Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong opposition to the U.S. unilateral measures against its maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries, which are seen as protectionist and discriminatory actions that violate WTO rules and harm China's industrial interests [2][3]. Group 1: U.S. Measures and China's Response - The U.S. has implemented port fees and restrictions on China's maritime and shipbuilding sectors based on the findings of a Section 301 investigation, which China views as a violation of the China-U.S. Maritime Agreement and WTO rules [2]. - China has expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposition to these measures, stating they unfairly advantage U.S. shipping and shipbuilding companies and harm China's related industries [2]. - In retaliation, China announced on October 10 that it would impose special port fees on vessels with U.S. elements, including those flagged, built, or owned by U.S. companies [2]. Group 2: Impact on Global Trade and U.S. Economy - The U.S. measures are expected to disrupt global supply chains, significantly increase international trade costs, and contribute to rising inflation in the U.S., ultimately harming the competitiveness of U.S. ports and employment [2]. - There are voices within the U.S. industry opposing these measures, indicating that such actions are detrimental to both U.S. interests and the development of its shipbuilding sector [2]. Group 3: China's Legal and Regulatory Actions - In order to protect its industrial interests, China has placed certain companies that assisted the U.S. investigation on a countermeasure list and will investigate actions that threaten the safety and development of its maritime and shipbuilding industries [3]. - China emphasizes a commitment to conducting investigations and enforcement in an open, fair, and just manner, ensuring the rights of all stakeholders are protected [3]. - China maintains a clear stance on these issues, indicating readiness for both confrontation and dialogue, urging the U.S. to correct its actions and engage in equal dialogue to resolve mutual concerns [3].

美方措施不仅影响全球供应链稳定、大幅提高国际贸易成本，也会推高美国内通 胀，损害美港口竞争力和就业，影响美自身供应链安全和韧性。美方产业界对此也有 很多反对声音，充分显示出美方做法损人不利己，无益于自身造船业发展。 为进一步维护中国相关产业利益，中方有关部门根据《中华人民共和国国家安全 法》《中华人民共和国反外国制裁法》《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等有关规 定，将部分协助、支持美方相关调查活动的企业列入反制清单，对美国及部分国家和 企业危害我国航运、造船等相关产业安全发展利益的行为发起调查。在调查实施过程 中，中方将秉承公开、公平、公正原则开展执法和调查，充分保障各利害关系方权 利。 美东时间10月14日，美国依据所谓301调查结果，正式对中国海事、物流和造船 领域实施港口费等限制措施，请问中方对此有何回应？ 答： 美方措施是典型单边主义、保护主义行为，严重违反世贸组织规则，违背《中美 海运协定》平等互惠原则，赋予相关国家航运和造船企业不公平竞争优势，构成对中 国航运、造船等产业的歧视性做法，严重损害中国相关产业利益。中方对此强烈不 满，坚决反对，已于10月10日宣布将对涉及美国旗、美国造、美国公司拥有、参 ...

新华社北京10月14日电 商务部新闻发言人14日就美对华造船等行业301调查限制措施落地答记者问。 发言人说，为进一步维护中国相关产业利益，中方有关部门根据《中华人民共和国国家安全法》《中华 人民共和国反外国制裁法》《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等有关规定，将部分协助、支持美方相关 调查活动的企业列入反制清单，对美国及部分国家和企业危害我国航运、造船等相关产业安全发展利益 的行为发起调查。在调查实施过程中，中方将秉承公开、公平、公正原则开展执法和调查，充分保障各 利害关系方权利。 发言人强调，中方在相关问题上的立场是明确的、一贯的，打，奉陪到底；谈，大门敞开。中方敦促美 方纠正错误做法，与中方相向而行，通过平等对话协商方式解决双方关切的问题。 【纠错】 【责任编辑:谷玥】 发言人表示，美方措施是典型单边主义、保护主义行为，严重违反世贸组织规则，违背《中美海运协 定》平等互惠原则，赋予相关国家航运和造船企业不公平竞争优势，构成对中国航运、造船等产业的歧 视性做法，严重损害中国相关产业利益。中方对此强烈不满，坚决反对，已于10月10日宣布将对涉及美 国旗、美国造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶收取特别港 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. has implemented unilateral and protectionist measures against China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors, violating WTO rules and the principle of mutual benefit in the China-U.S. shipping agreement [1] - China has expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposition to these measures, announcing special port fees for vessels with U.S. elements [1] - The U.S. actions are expected to disrupt global supply chains, significantly increase international trade costs, and negatively impact U.S. inflation and port competitiveness [1] Group 2 - In response to the U.S. actions, China has placed certain companies that assisted the U.S. investigation on a countermeasure list and will investigate behaviors that threaten China's maritime and shipbuilding industries [2] - China emphasizes a clear and consistent stance on these issues, indicating readiness for both confrontation and dialogue [2]

格隆汇10月14日｜美方措施是典型单边主义、保护主义行为，严重违反世贸组织规则，违背《中美海运 协定》平等互惠原则，赋予相关国家航运和造船企业不公平竞争优势，构成对中国航运、造船等产业的 歧视性做法，严重损害中国相关产业利益。中方对此强烈不满，坚决反对，已于10月10日宣布将对涉及 美国旗、美国造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶收取特别港务费。 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com (责任编辑：宋政 HN002) ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has implemented unilateral and protectionist measures against China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries, which are seen as discriminatory and harmful to China's industrial interests [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Measures and China's Response - The U.S. has officially imposed port fees and other restrictions on China's maritime and shipbuilding sectors based on the results of a Section 301 investigation [1]. - China strongly opposes these measures, viewing them as a violation of WTO rules and the U.S.-China Maritime Agreement, which undermines fair competition [1]. - In retaliation, China announced on October 10 that it would impose special port fees on vessels with U.S. elements, including those flagged, built, or owned by U.S. companies [1]. Group 2: Impact on Global Trade and U.S. Industry - The U.S. measures are expected to disrupt global supply chains, significantly increase international trade costs, and contribute to rising inflation in the U.S. [1]. - There are concerns that these actions will harm the competitiveness and employment levels at U.S. ports, as well as affect the resilience of the U.S. supply chain [1]. - There is notable opposition from the U.S. industry regarding these measures, indicating that they may be counterproductive to the development of the U.S. shipbuilding sector [1]. Group 3: China's Further Actions - In order to protect its industrial interests, China has placed certain companies that assisted the U.S. investigation on a countermeasure list and will investigate actions that threaten the safety and development of its maritime and shipbuilding industries [2]. - China emphasizes a commitment to conducting investigations in an open, fair, and just manner, ensuring the rights of all stakeholders are protected [2]. - China maintains a clear stance on the issue, indicating readiness to engage in dialogue while also preparing to respond firmly to U.S. actions [2].

智通财经APP获悉，美东时间10月14日，美国依据所谓301调查结果，正式对中国海事、物流和造船领 域实施港口费等限制措施。对此，商务部新闻发言人称，美方措施是典型单边主义、保护主义行为，严 重违反世贸组织规则，违背《中美海运协定》平等互惠原则，赋予相关国家航运和造船企业不公平竞争 优势，构成对中国航运、造船等产业的歧视性做法，严重损害中国相关产业利益。中方对此强烈不满， 坚决反对，已于10月10日宣布将对涉及美国旗、美国造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶 收取特别港务费。 答：美方措施是典型单边主义、保护主义行为，严重违反世贸组织规则，违背《中美海运协定》平等互 惠原则，赋予相关国家航运和造船企业不公平竞争优势，构成对中国航运、造船等产业的歧视性做法， 严重损害中国相关产业利益。中方对此强烈不满，坚决反对，已于10月10日宣布将对涉及美国旗、美国 造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶收取特别港务费。 美方措施不仅影响全球供应链稳定、大幅提高国际贸易成本，也会推高美国内通胀，损害美港口竞争力 和就业，影响美自身供应链安全和韧性。美方产业界对此也有很多反对声音，充分显示出美方做法损人 不利己， ...

有记者问：美东时间10月14日，美国依据所谓301调查结果，正式对中国海事、物流和造船领域实施港 口费等限制措施，请问中方对此有何回应？ 答：美方措施是典型单边主义、保护主义行为，严重违反世贸组织规则，违背《中美海运协定》平等互 惠原则，赋予相关国家航运和造船企业不公平竞争优势，构成对中国航运、造船等产业的歧视性做法， 严重损害中国相关产业利益。中方对此强烈不满，坚决反对，已于10月10日宣布将对涉及美国旗、美国 造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶收取特别港务费。 美方措施不仅影响全球供应链稳定、大幅提高国际贸易成本，也会推高美国内通胀，损害美港口竞争力 和就业，影响美自身供应链安全和韧性。美方产业界对此也有很多反对声音，充分显示出美方做法损人 不利己，无益于自身造船业发展。 为进一步维护中国相关产业利益，中方有关部门根据《中华人民共和国国家安全法》《中华人民共和国 反外国制裁法》《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等有关规定，将部分协助、支持美方相关调查活动的 企业列入反制清单，对美国及部分国家和企业危害我国航运、造船等相关产业安全发展利益的行为发起 调查。在调查实施过程中，中方将秉承公开、公平、公正原 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the US and China, highlighting the recent retaliatory measures taken by China in response to US tariffs and sanctions, and emphasizes the shift in power dynamics, suggesting a "strong China, weak America" narrative. Group 1: US-China Trade Relations - The US has repeatedly initiated hostile actions against China, which China has responded to with significant countermeasures, indicating a pattern of reciprocal actions [1][2][11] - The US's attempt to impose discriminatory fees on Chinese vessels is viewed as an unreasonable tactic, reflecting a misunderstanding of its own position in the global maritime industry [3][4][8] Group 2: Maritime Industry Dynamics - In 2023, China constructed a total of 32.86 million tons of commercial ships, holding a 51% share of the global market, while the US only built 64,800 tons, representing a mere 0.1% market share [7] - Despite the US's attempts to influence global shipping and shipbuilding dynamics, the actual impact of its policies is limited, as evidenced by the recovery of Chinese shipyards' order volumes [9][12] Group 3: Semiconductor Industry and Sanctions - The US has intensified its sanctions against Chinese semiconductor companies, with a record number of firms added to the entity list, indicating a strategic focus on this sector [13][14] - The US's export controls have expanded significantly, affecting a wide range of Chinese companies and complicating international supply chains [15][18] Group 4: Perception of Power Dynamics - The article posits that the overall power dynamic has shifted, with China now perceived as stronger relative to the US, particularly in manufacturing and technology sectors [23][24][26] - The narrative of "strong China, weak America" is gaining traction, as evidenced by China's advancements in various industries, including manufacturing and military technology [25][42] Group 5: Global Reactions and Future Implications - The article notes a growing recognition among global leaders and businesses of China's rising strength and the need to adapt to this new reality [41][42] - The ongoing trade tensions and retaliatory measures are expected to continue shaping the landscape of US-China relations, with potential long-term implications for global trade and industry dynamics [22][42]

Core Points - The article discusses China's countermeasures against five U.S. subsidiaries of Hanwha Ocean Co., Ltd. in response to the U.S. 301 investigation into China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries [2][3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has officially announced these countermeasures, which will take effect on October 14, 2025 [2] Group 1 - The U.S. investigation and measures against China's maritime and logistics sectors are deemed a serious violation of international law and harm the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises [3] - Hanwha Ocean's U.S. subsidiaries are accused of assisting the U.S. government in these investigations, which threatens China's sovereignty and development interests [3] - The countermeasures include prohibiting organizations and individuals within China from engaging in transactions or cooperation with the listed U.S. subsidiaries [3]