Workflow
知识产权侵权
icon
Search documents
被指“未经授权用歼20形象”,理想汽车回应
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-09-26 08:48
9月26日,理想汽车相关负责人回应南都N视频记者称,已在收到函件图片后第一时间暂停相关宣传。 近日,理想汽车因在2025年长春航展的宣传海报中,未经授权使用中国航空工业集团有限公司(下 称"中航工业")"歼-20、歼-10、空警-500"等军机型号形象,引发争议。 中航工业方面发函要求理想汽车立即停所有侵权内容传播,并正式道歉。 据了解,近日,有消息称中国航空工业文化中心向理想汽车发送了《关于立即停止侵权行为的质询 函》。该中心是中国航空工业集团公司直管的功能性单位,负责中航工业以及所属业务单元的新闻宣 传、品牌授权和知识产权维护等工作。 质询函内容显示,该中心发现理想汽车为宣传推广"理想"品牌汽车发布海报,在未经其允许的情况下擅 自使用"歼-20、歼-10、空警-500"等多种飞机型号形象,并配以《与国同梦 与家同行》的宣传主题在多 个传播平台展示具有误导性内容。 中国航空工业文化中心表示,"理想汽车未经我方授权,擅自使用中航飞机型号形象进行广告宣传的行 为,侵犯了公司合法权益,误导了消费者的合法知情权,已经属于严重虚假宣传以及知识产权侵权行 为。"该中心要求理想汽车立即停止所有侵权内容传播,删除所有侵权内 ...
理想汽车被指“未经授权用歼20形象”!回应:已暂停宣传
Core Viewpoint - Recently, Li Auto faced controversy for using images of military aircraft such as "J-20, J-10, and KJ-500" in promotional materials for the 2025 Changchun Airshow without authorization from China Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC) [1][4] Group 1: Incident Details - AVIC's cultural center sent a letter to Li Auto demanding an immediate halt to all infringing content and a formal apology [4] - The promotional materials included misleading content with the theme "Dreaming with the Country, Walking with the Family" displayed on multiple platforms [4] - The cultural center stated that Li Auto's actions constituted serious false advertising and intellectual property infringement, misleading consumers' right to know [4] Group 2: Company Response - On September 26, a representative from Li Auto confirmed that the company had received the letter and promptly suspended the related promotional activities [5] - The company emphasized the importance of the issue and initiated contact with AVIC's brand management and cultural centers for verification [5] - AVIC is a state-owned enterprise established in 2008, managing over 100 subsidiaries and 26 listed companies across various sectors, including military and civil aviation [5]
理想汽车被指“未经授权用歼20形象”!回应称已暂停宣传
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-09-26 06:45
中国航空工业文化中心表示,"理想汽车未经我方授权,擅自使用中航飞机型号形象进行广告宣传的行 为,侵犯了公司合法权益,误导了消费者的合法知情权,已经属于严重虚假宣传以及知识产权侵权行 为。"该中心要求理想汽车立即停止所有侵权内容传播,删除所有侵权内容,并正式道歉,对外澄清双 方无联名宣传关系。 对此,9月26日,理想汽车相关负责人向南都记者表示,"此前确实通过非正式渠道收到了'中国航空工 业文化中心'的函件图片。鉴于涉及航空相关议题,公司高度重视,已在收到函件图片后第一时间暂停 相关宣传,并主动与'中航工业品牌运营管理中心'和'中国航空工业文化中心'建立联系沟通、开展核 实。" 中航工业官网显示,该公司是由中央管理的国有特大型企业,是国家授权的投资机构,于2008年11月6 日由原中国航空工业第一、第二集团公司重组整合而成立。集团公司设有航空武器装备、军用运输类飞 机、直升机、机载系统、通用航空、航空研究、飞行试验、航空供应链与军贸、专用装备、汽车零部 件、资产管理、金融、工程建设等产业,下辖100余家成员单位、26家上市公司。 相关海报。 据了解,近日,有消息称中国航空工业文化中心向理想汽车发送了《关于立即停 ...
理想汽车与“歼-20”同框海报惹争议!中航工业:已关注,正调查
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Li Auto's promotional materials featuring military aircraft has sparked significant discussion and led to an investigation by the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) regarding potential intellectual property infringement [1][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Li Auto released promotional posters during the 2025 Changchun Airshow that included images of military aircraft such as "J-20," "J-10," and "KJ-500," which has drawn public attention [1]. - AVIC has acknowledged the situation and is currently conducting an internal investigation into the matter [1]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Responses - A letter from the China Aviation Industry Cultural Center, dated September 20, demanded that Li Auto cease all infringing activities, remove the promotional content, and issue a public apology for unauthorized use of military aircraft images [3]. - Li Auto confirmed receipt of the letter and stated that it has paused the related promotional activities while initiating communication with AVIC regarding the concerns raised [3][4]. Group 3: Clarifications from Li Auto - Li Auto clarified that the promotional theme "With the Country's Dream, With the Family's Journey" was part of a collaboration with the Changchun Airshow and had been previously discussed with the event organizers [4]. - The company also noted that another image featuring "Li MEGA" was taken with permission from the airshow's operational service provider [4].
遭全球软件巨头起诉侵权 中望软件:对Autodesk主张不认可,将积极应诉
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-07-30 16:38
Core Viewpoint - The first design-oriented industrial software company listed on the A-share market, Zhongwang Software, is being sued by global software giant Autodesk for copyright infringement and other claims [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Autodesk has filed a lawsuit against Zhongwang Software and related parties in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, and breach of existing agreements [1][2]. - The lawsuit requests preliminary and permanent injunctions against Zhongwang Software and related parties, compensation for damages, and the destruction of infringing copies related to ZWCAD [2][3]. - Zhongwang Software has stated that it does not recognize Autodesk's claims and will actively respond to the lawsuit, although the specific amount involved in the case has not been clarified yet [1][3]. Group 2: Company Background - Zhongwang Software has been focused on industrial design software for over 20 years, developing a range of products including its own 2D and 3D CAD/CAM software, and has established a core technology and product matrix [3]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to research and innovation, asserting that all its developed software possesses independent intellectual property rights [3]. Group 3: Previous Legal Issues - This is not the first legal dispute between Autodesk and Zhongwang Software; Autodesk previously filed lawsuits in 2014 regarding alleged theft of AutoCAD source code used in the development of ZWCAD+ [4]. - A settlement was reached in November 2015 between Zhongwang Software and Autodesk regarding the earlier lawsuits [4].
茶咖日报|从LOGO到包装全面模仿,幸猫咖啡因侵权被判赔偿瑞幸500万
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-07-18 11:08
Group 1: Legal Issues in the Coffee Industry - Luckin Coffee won a trademark infringement case against Lucky Cat Coffee, resulting in a compensation of 5 million yuan [1][2] - The court found that the trademarks of Lucky Cat Coffee and Luckin Coffee were highly similar in appearance and visual effects, increasing the likelihood of confusion [2] - The infringing company, Hot Flow Company, was deemed to have acted with obvious malicious intent, profiting significantly from the infringement [2] Group 2: Strategic Partnerships and Sustainability Initiatives - Starbucks China announced a strategic partnership with Envision Group to develop a digital carbon management platform, aiming to cover 100% of its direct and indirect suppliers over the next three years [3] - The partnership will enhance sustainability practices in over 7,500 Starbucks stores, integrating smart IoT systems for real-time data tracking and energy efficiency [3] - Envision's solutions in the Starbucks Coffee Innovation Park include solar energy, smart storage, and digital carbon management systems to achieve energy savings and carbon reduction [3] Group 3: Market Expansion - Blue Bottle Coffee opened its first independent store in Southeast Asia at the Palais Renaissance shopping center in Singapore, following the success of its previous franchise [7] - The new store features a menu that includes Bella Donovan espresso drinks starting at 6.50 SGD, along with exclusive products like yogurt bowls and homemade waffles [7] Group 4: Environmental Restoration Efforts - Nestlé and Barry Callebaut announced a collaboration with Re.green to restore cocoa and coffee-growing regions in Brazil as part of their environmental restoration project [8][9] - The initiative aims to plant 11 million trees over 8,000 hectares, with Nestlé fully funding the Re.green project and covering 60% of Barry Callebaut's costs [9]
零食包装有方大同专辑封面涉嫌侵权?茶颜悦色致歉:全面下架
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-17 15:57
Group 1 - The controversy arose when a snack packaging from the company Tea Yan Yue Se featured an image resembling the album cover of singer Fang Datong's "Dreamer," leading to accusations of copyright infringement from some netizens, while others viewed it as a tribute [1] - The company responded to the controversy by stating that the product in question has been taken off the shelves and apologized for the oversight in their creative review process [4] - Legal experts indicated that using copyrighted material for commercial purposes requires permission from the copyright holder, and the use of the album cover could potentially constitute a violation of copyright laws [4] Group 2 - Tea Yan Yue Se, established in 2013 in Changsha, is a tea beverage brand under Hunan Chayue Cultural Industry Development Group Co., Ltd., which has undergone four rounds of financing, the latest being in February 2021 [5] - As of July 14 this year, the company operates 788 stores nationwide and has expanded its brand portfolio to include coffee and lemon tea brands, as well as a tavern brand [5] - The company has been rumored to be planning an IPO multiple times, with the latest speculation suggesting a shift from the Hong Kong stock market to the US market, although company representatives have denied receiving any such information [5]
短剧被质疑“碰瓷”华为、小米,抖音:无法判定是否违规
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-07-10 02:35
Core Viewpoint - A short drama titled "After Being Laid Off, the Female CEO Regrets" has drawn attention due to its similarities in character names and plot with Huawei and Xiaomi, raising concerns about potential legal implications related to intellectual property and personality rights [1][8]. Group 1: Plot and Characters - The male protagonist, Yu Chengdong, is focused on the autonomous driving sector and is depicted as being wrongfully dismissed by CEO Song Mingzhu of Tengyuan Group, later being recruited by Su Qi, chairman of Xiaomi Group, with a high salary [1]. - The drama features a plot where Yu Chengdong ultimately defeats Tengyuan Group at an automotive summit and acquires the company, leading to the dismissal of Song Mingzhu [1]. Group 2: Legal Concerns - The drama has been criticized for potentially infringing on the rights of real-life individuals and companies due to the close resemblance of character names and company names to those of Huawei and Xiaomi [1][9]. - Legal experts suggest that even indirect references to real individuals or companies can lead to claims of "implied behavior," which may infringe on trademark rights and could damage the reputation of the referenced entities [9][10]. - It is recommended that creators of such dramas obtain authorization from the real-life figures they are portraying and clarify which elements are fictional to mitigate legal risks [9][10].
蛋糕店收到律师函,只因两年半前制作了这款蛋糕,法律人士这样说
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-07-07 15:21
Core Viewpoint - A cake shop in Suining, Sichuan, received a lawyer's letter demanding compensation for copyright infringement related to a custom "Octonauts" cake made in December 2022, highlighting ongoing legal actions against small cake shops for similar issues [1][3][9]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Infringement Claims - The lawyer's letter was issued by Wanda Children's Cultural Development Co., which holds exclusive rights to the "Octonauts" series, including reproduction and distribution rights until January 31, 2053 [9]. - The cake shop owner, Mr. Liao, expressed confusion over the timing of the legal action, questioning why it took over two years for the complaint to arise after the cake was picked up [5][7]. - Other cake shops in the area have reported receiving similar legal notices, with some even closing down due to these claims [7][9]. Group 2: Industry Context and Implications - The cake shop industry is facing increased scrutiny, with over 200 legal cases involving cake shops filed by Wanda Children's Cultural Development Co. for copyright infringement related to the "Octonauts" theme [9]. - Legal experts indicate that using copyrighted characters or images without permission constitutes infringement, regardless of the shop owner's awareness [10]. - The widespread nature of these legal actions suggests a significant risk for small and medium-sized cake shops that may not have the resources to navigate copyright laws effectively [9][10].
海关大战盗版labubu,忙坏泡泡玛特法务部?
Hu Xiu· 2025-07-01 08:37
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of counterfeit "lafufu" toys, which are imitations of the popular "labubu" figures, and the ongoing efforts by customs authorities in China to combat their importation and distribution. The phenomenon has gained significant attention, leading to a cultural trend among workers who follow customs updates on the seizures of these counterfeit goods. Group 1: Customs and Enforcement - Customs authorities have intensified their focus on counterfeit "lafufu" toys, with daily updates on seizures becoming a popular topic among workers [4][11][15] - The customs department has reported large-scale confiscations, with examples including 10,000 units in Hangzhou and 30,000 in Ningbo [14] - The article highlights the role of customs as a key player in the fight against counterfeit goods, transforming it into a central figure in the "lafufu" saga [10][39] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The counterfeit "lafufu" market has seen a surge in production, with some factories adding multiple production lines to meet demand [22] - Prices for high-quality imitations can reach up to 180 yuan per unit, indicating a lucrative market for counterfeit goods [21] - The article notes that the "lafufu" phenomenon has created a unique market segment, with various forms and styles being produced and sold [24][35] Group 3: Cultural Impact - The ongoing customs operations against "lafufu" have become a source of entertainment and engagement for workers, who eagerly await updates on the latest seizures [15][17] - The customs updates have turned into a daily ritual for many, reflecting a blend of humor and interest in the absurdity of the counterfeit market [15][18] - The article mentions that even international audiences are engaging with the "lafufu" trend, showcasing its global reach [9][10] Group 4: Legal and Intellectual Property Issues - The customs actions against "lafufu" are primarily focused on intellectual property infringement rather than smuggling, as the goods do not typically involve tax evasion [39][40] - The article discusses the complexities of determining whether a counterfeit item constitutes an infringement, highlighting the legal gray areas involved [44][45] - Customs has the authority to enforce intellectual property protections, which has led to increased scrutiny of counterfeit goods at borders [40][43]