【环球时报驻德国特约记者 青木 环球时报特约记者 余见】美国总统特朗普称美"绝对需要格陵兰岛"引发的风波持续发酵。据美国"政治新闻网"欧洲版报 道，丹麦首相弗雷泽里克森5日表示，"如果美国选择军事攻击另一北约国家，那么一切都会终结，包括北约和二战结束后建立的（集体）安全"。此前一 天，她敦促美国"停止威胁"格陵兰岛。据英国《卫报》报道，法国、德国、英国、意大利、波兰、西班牙和丹麦的领导人6日发表联合声明，称格陵兰岛属 于其人民。英国《经济学人》杂志网站刊文称，与大约一年前特朗普威胁"吞并"格陵兰岛时的情况相比，面对如今委内瑞拉的先例，欧洲国家的心态发生了 变化，增加了恐慌感。"政治新闻网"欧洲版、法新社等外媒称，欧洲对美国突袭委内瑞拉的反应较为低调，恰恰凸显他们在应对美国欲控制格陵兰岛一事上 所处的困境。欧洲希望避免进一步激怒美国，但分析人士说，他们可能终将面临是否要对抗美国的抉择。 丹麦首相：应该认真对待美国威胁 据美国《纽约时报》5日报道，弗雷泽里克森5日接受了一系列采访。她表示，"应该认真对待"美国的威胁，它对丹麦和格陵兰岛施加了"不可接受的压 力"。"政治新闻网"欧洲版引述英国皇家联合军种研究所高级研 ...

【环球时报驻美国特约记者 李勇 环球时报特约记者 陈欣 柳玉鹏 裴茗】"我们正开始一个新的外交周。"当地时间7日晚，乌克兰总统泽连斯基在乘坐火车时 录制下这段视频讲话。次日，他在伦敦与英国首相斯塔默、德国总理默茨、法国总统马克龙举行会谈。接下来，泽连斯基还计划前往布鲁塞尔与罗马，先后 与欧盟和北约领导人以及意大利总理梅洛尼举行会谈。就在上周六，美乌官员结束了持续3天关于俄乌"和平计划"的谈判。英国广播公司（BBC）8日称，乌 克兰的欧洲盟友正在计划如何应对华盛顿持续施压基辅在和平谈判中作出让步，"西方的团结如今正承受着空前压力"。就在7日，美国总统特朗普说，他对 泽连斯基尚未阅读美方提出的"和平计划"而感到"有点失望"。 据法新社8日报道，斯塔默当天接受采访时说，他不会向泽连斯基施压，让其接受由美国政府主导的"和平计划"方案。和平协议需要具备一个强有力的安全 保障。据报道，斯塔默还称赞了特朗普，说后者在短短几周内就推动谈判取得"过去4年里我们所能取得的最大进展"。 BBC认为，8日在伦敦举行的会谈对与会各国都至关重要，因为"特朗普政府正逐渐远离他们而转向俄罗斯"。过去数周，关于乌克兰问题的谈判举行了多 轮，美 ...

Core Viewpoint - The new U.S. National Security Strategy portrays Europe, rather than Russia, as the primary adversary, indicating a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy and potentially deepening divisions within the transatlantic alliance [1][2][6][7]. Summary by Sections U.S. National Security Strategy - The annual strategic document previously highlighted threats from Russia but now directs harsh criticism towards NATO allies in Europe, describing them as declining powers that have ceded sovereignty to the EU [2][6][10]. - The report warns that immigration could lead to the "civilizational extinction" of Europe, potentially transforming several NATO countries into nations dominated by "non-European" populations within two decades [7][10]. Critique of European Policies - The strategy criticizes the EU and other multinational organizations for undermining political freedom and sovereignty, accusing many European governments of subverting democratic processes without providing specific details [10][11]. - It emphasizes the need for Europe to correct its current trajectory and regain confidence, suggesting a paternalistic tone in its recommendations [10][11]. Shift in U.S.-Europe Relations - The document reflects a fundamental change in how the U.S. views its relationship with Europe, positioning the U.S. as an arbiter between Europe and Russia rather than a traditional ally against Russian threats [11][12]. - The strategy calls for an end to NATO's "ever-expanding alliance" and suggests a return to cooperation with Russia, which some analysts interpret as a strategy that undermines existing European structures [11][12]. European Response - European leaders are urged to reconsider their traditional transatlantic relationships in light of the new U.S. stance, with some experts suggesting that the document signals the end of the conventional alliance [7][8][12]. - The EU has rejected claims that it supports harmful immigration policies or undermines free speech, asserting that U.S. national security is closely tied to European security [12][14].

Group 1 - The iShares Silver Trust, the world's largest silver ETF, reported a holding of 15,356.61 tons of silver as of August 18, with an increase of 285.30 tons from the previous trading day [1] - On August 18, the spot silver price closed at $38.00 per ounce, up 0.03%, with an intraday high of $38.26 and a low of $37.79 [1] Group 2 - European officials announced a virtual meeting with U.S. leaders to further coordinate strategies regarding post-war security in Ukraine, enhancing transatlantic alliance cohesion [3] - Recent high-level talks in Washington among European leaders aimed to maintain a unified stance on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, showcasing a new atmosphere of cooperation [3] - Ukrainian President Zelensky adopted a more diplomatic approach, aligning with U.S. leadership styles to set a constructive tone for negotiations [3] - During a joint press conference, U.S. and Ukrainian leaders carefully avoided sensitive topics, indicating a mutual desire to maintain dialogue and focus on achievable outcomes despite existing differences [3]

Group 1 - NATO leaders agreed to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP to address security challenges from geopolitical conflicts, marking a significant political victory for Donald Trump [1] - The declaration emphasizes a strong commitment to collective defense, aiming to protect 1 billion citizens and uphold freedom and democracy [1] - The new spending target is a response to deep security threats, particularly from Russia and ongoing terrorism, with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte suggesting Russia could be capable of attacking the alliance within five years [1] Group 2 - The declaration confirmed NATO's support for Ukraine but removed the previous statement that "Ukraine's future belongs to NATO," indicating reluctance from the Trump administration to provide more military aid [2] - The new spending target is broken down into 3.5% for core defense and 1.5% for infrastructure and cybersecurity investments, potentially leading to trillions in defense spending by 2035 [4] - The trajectory of spending will be reassessed in 2029, with direct contributions to Ukraine's defense counting towards military spending [6]

Group 1: Core Points - The UK and EU have reached a historic agreement to reset their relationship after Brexit, covering various areas including trade, defense, and personnel movement [3][4][6] - The fishing industry remains a focal point, with the UK extending EU fishing vessels' access to its waters for an additional 12 years, significantly longer than previously proposed [3][4] - The UK government anticipates that the new agreements will boost the economy by nearly £9 billion by 2040, with a projected 20% increase in agricultural exports to the EU [4][6] Group 2: Economic Implications - The simplification of food and beverage import/export processes is expected to enhance the UK's seafood sales to the EU [4] - The UK plans to invest £360 million in the fishing industry to modernize fleets and support tourism and seafood exports [4] - The EU has agreed to initiate a €150 billion arms loan program, indicating a commitment to defense collaboration [4][5] Group 3: Political Context - The change in UK leadership, with the Labour Party's Starmer becoming Prime Minister, reflects a shift towards improving relations with the EU [7][8] - The current geopolitical landscape, including the US's changing interest in Europe and ongoing conflicts, is influencing the rapprochement between the UK and EU [6][8] - There are internal challenges within the UK regarding the fishing agreement, with significant opposition from political factions and industry groups [7][8]

Core Points - France is actively seeking to avoid a trade war with China, as indicated by a recent phone call from French President Macron's foreign affairs advisor to Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, emphasizing the need for dialogue to resolve economic disputes [3][5] - The backdrop of this communication includes previous tensions where the EU imposed unreasonable tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, which France had a significant role in instigating [3][5] - The pressure on France to engage with China also stems from domestic business groups urging the government to mitigate escalating trade tensions, particularly in light of potential tariffs from the US [5][7] Economic Context - The EU is currently facing economic pressures not only from internal disputes but also from external threats, particularly from the US regarding tariffs, prompting France to take a proactive stance in its trade relations with China [5][7] - The French cognac industry has been particularly vocal in urging the government to negotiate with China to prevent further economic fallout from trade disputes [5] Geopolitical Implications - The conversation between France and China also touched upon the ongoing situation in Ukraine, with both parties expressing a desire for a fair and sustainable peace agreement, highlighting a shared interest in regional stability [5][7] - The current geopolitical landscape, characterized by the US's direct negotiations with Russia, has left Europe feeling sidelined, which may influence its future diplomatic strategies [7][9]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent turmoil in Europe caused by Trump's actions and statements, which have led to a significant shift in the perception of the transatlantic alliance and security dynamics in the region [4]. Group 1 - Trump's administration has created confusion among European leaders, leading to a sense of disillusionment regarding the transatlantic alliance [4]. - The U.S. has shifted its stance on security guarantees for Europe, with the Defense Secretary indicating a reduced commitment to European security [4]. - Unlike the Biden administration's approach, Trump seeks dialogue and normalization of relations with Putin, contrasting with Europe's imposition of new sanctions [4]. Group 2 - The article highlights the emotional journey of European leaders from shock to fear as they grapple with the implications of U.S. policy changes [4]. - Trump's perspective emphasizes that the Ukraine issue is primarily a European concern, suggesting a disconnect between U.S. and European priorities [4].