Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unexpected global impact of U.S. tariffs, which were initially aimed at China but ended up affecting many countries, leading to a compromise with China while other nations faced higher tariffs [2][3]. Economic Impact - China's economic dependence on the U.S. has significantly decreased since 2016, with a shift towards the Belt and Road Initiative, making U.S. tariffs less impactful [6]. - The domestic consumption market in China, with a population of 1.4 billion, has become a major economic driver, posing a risk to the U.S. if it continues its hardline stance [6]. Industrial Development - China has upgraded its industrial capabilities, exporting high-tech products that the U.S. cannot easily replace, which has led to self-inflicted damage from U.S. tariffs [8]. - China holds a dominant position in critical sectors like rare earths and renewable energy, increasing U.S. reliance on Chinese exports [8]. Military Strength - China's military capabilities are reportedly on par with or surpassing those of the U.S., particularly in advanced military technologies [11]. - The presence of U.S. military forces in allied countries deters those nations from taking a strong stance against the U.S., while China’s military strength allows it to confront the U.S. more confidently [9][10].

特朗普对华进行关税讹诈，为什么说象征意义大于实际意义？对于中美贸易，特朗普对华提出三大要求，为什么说这些要求是非常无理的呢？ 自从中国出台稀土新规之后，特朗普对华动作就一直没有停止过，他先是对华发起了关税讹诈，威胁从下月初开始要对中国商品加征100%的关税，就在这 两天，特朗普又作出了两个新的表态。 第二个，就是只要中方作出三大让步，美国就刀下留人。具体是哪三大让步呢？一是中国进口美国大豆；二是中国放开稀土出口；三是中国禁止芬太尼。只 要中国按照特朗普的要求照做的话，他就会降低对华关税。很明显，特朗普的要求非常无理。首先，进口美国大豆和放开稀土管控这两件事，它们是在中美 关税战的背景下发生的。那在双方还未就关税谈判达成共识的情况下，中国就进口美国大豆，放开稀土管控，这无疑就是在对美妥协，它是不符合中方利益 的。所以，目前特朗普的这两个要求，中国是无法满足的。其次，就是芬太尼问题，它是中美之间老生常谈的话题，也是美国用来抹黑中国的惯常伎俩。 在这个问题上，中国已经多次做出表态，芬太尼是美国的问题，不是中国的问题，责任在美国自身。特朗普一直在拿芬太尼说事，很显然还是想要继续坚持 由此对华加征的关税。再次，特朗普提 ...

Core Points - The trade relationship between the US and India is deteriorating rapidly, with the US seeking greater market access in sensitive sectors like agriculture and dairy, which India cannot agree to [1] - The US has announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting from the 27th of this month due to India's continued import of Russian oil, potentially raising tariffs on some Indian exports to the US to 50% [2] - India's exports to the US account for nearly 20% of its total exports, making it heavily reliant on the US market, while the US's dependence on Indian imports is relatively low [3] Trade Dynamics - The imposition of "secondary tariffs" could significantly impact the Indian economy, as the US's reliance on Indian exports is minimal compared to India's reliance on the US [3] - The structural importance of Indian exports in its economy means that tariffs would have substantial direct, long-term, and indirect effects on India [3] - The US is also applying tariffs on other countries, indicating a need for a balanced approach in its policy towards India, suggesting that negotiations may continue to avoid the full implementation of the 50% tariff [3] Strategic Responses - India is likely to adopt strategies similar to Brazil, which has diversified its export destinations and supported domestic enterprises in response to US tariffs [6] - India plans to strengthen domestic demand and purchasing power to offset some of the export losses while continuing diplomatic negotiations with the US [6] - The Indian government is expected to maintain a balanced foreign policy, particularly in its dealings with major powers, to mitigate the impact of US tariffs [6]

Core Points - The U.S. has implemented new "reciprocal tariffs" on 69 trade partners, with rates ranging from 10% to 41%, causing widespread criticism and concern among affected countries [1][2][3] - The tariffs are seen as a continuation of the U.S. administration's aggressive trade policy, with specific countries like Brazil, Switzerland, India, and Japan facing particularly high rates [2][3][4] - The trade agreements reached with countries like South Korea and the EU are under scrutiny, with concerns about the fairness and execution of these agreements [5][6] Summary by Category Tariff Implementation - The new tariffs, effective from August 7, include a 15% rate for 40 countries, while 10 countries face rates of 19% or 20% [1] - Brazil faces a combined tariff rate of 50% due to additional tariffs imposed on its products [2] - Switzerland is subjected to a 39% tariff, the highest among European nations, raising alarms about its economic impact [2] Reactions from Affected Countries - Brazil's President Lula has stated that the country will not yield to U.S. pressure and has sought consultations through the WTO [2] - India's government has condemned the U.S. tariffs as unfair and has pledged to protect its national interests [3] - South Korea's agreement with the U.S. has faced criticism domestically for perceived excessive concessions [3] Trade Agreement Concerns - Japan's trade agreement with the U.S. is facing challenges, as the newly announced tariffs contradict prior agreements, leading to calls for correction [4] - The EU's agreement with the U.S. has been criticized for signaling weakness and excessive concessions, particularly from Germany [5] - Analysts suggest that the U.S. may continue to apply pressure on countries to reach trade agreements, but the long-term sustainability of such policies remains uncertain [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China is better prepared to respond to U.S. tariffs due to past experiences and strategic preparations, including self-sufficiency in technology and boosting domestic demand [3] - China’s response to U.S. tariffs is driven by a sense of disrespect from the U.S. government, which has disregarded previous cooperation on issues like fentanyl [3] - The high level of existing tariffs imposed by the U.S. has led China to feel compelled to retaliate, while also being cautious to maintain a favorable business environment for foreign investments [3] Group 2 - The decision-making process in the White House is described as "chaotic," lacking a clear strategy and relying on impulsive tariff actions to exert global influence [4] - The U.S. tariffs are unlikely to be effective against China, as many countries have stronger trade ties with China than with the U.S., making it impractical for them to sacrifice their relationships with China for U.S. concessions [7] - The tariffs are accelerating the internationalization of Chinese companies, pushing them to transform into multinational corporations, driven by various factors beyond just tariffs [7] Group 3 - China has a longer-term strategic planning capability compared to the U.S., particularly in areas like technological self-sufficiency, which is being effectively implemented [8] - The continuity of Chinese policies is likened to steering a ship, with the government able to guide the direction and ensure progress towards established goals [8]

Group 1 - The article discusses the impact of U.S. tariffs on Japan, particularly focusing on the 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, which are expected to significantly affect Japan's economy and its automotive industry [1][3] - Japan exported over 1.33 million passenger cars to the U.S. in 2024, accounting for nearly 30% of its total exports to the U.S., highlighting the importance of the U.S. market for Japan's automotive sector [3] - The new tariffs could lead to a 0.3% contraction in Japan's GDP, indicating the potential economic repercussions for the country [3] Group 2 - In response to U.S. pressure, Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Shigeru has stated that Japan will not compromise on tariff issues and will advocate for free trade alongside other nations [5] - Kishida refuted claims made by President Trump regarding Japan's lack of support for the U.S., emphasizing the importance of Japan's national interests [5] - Japan's recent diplomatic efforts include sending a delegation to China, signaling a potential strategy to leverage its relationship with China in negotiations with the U.S. [7]

Group 1 - The World Gold Council's report indicates that global gold demand reached 1206 tons in Q1 2025, a 1% year-on-year increase, driven by a recovery in gold ETF demand which surged by 170% to 552 tons, the highest level since Q1 2022 [1] - Retail investment in China significantly boosted gold bar and coin demand, which rose by 3% year-on-year to 325 tons, marking the second-highest quarterly demand on record [1] - The value of the US dollar relative to gold has plummeted by 99% over the past 50 years, with the dollar's value hitting a historic low recently, reflecting a loss of confidence in the dollar [2][5] Group 2 - Since the end of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, the dollar's value measured in gold has decreased to about 1% of its original value, with gold prices soaring to over $3500 per ounce as of April 22, 2023 [3] - The M1 money supply in the US has expanded from $225 billion in 1971 to $18.56 trillion in March 2025, an increase of over 80 times, while gold production has only increased by about 200% during the same period [5] - Analysts predict that the price of gold could reach $3700 per ounce by the end of 2025, with potential increases to $4500 if economic conditions worsen [5] Group 3 - The current gold price rally has entered its 18th week, with prices fluctuating around $3300, indicating a potential turning point and increased volatility ahead [8] - Recent legislative actions in Arizona regarding Bitcoin reserves have prompted investors to reconsider the relationship between cryptocurrencies and gold, leading to a shift towards gold as a safer investment [8] - Gold prices are currently oscillating between $3260 and $3360, with key resistance at $3360 and support at $3300, suggesting continued short-term volatility [9]

Group 1 - The article criticizes the U.S. tariff policy as a unilateral and reckless approach that undermines international trade order and serves political interests [1][10] - The U.S. has imposed various tariffs on imports from China and other countries, including a 20% tariff on all Chinese goods and 25% on steel and aluminum [2][3] - The implementation of "reciprocal tariffs" has led to significant increases in tariffs on imports from various countries, with rates reaching as high as 125% for certain goods from China [3][4] Group 2 - The article argues that the "reciprocal tariff" calculation method is flawed and does not accurately reflect trade imbalances, as it is based on arbitrary parameters set by the U.S. [4][5] - The U.S. tariff policy is said to violate World Trade Organization (WTO) principles, including the most-favored-nation treatment and non-discrimination rules [5][6] - The article highlights that the U.S. trade deficit is a structural issue that cannot be resolved through tariffs, as it is influenced by comparative advantages and international division of labor [7][8] Group 3 - The article notes that since the onset of the trade war in 2018, the overall U.S. trade deficit has not decreased, but rather has been redistributed among trading partners [8][9] - It emphasizes that high tariffs will not effectively fund domestic tax cuts, as tariff revenue is minimal compared to income and sales taxes [9][10] - The article warns that the tariff policy is likely to increase inflationary pressures in the U.S., ultimately burdening consumers [10][11] Group 4 - The article discusses the political pressures facing the U.S. tariff policy, with increasing opposition from both parties and concerns about its economic impact [10][11] - It highlights the potential for significant market volatility and economic downturns as a result of the tariff measures, with major financial institutions adjusting their growth forecasts [11][12] - The article concludes that the high tariffs may distort global resource allocation and weaken the U.S. industrial base, contradicting the political promises made by the Trump administration [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has announced a temporary exemption from tariffs on certain products, including computers, smartphones, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and integrated circuits, while indicating potential future tariffs specifically on semiconductors [1] Group 1: Tariff Exemptions - The U.S. has exempted certain electronic products from "reciprocal" tariffs, which includes computers and smartphones [1] - This exemption is described as a temporary measure by President Trump [1] Group 2: Future Tariff Plans - U.S. Commerce Secretary Raimondo stated that tariffs on semiconductors will be imposed separately [1] Group 3: China's Response - Experts suggest that China has recognized the absurdity and coercive nature of U.S. tariff measures [1] - China's response of "not responding" is interpreted as a sign of insight and disdain towards U.S. tariff threats, rather than weakness [1] - For meaningful dialogue, China requires tangible actions from the U.S. [1]

Group 1 - The article argues that extreme tariff measures by the U.S. will ultimately harm both the U.S. and its trading partners, as supported by historical and empirical evidence [1][7] - Historical economists, from Bastiat to List, have emphasized the importance of moderate tariffs and free trade for economic development, indicating that excessive tariffs can weaken domestic production capacity [1][2] - A study by French economist Philippe Aghion and others found that tariffs do not correlate positively with total factor productivity, while fiscal subsidies and tax incentives do [2][3] Group 2 - The article highlights that prior to joining the WTO, high tariffs on imported cars did not lead to a strong domestic automotive industry in China, demonstrating that tariff protection does not foster industrial progress [3][4] - Post-WTO accession, China has gradually reduced its average tariff rate to 7.3% by 2023, indicating a shift towards lower trade barriers [4] - The development of industries in Shenzhen, such as mobile phones and renewable energy vehicles, is attributed to market competition rather than tariff protection [5][6]