长春燃气公告，2025年上半年营业收入10.66亿元，同比下降5.69%。归属于上市公司股东的净亏损 5508.47万元，上年同期净亏损5277.71万元。基本每股收益-0.09元／股，与上年同期持平。 ...

8月27日，蓝天转债盘中下跌2.0%报137.002元/张，成交额6091.01万元，转股溢价率13.36%。 资料显示，蓝天转债信用级别为"AA"，债券期限6年（第一年0.30%,第二年0.50%,第三年1.00%,第四年 1.50%,第五年1.80%,第六年2.00%），对应正股名称为蓝天燃气，转股开始日为2024年2月21日，转股价 8.38元。 可转换债券简称可转债，是一种可以在特定时间、按特定条件转换为普通股票的特殊企业债券，兼具债 权和股权的特征。一般而言，持有人可按照发行时约定的价格将债券转换成公司的普通股票的债券。如 果债券持有人不想转换，则可以继续持有债券，直到偿还期满时收取本金和利息，或者在流通市场出售 变现。 资料显示，河南蓝天燃气股份有限公司成立于2002年,系河南省能源系统先进工作单位,是河南省主干线 管网覆盖范围较广、规模较大的综合性燃气企业集团,主营业务为天然气输送及销售,已于2021年1月在上 交所主板挂牌上市(股票代码:605368)。公司主要运营管理项目为国家西气东输一线豫南支线、国家西气 东输二线南阳至驻马店支线、博爱至薛店支线、禹州至许昌支线,天然气支干线总长度700多 ...

中油燃气（00603）发布截至2025年6月30日止6个月中期业绩，该集团取得营业额78.9亿港元，同比减 少15.09%；公司拥有人应占溢利2.51亿港元，同比减少6.72%；每股盈利4.8港仙。 来源：新浪港股 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company reported a decline in revenue and profit for the six months ending June 30, 2025, while implementing measures to enhance the efficiency of its gas business [1] Financial Performance - The company achieved a revenue of HKD 7.89 billion, a year-on-year decrease of 15.09% [1] - Profit attributable to shareholders was HKD 251 million, down 6.72% year-on-year [1] - Earnings per share stood at HKD 0.048 [1] Gas Business Efficiency - The company adopted a strategy of "strengthening the fundamentals, stabilizing the main business, and addressing losses" to ensure stable development of its gas business [1] - The gas extraction rate remained high at 99%, with the average procurement price decreasing by RMB 0.04 per cubic meter year-on-year [1] - An innovative "resource pool + collective transportation" model was implemented to effectively address regional shortages [1] User Growth and Gas Volume - The total number of residential users exceeded 2.16 million, while industrial and commercial users surpassed 20,000 [1] - Gas sales volume reached 2.305 billion cubic meters, and gas transmission volume was 1.332 billion cubic meters [1]

Core Viewpoint - 中油燃气的营业额在2025年上半年出现显著下降，主要受到国内经济环境和气温变化的影响 [1][2] Financial Performance - 截至2025年6月30日的六个月，集团录得营业额78.90亿港元，同比下降15% [1] - 整体毛利为9.86亿港元，毛利率保持在12% [1] - 公司拥有人应占期内溢利为2.51亿港元，减少7% [1] Segment Performance - 销售及输送天然气及其他相关产品的营业额为67.17亿港元，同比减少8%，主要因国内经济环境变化及气温偏高导致销量减少6% [2] - 燃气管道建造及接驳营业额为2.92亿港元，同比减少18%，但毛利率由26%提升至37% [2] - 开采及生产原油及天然气营业额为2.47亿港元，保持稳定增长 [2] - 生产及销售煤基清洁能源及其他相关产品的营业额为6.34亿港元，同比下降54%，因环境保护要求提高导致产能调整 [2]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the announcement by Shandong Water Development Gas Co., Ltd. regarding its board meeting and the composition of its revenue for the year 2024 [1] - The company held its fifth session of the eighth board meeting on August 26, 2025, in Jinan, Shandong Province, where it reviewed the semi-annual report and summary for 2025 [1] - For the year 2024, the revenue composition of the company is as follows: Energy comprehensive services account for 57.57%, LNG (LPG) gas sales account for 31.57%, gas equipment business accounts for 10.24%, and other businesses account for 0.62% [1] Group 2 - The article also highlights the booming pet industry, which is valued at 300 billion yuan, indicating a significant market opportunity for related companies [1] - The rise in the pet industry has led to an increase in stock prices for industry-listed companies [1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core Views - Layout of the bottom - position is as important as flexible offense. A basket of "high - dividend × low - volatility" dividend assets can provide a natural "shock absorber" for the portfolio, and the combination can withstand extreme market conditions by suppressing volatility with stable cash flows and low β and then capturing market mismatches with the remaining positions [3]. - To amplify returns in the dividend pool, a dual - screening approach is more reliable than relying solely on the "high - dividend" indicator. Adding a second filter such as low - volatility, earnings quality, or institutional holdings can eliminate potential risks and further increase the returns of general dividend assets [3]. - On top of the dividend bottom - position, there are systematic excess opportunities from the left - to - right shift of the industrial cycle. Priority should be given to companies with stable cash flows despite pressured profits. Industries such as cement, silicone, and phosphate chemicals are currently in the preferred range, while the photovoltaic chain is still in a state of "double losses in profit and cash flow". The overall allocation strategy involves initially establishing an observation position, increasing the position after confirming the leading indicators of the profit inflection point, and exiting when profits weaken again or the gross margin is inverted [3]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Bottom - Position Allocation Necessity: "Pure Left" and "Pure Right" Are Not Desirable - In a market with an increasing industry rotation center, it is crucial to build a long - term core position first. A 15 - year quarterly rotation experiment on 31 Shenwan primary industries shows that both extreme left - side bottom - fishing and extreme right - side chasing result in single - digit annualized returns and significant drawdowns. In contrast, a dividend portfolio characterized by "high - dividend × low - volatility" can provide double - digit annualized returns and keep drawdowns within an acceptable range. Therefore, increasing the exposure of "high - dividend + low - β" in the bottom - position can provide a safety cushion for the portfolio [7]. - Dividend assets are the optimal core bottom - position in terms of return - to - drawdown. Historical stress tests show that the dividend index has shallower drawdowns, a stable 3 - year rolling Sharpe ratio, and does not require market timing in the long - term perspective. It also has higher probabilities of achieving positive returns in different holding periods compared to most broad - based and style indices [10][12][21]. 3.2 Dividend Yield Single - Factor Trap - Selecting stocks based solely on the "high - dividend" factor often leads to choosing high - volatility stocks with limited return increases and large drawdowns. Adding a second filter such as low - volatility or earnings quality can improve the overall cost - effectiveness. Statistical regression shows that the dividend yield alone has a weak explanatory power for future returns [29]. - Several case studies illustrate different types of "false high - dividend" traps. For example, some companies rely on one - time gains to support high dividends, some have high dividends due to falling stock prices rather than improved profitability, and some have high dividends at the peak of the business cycle or due to high leverage. To avoid these traps, specific financial and operational criteria need to be set [37][40][44]. 3.3 High - Dividend Smart - Beta's Distortion Risk - Modified dividend indices such as "Dividend Quality" and "Dividend Potential" have larger fluctuations and deeper drawdowns than the CSI Dividend Index. Their style drift and uncontrolled risk exposure lead to higher volatility, especially in bear markets. The main reasons are their high - concentration weighting, high - valuation requirements, and frequent chasing of market highs [60][64]. - The CSI Dividend Index selects 100 stocks based on a three - year dividend yield with a diversified weighting, while the Dividend Quality and Dividend Potential indices select 50 stocks by adding factors such as ROE and EPS growth, with a more concentrated and high - chasing weighting. As a result, they are more likely to suffer from double - kills of earnings and valuation when the market weakens [64]. 3.4 Potential Ways to Enhance Dividend Low - Volatility - **Dividend + Pricing Power Approach**: Traditional high - dividend indices have several drawbacks, including style drift, inclusion of high - risk high - dividend stocks, and right - side trading characteristics. A comprehensive scoring system based on pricing power, price - to - earnings ratio, and stability can be used to select the top 20 stocks for a portfolio. A ten - year back - test shows that this combination has better performance in terms of cumulative return, annualized return, and drawdown control compared to the CSI Dividend Index [83][84]. - **Considering Institutional Participation Rate**: Incorporating institutional holdings into high - dividend screening reveals that stocks with high institutional participation (≥20%) from stable - cash - flow industries have better risk - return profiles, including higher cumulative returns, greater upside potential, and controlled drawdowns. In contrast, stocks with low institutional participation (<20%) from cyclical industries perform less well. Therefore, combining high - dividends with institutional recognition can build a safer and more sustainable dividend portfolio [89]. 3.5 Bottom - Position Is Not Just Dividends: Quality Low - Volatility and Cash Cows - The "quality + low - volatility" dual - screened bottom - position established in June 2020 can achieve a balance between offense and defense. By filtering out high - leverage and low - resilience companies and compressing risk thresholds, it has achieved a five - year rolling net value increase of about 1.6 times, with stable single - digit annualized returns and significantly reduced volatility and drawdowns compared to ordinary low - volatility strategies [94]. - The long - term returns of dividend assets mainly come from stable dividends and profits rather than valuation increases. From 2014 - 2025, the annualized total returns of Dividend Low - Volatility and CSI Dividend after reinvestment were 13.9% and 13.2% respectively, with dividend contributions exceeding 9 percentage points and accounting for over 70% of the total returns [98]. - The cash - cow enhancement framework uses six dimensions to examine potential risks in high - dividend portfolios and provides corresponding enhancement measures. These measures include equal - weighting industries and quality sorting to address concentration risks, using free - cash - flow and growth thresholds to eliminate "high - dividend traps", and implementing valuation gates and hedging strategies to manage valuation risks [108]. 3.6 Industrial Cycle Reversal: From Left to Right - At the inflection point of the industrial cycle, multi - dimensional indicators such as fundamentals, inventory, price, valuation, and funds often show concurrent inflection points. The consistency in the industry dimension, from raw material prices to mid - stream production and downstream demand, can improve the reliability of inflection - point signals. For example, the anti - involution market rhythm is often in line with this "consistency chain" [111][112]. - At the company level, by dividing samples into leading, mid - stream, and tail companies, monitoring the second - order derivatives of 10 key indicators can help identify the acceleration of marginal improvements in demand, pricing, or cash flows. When at least three indicators in any two of the three sample layers show positive second - order derivatives, it can be regarded as a company - level consistency inflection point [114]. - The industrial cycle reversal framework uses a "three - light" approach to determine investment opportunities. When the three conditions of valuation repair, profit - cash flow resonance improvement, and completion of inventory reduction and demand expansion are met simultaneously, it indicates a three - dimensional resonance of supply - demand, profit, and sentiment, and investors can make aggressive investments. Otherwise, they should continue to hold the dividend bottom - position [115].

| | | | 统计截止日｜区间股价涨跌幅｜股东户数｜增减｜增减比例｜户均持股市值（元）｜户均持股数（股） | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2025-06-30 | -2.32% | 31290 3804 | 13.84% | 26.90万 | 3.55万 | | 2025-03-31 | -4.14% | 27486 -4368 | -13.71% | 32.77万 | 4.05万 | | 2024-12-31 | 9.63% | 31854 1777 | 5.91% | 29.50万 | 3.49万 | | 2024-09-30 | 7.19% | 30077 1415 | 4.94% | 28.84万 | 3.70万 | 根据统计，陕天然气2025年3月31日至2025年6月30日，主力资金净流出1.87亿元，游资资金净流入 2200.78万元，散户资金净流入1.65亿元。期间龙虎榜该股共上榜1次，深股通专用席位上榜0次。近3个 月融资净流入1.31亿，融资余额增加；融券净流入22.19万，融券余额增加。 新浪合作大平台期货开户 安全快捷有保障 ...

Group 1 - The company reported a revenue of 1.189 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, representing a year-on-year decrease of 7.40% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was a loss of 61.06 million yuan [1] - The net profit excluding non-recurring items was a loss of 14.25 million yuan [1] - The basic earnings per share were -0.13 yuan [1]

每经AI快讯，美能能源（SZ 001299，收盘价：12.48元）8月26日晚间发布关于为全资子公司开立信用 证提供担保的公告。公告称，公司全资子公司宝鸡美能、全资子公司神木美能在开展原材料采购业务过 程中，拟向"招商银行股份有限公司西安分行"申请开立"国内信用证"，用于结算供应商货款。为助力子 公司的业务发展，公司拟为上述两家全资子公司提供担保，合计担保金额不超过人民币2亿元，担保期 限自公司股东大会审议通过之日起两年。 每日经济新闻 本次担保后，公司及控股子公司的对外担保额度总额为人民币2亿元，占公司最近一期经审计净资产的 15.4%。 2024年1至12月份，美能能源的营业收入构成为：城镇燃气占比100.0%。 截至发稿，美能能源市值为30亿元。 每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——能给主人"打电话"的宠物智能手机也来了！宠物产业3000亿元市场大爆 发，行业上市公司"涨"声一片 （记者 王可然） 免责声明：本文内容与数据仅供参考，不构成投资建议，使用前请核实。据此操作，风险自担。 ...