Core Viewpoint - The company Xibei is facing a lease dispute in Shenzhen, with a notice demanding the immediate resumption of operations due to the company's abrupt decision to cease operations amid a public relations crisis related to pre-prepared dishes [1][2]. Group 1: Lease Dispute - A notice from Shenzhen Haiya Binfeng City Commercial Co., Ltd. demands that Xibei immediately resume operations, accusing the company of neglecting the rights of its loyal members and choosing an undignified way to exit [1]. - The notice indicates that Xibei has operated in Haiya Binfeng City for nearly ten years, accumulating a significant number of loyal members [1]. - Xibei applied to stop operations on February 28, 2026, citing the impact of a public relations crisis, but the mall offered various solutions to help the company through the difficulties [1]. Group 2: Company Response - A staff member at the Xibei Haiya Binfeng City store stated that the closure is due to business adjustments and that member benefits such as coupons, points, and balances will not be affected, as they can be used at nearby stores or refunded [3]. - Xibei confirmed on February 3 that it had applied for a suspension of operations on January 15, 2026, and is in active communication with partners to reach a mutually acceptable solution [3]. - The company, Shenzhen Xibei Joy Catering Co., Ltd., was established in November 2015 with a registered capital of 8 million yuan, and is primarily controlled by Inner Mongolia Xibei Catering Group Co., Ltd. [3]. Group 3: Financial Impact - Since the pre-prepared dishes controversy began in September 2025, Xibei and its founder have faced significant public scrutiny, with projected losses exceeding 600 million yuan from September 2025 to March 2026 [8].

Core Viewpoint - The restaurant chain Xibei is planning to close 102 stores nationwide, which accounts for approximately 30% of its total stores, affecting around 4,000 employees [3][4]. Group 1: Store Closures - Xibei is set to close 102 stores across the country, representing about 30% of its total store count [3][4]. - The closure will impact approximately 4,000 employees [3][4]. - The store manager of the Hefei store reported no knowledge of the closure and stated that business was performing well [3]. Group 2: Impact of Controversy - Xibei has faced significant negative publicity due to accusations from Luo Yonghao regarding its pre-made dishes, leading to a sharp decline in customer traffic and sales [4]. - In response to the controversy, Xibei has implemented measures such as price reductions, issuing coupons, and increasing employee salaries [4]. - The founder of Xibei, Jia Guolong, acknowledged that the impact of this crisis is greater than any previous operational challenges faced by the company [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing public dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, focusing on the accusations regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes in Xibei restaurants and the implications for both parties involved [2][4][6]. Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Statements - Luo Yonghao claims that his company, Smartisan Technology, faced significant criticism for four years, attributing its failure to internal mistakes rather than external attacks [8]. - He argues that the cost of frozen broccoli is indeed higher, suggesting that the criticism regarding this ingredient is somewhat unjustified, while asserting that Xibei primarily serves pre-prepared dishes [8]. - Luo emphasizes that if a business owner is genuinely concerned about employee layoffs, they should not engage in reckless behavior, highlighting a disconnect between some older entrepreneurs and the realities of the business world [9]. Group 2: Jia Guolong's Response - Jia Guolong asserts that Xibei's restaurants do not use pre-prepared dishes, clarifying the distinction between "central kitchen preparation" and "pre-packaged dishes" [6]. - He addresses rumors about the closure of 102 Xibei locations, stating that affected employees will receive their full wages and that customer prepaid cards will remain valid at other locations [6]. - Jia plans to respond comprehensively to Luo's accusations, demanding an apology for the alleged harm caused to Xibei and the broader restaurant industry [10].

Core Viewpoint - The founder of Xibei, Jia Guolong, plans to respond comprehensively to accusations of defamation made by Luo Yonghao regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes in Xibei restaurants [1][10]. Group 1: Accusations and Responses - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei for serving mostly pre-prepared dishes and called for legislation requiring restaurants to disclose the use of such dishes [2][11]. - Jia Guolong shared a post questioning the standards for defining pre-prepared dishes and pointed out the double standards in Luo's criticism of other restaurants [1][10]. - Jia emphasized that high-end restaurants in developed countries also use pre-prepared ingredients, challenging the notion that Xibei is unique in this practice [1][10]. Group 2: Industry Context - The discussion highlights a broader trend in the food industry where pre-prepared dishes are increasingly common, particularly in formal dining settings in China [8][18]. - Jia noted that the market share of pre-prepared dishes in developed countries is higher, but these products are primarily used in consumer markets and fast food, unlike in China where they are often disguised as freshly made meals [8][18]. - The support for the pre-prepared food industry in China is aimed at improving convenience and hygiene for consumers, rather than misleading them [8][18].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing public dispute between Xibei's founder Jia Guolong and Luo Yonghao has escalated, with Jia announcing a comprehensive response to allegations made by Luo regarding Xibei's practices, particularly concerning frozen organic broccoli [1][2]. Group 1: Company Statements - Jia Guolong plans to address Luo Yonghao's serious defamation claims against Xibei, urging Luo to apologize for misleading the public about the frozen broccoli issue, which has reportedly harmed many stakeholders in the restaurant industry [2]. - Luo Yonghao has previously stated that the failure of his company, Smartisan Technology, was not solely due to external criticism but involved various internal mistakes, indicating a broader context of accountability in business operations [4]. Group 2: Industry Context - The controversy surrounding frozen broccoli highlights a larger issue within the food industry, where the cost of frozen vegetables is acknowledged to be higher, suggesting that some criticisms may be misplaced [5]. - The market for prepared foods in developed countries is significantly larger than in China, where such products are often misrepresented in restaurants, raising concerns about transparency and quality in the food service sector [6]. - The departure of Xibei's Vice President and Public Relations Head, Song Xuan, amid this controversy indicates potential internal challenges within the company, as he expressed gratitude towards Xibei and its leadership while citing personal development reasons for his exit [7].

Group 1 - The controversy surrounding the prepared dishes of the restaurant brand Xibei has been reignited by entrepreneur Luo Yonghao's comments [1] - Hua Shan, founder of Hua Yu Hua, defended Xibei's recent employee salary increase, suggesting that the brand is being unfairly attacked in the media [1] - Luo Yonghao responded to Hua Shan's comments with questions and a demand for a public apology by a specified deadline [1] Group 2 - Luo Yonghao previously criticized Xibei's dishes as being "too disgusting," which led to widespread public discussion and media attention [1] - As of now, Hua Shan has not responded to Luo Yonghao's accusations, and his social media account has restricted interactions [1] - Xibei has not made any public statements regarding the ongoing controversy [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and Hua Shan highlights the challenges faced by the Xibei brand in the restaurant industry, particularly regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes and public perception [5][6]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Luo Yonghao publicly criticized Xibei for serving pre-prepared dishes, which he found unsatisfactory and overpriced, calling for legislation to require restaurants to disclose such practices [5]. - Hua Shan, a brand consultant for Xibei, claimed that the brand is being "calculated against" and emphasized its commitment to quality and integrity in the restaurant industry [4][5]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Impact - Luo's comments sparked widespread attention and discussion online, leading to a significant backlash against Xibei and raising questions about its food quality [6]. - The controversy has placed Xibei in a challenging position, as it navigates public scrutiny and the implications of the criticism on its brand reputation [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Xibei and Luo Yonghao has sparked significant online discussion, highlighting employee grievances and the company's response to wage increases, while also raising questions about the quality of food served at Xibei restaurants [1]. Group 1: Company Response - Xibei's brand consultant, Hua Shan, emphasized that Xibei represents the pinnacle of the Chinese restaurant industry, committed to sincerity towards both customers and employees, and criticized the negative online narrative surrounding the company [1]. - The company has been portrayed as adhering to traditional values and integrity, positioning itself against perceived online injustices [1]. Group 2: Public Reaction - Luo Yonghao's criticism of Xibei, particularly regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes and high prices, has gained traction on social media, leading to widespread public discourse and placing Xibei in a challenging position regarding its reputation [1]. - The backlash from Luo's comments has resulted in Xibei facing scrutiny over its food quality, with calls for legislative measures to require restaurants to disclose the use of pre-prepared ingredients [1].

Core Points - The restaurant chain "Xibei" is currently facing public scrutiny over its use of pre-prepared dishes, leading to an official apology and a commitment to rectify nine issues by October 1 [1] - As of September 29, reports indicate that only one out of several Xibei locations has completed the required adjustments, with staff citing delays in receiving necessary ingredients [1] - The founder of Xibei, Jia Guolong, has cleared content from his social media accounts, which has raised concerns about the company's public image [3] Summary of Adjustments - Xibei has announced several corrective measures, including switching all dishes cooked with soybean oil to non-GMO soybean oil [2] - Specific adjustments include: 1. Children's beef braised rice will now be stir-fried in-store 2. Children's beef patties will be made fresh in-store 3. Cod fish strips will be replaced with fresh large yellow croaker, prepared in-store 4. Lamb skewers will be cut, skewered, and grilled fresh in-store 5. Pork chop sauerkraut will use fresh pork ribs instead of semi-finished products, cooked in-store 6. Braised meat in flaky bread will use fresh meat for in-store braising 7. Shredded spicy chicken will use fresh chicken for in-store cooking 8. Oat millet porridge will be freshly cooked in-store with added fresh pumpkin slices [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal risks associated with criticizing pre-prepared food products, questioning whether businesses can successfully sue consumers for negative reviews and what the potential consequences of such actions might be [1] Group 1: Legal Risks - There is a looming legal risk for consumers who publicly criticize businesses, raising concerns about potential lawsuits for defamation [1] - The article explores the possibility of consumers facing legal repercussions, including the need to apologize, pay damages, or even face imprisonment for expressing negative opinions [1] Group 2: Consumer Behavior - The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the legal boundaries when expressing dissatisfaction with products and services [1] - It highlights the need for consumers to be aware of the potential consequences of their online comments regarding businesses [1]