对于百万元以下的专项公益，如何更好地发挥慈善信托灵活、精准、高效、规范的优势，北方信托也在不断积累经验：一 是三方联动，打造"精准公益"闭环生态。北方信托构建了"委托人+指令权人+受托人"三方联动机制，各司其职、监督制衡，实 现"资金捐赠—合规采购—精准捐赠"全流程规范闭环管理。二是快速执行。北方信托凭借专业的管理能力，精准高效地执行物 资采购与捐赠，回应出资人意愿。三是跟踪反馈。为了给出资人更直观的捐赠体验，慈善信托专门设置了反馈机制，从物资验 收、分配使用，到后续补给、效果反馈，让出资人感受到信托专业、合规、透明的执行全过程。 记者从北方信托方面获悉，未来，北方信托将切实履行天津国资唯一控股信托公司的社会责任，继续坚守受托人职责，充 分发挥信托制度优势，让信托机制成为连接爱心与需求的"摆渡之舟"，用实际行动生动诠释"金融为民、忠于所托"的理念，为 助力素质教育均衡发展、托举少年梦想，贡献坚实而温暖的力量。 （编辑 汪世军） 该慈善信托聚焦"德智体美劳"全面发展，为乡村孩子补齐"成长短板"，精准瞄准部分乡村学校存在的体育器材老化、美术 用品不足等问题。信托存续期间，其将根据乡村教育发展需求，灵活调整捐赠物资 ...

近日，大业信托消息显示，公司党委副书记、拟任总经理黄俊率公司党委委员、董事会秘书汪鑫、资产 服务信托事业三部负责人贾祎等拜访上海信托。这表明，黄俊即将出任大业信托总经理一职，任职资格 尚待监管批准。 据悉，黄俊今年45岁，此前为大业信托副总经理。本次职务变动是由副转正。此前，他曾任中国东方资 产管理公司广州办事处市场开发部主任、助理经理、大业信托有限责任公司投资管理部总经理、中国东 方资产管理公司广州办事处江门地区业务部高级经理、中国东方资产管理股份有限公司深圳市分公司助 理总经理、广东省分公司总经理助理等。 2025年8月8日，大业信托召开2025年年中党建与经营管理工作会议。会议表示，经营工作要继续稳住良 好发展态势，注重速度与质量的统筹平衡，坚持业务转型、风险化解与内部改革并重。 大业信托是经国家金融监管总局（原中国银监会）批准设立的非银行金融机构，于2011年3月重新登记 后正式开业，注册资本20亿元，注册地广州。实行广州、北京双总部管理，在上海、武汉、杭州、福州 设有异地部门。截至2024年末，公司累计成立信托规模9414.21亿元。大业信托有3家股东，广州金融控 股集团有限公司持股38.33%，中 ...

政策持续完善 本报记者 方凌晨 1月19日，"上善"系列百利宏荣才慈善信托完成备案，慈善信托再添新成员。 作为信托公司业务三分类之一，慈善信托目前规模已突破百亿元，并于近日迎来了信息公开规范——民政部、金融监管总 局联合公布《慈善信托信息公开办法》（以下简称《办法》），将自2026年4月1日起施行。 在业内人士看来，随着《办法》的正式实施，慈善信托将迎来新发展阶段，未来或将呈现资产结构多元化、"慈善+金 融"深度融合、业务专业化与精细化等发展趋势。 平安信托相关人士对《证券日报》记者表示："随着国家对慈善事业的重视，慈善信托相关法律法规逐步完善，慈善信托 作为信托公司业务三分类之一，将在政策引导下获得更多发展机会。同时，随着社会财富增长与慈善意识提升，高净值人群和 企业对社会责任的关注度不断提高，慈善信托成为其实现公益意愿的重要工具。" 在万向信托相关人士看来，未来慈善信托将呈现资产结构多元化、"慈善+金融"深度融合、业务专业化与精细化三大发展 趋势。"一是，未来信托财产类型将从现金为主，逐步扩展到股权、不动产、艺术品等多元化资产；二是，慈善信托将与家族 信托、资产管理等业务更紧密地结合，形成'慈善目的+金融 ...

Core Viewpoint - The sudden suspension of partial products by Zhongrong Trust since September 2023 has left nearly 30,000 individual creditors and 2,000 institutional creditors in a predicament regarding their rights protection, with billions of funds unaccounted for, severely damaging the credibility of the financial industry and related departments [1][10] Group 1: Redemption Core - Creditors are primarily concerned about the recovery of their principal, the timeline for repayment, and the proportion of funds that can be retrieved [3][12] - Only a few high-quality infrastructure and government credit products have achieved full repayment, while most products lack a clear repayment schedule, leading to repeated inquiries about a phased repayment plan and the timing of each payment [3][12] - Known repayment ratios include 86.54% for Junrui 175 and over 40% for Rongya 68, while products like Cheng'an 96 face risks of principal loss due to project bankruptcy, raising questions about how repayment ratios are determined [3][12] Group 2: Asset Truth - Creditors express doubts about the authenticity and transparency of underlying assets, questioning whether funds have been improperly pooled and redirected to high-risk areas like real estate or related enterprises [4][13] - There is a demand for disclosure of asset transparency and proof of fund flow, as well as updates on whether corresponding assets have been auctioned, transferred, or restructured [4][13] - Creditors are also concerned about obstacles in asset disposal, such as unsold real estate and disputes over priority claims on mortgaged assets, seeking solutions to these bottlenecks [4][13] Group 3: Disposal Path - Creditors are focused on the overall framework and direction of risk disposal to avoid losses due to changes in disposal models [5][14] - There is uncertainty regarding whether the company will enter bankruptcy proceedings, with conflicting statements from staff causing concern about prolonged repayment cycles and altered priority of claims [5][14] - Creditors are also worried about the relationship between Zhongrong Trust's disposal and the bankruptcy proceedings of Zhongzhi, seeking confirmation that these processes are separate [5][14] Group 4: Rights Protection Choices - Creditors face dilemmas regarding effective paths for rights protection, debating whether to pursue lawsuits or criminal reports [6][17] - There are concerns about the effectiveness of lawsuits in securing claims and the potential costs and lengthy timelines involved, as well as the applicability of criminal reports [6][17] - Creditors who have already filed lawsuits are interested in the priority of asset preservation and how to proceed if cases are stalled due to procedural issues [6][17] Group 5: Fairness Issues - Creditors are questioning the fairness of the repayment process, particularly regarding the existence of preferential treatment for certain groups [7][18] - There are rumors of differential repayment practices for institutional investors and large fund holders, prompting demands for clarity on the repayment order between ordinary creditors and special entities [7][18] - Concerns also extend to the consistency of repayment across similar products, with calls for a unified disclosure of asset disposal progress to ensure all creditors are informed [7][18] Group 6: Special Appeals - Special groups, such as the elderly or those with serious illnesses, are seeking priority in repayment, expressing dissatisfaction with the current handling of their appeals [8][20] - Creditors are eager to know if there will be mechanisms for prioritizing repayments for vulnerable groups and how quickly they can expect responses to their appeals [8][20] - There are complaints about the difficulty in communicating with the company and a desire for more efficient channels for feedback and direct engagement with regulatory bodies [8][20]

Group 1: Credit Performance - Corporate credit outperformed household credit in December 2025, with significant increases in short-term and medium-to-long-term loans compared to the same period in 2024[4] - Household sector continued to deleverage, with a net repayment in short-term loans and only 10 billion yuan in new medium-to-long-term loans, primarily due to poor real estate sales and decreased willingness to consume[4][21] - Overall, the total social financing scale increased by 3.34 trillion yuan year-on-year, reaching 35.6 trillion yuan for the entire year[13] Group 2: Monetary Supply and Deposits - M2 growth rate improved to 8.5% year-on-year in December 2025, up from 8% in November[13] - Non-bank financial institutions saw better deposit performance compared to 2024, influenced by regulatory changes in interbank deposit rates[5][23] - New household deposits exceeded those of 2024, indicating limited scale of deposit migration[5][24] Group 3: Future Outlook and Risks - Future positive factors include continued support from policy financial tools, proactive government bond financing, and structural interest rate cuts, with expectations for social financing growth to stabilize or slightly increase[6] - Risks include unexpected changes in the economic environment and policy adjustments that could impact market risk appetite and bond market dynamics[7][30]

Core Viewpoint - The recent release of the "Top Ten Green Trust Cases for 2025" by the China Trust Industry Association highlights the industry's shift towards green finance, showcasing successful projects that contribute to low-carbon transformation and the activation of dormant green assets [1][2]. Group 1: Overview of Green Trust Cases - The selected projects include various types of trust services such as asset management and public welfare, demonstrating the diverse applications of green trust in the industry [1]. - Notable projects include the Kunlun Trust's CCUS project, Shandong Guoxin's CCER carbon asset revenue rights project, and the Foreign Trade Trust's household photovoltaic service trust project, among others [1]. Group 2: Industry Insights and Future Directions - Industry experts believe that green trust is essential for the trust sector to return to its core functions, reshape business logic, and find new growth points [2]. - The ten cases serve as replicable models for the industry, indicating a broad future for green trust development [2]. Group 3: Innovative Project Mechanisms - Shandong Guoxin's CCER carbon asset revenue rights project addresses challenges faced by environmental enterprises, utilizing trust structures to convert carbon assets into manageable financial assets [3]. - The project employs innovative mechanisms such as specific carbon asset rights transfer and a dual-layer exit strategy to ensure the safety of trust funds [3]. Group 4: Performance and Impact - The project has shown significant environmental benefits, such as reducing pollutant emissions and preventing the return of waste oil to the food supply chain, thus providing a replicable solution for urban green governance [3]. - As of November 2025, Shandong Guoxin's green trust business had a scale of 8.532 billion yuan, an increase of approximately 3.3 billion yuan from the beginning of the year [4]. Group 5: Policy Environment and Support - The policy environment for green trust has been continuously optimized since 2025, with regulatory bodies encouraging trust institutions to develop green trust initiatives [4]. - The issuance of guidelines and frameworks by the China Trust Industry Association aims to enhance the industry's capacity to engage in green finance and improve ESG governance [4]. Group 6: Future Commitment and Strategy - Industry leaders emphasize the need for increased innovation in green trust to support ecological protection and low-carbon transformation [5]. - Companies are encouraged to leverage their unique advantages in trust structures to provide diverse and sustainable financial solutions that align with national carbon reduction goals [5].

Group 1 - Multiple trust companies reported revenue and net profit growth for 2025, with Kunlun Trust seeing a net profit increase of over 400% [2] - Kunlun Trust's net profit for 2025 reached 1.22 million yuan, benefiting from a low base effect [2] - Other trust companies such as Yingda Trust and Shaanxi Guotou A also reported significant revenue and profit increases, with Yingda Trust's revenue growing by 51.49% to 4.528 billion yuan and net profit increasing by 63.70% to 2.950 billion yuan [3] Group 2 - Guizhou Bank announced it will assume all deposits from Longli Guofeng Village Bank through a trust plan, marking a new model in village bank reform [4] - The deposit assumption agreement was confirmed on January 12, 2026, and is notable for not involving cash payment but rather asset income rights [4] Group 3 - The People's Bank of China announced a 0.25 percentage point reduction in various structural monetary policy tool rates, with the one-year re-lending rate now at 1.25% [5] - This adjustment aims to enhance support for economic structural transformation and optimization [5] Group 4 - The Ministry of Civil Affairs and the Financial Regulatory Administration released the "Charity Trust Information Disclosure Measures," effective from April 1, 2026 [6] - The measures aim to improve the regulatory framework for charity trusts and enhance transparency in the sector [6] - Key provisions include the obligation for trustees to disclose information and the establishment of a national charity information disclosure platform [7]

关于提起诉讼的公告 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：688048 证券简称：长光华芯 公告编号：2026-001 苏州长光华芯光电技术股份有限公司 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 案件所处的诉讼阶段：已受理暂未开庭 ● 上市公司所处的当事人地位：原告 ● 涉案的金额：人民币6,000万元（不含利息） ● 是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：公司已根据企业会计准则对中融信托的理财产品全额计提了公 允价值变动损失。鉴于本次诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，该诉讼事项对公司后期利润的影响具有不确定性， 最终实际影响以法院判决为准。若信托理财部分或全部收回，将对收回的当期利润产生积极影响。 一、本次起诉的基本情况 苏州长光华芯光电技术股份有限公司（以下简称"长光华芯"或"公司"）就公司与中融国际信托有限公司 （以下简称"中融信托"）的信托理财纠纷向哈尔滨市南岗区人民法院（以下简称"法院"）提起诉讼，并 于近日收到法院的案件受理通知，案号：（2025）黑0103民初33505号。截至本公 ...

（编辑 袁冠琳） 证券日报网讯 1月16日，陕国投A在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，净资产中其他综合收益变动影响 净资产、但不影响净利润，故期末每股净资产除了考虑每股收益及分红的影响外，还需考虑其他综合收 益变动的影响。 ...

Core Viewpoint - State Grid Yingda (stock code: 600517.SH) reported significant growth in its subsidiary Yingda Trust's 2025 unaudited financial results, with a notable increase in both revenue and net profit compared to the previous year [1] Financial Performance - Yingda Trust achieved operating revenue of 4.528 billion yuan in 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 51.49% [1] - The net profit for 2025 reached 2.950 billion yuan, marking a year-on-year growth of 63.70% [1] - The net income from fees and commissions was 2.836 billion yuan, showing a slight decline of 2.97% compared to the same period last year [1] - Fair value changes contributed significantly with earnings of 1.508 billion yuan, a substantial increase of 1.607 billion yuan from the previous year's loss of 107 million yuan [1] Asset Overview - Yingda Trust's total assets slightly increased, reaching 17.318 billion yuan at the end of the period, showing a significant rise from the beginning of the year [1] Company Background - Yingda Trust was established in March 1987 and has a registered capital of 4.029 billion yuan, located in Beijing [1] - Major shareholders include State Grid Yingda Co., Ltd. (73.49%), China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd. (25.00%), Jinan Steel Group Co., Ltd. (0.82%), and Shandong Wangrui Material Co., Ltd. (0.69%) [1]