控股公司 未依法履行处置固废相关责任 在企业管理能力、财务状况、行业竞争等因素之外，环境风险日渐成为上市公司重要的经营风险之一。环境风险关乎企业发展，也关乎企业形象。 2025年8月第二周，哪些上市公司的环境保护与信披责任亮起了红灯？且看A股绿色周报第210期。 每日经济新闻联合环保领域知名NGO公众环境研究中心 ...

Core Viewpoint - In the first week of August 2025, ten listed companies in the A-share market were identified as having environmental risks, raising concerns about their environmental protection and disclosure responsibilities [1]. Group 1: Companies with Environmental Violations - Huaneng International's subsidiary, Huaneng Linxiang New Energy Co., was fined 200,000 yuan for failing to legally approve environmental documents and for operating without the necessary environmental protection facilities [2][3]. - Huaneng International's other subsidiary, Huaneng Hunan Yueyang Power Co., was fined 150,000 yuan for improper wastewater management and failure to implement effective dust control measures [4]. - The total fines imposed on Huaneng International's subsidiaries amounted to 350,000 yuan [4]. Group 2: Other Companies Facing Penalties - Haineng Energy Technology Co. faced a fine of 246,400 yuan due to its subsidiary, Daqing Sanju Energy Purification Co., illegally discharging pollutants through unauthorized pipes [5]. - Guoxuan High-Tech's subsidiary, Yifeng Guoxuan Lithium Industry Co., was fined 300,000 yuan for unauthorized storage of industrial solid waste [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - Recent environmental violations by several listed companies have raised concerns about their operational risks and responsibilities in environmental protection [2][3]. Group 1: Environmental Violations and Penalties - Jindalai's subsidiary, Jincen Water Co., was fined 280,000 yuan for discharging wastewater into the external environment due to improper modifications to drainage systems [3][4]. - Northern Rare Earth's subsidiary, Baotou Green Source, was fined 109,092 yuan for exceeding air pollutant discharge limits, specifically carbon monoxide [4][5]. - Chifeng Gold's subsidiary, Wulong Mining, was fined 246,000 yuan for commencing production without the necessary environmental protection facility approvals [7]. - Huadong's subsidiary, Quzhou Minxin Food Co., was fined 296,000 yuan for exceeding pollutant discharge limits and evading regulatory oversight [8]. Group 2: Impact on Shareholders and Market Perception - The environmental risks associated with these companies could potentially affect 1.2548 million shareholders, raising concerns about investment risks [3]. - The report highlights that environmental risks are becoming a significant aspect of operational risks for listed companies, impacting their development and public image [3].

Group 1 - The A-share market has seen a resurgence of environmental issues, with 10 listed companies penalized for violations related to excessive emissions and unapproved environmental facilities [1][3] - Guozhong Water Holdings' Taiyuan Haofeng Wastewater Treatment Co., Ltd. was fined 400,000 yuan for exceeding water pollutant discharge standards, with total nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen levels surpassing national limits [1][3] - Electric Power Investment Energy was fined 350,000 yuan for using environmental protection facilities that had not been approved, highlighting deficiencies in project management and compliance [2][3] Group 2 - Environmental risks are becoming a significant operational risk for listed companies, with 6 out of 10 penalized companies being state-owned enterprises, potentially affecting 887,300 shareholders [3] - The increasing emphasis on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investment principles is leading investors to prioritize companies' sustainable development capabilities [3] - Companies must enhance their environmental management and compliance levels to protect their brand image and investor confidence [5] Group 3 - The level of public disclosure regarding environmental regulatory information has improved, supported by legal frameworks that ensure citizens' rights to access environmental information [4] - The revised Environmental Protection Law emphasizes the importance of information disclosure and public participation in environmental protection [4]